How to Write History explained

How to Write History (Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: Πῶς δεῖ ἱστορίαν συγγράφειν) is the title of a study by the classical Syrian[1] writer Lucian, which may be considered the only work on the theory of history-writing to survive from antiquity.[2]

Themes

The first part of Lucian’s essay involved a critical attack on contemporary historians. Lucian maintained that they confused history with panegyric, overloaded it with irrelevant details, and weighed it down with overblown rhetoric.[3]

Lucian recommended instead the virtues of clear narration, and the valorisation of truth.[4] He argued that the historian should write for all times, as “a free man, fearless, incorruptible, the friend of truth”;[5] and held up the work of Thucydides as the legislative template for all subsequent historians.[6] He argued that the "historian's sole task is to tell the tale as it happened" which is latter reflected in works of von Ranke among others.

Later influence

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Richter, Daniel S.. 2017. Chapter 21: Lucian of Samosata. The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. 1. Richter. Daniel S.. Johnson. William A.. Oxford, England. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199837472.013.26. 978-0-19-983747-2. 328-329.
  2. http://people.duke.edu/~wj25/UC_Web_Site/Lucian/Syllabus.htm Lucian and Historiography
  3. Book: Butcher, S. H. . Samuel_Butcher_(classicist). Harvard Lectures on Greek Subjects . London . Macmillan and Co., Ltd. . 1904 . 249 . 18 March 2020. Internet Archive.
  4. M Winkler, Fall of the Roman Empire (2012) p. 181-2
  5. Book: Butcher, S. H. . Samuel_Butcher_(classicist). Harvard Lectures on Greek Subjects . London . Macmillan and Co., Ltd. . 1904 . 250 . 18 March 2020. Internet Archive.
  6. P J Rhodes, Intro, Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War (OUP 2009) p. l
  7. D Marsh, Lucian and the Latins (1998) p. 29
  8. E Gibbon, Abridged Decline and Fall (Penguin 2005) p. 63 and p. 782