| Shorttitle: | Home Mortgage Disclosure Act |
| Longtitle: | An Act to extend the authority for the flexible regulation of interest rates on deposits and share accounts in depository institutions, to extend the National Commission on Electronic Fund Transfers, and to provide for home mortgage disclosure. |
| Enacted By: | 94th |
| Effective Date: | December 31, 1975 |
| Public Law Url: | http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-89/pdf/STATUTE-89-Pg1124.pdf |
| Cite Public Law: | 94-200 |
| Title Amended: | 12 U.S.C.: Banks and Banking |
| Sections Created: | §§ 2801-2811 |
| Sections Amended: | § 461 et seq. |
| Leghisturl: | http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d094:SN01281:@@@R |
| Introducedin: | Senate |
| Introducedby: | William Proxmire (D–WI) |
| Introduceddate: | March 21, 1975 |
| Committees: | Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, House Banking, Currency, and Housing |
| Passedbody1: | Senate |
| Passeddate1: | September 4, 1975 |
| Passedvote1: | 45-37 |
| Passedbody2: | House |
| Passeddate2: | October 31, 1975 |
| Passedvote2: | 177-147, in lieu of |
| Conferencedate: | December 12, 1975 |
| Passedbody3: | Senate |
| Passeddate3: | December 15, 1975 |
| Passedvote3: | agreed |
| Passedbody4: | House |
| Passeddate4: | December 18, 1975 |
| Passedvote4: | agreed |
| Signedpresident: | Gerald Ford |
| Signeddate: | December 31, 1975 |
The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (or HMDA, pronounced) is a United States federal law that requires certain financial institutions to provide mortgage data to the public. Congress enacted HMDA in 1975.[1]
HMDA grew out of public concern over credit shortages in certain urban neighborhoods. Congress believed that some financial institutions had contributed to the decline of some geographic areas by their failure to provide adequate home financing to qualified applicants on reasonable terms and conditions. Thus, one purpose of HMDA and Regulation C is to provide the public with information that will help show whether financial institutions are serving the housing credit needs of the neighborhoods and communities in which they are located. A second purpose is to aid public officials in targeting public investments from the private sector to areas where they are needed. Finally, the FIRREA amendments of 1989 require the collection and disclosure of data about applicant and borrower characteristics to assist in identifying possible discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing antidiscrimination statutes.[2]
As the name implies, HMDA is a disclosure law that relies upon public scrutiny for its effectiveness. It does not prohibit any specific activity of lenders, and it does not establish a quota system of mortgage loans to be made in any Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or other geographic area as defined by the Office of Management and Budget.[3]
US financial institutions must report HMDA data to their regulator if they meet certain criteria, such as having assets above a specific threshold. The criteria are different for depository and non-depository institutions and are available on the FFIEC website.[4] Additional information on institutional and transactional coverage for HMDA data collection years 2017 and onward can be found on the CFPB's regulation implementation page.[5] The datasets containing information on HMDA reporters are the HMDA Panel[6] and HMDA Transmittal Sheet.
In 2012, there were 7,400 institutions that reported a total of 18.7 million HMDA records.[7]
Companies covered under HMDA are required to submit a Loan Application Register (LAR) to the FFIEC via the CFPB which acts as the HMDA processor. The LAR must contain the data outlined in the Filing Instruction Guide (FIG) for the relevant collection year for all covered applications or loans.[8] [9] [10] [11]
For data from years prior to 2017 reporting institutions were required to submit their LARs by March 1 to the Federal Reserve Board on behalf of Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), an interagency body empowered to administer HMDA. Pursuant to the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as of 2018 HMDA data was to be submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau via an online portal named the HMDA Platform.[12] The first year of data submitted via this process was 2017.
The Dodd-Frank expanded the data fields collected under HMDA to provide better regulatory and public visibility into mortgage markets. Some changes include:
On behalf of the FFIEC, the CFPB maintains a HMDA compliance guide that is publicly available and contains information on how and what to report in the data collection.[17] Additional tools are made available by the FFIEC to facilitate compliance with Regulation C.[18]
The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act allowed small banks to claim partial exemptions from reporting certain data fields if their Community Reinvestment Act ratings were not low and they were below certain counts for mortgage activity.[19]
Contents of the HMDA data collection for 2017[20] and prior:
New or changed contents of the HMDA data collection for 2018[22] and onward:
HMDA data products are hosted on behalf of the FFIEC by the Federal Reserve Board[23] for data HMDA collections for 2016 and prior and the CFPB for HMDA collections 2017 and later.[24] Additionally, historic files prior to 2014 can be found at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) website. The NARA files include both Final and Ultimate datasets. The Final datasets include one year of resubmissions and late submissions by HMDA reporters and the Ultimate files contain two years of late and resubmitted data. NARA files include the statistical aggregates collected prior to 1990, the transaction level data collected in 1990 and onward, and the Aggregate[25] [26] and Disclosure[27] [28] reports produced from those data. The Aggregate and Disclosure reports were modified in 2018 due to changes in Regulation C.[29]
In order to determine what transaction level data would be made public in the 2018 and onward HMDA collections, the CFPB used a balancing test method that weighed public utility of the data against potential for consumer harm.[30] The application of the balancing test resulted in some fields being redacted and others being modified in order to protect applicant and borrower privacy.
HMDA datasets are published annually and include the Loan Application Register (LAR), Transmittal Sheet (TS), and Panel. The LAR contains transaction level data that were covered by Regulation C during the collection year. The LAR is one of the few datasets that contains application data as well as originated mortgages which allows calculation of denial rates and must be accounted for when analyzing HMDA data. The Transmittal Sheet contains self reported information related to HMDA reporters. The Panel is a compilation of regulatory data related to an institution that is used to profile HMDA reporters by peer group, such as by asset size, or by depository status and provide identifiers that link to other datasets, such as the CRA and the National Information Center. Initial dataset publications are referred to as the Modified LAR and are available on 3/31 of each calendar year.[31] Later in the year additional datasets are published including the Snapshot,[32] a point in time copy of HMDA of all three annual HMDA datasets, and Dynamic, TS and LAR files that are updated weekly.
The HMDA Data Browser was launched as an access tool for the 2018 and onward HMDA collections. The Data Browser allows filtering by geographic location, including State, MSA, and county, HMDA reporter, by LEI or name, and up to two additional data fields.[33] The Data Browser also allows access via API.[34]
HMDA data can be used to identify indicators of potential mortgage discrimination, however HMDA does not contain sufficient data to make conclusive determinations regarding discrimination. In all cases of possible discrimination, the basic regulatory inquiry revolves around whether a protected class of persons being denied a loan or offered different terms for reasons other than objectively acceptable characteristics (e.g. income, collateral).
Simultaneously, this area is the rifest for contention with respect to discriminatory claims, since there are market driven reasons for charging a higher rate that may exhibit discriminatory patterns. For example, a loan officer may query applicants to see if they have applied and been approved for a loan at any other banks. The rate for those that can produce another institution's offer may then be adjusted accordingly to remain competitive. However, if a certain ethnic group is less likely to "shop around" for the best rate, then the mere application of this principle — which is otherwise non-discriminatory in intent — can produce discriminatory effects. Many disputes between lenders and regulators in the context of price discrimination relate to such scenarios. Again, the key litmus test is whether the objective characteristic being used to lower or raise the mortgage rate for a given group is substantive in its own right with respect to the risk or profitability of the potential loan, rather than mere a proxy for racial discrimination.