Turkic history explained

Turkic history is the systematic documentation and study of events involving the Turkic peoples.

Origins

Turks were an important political identity of Eurasia. They first appeared at Inner Eurasian steppes and migrated to many various regions (such as Central Asia, West Asia, Siberia, and Eastern Europe.) and participated in many local civilizations there. It is not yet known when, where, and how the Turks formed as a population identity. However, it is predicted that Proto-Turkic populations have inhabited regions that they could have the lifestyle of Eurasian equestrian pastoral nomadic culture.

Türk was first used as a political identity in history during the Göktürk Khaganate period.[1] The old Turkic script was invented by Göktürks as well.[2] The ruling Ashina clan origins are disputed.

Although there are debates about its inception, the history of the Turks is an important part of world history. The history of all people that emerged in Eurasia and North Africa has been affected by the movements of the Turks to some degree. Turks also played an important role in bringing Eastern cultures to the West and Western cultures to the East. Their own religion became the pioneer and defender of the foreign religions they adopted after Tengrism, and they helped their spread and development (Manichaeism, Judaism, Buddhism, Orthodox, Nestorian Christianity and Islam).

The beginning of Turkic history

3rd century BC

4th century

5th century

Middle Ages/Turks

6th century

7th century

Central Asia

Eastern Europe

8th century

Inner Asia

Eastern Europe

9th century

Central Asia

Eastern Europe

Asia and Africa

10th century

Central Asia

Eastern Europe

Asia and Africa

11th century

Central Asia

Eastern Europe

Asia

South Asia

12th century

Asia

Iran and Central Asia

South Asia

Eastern Europe

13th century

Asia and the Middle East

Central Asia

South Asia

14th century

15th century

Asia

Central Asia

Eastern Europe

Modern era (1500 AD – present)

16th century

Eastern Europe

Central Asia

Asia

South Asia

Africa

17th century

Eastern Europe

Central Asia

South Asia

18th century

Eastern Europe

Asia

Central Asia

Africa

19th century

Eastern Europe

Central Asia

South Asia

Africa

20th century

21st century

Notes

Turkish books

English and foreign books

See also

Sources

Notes and References

  1. Book: West, Barbara A. . Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania . 19 May 2010 . Infobase Publishing . 978-1-4381-1913-7 . 829 . The first people to use the ethnonym Turk to refer to themselves were the Turuk people of the Gokturk Khanate in the mid sixth-century.
  2. Sigfried J. de Laet, Joachim Herrmann, (1996), History of Humanity: From the seventh century B.C. to the seventh century A.D., p. 478
  3. [Sima Qian]
  4. Pulleyblank, E. G. "The Name of the Kirghiz." Central Asiatic Journal 34, no. 1/2 (1990). p. 99
  5. Pulleyblank, "Central Asia and Non-Chinese Peoples of Ancient China", p. VII 21–26.
  6. Duan, "Dingling, Gaoju and Tiele", p. 370.
  7. Hyun Jin Kim: The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe. Cambridge University Press, 2013. pp.175–176.
  8. Peter B. Golden: Some Thoughts on the Origins of the Turks and the Shaping of the Turkic Peoples in Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World. Ed. Victor H. Mair. University of Hawaii Press, 2006. p.140
  9. [Xin Tangshu]
  10. Xu Elina-Qian, Historical Development of the Pre-Dynastic Khitan, University of Helsinki, 2005. p. 176. quote: "The Mohe were descendants of the Sushen and ancestors of the Jurchen, and identified as Tungus speakers."
  11. Werner, Heinrich Zur jenissejisch-indianischen Urverwandtschaft. Harrassowitz Verlag. 2004 abstract. p. 25
  12. Web site: 18 December 2020. Geçmişten Günümüze Türk Tarihi. 18 December 2020. Story and History. tr.
  13. Song Lian et al., History of Yuan, "Vol. 118" "阿剌兀思剔吉忽里,汪古部人,係出沙陀雁門之後。" Alawusi Tijihuli, a man of the Ongud tribe, descendant(s) of the Wild Goose Pass's Shatuo
  14. Paulillo, Mauricio. "White Tatars: The Problem of the Öngũt conversion to Jingjiao and the Uighur Connection" in From the Oxus River to the Chinese Shores: Studies on East Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia (orientalia - patristica - oecumenica) Ed. Tang, Winkler. (2013) pp. 237-252
  15. Book: Аристов Н. А. . Труды по истории и этническому составу тюркских племен . В. М. Плоских . Бишкек . 2003 . Илим . 103. 5-8355-1297-X.
  16. Book: Очир А. . Монгольские этнонимы: вопросы происхождения и этнического состава монгольских народов . Э. П. Бакаева, К. В. Орлова . Элиста . 2016 . КИГИ РАН . 133–135. 978-5-903833-93-1.
  17. Ozkan Izgi, "The ancient cultures of Central Asia and the relations with the Chinese civilization" The Turks, Ankara, 2002, p. 98,
  18. Paulillo, Mauricio. "White Tatars: The Problem of the Öngũt conversion to Jingjiao and the Uighur Connection" in From the Oxus River to the Chinese Shores: Studies on East Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia (orientalia - patristica - oecumenica) Ed. Tang, Winkler. (2013) pp. 237-252
  19. Tibetan as a "model language" in the Amdo Sprachbund: evidence from Salar and Wutun. Erika . Sandman. Camille. Simon. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. 2016. 3. 1. 88. 10.1515/jsall-2016-0003 . 146919944 . hal-03427697.
  20. Tibetan as a "model language" in the Amdo Sprachbund: Evidence from Salar and Wutun . Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics . 23 October 2023 . 3 . 1 . 85 . Sandman . Erika . Simon . Camille . 10.1515/jsall-2016-0003 . 146919944 .
  21. A Grammar of Wutun. University of Helsinki. PhD Thesis. Department of World Cultures. Erika . Sandman. 15.
  22. Han. Deyan. Ma Jianzhong and Kevin Stuart, translators. 2. Mostaert . Antoine . Central Asiatic Journal . 43–44 . 1999 . O. Harrassowitz . 212 . The Salar Khazui System.
  23. Kinney. Drew H.. 2016. Civilian Actors in the Turkish Military Drama of July 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20171011081541/http://www.emgr.unic.ac.cy/wp-content/uploads/EMPN_10.pdf. dead. 2017-10-11. Eastern Mediterranean Policy Note. 10. 1–10.