California Air Resources Board Explained

Agency Name:California Air Resources Board
Formed:1967
Preceding1:Bureau of Air Sanitation
Preceding2:Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Board
Jurisdiction:California
Headquarters:1001 I Street, Sacramento, California
Employees:1,365[1]
Budget:$581.1 million
Chief1 Name:Liane M. Randolph
Chief1 Position:Chair
Parent Agency:California Environmental Protection Agency
Website:http://www.arb.ca.gov

The California Air Resources Board (CARB or ARB) is an agency of the government of California that aims to reduce air pollution. Established in 1967 when then-governor Ronald Reagan signed the Mulford-Carrell Act, combining the Bureau of Air Sanitation and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Board, CARB is a department within the cabinet-level California Environmental Protection Agency.

The stated goals of CARB include attaining and maintaining healthy air quality; protecting the public from exposure to toxic air contaminants; and providing innovative approaches for complying with air pollution rules and regulations. CARB has also been instrumental in driving innovation throughout the global automotive industry through programs such as its ZEV mandate.

One of CARB's responsibilities is to define vehicle emissions standards. California is the only state permitted to issue emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act, subject to a waiver from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Other states may choose to follow CARB or the federal vehicle emission standards but may not set their own.[2]

Governance

California Air Resources Board leadership
data-sort-type="text" Name !data-sort-type="text" Affiliation !data-sort-type="isoDate" Appointed !data-sort-type="isoDate" Term ends
data-sort-value="Randolph, Liane M." Liane M. RandolphChairdata-sort-value="2020-12" data-sort-value="2026-12-31"
data-sort-value="Rechtschaffen, Cliff" Cliff RechtschaffenPublic Memberdata-sort-value="2023-09" data-sort-value="2024-12-31"
data-sort-value="Balmes, John R." John R. Balmes, MDPhysiciandata-sort-value="2007-12" data-sort-value="2027-12-31"
data-sort-value="De La Torre, Hector" Hector De La TorreAssemblydata-sort-value="2018-06" data-sort-value="2025-01-01"
data-sort-value="Eisenhut, John" John EisenhutAgriculturedata-sort-value="2013-08" data-sort-value="2029-12-31"
data-sort-value="Vargas, Nora" Nora VargasSan Diego APCDdata-sort-value="2022-02" data-sort-value="2024-12-31"
data-sort-value="Florez, Dean" Dean FlorezSenatedata-sort-value="2016-02" data-sort-value="2024-12-31"
data-sort-value="Garcia, Eduardo" Eduardo GarciaEx Officio (Assembly)data-sort-value="2017-02"
data-sort-value="Hurt, Davina" Davina HurtBay Area AQMDdata-sort-value="2020-12" data-sort-value="2026-12-31"
data-sort-value="Kracov, Gideon" Gideon KracovSouth Coast AQMDdata-sort-value="2020-12" data-sort-value="2026-12-31"
data-sort-value="Stern, Henry" Henry SternEx Officio (Senate)data-sort-value="2023-01"
data-sort-value="Pacheco-Werner, Tania" Tania Pacheco-Werner, PhDSan Joaquin Valley APCDdata-sort-value="2020-12" data-sort-value="2026-12-31"
data-sort-value="Guerra, Eric" Eric GuerraSacramento Region Air Districts Memberdata-sort-value="2023-01" data-sort-value="2028-12-31"
data-sort-value="Shaheen, Susan" Susan ShaheenAutomotive Memberdata-sort-value="2023-01" data-sort-value="2028-12-31"
data-sort-value="Perez, V. Manuel" V. Manuel PerezAir District Memberdata-sort-value="2023-01" data-sort-value="2028-12-31"
data-sort-value="Tavorkian, Diane" Diane TavorkianPublicdata-sort-value="2018-08-31" data-sort-value="2029-12-31"
CARB's governing board is made up of 16 members, with 2 non-voting members appointed for legislative oversight, one each by the California State Assembly and Senate. 12 of the 14 voting members are appointed by the governor and subject to confirmation by the Senate: five from local air districts, four air pollution subject-matter experts, two members of the public, and the Chair. The other two voting members are appointed from environmental justice committees by the Assembly and Senate.

Five of the governor-appointed board members are chosen from regional air pollution control or air quality management districts, including one each from:[3]

Four governor-appointed board members are subject matter experts in specific fields: automotive engineering, currently Dan Sperling; science, agriculture, or law, currently John Eisenhut; medicine, currently John R. Balmes, M.D.; and air pollution control. The governor is also responsible for two appointees from members of the public, and the final governor appointee is the Board's Chair. The first Chair of CARB was Dr. Arie Jan Haagen-Smit, who was previously a professor at the California Institute of Technology and started research into air pollution in 1948. Dr. Haagen-Smit is credited with discovering the source of smog in California, which led to the development of air pollution controls and standards.[4] In honor of his legacy, CARB started the Haagen-Smit Clean Air Awards program in 2001 to recognize individuals who have had significant accomplishments in the field of air quality and climate change.[5]

The two legislature-appointed board members work directly with communities affected by air pollution. They are currently Diane Takvorian and Dean Florez, appointed by the Assembly and Senate respectively.

Organizational structure

CARB is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, an organization which reports directly to the Governor's Office in the Executive Branch of California State Government.[6]

CARB has 15 divisions and offices:[7]

Air Quality Planning and Science Division

The division assesses the extent of California's air quality problems and the progress being made to abate them, coordinates statewide development of clean air plans and maintains databases pertinent to air quality and emissions. The division's technical support work provides a basis for clean air plans and CARB's regulatory programs. This support includes management and interpretation of emission inventories, air quality data, meteorological data and of air quality modeling.[8] [9]

The Air Quality Planning and Science Division has five branches:[9]

Atmospheric Modeling & Support Section

The Atmospheric Modeling & Support Section is one of three sections within the Modeling & Meteorology Branch. The other two sections are the Regional Air Quality Modeling Section and the Meteorology Section.[8]

The air quality and atmospheric pollution dispersion models[10] [11] routinely used by this Section include a number of the models recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The section uses models which were either developed by CARB or whose development was funded by CARB, such as:

Role in reducing greenhouse gases

See also: Climate change in California. The California Air Resources Board is charged with implementing California's comprehensive suite of policies to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. In part due to CARB, California has successfully decoupled greenhouse gas emissions from economic growth, and achieved its goal of reducing emissions to 1990 levels four years earlier than the target date of 2020.[14]

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Incentive Program

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Incentive Program (also known as Fueling Alternatives) is funded by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), offered throughout the State of California and administered by the California Center for Sustainable Energy (CCSE).[15]

Low-Emission Vehicle Program

The CARB first adopted the Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV) Program standards in 1990 to address smog-forming pollutants, which covered automobiles sold in California from 1994 through 2003. An amendment to the LEV Program, known as LEV II, was adopted in 1999, and covered vehicles for the 2004 through 2014 model years. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission regulations were adopted in 2004 starting for the 2009 model year, and are named the "Pavley" standards after Assemblymember Fran Pavley, who had written Assembly Bill 1493 in 2002 to establish them.[16] [17] A second amendment, LEV III, was adopted in 2012, and covers vehicles sold from 2015 onward for both smog (superseding LEV II) and GHG (superseding Pavley) emissions.[18] The rules created under the LEV Program have been codified as specific sections in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations;[19] in general, LEV I is § 1960.1; LEV II is § 1961; Pavley is § 1961.1; LEV III is § 1961.2 (smog-forming pollutants) and 1961.3 (GHG). The ZEV regulations, which were initially part of LEV I, have been broken out separately into § 1962.[20]

For comparison, the average new car sold in 1965 would produce approximately 2000lb of hydrocarbons over 100000miles of driving; under the LEV I standards, the average new car sold in 1998 was projected to produce hydrocarbon emissions of 50lb over the same distance, and under LEV II, the average new car in 2010 would further reduce hydrocarbon emissions to 10lb.[21]

Required labeling

Global warming and smog scores
Global
warming
score
(g/mi)		Smog
score		MY (2009) 2013–2017[22] MY 2018+[23]
CA
LEV II 		NMOG+
(g/mi) 		CA
LEV III 		NMOG+
(g/mi)
10<20010ZEV Bin 1 0.000ZEV Bin 0 0.000
9200–2399AT PZEV, PZEV — 0.030— —
8240–2798SULEV Bin 2 0.030SULEV20 Bin 20 0.020
7280–3197— Bin 3 0.085SULEV30 Bin 30 0.030
6320–3596— Bin 4 0.110ULEV50 Bin 50 0.050
5360–3995ULEV — 0.125ULEV70 Bin 70 0.070
4400–4394LEV Bin 5 0.160— —
3440–4793— Bin 6 0.190 – 0.200ULEV125 Bin 125 0.125
2480–5192— Bin 7 0.240— —
1≥5201— Bin 8a 0.325LEV160 Bin 160 0.160
Notes
In 2005, the California State Assembly passed AB 1229, which required all new vehicles manufactured after January 1, 2009 to bear an Environmental Performance Label, which scored the emissions performance of the vehicle on two scales ranging between 1 (worst) and 10 (best): one for global warming (emissions of GHG such as,, air conditioning refrigerants, and) and one for smog-forming compounds (non-methane organic gases (NMOG),, and).[22] [24] The Federal Government followed suit and required a similar "smog score" on new vehicles sold starting in 2013; the standards were realigned for labels applied to 2018 model year vehicles.

Vehicle categories

The LEV program has established several categories of reduced emissions vehicles. LEV I defined LEV and ULEV vehicles, and added TLEV and Tier 1 temporary classifications that would not be sold after 2003. LEV II added SULEV and PZEV vehicles, and LEV III tightened emission standards. The actual emission levels depend on the standards in use.

LEV I defined emission limits for several different classes of vehicle, including passenger cars (PC), light-duty trucks (LDT), and medium-duty vehicles (MDV). Heavy-duty vehicles were specifically excluded from LEV I. LEV I also defined a loaded vehicle weight (LVW) as the vehicle's Curb weight plus an allowance of 300lb. In general, the most stringent standards were applied to passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a LVW up to 3750lb (these "light" LDTs were later denoted LDT1 under LEV II). LEV II increased the scope of vehicles classed as light-duty trucks to encompass a higher GVWR up to 8500lb, compared to the LEV I standard of 6000lb. In addition, LEV I had defined less stringent limits for heavier LDTs (denoted LDT2 with a LVW 3751lb5750lb); LEV II closed that discrepancy and defined a single emissions standard for all PCs and LDTs. Under LEV III, medium-duty passenger vehicles (MDPV) were brought under the most stringent standards alongside PCs and LDTs.

Vehicle classes under the LEV regulations
Class Abbr. Notes
Passenger car PC— Designed primarily for transportation of persons with a design capacity of ≤12 people.
Light-duty truck LDT≤6000lb Designed primarily for transportation of property, derivatives of those, or available with special features for off-street use. LDT1 was defined as those with LVW up to 3750lb, and LDT2 was defined as those with LVW from 3751lb5750lb.
≤8500lb
Medium-duty vehicle MDV≤8500lb Any non-passenger vehicle with a GVWR >6000lb and less than the limits shown here.
≤14000lb
Notes

Smog-forming compound emissions limits

Rather than providing a single standard for vehicles based on age, purpose, and weight, the LEV I standards introduced different tiers of limits for smog-forming compound emissions starting in the 1995 model year. After 2003, LEV was the minimum standard to be met.

California Emissions Standards[25]
CategoryNMOG+PM
LEV I[26] LEV II[27] LEV III[28] LEV ILEV IILEV IIILEV ILEV IILEV IIILEV ILEV IILEV III
Tier 10.91——4.2————————
TLEV0.756——4.2——0.08——0.018——
LEVLEV1600.3900.1600.1604.24.24.20.080.010.010.0180.0180.004
ULEVULEV125<--NMOG+NOx, L1-->0.355<--NMOG+NOx, L2-->0.1250.125<--CO, L1-->2.1<--CO, L2-->2.12.1<--PM, L1-->0.04<--PM, L2-->0.01<--PM, L3-->0.01<--HCHO, L1-->0.011<--HCHO, L2-->0.011<--HCHO, L3-->0.004
ULEV700.070<--CO-->1.7
ULEV500.050
SULEVSULEV30<--NMOG+NOx, L1-->—<--NMOG+NOx, L2-->0.0300.030<--CO, L1-->—<--CO, L2-->1.0<--CO, L3-->1.0<--PM, L1-->—<--PM, L2-->0.01<--PM, L3-->0.01<--HCHO, L1-->—<--HCHO, L2-->0.004<--HCHO, L3-->0.004
SULEV200.020
Notes

Greenhouse gas emissions limits

CARB adopted regulations for limits on greenhouse gas emissions in 2004 starting with the 2009 model year to support the direction provided by AB 1493.[16] In June 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-03-05, which required a reduction in California GHG emissions, targeting an 80% reduction compared to 1990 levels by 2050.[29] Assembly Bill 32, better known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, codified these requirements.[30]

CARB filed a waiver request with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act in December 2005 to permit it to establish limits on greenhouse gas emissions; although the waiver request was initially denied in March 2008, it was later approved on June 30, 2009 after President Barack Obama signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the EPA to reconsider the waiver.[16] [31] In the initial denial, EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson stated the Clean Air Act was not "intended to allow California to promulgate state standards for emissions from new motor vehicles designed to address global climate change problems" and further, that he did not believe "the effects of climate change in California are compelling and extraordinary compared to the effects in the rest of the country."[32] Johnson's successor, Lisa P. Jackson, signed the waiver overturning Johnson's denial, writing that "EPA must grant California a waiver if California determines that its standards are, in the aggregate, at least as protective of the public health and welfare as applicable Federal standards." Jackson also noted that in the history of the waiver process, over 50 waivers had been granted and only one had been fully denied, namely the March 2008 denial of the GHG emissions regulation.[33]

Greenhouse gas fleet average emissions targets
Model
Year 		(g/mi -equivalent)
PCs & LDT1s LDT2s & MDPVs
2009323 439
2010301 420
2011267 390
2012233 361
2013227 355
2014222 350
2015213 341
2016+205 332
CARB decided to adopt regulation of GHG emissions under Executive Order G-05-061, which provided phase-in targets for fleet average GHG emissions in -equivalent grams per mile starting with the 2009 model year.[34] The calculation of -equivalent emissions was based on contributions from four different chemicals:,,, and air conditioning refrigerants.

The emissions in g/mi -equivalent are calculated according to the formula

equivalent
CO
2

=CO2+296 x N2O+23 x CH4-ACdirect-ACindirect

, which has two terms for direct and indirect emissions allowances of air conditioning refrigerants, depending on the refrigerant used, such as HFC134a, and the system design. Vehicles powered by alternative fuels use a slightly modified formula,
equivalent
CO
2

=(CO2+ACindirect) x F+296 x N2O+23 x CH4+ACdirect

, where

F

is a fuel adjustment factor depending on the alternative fuel used (1.03 for natural gas, 0.89 for LPG, and 0.74 for E85). ZEVs are also required to calculate GHG as the processes to generate the energy (or fuel) used also produce GHG. For ZEVs,
equivalent
CO
2

=U+ACdirect

, where

U

is the upstream emissions factor (130 g/mi for battery electric vehicles, 210 for hydrogen/fuel cell, and 290 for hydrogen/internal combustion). Direct emissions could be calculated in a relatively straightforward fashion based on fuel consumption.[35] Manufacturers that do not wish to measure emissions may assume a value of 0.006 g/mi. An update was issued in 2010 which allowed manufacturers to calculate GHG emissions using CAFE data; for conventionally powered vehicles, the contribution from the nitrous oxide and methane terms could be assumed to be 1.9 g/mi.[36]

CARB voted unanimously in March 2017 to require automakers to average for new cars in 2025.[37]

Section 177 states

"California emissions" states[38] [39]
State LEV ZEV MY
CA2005
CO2022
CT2008
DC2012
DE2014
MA2009
MD2011
ME2009
MN2025 (anticipated)
NJ2009
NM2026
NV2025
NY2009
OR2009
PA2008
RI2009
VA2025
VT2009
WA2009 (ZEV: 2025)
Because California had emissions regulations prior to the 1977 Clean Air Act, under Section 177 of that bill, other states may adopt the more stringent California emissions regulations as an alternative to federal standards. Thirteen other states and the District of Columbia have chosen to do so, and ten of those have additionally adopted the California Zero-Emission Vehicle regulations.[38] [40] [41] In December 2020, Minnesota announced its intention to adopt California LEV and ZEV rules;[42] following a hearing before an administrative law judge in February 2021, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency adopted the California regulations.[43] [44] In August 2022, Virginia, citing to a 2021 law, announced it would follow California regulations for ZEV registrations.[45]

Arizona and New Mexico had previously adopted California LEV regulations under Section 177, but later repealed those states' clean car standards in 2012[46] and 2013,[47] respectively.[48]

In Canada, the province of Quebec adopted CARB standards effective in 2010.[49] CARB and the Government of Canada entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in June 2019 to cooperate on greenhouse gas emissions mitigation.[50]

Zero-Emission Vehicle Program

The CARB Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program was enacted by the California government starting in 1990 to promote the use of zero emission vehicles.[51] The program goal is to reduce the pervasive air pollution affecting the main metropolitan areas in the state, particularly in Los Angeles, where prolonged pollution episodes are frequent. The California ZEV rule was first adopted by CARB as part of the 1990 Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV I) Program.[52] The focus of the 1990 rules (ZEV-90) was to meet air quality standards for ozone rather than the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.[53]

Under LEV II in 1999, the ZEV regulations were moved to a separate section (13 CCR § 1962) and the requirements for ZEVs as a percentage of fleet sales was made more formal. Executive Order S-03-05 (2005) and Assembly Bills 1493 (2002) and 32 (2006) prompted CARB to reevaluate the ZEV program as last amended in 1996, which had been primarily concerned with reducing emissions of smog-forming pollutants.[53] By the time AB 32 passed in 2006, vehicles complying with PZEV and AT PZEV standards had become commercially successful, and the ZEV program could then shift towards reducing both smog-forming compounds and greenhouse gases.[53]

The next set of ZEV regulations were adopted in 2012 with LEV III. CARB put both LEV and ZEV rules together as the Advanced Clean Cars Program (ACC), adopted in 2012, which included regulations for cars sold through the 2025 model year. The regulations include updates to regulations for LEV III (for smog-forming emissions), LEV III GHG (for greenhouse gas emissions), and ZEV.[54] [55] [56] Since then, in September 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing that by 2035, all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California will be zero-emission vehicles.[57] Executive Order N-79-20 directs CARB to develop regulations to require that ZEVs be an increasing share of new vehicles sold in the state, with light-duty cars and trucks and off-road vehicles and equipment meeting the 100% ZEV goal by 2035 and medium and heavy-duty trucks and buses meeting the same 100% ZEV goal by 2045. The order also directs Caltrans to develop near-term actions to encourage "an integrated, statewide rail and transit network" and infrastructure to support bicycles and pedestrians.[58] In response, CARB began development of the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) Program, focusing on emissions of vehicles sold after 2025. ACC II reiterated the aim to have all new passenger cars, trucks and SUVs sold in the state to be zero emissions vehicles by 2035,[59] and was scheduled for consideration before CARB in June 2022.[60] The regulations of ACC II were adopted by California in August 2022.[61]

Vehicle definitions

LEV I defined a ZEV as one that produces "zero emissions of any criteria pollutants under any and all possible operational modes and conditions." A vehicle could still qualify as a ZEV with a fuel-fired heater, as long as the heater was unable to be operated at ambient temperatures above and did not have any evaporative emissions.[26] Under LEV II (ZEV-99), the ZEV definition was updated to include precursor pollutants, but did not consider upstream emissions from power plants.[62]

The ZEV regulation has evolved and been modified several times since 1990, and several new partial or low-emission categories were created and defined,[63] [64] [65] including the introduction of PZEV and AT PZEV categories in ZEV-99.[62]

Manufacturer sales volume

Under ZEV-90, CARB classified manufacturers according to the average sales per year between 1989 and 1993; small volume manufacturers were those that sold 3,000 or fewer new vehicles per year; intermediate volume manufacturers sold between 3,001 and 35,000; and large volume manufacturers sold more than 35,000 per year.[26] For large volume manufacturers, CARB required that 2% of 1998 to 2000 model year vehicles sold were ZEVs, ramping up to 5% ZEVs by 2001 and 10% ZEVs in 2003 and beyond. Intermediate volume manufacturers were not required to meet the goals until 2003, and small volume manufacturers were exempted. These percentages were calculated based on total production of passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a loaded vehicle weight (LVW) less than 3750lb.[66]

ZEV credit system

ZEV-96 credits
Model
Year 		2 ZEV Count 3 ZEV Count
Range
(mi) 		Specific Energy
(Wh/kg) 		Range
(mi) 		Specific Energy
(Wh/kg)
1996–97any any≥70 ≥40
1998≥100≥130
1999≥50≥60
2000≥140≥175
2001–02≥60≥90
The LEV I rules also introduced the concept of emission credits. Under LEV I, the vehicle fleet average emissions rate of non-methane organic gases (NMOG) produced by a manufacturer was required to meet increasingly stringent requirements starting in 1994.[26] The calculation of fleet average NMOG emissions was based on a weighted sum of vehicle NMOG emissions, based on the number sold and type of certification (i.e., TLEV, LEV, ULEV, etc.), divided by the total number of vehicles produced, including ZEVs.[26] Manufacturers whose fleet average NMOG emissions met or exceeded the NMOG emissions goal would be subjected to civil penalties; those which fell below the goal would receive credits, which could then be marketed to other manufacturers.[26]

The 1996 amendments to the ZEV regulations in LEV I (ZEV-96) introduced credits where a ZEV could be counted more than once based on vehicle range or battery specific energy to encourage deployment of ZEVs prior to 2003.

Under LEV II/ZEV-99, the PZEV and AT PZEV categories were introduced, and the percentage of ZEVs sold by a manufacturer could be partially met by the sales of PZEV and AT PZEVs.[62] If a vehicle met PZEV criteria, it qualified for a credit equal to 0.2 of one ZEV for the purposes of calculating that manufacturer's ZEV production.[62] AT PZEVs capable of traveling with zero emissions for a limited range were allowed additional credit if the urban all-electric range was at least ten miles.[62] ZEVs that were introduced prior to 2003 received a multiplier, with a value ranging up to 10× a single ZEV depending on the all-electric range and fast-charging capability.[62]

MOA demonstration fleet

MOA EVs (1997+)
Mfr Model Date Battery Range Qty
(12/97)
ChryslerEPIC?/97 SLA 60miles 17
FordRanger EV?/97 SLA 60miles 10
GMEV112/96 SLA 75miles 265
GMS-10 EV?/97 SLA 40miles 354
NiMH 80miles 7
HondaEV Plus05/97 NiMH 125miles 104
NissanAltra?/98 Li-ion 120miles —
ToyotaRAV4 EV10/97 NiMH 125miles 69
In March 1996, ZEV-96 eliminated the ZEV ramp-up planned to start in 1998, but the goal of 10% ZEVs by 2003 was retained, with credits granted for sales of partial ZEVs (PZEVs).[67] [68] According to comment responses, CARB determined that advanced batteries would not be ready in time to meet the ZEV requirements until at least 2003.[69]

In conjunction with relaxing the requirements in ZEV-96, CARB signed memoranda of agreement (MOAs) with the seven large scale manufacturers to begin rolling out demonstration fleets of ZEVs with limited public availability in the near term. The GM EV1 was the first battery electric vehicle (BEV) offered to the public, in partial fulfillment of the agreement with CARB. The EV1 was available only through a /month lease starting in December 1996; the initial markets were South Coast, San Diego, and Arizona, and expanded to Sacramento and the Bay Area. GM also offered an electric S-10 pickup truck to fleet operators.

In 1997, Honda (EV Plus, May 1997), Toyota (RAV4 EV, October 1997), and Chrysler (EPIC, 1997) followed suit. Ford also introduced the Ranger EV for the 1998 model year, and Nissan stated they planned to offer the Altra in the 1998 model year as well to fulfill the MOA. As an acceptable alternative, Mazda stated they would purchase ZEV credits from Ford.[70]

Advanced Clean Cars

The Low-Emission Vehicle Program was revised to define modified ZEV regulations for 2015 models.[68] [71] [72] CARB estimates that ACC will result in 10% of all sales to be ZEVs by 2025.[73] The share remained at 3% between 2014 and 2016. Battery vehicles receive 3 or 4 credits, while fuel cell cars receive 9., a credit has a market value of $3-4,000, and some automakers have more credits than required.[74] [75]

CARB held a public workshop in September 2020 where several new consumer-friendly regulations for ZEVs were proposed to improve adoption:[76]

In May 2021, additional draft requirements were added:[77]

To improve access to ZEVs, CARB added proposed environmental justice (EJ) credits in August 2021 for manufacturers who improve options for clean transportation to underserved communities, such as by providing a discount on a ZEV that would be used in a community-based clean mobility program. The August workshop also included additional regulations for ZEVs:[78]

The final workshop in October 2021 proposed that ZEVs would be taken out of fleet calculations for vehicle emissions and provided yearly targets for ZEV vehicle sales as a percent of total sales, including potential EJ credits. Additionally, the required warranty period and requirements to take credit for PHEV sales were defined:[79]

OHV Emission Standards

The California DMV implements the policy dictates of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) with respect to registration of off-highway motor vehicles (OHVs).[80] Registration consists of ID plates or placards issued by the DMV.[81] Operating a motorized vehicle off-highway in California requires either a Green Sticker or a Red Sticker ID. The Green Sticker indicates that the vehicle has passed emission requirements. The Red Sticker (issued through 2021) restricts OHV use due to not meeting emission standards established by the CARB. The red sticker program began in 1994 when CARB adopted standards for emissions from two-stroke engines used primarily on dirt bikes. Between 1998 and 2003, the red sticker program was refined allowing vehicles that did not meet peak ozone season standards to be operated only at specific times of the year. [82] As of model year 2022, the CARB no longer authorizes issuing of red stickers. [83]

Commercial Harbor Craft Regulation

The California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Commercial Harbor Craft regulation is a regulatory framework aimed at reducing emissions from commercial vessels operating in California's harbors and ports. The rule primarily targets diesel-powered vessels such as ferries, tugboats, and other workboats that operate in and around California's ports.[84] [85] Since the original adoption of regulation in 2008, and its amendments in 2010 and 2022, vessel owners in the state have been required to either replace their engines or send their boats out of the state.[86] [87]

Low-carbon fuel standard

See main article: Low-carbon fuel standard. The Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) requires oil refineries and distributors to ensure that the mix of fuel they sell in the Californian market meets the established declining targets for greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2-equivalent grams per unit of fuel energy sold for transport purposes. The 2007 Governor's LCFS directive calls for a reduction of at least 10% in the carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by 2020. These reductions include not only tailpipe emissions but also all other associated emissions from production, distribution and use of transport fuels within the state. Therefore, California LCFS considers the fuel's full life cycle, also known as the "well to wheels" or "seed to wheels" efficiency of transport fuels.[52] [88] The standard is aimed to reduce the state’s dependence on petroleum, create a market for clean transportation technology, and stimulate the production and use of alternative, low-carbon fuels in California.[89]

On April 23, 2009, CARB approved the specific rules for the LCFS that will go into effect in January 2011.[90] [91] The rule proposal prepared by its technical staff was approved by a 9-1 vote, to set the 2020 maximum carbon intensity reference value to 86 grams of carbon dioxide released per megajoule of energy produced.[89] [92]

PHEV Research Center

The PHEV Research Center was launched with funding from the California Air Resources Board.

Innovative Clean Transit

See main article: Innovative Clean Transit rule. Under the Innovative Clean Transit (formerly known as the Advanced Clean Transit) regulation adopted in December 2018, public transportation agencies in California will gradually transition to a zero-emission bus fleet by 2040.[93] Large transit agencies (defined as those operating more than 65 buses in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin or South Coast Air Quality Management District, or those operating more than 100 buses elsewhere with populations greater than 200,000) are required to have 25% of new bus purchases as zero-emission buses (ZEBs) starting in 2023, 50% of new purchases as ZEBs starting in 2026, and 100% of new purchases as ZEBs starting in 2029. Small transit agencies are required to make 25% of new purchases as ZEBs in 2026 and 100% of new purchases as ZEBs in 2029+. Per the regulation, ZEBs are defined to include battery electric buses and fuel cell buses, but do not include electric trolleybuses which draw power from overhead lines.[94] The Antelope Valley Transit Authority has set a goal to be the first all-electric fleet by the end of 2018, ahead of the tightened regulations.[95]

Regulation of ozone produced by air cleaners and ionizers

The California Air Resources Board has a page listing air cleaners (many with ionizers) meeting their indoor ozone limit of 0.050 parts per million.[96] From that article:

Southern California headquarters, Mary D. Nichols Campus

On October 27, 2017 CARB broke ground on its new state-of-the-art Southern California headquarters. CARB chose the site near the University of California, Riverside, in March 2016 and completed environmental studies in June 2017. Construction costs of $419 million, which include $108 million for specialized laboratory and testing equipment, were approved by the Legislature in July. Of those costs, $154 million comes from fines paid by Volkswagen for air quality violations related to the diesel car cheating case. Additional funds will come from the Motor Vehicle Account, the Air Pollution Control Fund and the Vehicle Inspection Repair Fund.[97]

Over a decade of planning has gone into the development of a replacement for CARB’s aging Haagen-Smit Laboratory. Opened in 1973 in El Monte, California, the Haagen-Smit Laboratory is the site of many of CARB’s groundbreaking efforts to reduce the emissions of cars and trucks, as well as efforts to introduce zero-emission and plug-in vehicles to California. In 2015, engineers and technicians based at the Haagen-Smit Laboratory were instrumental in discovering the infamous VW diesel “defeat device,” leading to the largest emissions control violation settlement in national and California history.

The new campus features an extended range of dedicated test cells, including heavy-duty testing. There is also workspace for accommodating new test methods for future generations of vehicles, and space for developing enhanced on-board diagnostics and portable emissions measurement systems. The facility also includes a separate advanced chemistry laboratory. The Southern California Headquarters’ office and administration space accommodates 460 employees and includes visitor reception and public areas, a press room, flexible conference and workshop space, and a 250-person public auditorium.

Sustainability drove the striking architecture and every detail of the campus. Designed by ZGF Architects and built by Hensel Phelps, the new headquarters is built for the future. At 402,000 square feet, it is designed to be the largest Zero Net Energy building in the United States, aided by solar arrays throughout the campus that generate 3.5 Megawatts of electricity, and a chilled beam temperature management system that provides increased energy efficiency and occupant comfort. As a result, the facility achieves Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Platinum certification, and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Tier 2 standards and is designed to achieve Zero-Net Energy performance .

On November 18, 2021, CARB dedicated the new Southern California headquarters in honor of former Chair Mary D. Nichols whose career at CARB spanned four decades under three different California governors.[98]

See also

California Air Resources Board
Other

External links

News

Notes and References

  1. Web site: 2015-16 Budget of California. January 1, 2016.
  2. Web site: Vehicle Emissions California Waivers and Authorizations. United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 2, 2016. November 25, 2016.
  3. Web site: Leadership - California Air Resources Board. California Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  4. Web site: Dr. Arie Haagen-Smit: Founding Chairman . California Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  5. Web site: Haagen-Smit Clean Air Awards . California Air Resources Board . 26 November 2023.
  6. Web site: Organization of the California Air Resources Board California Air Resources Board. 2021-10-23. ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  7. Web site: Organization of the California Air Resources Board. live. www.arb.ca.gov. https://web.archive.org/web/20200420104309/https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/about/organization-california-air-resources-board . 2020-04-20 .
  8. http://www.arb.ca.gov/html/org/orgptsd.htm ARB's Planning and Technical Support Division
  9. Web site: Organization – Air Quality Planning and Science Division California Air Resources Board. 2021-10-23. ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  10. Book: Turner, D.B.. Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling. 2nd. CRC Press. 1994. 978-1-56670-023-8. registration.
  11. Book: Beychok, Milton R.. Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion. 4th. author-published. 2005. 978-0-9644588-0-2. Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion.
  12. Web site: CALGRID Model . 2006-08-26 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060923011240/http://www.arb.ca.gov/eos/soft.htm#calgrid . 2006-09-23 . dead .
  13. http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/sarmap.htm CARB's SARMAP Model
  14. Web site: Climate Pollutants Fall Below 1990 Levels for First Time . California Air Resources Board . 27 July 2018.
  15. Web site: Incentive Program for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles. 2010-09-30. California Air Resources Board. 2011-11-07.
  16. Web site: Clean Car Standards - Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493 . January 11, 2017 . California Air Resources Board . 7 December 2018.
  17. 2002 . 200 . 864 . An act to amend Section 42823 of, and to add Section 43018.5 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to air quality..  direct URL
  18. Web site: Low-Emission Vehicle Program . January 25, 2017 . California Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  19. Web site: Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations and Test Procedures . October 18, 2017 . California Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  20. Web site: The California Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations (With Amendments Effective October 16, 2017) . October 16, 2017 . California Air Resources Board . 6 December 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171220025732/https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/levprog/cleandoc/cleancomplete_lev-ghg_regs_10-17.pdf . 20 December 2017 . dead .
  21. Web site: Fact Sheet: LEV II - Amendments to California's Low-Emission Vehicle regulations . February 1999 . California Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  22. Web site: Environmental Performance Label . Chiladakis, Lisa . March 2010 . California Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  23. Web site: Understand the Smog Rating . DriveClean . 5 December 2018.
  24. 2005 . 575 . 4355 . An act to amend Section 43200 of, and to add Section 43200.1 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to air pollution. .  direct URL
  25. Web site: Emission Standards: United States: Cars and Light-Duty Trucks: California . DieselNet . 5 December 2018.
  26. Web site: California exhaust emission standards and test procedures for 1988 and subsequent model passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles . June 24, 1996 . California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  27. Web site: Attachment A-2: California 2001 through 2014 model criteria pollutant exhaust emission standards and test procedures and 2009 through 2016 greenhouse gas exhaust emission standards and test procedures for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles . March 22, 2012 . California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  28. Web site: Attachment A-3: California 2015 and subsequent model criteria pollutant exhaust emission standards and test procedures and 2017 and subsequent greenhouse gas exhaust emission standards and test procedures for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles . March 22, 2012 . California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board . 5 December 2018.
  29. Web site: California Executive Order S-3-05 . June 1, 2005 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060922231000/http://gov.ca.gov/index.php?%2Fexecutive-order%2F1861%2F . 22 September 2006 . dead . State of California, Office of the Governor . 6 December 2018 .
  30. 2006 . An act to add Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) to the Health and Safety Code, relating to air pollution . September 27, 2006 . 488 . 3419.  direct URL
  31. Web site: California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Request . June 30, 2009 . United States Environmental Protection Agency . 7 December 2018.
  32. Web site: California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Denying a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for Californias 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles . Johnson, Stephen L. . March 6, 2008 . United States Environmental Protection Agency . 7 December 2018.
  33. Web site: California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Denying a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for Californias 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles . Jackson, Lisa P. . June 30, 2009 . United States Environmental Protection Agency . 7 December 2018.
  34. Web site: Final Regulation Order: Amendments to Sections 1900 and 1961, and Adoption of new Section 1961.1, Title 13, California Code of Regulations . September 15, 2005 . California Air Resources Board . 7 December 2018.
  35. Web site: How to calculate the CO2 emission from the fuel consumption? . ecoscore . 7 December 2018.
  36. Web site: Final Regulation Order . April 1, 2010 . California Air Resources Board . 7 December 2018.
  37. Web site: What's New List Serve Post Display. www.arb.ca.gov.
  38. Web site: States that have Adopted California's Vehicle Standards under Section 177 of the Federal Clean Air Act . March 27, 2019 . California Air Resources Board . 18 October 2019.
  39. Web site: States Adopting California's Clean Cars Standards . Maryland Department of the Environment . 5 December 2018.
  40. Web site: Fact Sheet: The Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Regulation . California Air Resources Board . 19 July 2024.
  41. Air Quality Control Commission approves low emission vehicle standards . Neustifter, Jeremy . November 16, 2018 . State of Colorado, Department of Public Health & Environment . 28 January 2019.
  42. Web site: Notice of intent to adopt rules with a hearing: Proposed Rules Adopting Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards—Clean Cars Minnesota . December 14, 2020 . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency . 2 December 2021.
  43. In the Matter of Clean Cars Minnesota Rulemaking OAH 71-9003-36416; Revisor R-4626 . May 7, 2021 . Palmer-Denig . Judge Jessica A. . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency . 2 December 2021.
  44. Web site: Rulemaking: Clean Cars Minnesota . 2021 . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency . 2 December 2021.
  45. Web site: Budryk . Zack . 2022-08-29 . Virginia AG says state bound by California rule phasing out new gas-powered cars . 2022-08-29 . The Hill . en-US.
  46. Web site: Notice of final rulemaking . Arizona Department of Environmental Quality . November 2011 . 28 January 2019.
  47. Web site: Petition to repeal regulations . State of New Mexico, Environmental Improvement Board . June 2013 . 28 January 2019.
  48. Web site: State Action . Clean Cars Campaign . 28 January 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190129010441/http://www.cleancarscampaign.org/web-content/stateaction/stateaction.html . 29 January 2019 . dead .
  49. News: Quebec adopts California car emissions standards . December 29, 2009 . CBC . 28 January 2019.
  50. Web site: Memorandum of Understanding between the California Air Resourcese Board, of the State of California, and Environment and Climate Change Canada, of the Government of Canada to Enhance Cooperation on Measures that Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions . 26 June 2019 . Environment and Climate Change Canada . 18 October 2019.
  51. Web site: California's Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program. Union of Concerned Scientists. 2009-01-30. 2009-04-21.
  52. Book: Sperling . Daniel . Deborah . Gordon . Two billion cars: driving toward sustainability . 2009 . 24, 189–191 . . New York . 978-0-19-537664-7 . 6 December 2018 .
  53. Summary of Staff's Preliminary Assessment of the Need for Revisions to the Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation . November 25, 2009 . California Air Resources Board . 6 December 2018.
  54. Web site: Low-Emission Vehicles (LEV) & GHG 2012 . January 26, 2012 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  55. Web site: Zero Emission Vehicles 2012 . January 26, 2012 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  56. Web site: LEV III GHG and ZEV Regulation Amendments for Federal Compliance option . November 15, 2012 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  57. Governor Newsom Announces California Will Phase Out Gasoline-Powered Cars & Drastically Reduce Demand for Fossil Fuel in California's Fight Against Climate Change . September 23, 2020 . State of California, Office of Governor Gavin Newsom . 2 December 2021.
  58. Web site: Executive Order N-79-20 . Newsom, Gavin . September 23, 2020 . State of California, Office of Governor Gavin Newsom . 2 December 2021.
  59. Web site: Advanced Clean Cars II California Air Resources Board . 2024-02-16 . ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  60. Web site: Governor Newsom's Zero-Emission by 2035 Executive Order (N-79-20) . January 19, 2021 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  61. Web site: Advanced Clean Cars II: The next phase of California’s Zero-Emission Vehicle and Low-Emission Vehicle regulations . 2024-02-16 . International Council on Clean Transportation . en-US.
  62. Web site: California exhaust emission standards and test procedures for 2005 through 2008 model zero-emission vehicles, and 2001 through 2008 model hybrid electric vehicles, in the passenger car, light-duty truck and medium-duty vehicle classes . December 2, 2009 . California Air Resources Board . 10 December 2018.
  63. Web site: Fact Sheet: California Vehicle Emissions. 2004-04-08. California Air Resources Board. 2009-04-21. https://web.archive.org/web/20090411065615/http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/factsheets/calemissions.pdf. 2009-04-11. dead.
  64. Book: Sherry Boschert. Plug-in Hybrids: The Cars that will Recharge America. 2006. 15–28. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada. 978-0-86571-571-4. registration. See the box "Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Mandate Timeline", pp. 23-28
  65. Web site: What is a ZEV - Zero Emissions Vehicle?. Christine & Scott Gable. About.com: Hybrid Cars & Alt Fuels. 2008-04-21. 2011-10-25. https://web.archive.org/web/20111025073309/http://alternativefuels.about.com/od/glossary/g/ZEV.htm. dead.
  66. According to the LEV I regulations, the LVW is defined as the sum of the vehicle's kerb weight and a 300lb allowance for the driver and fuel.
  67. Web site: Final Regulation Order: Sections 1900, 1960.1 and 1976, Title 13, CCR . March 28, 1996 . California Air Resources Board . 6 December 2018.
  68. Web site: Zero-Emission Vehicle Legal and Regulatory Activities: The ZEV Program Timeline. 2011-10-14. California Air Resources Board. 2014-09-22. https://web.archive.org/web/20141006105313/http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/background.htm. 2014-10-06. dead.
  69. Web site: Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking Including Summary of Comments and Agency Response . March 28, 1996 . California Air Resources Board . 6 December 2018.
  70. 1998 Zero-emission vehicle biennial program review . July 6, 1998 . California Air Resources Board . 6 December 2018.
  71. Web site: California Air Resources Board Votes to Modify ZEV Program in Short-Term; Complete Overhaul to Begin for New ZEV II. 2008-03-27. Green Car Congress. 2009-04-21.
  72. Web site: Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program. 2009-02-27 . California Air Resources Board. 2009-04-21.
  73. Web site: California Air Resources Board ZEV Action Plan . March 2021 . Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development . 2 December 2021.
  74. News: California's zero-emission vehicle program is stuck in neutral . Rory Carroll . Alexandria Sage . 2016-09-01 . 2017-07-26 . Reuters . https://web.archive.org/web/20161012131830/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-electriccars-insight-idUSKCN1173LK . 2016-10-12 . live .
  75. Web site: Zero-emission vehicle sales in the U.S. Reuters.
  76. Web site: Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) II Workshop . September 16, 2020 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  77. Web site: Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) II Workshop . May 6, 2021 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  78. Web site: Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) II Workshop . August 11, 2021 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  79. Web site: Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) II Workshop . October 13, 2021 . California Air Resources Board . 2 December 2021.
  80. Web site: OHV Registration. 2023-01-09 . ohv.parks.ca.gov.
  81. Web site: Off-highway Vehicle Registration. 2023-01-09 . DMV.CA.GOV.
  82. Web site: OHRV - Red Sticker Program. 2023-01-09 . California air resources board.
  83. Web site: New California Dirt Bike Laws For 2022 . John McCoy. 14 December 2022. 2023-01-09 . Dirt Legal . en-US.
  84. Web site: CHC Fact Sheet: Ferries California Air Resources Board . 2024-02-15 . ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  85. Web site: CHC Fact Sheet: Tugboats (Towing Vessels) California Air Resources Board . 2024-02-15 . ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  86. Web site: Commercial Harbor Craft California Air Resources Board . 2024-02-15 . ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  87. Web site: Industry concerns over CARB amendments spark emission compliance battle . 2024-02-15 . www.workboat.com . en.
  88. Web site: Low-Carbon Fuel Standard Program. California Air Resources Board. 2009-04-14. 2009-04-23.
  89. Web site: Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Volume I: Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons. California Air Resources Board. 2009-03-05. 2009-04-26.
  90. News: Air Resources Board moves to cut carbon use. San Francisco Chronicle. Wyatt Buchanan. 2009-04-24. 2009-04-25.
  91. News: Calif. Approves Nation's 1st Low-Carbon Fuel Rule. phys.org . . Young, Samantha . 2009-04-24 . 2009-04-25.
  92. News: Sugarcane Ethanol Passes Critical Test in California. World-Wire. UNICA press release. 2009-04-24. 2009-04-25. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20090426072816/http://world-wire.com/news/0904230003.html. 2009-04-26.
  93. California transitioning to all-electric public bus fleet by 2040 . December 14, 2018 . California Air Resources Board . 3 January 2019.
  94. Web site: Final Regulation Order, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Section 2023 . December 14, 2018 . California Air Resources Board . 3 January 2019.
  95. Web site: Electric Bus Fleet Conversion . Antelope Valley Transit Authority . 3 January 2019.
  96. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/air-cleaners-ozone-products/california-certified-air-cleaning-devices California Certified Air Cleaning Devices
  97. Web site: California Air Resources Board breaks ground on world-class lab, headquarters in Riverside California Air Resources Board. 2021-11-19. ww2.arb.ca.gov.
  98. Web site: CARB dedicates new Southern California headquarters in Riverside California Air Resources Board. 2021-11-19. ww2.arb.ca.gov.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "California Air Resources Board".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.