Ideas and delusions of reference explained

Ideas of reference and delusions of reference describe the phenomenon of an individual experiencing innocuous events or mere coincidences[1] and believing they have strong personal significance.[2] It is "the notion that everything one perceives in the world relates to one's own destiny", usually in a negative and hostile manner.[3]

In psychiatry, delusions of reference form part of the diagnostic criteria for psychotic illnesses such as schizophrenia,[4] delusional disorder, and bipolar disorder with mania, as well as for the narcissistic and schizotypal types of personality disorder.[5] To a lesser extent, their presence can be a hallmark of paranoid personality disorder, as well as body dysmorphic disorder. They can be found in autism during periods of intense stress.[6] They can also be caused by intoxication, such as from stimulants like methamphetamine.

Psychoanalytic views

In Sigmund Freud's view, "Delusions of being watched present this power in a regressive form, thus revealing its genesis...voices, as well as the undefined multitude, are brought into the foreground again by the [<nowiki/>[[paranoid]]] disease, and so the evolution of conscience is reproduced regressively."[7] As early as 1928, Freud's contemporary, Carl Jung, introduced the concept of synchronicity, a theory of "meaningful coincidences".[8]

In 1946, Otto Fenichel concluded that "the projection of the superego is most clearly seen in ideas of reference and of being influenced....Delusions of this kind merely bring to the patient from the outside what his self-observing and self-critical conscience actually tells him."[9]

Jacques Lacan similarly saw ideas of reference as linked to "the unbalancing of the relation to the capital Other and the radical anomaly that it involves, qualified, improperly, but not without some approximation to the truth, in old clinical medicine, as partial delusion"[10] —the "big other, that is, the other of language, the Names-of-the-Father, signifiers or words",[11] in short, the realm of the superego.

Anti-psychiatry

Validation rather than clinical condemnation of ideas of reference is frequently expressed by anti-psychiatrists, on the grounds, for example, that "the patient's ideas of reference and influence and delusions of persecution were merely descriptions of her parents' behavior toward her."[12] While accepting that "there is certainly confusion between persecutory fantasies and persecutory realities", figures like David Cooper believe that "ideas of connection with apparently remote people, or ideas of being influenced by others equally remote, are in fact stating their experience" of social influence – albeit in a distorted form by "including in their network of influence institutions as absurd as Scotland Yard, the Queen of England, the President of the United States, or the BBC".[13]

R. D. Laing took a similar view of the person who was "saying that his brains have been taken from him, that his actions are controlled from outer space, etc. "Such delusions are partially achieved derealization-realizations."[14] Laing also considered how "in typical paranoid ideas of reference, the person feels that the murmurings and mutterings he hears as he walks past a street crowd are about him. In a bar, a burst of laughter behind his back is at some joke cracked about him", but felt that deeper acquaintance with the patient reveals in fact that "what tortures him is not so much his delusions of reference, but his harrowing suspicion that he is of no importance to anyone, that no one is referring to him at all."[15]

Delusions of reference

Ideas of reference must be distinguished from delusions of reference, which may be similar in content but are held with greater conviction.[16] With the former, but not the latter, the person holding them may have "the feeling that strangers are talking about him/her, but if challenged, acknowledges that the people may be talking about something else".[17]

From the psychoanalytic view, there may be at the same time "transitions...to delusions" from ideas of reference: "abortive ideas of reference, in the beginning of their development or, in schizotypal personalities, continuously, may remain subject to the patient's criticism...under adverse circumstances, by minimal economic shifts, however, reality testing may be lost and daydreams of this kind turn into delusions."[18]

It has been noted that a person "rigidly controlled by his superego...readily forms sensitive ideas of reference. A key experience may occur in his life circumstances and quite suddenly these ideas become structured as delusions of reference."[19] Within the "focus of paranoia...that man crossing his legs, that woman wearing that blouse—it can't just be accidental. It has a particular meaning, is intended to convey something."[20]

Examples

Persons with ideas of reference may experience:

Literary analogues

Notes and References

  1. 3016695 . 21234155 . 10.4103/0972-6748.57851 . 18 . Understanding delusions . 2009 . Ind Psychiatry J . 3–18 . Kiran C, Chaudhury S . 1 . free .
  2. Web site: Ideas of Reference - Encyclopedia of Psychology. 17 June 2016. 27 February 2014. 11 January 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160111152159/http://psychcentral.com/encyclopedia/2008/ideas-of-reference/. dead.
  3. Laurence M. Porter, Women's Vision in Western Literature (2005) p. 117
  4. Andreasen, Nancy C. (1984). "Scale for the assessment of positive symptoms" ; The Movement Disorder Society.
  5. Lenzenweger, MF, Bennett, ME, & Lilenfeld, LR. 1997. The Referential Thinking Scale as a measure of schizotypy: Scale development and initial construct validation. Psychological Assessment. 9. 4. 452–463. 2018-08-31. https://web.archive.org/web/20180901003748/https://www.binghamton.edu/psychology/people/mlenzenwegerlab/Lenzenweger%20Bennett%20and%20Lilenfeld%201997.pdf. 2018-09-01. dead. 10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.452.
  6. Book: Schopler. Eric. Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism?. Mesibov. Gary B.. Kunce. Linda J.. 1998-04-30. Springer Science & Business Media. 978-0-306-45746-3. en.
  7. Sigmund Freud, On Metapsychology (PFL 11) p. 90
  8. Book: Tarnas, Richard. Cosmos and Psyche. Penguin Group. 2006. 978-0-670-03292-1. New York. 50.
  9. Fenichel, Otto (1946). The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (London) pp. 430–1
  10. Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection (London 1996) p. 214
  11. Hill, Philip (1997). Lacan for Beginners (London) p. 160
  12. Thomas J. Scheff, Being Mentally Ill (1999) p. 180
  13. David Cooper, The Death of the Family (Penguin 1974) p. 14 and p. 82
  14. R. D. Laing, Self and Others (Penguin 1969) p. 39
  15. Laing, p. 136
  16. P. B. Sutker/H. E. Adams, Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology (2001) p. 540
  17. Sutker/Adams, p. 540
  18. Fenichel, p. 444
  19. A. C. P. Sims, Symptoms in the Mind (2003) p. 129
  20. [Iain McGilchrist]
  21. V. M. Durand/D. H. Barlow, Essentials of Abnormal Psychology (2005)p. 442
  22. Eric Berne, A Layman's Guide to Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis (Penguin 1976) p. 205
  23. Quoted in Porter, Women's Vision p. 117
  24. Quoted in Hermione Lee, Virginia Woolf (London 1996) p. 195
  25. Margaret Mahy, Memory (London 1987) p. 23
  26. Patrick O'Brian, Treason's Harbour (London 2007) p. 19
  27. Web site: Vladimir Nabokov's "Signs and Symbols" . 2012-01-04 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120114144458/http://www.angelynngrant.com/nabokov.html . 2012-01-14 .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Ideas and delusions of reference".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.