Inchoatia Explained

Inchoatia is a genus of air-breathing land snails, terrestrial pulmonate gastropod mollusks in the family Clausiliidae, the door snails.[1]

Description

The species classified within the genus Inchoatia are conchologically similar. They all have slender to very slender, small to medium-sized shells with more or less prominent papillae along the suture. The clausilial apparatus is of the so-called "N-type", with a lamella spiralis and a plica principalis. As in genus Albinaria, the genital tract shows a dimorphism in penial structure, with either a papilla or a caecum.

Distribution

The species within this genus occur in limestone areas of the central and western part of mainland Greece, where some taxa are restricted to high altitudes.

Taxonomy

Some Inchoatia taxa were insufficiently known, even conchologically (in terms of a shell description) and were classified without clear reference to the underlying facts. In the past (Nordsieck 1972,[2] Nordsieck 1974,[3] Zilch 1981[4]) species of the Alopiinae were classified in the genusCarinigera or Sericata, mainly on the anatomical basis of having either a penial papilla or a caecum. This dogmatic approach led to a grouping together of clausiliid species with very different shells, which was eventually unmasked as unnatural by DNA analyses.[5] This position is however not embraced by Nordsieck (2007),[6] who lumped together several genus-group taxa, which "can be characterized neither by shell nor by genital characters", in his view.

The genus Inchoatia was introduced by Gittenberger & Uit de Weerd (2006)[7] on the basis of molecular phylogenetic analyses by Uit de Weerd et al. (2004).[8] This molecular phylogenetic study by Uit de Weerd et al. (2004)[8] was not designed to answer questions about the status of the species group taxa within Inchoatia.

The fact that the Inchoatia taxa are very disjunctly distributed means that attempting to discriminate species as against subspecies is even more of a subjective opinion than usual, because reproductive isolation under natural conditions cannot be observed. An objective or a generally accepted method to weigh morphological differences does not exist. DNA analyses may be extremely helpful, but cannot always be considered decisive with regard to species or subspecies status. Molecular phylogeny reconstructions made clear that reproductive isolation and lineage splitting do not always run entirely parallel, resulting in paraphyletic species. In Inchoatia, with some island-like distributions of presumably high alpine taxa, this may also be the case.

Besides synapomorphic nucleotide substitutions, these taxa share a similar shell shape, and have more or less continuous ranges. According to the molecular data, the major division within Inchoatia is between an Inchoatia inchoata + "Inchoatia regina" subclade, and an Inchoatia haussknechti + Inchoatia megdova subclade. This pattern is congruent with genital anatomical differences between the two subclades, previously used to place them in separate genera Sericata and Carinigera and with conchological similarities between the species within each subclade.

The molecular phylogenetic relationships between nominal subspecies within genus Inchoatia were examined by Uit de Weerd et al. (2009). A cladogram based on sequences of cytochrome-c oxidase I (COI) genes showing phylogenic relations of Inchoatia by Uit de Weerd et al. (2009) (simplified):

Species

According to Gittenberger & Uit de Weerd (2009) and Uit de Weerd et al. (2009) the genus Inchoatia includes three species, each of which has a number of subspecies:

References

This article incorporates CC-BY-3.0 text from references.[9] [10]

Notes and References

  1. MolluscaBase eds. (2020). MolluscaBase. Inchoatia E. Gittenberger & Uit de Weerd, 2006. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=996065 on 2020-12-15
  2. Nordsieck H. (1972). "Zur Anatomie und Systematik der Clausilien, XI. Neue Formen und taxonomische Revision einiger Gruppen der Alopiinae". Archiv für Molluskenkunde 102: 1-51.
  3. Nordsieck H. (1974). "Zur Anatomie und Systematik der Clausilien, XV. Neue Clausilien der Balkan-Halbinsel (mit taxonomischer Revision einiger Gruppen der Alopiinae und Baleinae)". Archiv für Molluskenkunde 104: 123-170.
  4. Zilch A. (1981). "Die Typen und Typoide des NaturMuseums Senckenberg, 65: Mollusca: Clausiliidae (6): Alopiinae (4): Montenegrinini". Archiv für Molluskenkunde 111: 123-145.
  5. Uit de Weerd D. R. & Gittenberger E. (2004). "Re-evaluating Carinigera: molecular data overturn the current classification within the clausiliid subfamily Alopiinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata)". Journal of Molluscan Studies 70(4): 295-308. .
  6. Nordsieck H. (2007). Worldwide door snails (Clausiliidae), recent and fossil. 1-214. ConchBooks, Hackenheim.
  7. Gittenberger E. & Uit de Weerd D. R. (2006). "The genus Inchoatia validated and three mistakes corrected". Basteria 70: 131-132.
  8. Uit de Weerd D.R., Piel W. H. & Gittenberger E. (2004). "Widespread polyphyly among Alopiinae snail genera: when phylogeny mirrors biogeography more closely than morphology". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33(3): 533-548.
  9. Gittenberger E. & Uit de Weerd D. R. (2009). "Summarizing data on the Inchoatia taxa, including Inchoatia megdova bruggeni subspec. nov. (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Clausiliidae)". Zoologische Mededelingen 83 http://www.zoologischemededelingen.nl/83/nr03/a08
  10. Uit de Weerd D. R., Schneider D. & Gittenberger E. (2009). "Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Inchoatia taxa". Zoologische Mededelingen 83: 589-592. http://www.zoologischemededelingen.nl/83/nr03/a09