The Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) is noted for its role in elections in the Philippines.
The Iglesia ni Cristo is known for its practice of bloc voting during elections.[1] [2] [3] The INC is known for issuing directives to vote for certain candidates endorsed by the church under the tenet of obedience and the advocacy of a united unit.[1] INC spokesperson Edwil Zabala has stressed the importance of unity of its members with the church leadership.[4] As a consequence, candidates often attempt to secure endorsement from the INC.[5]
According to pollster, Mahar Mangahas the INC usually announces its endorsements around a week before election day "when the rankings of the candidates in the polls have stabilized" and concludes that candidates' ranking in opinion polls are a factor on how the INC chooses candidates to support.[5]
The following is the list of candidates who have been endorsed by the Iglesia ni Cristo. The list is limited to candidates running for president, vice president, and senators.
Year | width=5px | Rank ! | Candidate | Party | width=100px | Votes! | width=50px | % ! | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 695,332 | 67.99 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 1,340,320 | 81.78 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 1,333,392 | 53.94 | ||||||||
3. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 419,890 | 11.85 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 3,861,324 | 51.94 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 5,017,343 | 61.47 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 18,309,360 | 88.02 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 10,807,197 | 53.62 | ||||||||
3. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 4,116,376 | 18.17 | [6] | |||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 10,722,295 | 39.86 | [7] | |||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 12,905,808 | 39.99 | [8] [9] | |||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 15,208,678 | 42.08 | [10] [11] | |||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 16,601,997 | 39.02 | [12] [13] | |||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 31,629,783 | 58.77 | [14] [15] |
Year | width=5px | Rank ! | Candidate | Party | width=100px | Votes! | width=50px | % ! | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 13,918,490 | 39.58 | ||||||||
2. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 14,155,344 | 34.47 | ||||||||
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 32,208,417 | 61.53 |
Year | width=5px | Rank ! | Candidate | Party | width=100px | Votes! | width=50px | % ! | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 27,027,235 | 48.23 | [16] | |||||||
2. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 24,367,564 | 43.48 | ||||||||
4. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 20,678,804 | 36.89 | ||||||||
5. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 20,320,069 | 36.26 | ||||||||
6. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 19,563,262 | 34.91 | ||||||||
7. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 19,359,758 | 34.54 | ||||||||
8. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 18,931,207 | 33.78 | ||||||||
9. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 18,539,537 | 33.08 | ||||||||
11. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 15,901,891 | 28.37 | ||||||||
12. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 15,174,288 | 27.08 | ||||||||
13. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 13,348,887 | 23.82 | ||||||||
16. | width=200px style="text-align:left;" | 11,360,526 | 20.27 |