Hindu deities explained

Hindu deities are the gods and goddesses in Hinduism. Deities in Hinduism are as diverse as its traditions, and a Hindu can choose to be polytheistic, pantheistic, monotheistic, monistic, even agnostic, atheistic, or humanist.[1] [2] [3] The terms and epithets for deities within the diverse traditions of Hinduism vary, and include Deva, Devi, Ishvara, Ishvari, Bhagavān and Bhagavati.[4]

The deities of Hinduism have evolved from the Vedic era (2nd millennium BCE) through the medieval era (1st millennium CE), regionally within Nepal, Pakistan, India and in Southeast Asia, and across Hinduism's diverse traditions.[5] [6] The Hindu deity concept varies from a personal god as in Yoga school of Hindu philosophy,[7] to thirty-three major deities in the Vedas,[8] to hundreds of deities mentioned in the Puranas of Hinduism.[9] Illustrations of major deities include Vishnu, Lakshmi, Shiva, Parvati, Brahma and Saraswati. These deities have distinct and complex personalities, yet are often viewed as aspects of the same Ultimate Reality called Brahman.[10] From ancient times, the idea of equivalence has been cherished for all Hindus, in its texts and in early 1st-millennium sculpture with concepts such as Harihara (Half Vishnu, Half Shiva)[11] and Ardhanārīshvara (half Shiva, half Parvati),[12] with myths and temples that feature them together, declaring they are the same.[13] [14] [15] Major deities have inspired their own Hindu traditions, such as Vaishnavism, Shaivism and Shaktism, but with shared mythology, ritual grammar, theosophy, axiology and polycentrism.[16] [17] [18] Some Hindu traditions, such as Smartism from the mid 1st millennium CE, have included multiple major deities as henotheistic manifestations of Saguna Brahman, and as a means to realizing Nirguna Brahman.[19] In Samkhya philosophy, Devata or deities are considered as "natural sources of energy" who have Sattva as the dominant Guna.

Hindu deities are represented with various icons and anicons in sculptures and paintings, called Murtis and Pratimas.[20] [21] [22] Some Hindu traditions, such as ancient Charvakas, rejected all deities and concept of god or goddess,[23] [24] [25] while 19th-century British colonial era movements such as the Arya Samaj and Brahmo Samaj rejected deities and adopted monotheistic concepts similar to Abrahamic religions.[26] [27] Hindu deities have been adopted in other religions such as Jainism,[28] and in regions outside India, such as predominantly Buddhist Thailand and Japan, where they continue to be revered in regional temples or arts.[29] [30]

In ancient and medieval era texts of Hinduism, the human body is described as a temple,[31] [32] and deities are described to be parts residing within it,[33] [34] while the Brahman (Absolute Reality, God)[35] [36] is described to be the same, or of similar nature, as the Atman (Self), which Hindus believe is eternal and within every living being.[37]

Devas and devis

See main article: Deva (Hinduism) and Devi. Deities in Hinduism are referred to as Deva (masculine) and Devi (feminine).[38] [39] [40] The root of these terms means "heavenly, divine, anything of excellence".[41]

In the earliest Vedic literature, all supernatural beings are called Asuras.[42] [43] By the late Vedic period (c. 500 BCE), benevolent supernatural beings are referred to as Deva-Asuras. In post-Vedic texts, such as the Puranas and the Itihasas of Hinduism, the Devas represent the good, and the Asuras the bad.[5] [6] In some medieval Indian literature, Devas are also referred to as Suras and contrasted with their equally powerful, but malevolent counterparts referred to as the Asuras.[44]

Hindu deities are part of Hindu mythology, both Devas and Devis feature in one of many cosmological theories in Hinduism.[45] [46]

Characteristics of Vedic-era deities

In Vedic literature, Devas and Devis represent the forces of nature and some represent moral values (such as the Adityas, Varuna, and Mitra), each symbolizing the epitome of specialized knowledge, creative energy, exalted and magical powers (Siddhis).[47] [48]

The most referred to Devas in the Rigveda are Indra, Agni (fire) and Soma, with "fire deity" called the friend of all humanity. Indra and Soma are two celebrated in a yajna fire ritual that marks major Hindu ceremonies. Savitr, Vishnu, Rudra (later given the exclusive epithet of Shiva), and Prajapati (later Brahma) are gods and hence Devas.[49]

The Vedas describes a number of significant Devis such as Ushas (dawn), Prithvi (earth), Aditi (cosmic moral order), Saraswati (river, knowledge), Vāc (sound), Nirṛti (destruction), Ratri (night), Aranyani (forest), and bounty goddesses such as Dinsana, Raka, Puramdhi, Parendi, Bharati, Mahi, among others, mentioned in the Rigveda.[50] Sri, also called Lakshmi, appears in late Vedic texts dated to be pre-Buddhist, but verses dedicated to her do not suggest that her characteristics were fully developed in the Vedic era.[51] All gods and goddesses are distinguished in the Vedic times, but in the post-Vedic texts (c. 500 BCE to 200 CE), and particularly in the early medieval era literature, they are ultimately seen as aspects or manifestations of one Brahman, the Supreme power.[51] [52]

Ananda Coomaraswamy states that Devas and Asuras in the Vedic lore are similar to Angels-Theoi-Gods and Titans of Greek mythology, both are powerful but have different orientations and inclinations, the Devas representing the powers of Light and the Asuras representing the powers of Darkness in Hindu mythology.[53] According to Coomaraswamy's interpretation of Devas and Asuras, both these natures exist in each human being, the tyrant and the angel is within each being, the best and the worst within each person struggles before choices and one's nature, and the Hindu formulation of Devas and Asuras is an eternal dance between these within each person.[54] [55]

Characteristics of medieval-era deities

In the Puranas and the Itihasas with the embedded Bhagavad Gita, the Devas represent the good, and the Asuras the bad.[5] [6] According to the Bhagavad Gita (16.6–16.7), all beings in the universe have both the divine qualities (daivi sampad) and the demonic qualities (asuri sampad) within them.[6] The sixteenth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita states that pure god-like saints are rare, as are pure demon-like evil individuals among human beings. Instead, the majority of humanity is multi-charactered with a few or many faults.[6] According to Jeaneane Fowler, the Gita states that desires, aversions, greed, needs, emotions in various forms "are facets of ordinary lives". It is only when they turn to lust, hate, cravings, arrogance, conceit, anger, harshness, hypocrisy, violence, cruelty and such negativity- and destruction-inclined tendencies that natural human inclinations metamorphose into something demonic (Asura).[6] [56]

The Epics and medieval era texts, particularly the Puranas, developed extensive and richly varying mythologies associated with Hindu deities, including their genealogies.[57] [58] Several of the Purana texts are named after major Hindu deities such as Vishnu, Shiva and Devi.[59] Other texts and commentators such as Adi Shankara explain that Hindu deities live or rule over the cosmic body as well as in the temple of the human body.[31] They remark that the Sun deity is the eyes, the Vāyu the nose, the Prajapati the sexual organs, the Lokapalas the ears, Chandra the mind, Mitra the inward breath, Varuna the outward breath, Indra the arms, Bṛhaspati the speech, Vishnu, whose stride is great, is the feet, and Māyā is the smile.[60]

Symbolism

Edelmann states that gods and anti-gods of Hinduism are symbolism for spiritual concepts. For example, god Indra (a Deva) and the antigod Virocana (an Asura) question a sage for insights into the knowledge of the self. Virocana leaves with the first given answer, believing now he can use the knowledge as a weapon. In contrast, Indra keeps pressing the sage, churning the ideas, and learning about means to inner happiness and power. Edelmann suggests that the Deva-Asura dichotomies in Hindu mythology may be seen as "narrative depictions of tendencies within our selves".[61] Hindu deities in Vedic era, states Mahoney, are those artists with "powerfully inward transformative, effective and creative mental powers".[62]

In Hindu mythology, everyone starts as an Asura, born of the same father. "Asuras who remain Asura" share the character of powerful beings craving for more power, more wealth, ego, anger, unprincipled nature, force and violence. The "Asuras who become Devas" in contrast are driven by an inner voice, seek understanding and meaning, prefer moderation, principled behavior, aligned with Ṛta and Dharma, knowledge and harmony.[63] [64] [65]

The god (Deva) and antigod (Asura), states Edelmann, are also symbolically the contradictory forces that motivate each individual and people, and thus Deva-Asura dichotomy is a spiritual concept rather than mere genealogical category or species of being. In the Bhāgavata Purana, saints and gods are born in families of Asuras, such as Mahabali and Prahlada, conveying the symbolism that motivations, beliefs and actions rather than one's birth and family circumstances define whether one is Deva-like or Asura-like.[66]

Ishvara

See main article: Ishvara. Another Hindu term that is sometimes translated as the deity is Ishvara, or various deities are described, state Sorajjakool et al., as "the personifications of various aspects of the same Ishvara".[67] The term Ishvara has a wide range of meanings that depend on the era and the school of Hinduism.[68] [69] [70] In ancient texts of Indian philosophy, Ishvara means supreme Self, Brahman (Highest Reality), ruler, king or husband depending on the context.[68] In medieval era texts, Ishvara means God, Supreme Being, personal god, or special Self depending on the school of Hinduism.[71] [70] [72]

Among the six systems of Hindu philosophy, Samkhya and Mimamsa do not consider the concept of Ishvara, i.e., a supreme being, relevant. Yoga, Vaisheshika, Vedanta, and Nyaya schools of Hinduism discuss Ishvara but assign different meanings.

Early Nyaya school scholars considered the hypothesis of a deity as a creator God with the power to grant blessings, boons, and fruits; but these early Nyaya scholars then rejected this hypothesis, and were non-theistic or atheists.[24] [73] Later scholars of Nyaya school reconsidered this question and offered counter arguments for what is Ishvara and various arguments to prove the existence of an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent deity (God).[74]

Vaisheshika school of Hinduism, as founded by Kanada in the 1st millennium BCE, neither required nor relied on a creator deity.[75] Later Vaisheshika school adopted the concept of Ishvara, states Klaus Klostermaier, but as an eternal God who co-exists in the universe with eternal substances and atoms, but He "winds up the clock, and lets it run its course".[75]

Ancient Mimamsa scholars of Hinduism questioned what is Ishvara (deity, God)?[76] They considered a deity concept unnecessary for a consistent philosophy and moksha (soteriology).[76] [77]

In the Samkhya school of Hindu philosophy, Isvara is neither a creator-God nor a savior-God.[78] This is called one of the several major atheistic schools of Hinduism by some scholars.[79] [80] Others, such as Jacobsen, state that Samkhya is more accurately described as non-theistic.[81] Deity is considered an irrelevant concept, neither defined nor denied, in Samkhya school of Hindu philosophy.

In the Yoga school of Hinduism, it is any "personal deity" (Ishta Deva or Ishta Devata)[82] or "spiritual inspiration", but not a creator God.[72] [83] Whicher explains that while Patanjali's terse verses in the Yogasutras can be interpreted both as theistic or non-theistic, Patanjali's concept of Isvara in Yoga philosophy functions as a "transformative catalyst or guide for aiding the yogin on the path to spiritual emancipation".[84]

The Advaita Vedanta school of Hinduism asserted that there is no dualistic existence of a deity (or deities).[85] There is no otherness nor distinction between Jiva and Ishvara.[86] [87] God (Ishvara, Brahman) is identical with the Atman (Self) within each human being in Advaita Vedanta school,[88] and there is a monistic Universal Absolute Oneness that connects everyone and everything.[89] [87] [90]

In Dvaita sub-school of Vedanta Hinduism, Ishvara is defined as a creator God that is distinct from Jiva (individual Selfs in living beings).[37] In this school, God creates individual Self (Atman), but the individual Self never was and never will become one with God; the best it can do is to experience bliss by getting infinitely close to God.[91]

Number of deities

Yantra as aniconic deities
Below:Yantras or mandalas (shown) are 3-D images.[92] In Tantra, a minority tradition in Hinduism,[93] they are considered identical with deity.[94] Similar tantric yantras are found in Jainism and Buddhism as well.[95]

Yāska, the earliest known language scholar of India (c. 500 BCE), notes Wilkins, mentions that there are three deities (Devas) according to the Vedas, "Agni (fire), whose place is on the earth; Vayu (wind), whose place is the air; and Surya (sun), whose place is in the sky".[96] This principle of three worlds (or zones), and its multiples is found thereafter in many ancient texts. The Samhitas, which are the oldest layer of text in Vedas enumerate 33 devas, either 11 each for the three worlds, or as 12 Adityas, 11 Rudras, 8 Vasus and 2 Ashvins in the Brahmanas layer of Vedic texts.[97] [41]

The Rigveda states in hymn 1.139.11,

One or one-ness

Thirty-three koti (33 supreme) divinities are mentioned in other ancient texts, such as the Yajurveda. Most by far, are goddesses state Foulston and Abbott, suggesting "how important and popular goddesses are" in Hindu culture.[98] Scholars state all deities are typically viewed in Hinduism as "emanations or manifestation of genderless principle called Brahman, representing the many facets of Ultimate Reality". In Hinduism, the concept is that "God, the universe, human beings and all else is essentially one thing" and there is a connected oneness where the same God resides within every human being as Atman, the eternal Self.[99] [100]

Iconography and practices

See main article: Murti. Hinduism has an ancient and extensive iconography tradition, particularly in the form of Murti (Sanskrit: मूर्ति, IAST: Mūrti), or Vigraha or Pratima.[21] A Murti is itself not the god in Hinduism, but it is an image of god and represents emotional and religious value.[101] A literal translation of Murti as an idol is incorrect, states Jeaneane Fowler when the idol is understood as superstitious end in itself.[101] Just like the photograph of a person is not the real person, a Murti is an image in Hinduism but not the real thing, but in both cases, the image reminds of something of emotional and real value to the viewer.[101] When a person worships a Murti, it is assumed to be a manifestation of the essence or spirit of the deity, the worshipper's spiritual ideas and needs are meditated through it, yet the idea of ultimate reality or Brahman is not confined in it.[101]

A Murti of a Hindu deity is typically made by carving stone, woodworking, metal casting, or through pottery. Medieval era texts describing their proper proportions, positions and gestures include the Puranas, Agamas and Samhitas particularly the Shilpa Shastras.[20] The expressions in a Murti vary in diverse Hindu traditions, ranging from Ugra symbolism to express destruction, fear and violence (Durga, Parvati, Kali), as well as Saumya symbolism to express joy, knowledge, and harmony (Parvati, Saraswati, Lakshmi). Saumya images are most common in Hindu temples.[102] Other Murti forms found in Hinduism include the Linga.[103]

A Murti is an embodiment of the divine, the Ultimate Reality or Brahman to some Hindus.[20] In the religious context, they are found in Hindu temples or homes, where they may be treated as a beloved guest and serve as a participant of Puja rituals in Hinduism.[104] A murti is installed by priests, in Hindu temples, through the Prana Pratishtha ceremony,[105] whereby state Harold Coward and David Goa, the "divine vital energy of the cosmos is infused into the sculpture" and then the divine is welcomed as one would welcome a friend.[106] In other occasions, it serves as the center of attention in annual festive processions and these are called Utsava Murti.[107]

Temple and worship

See main article: Hindu temple and Puja (Hinduism).

In Hinduism, deities and their icons may be hosted in a Hindu temple, within a home, or as an amulet. The worship performed by Hindus is known by several regional names, such as Puja. This practice in front of a murti may be elaborate in large temples, or be a simple song or mantra muttered in home, or offering made to sunrise or river or symbolic an icon of a deity.[108] [109] [110] Archaeological evidence of deity worship in Hindu temples trace Puja rituals to Gupta Empire era (c. 4th century CE).[111] [112] In Hindu temples, various pujas may be performed daily at various times of the day; in other temples, it may be occasional.[113] [114]

The Puja practice is structured as an act of welcoming, hosting, and honoring the deity of one's choice as one's honored guest,[115] and remembering the spiritual and emotional significance the deity represents to the devotee.[101] [116] Jan Gonda, as well as Diana L. Eck, states that a typical Puja involves one or more of 16 steps (Shodasha Upachara) traceable to ancient times: the deity is invited as a guest, the devotee hosts and takes care of the deity as an honored guest, praise (hymns) with Dhupa or Aarti along with food (Naivedhya) is offered to the deity, after an expression of love and respect the host takes leave, and with affection expresses goodbye to the deity.[117] The worship practice may also involve reflecting on spiritual questions, with image serving as support for such meditation.[118]

Deity worship (Bhakti), visiting temples, and Puja rites are not mandatory and are optional in Hinduism; it is the choice of a Hindu, it may be a routine daily affair for some Hindus, periodic ritual or infrequent for some.[119] [120] Worship practices in Hinduism are as diverse as its traditions, and a Hindu can choose to be polytheistic, pantheistic, monotheistic, monistic, agnostic, atheistic, or humanist.[121]

Devotees engage with deities in more personalized relationships. Ramanuja differentiates between three types of devotees: power-seekers, liberation-seekers, and those seeking love and communion with the deity. While all three are considered dharmic, they are not equally significant in terms of liberation. Power-seekers pursue goals for overall benefit, while liberation-seekers seek unity with the divine. The highest form of devotion is characterized by selfless love for the divine.[122]

Examples

See main article: List of Hindu deities and Rigvedic deities. Major deities have inspired a vast genre of literature such as the Puranas and Agama texts as well their own Hindu traditions, but with shared mythology, ritual grammar, theosophy, axiology and polycentrism.[17] [18] Vishnu and his avatars are at the foundation of Vaishnavism, Shiva for Shaivism, Devi for Shaktism, and some Hindu traditions such as Smarta traditions who revere multiple major deities (five) as henotheistic manifestations of Brahman (absolute metaphysical Reality).[123] [124] [125]

While there are diverse deities in Hinduism, states Lawrence, "Exclusivism – which maintains that only one's own deity is real" is rare in Hinduism.[123] Julius Lipner, and other scholars, state that pluralism and "polycentrism" – where other deities are recognized and revered by members of different "denominations", has been the Hindu ethos and way of life.[17] [126]

Trimurti and Tridevi

See main article: Trimurti and Tridevi. The concept of Triad (or Trimurti, Trinity) makes a relatively late appearance in Hindu literature, or in the second half of 1st millennium BCE.[127] The idea of triad, playing three roles in the cosmic affairs, is typically associated with Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva (also called Mahesh); however, this is not the only triad in Hindu literature.[128] Other triads include Tridevi, of three goddesses – Lakshmi, Saraswati and Parvati in the text Devi Mahatmya, in the Shakta tradition, which further assert that Devi is the Brahman (Ultimate Reality) and it is her energy that empowers Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva.[127] The other triads, formulated as deities in ancient Indian literature, include Sun (creator), Air (sustainer) and Fire (destroyer); Prana (creator), Food (sustainer) and Time (destroyer).[127] These triads, states Jan Gonda, are in some mythologies grouped together without forming a Trinity, and in other times represented as equal, a unity and manifestations of one Brahman.[127] In the Puranas, for example, this idea of threefold "hypostatization" is expressed as follows,

The triad appears in Maitrayaniya Upanishad, for the first time in recognized roles known ever since, where they are deployed to present the concept of three Guṇa – the innate nature, tendencies and inner forces found within every being and everything, whose balance transform and keeps changing the individual and the world.[128] [129] It is in the medieval Puranic texts, Trimurti concepts appears in various context, from rituals to spiritual concepts.[127] The Bhagavad Gita, in verses 9.18, 10.21-23 and 11.15, asserts that the triad or trinity is manifestation of one Brahman, which Krishna affirms himself to be.[130] However, suggests Bailey, the mythology of triad is "not the influence nor the most important one" in Hindu traditions, rather the ideologies and spiritual concepts develop on their own foundations.[128] The triad, with Brahma creating, Vishnu preserving and Shiva destroying, balances the functioning of the whole universe.

Avatars of Hindu deities

See main article: Avatar and Dashavatara. Hindu mythology has nurtured the concept of the avatar (avatāra), which represents the descent of a deity on earth.[131] [132] This concept is commonly translated as "incarnation",[131] and is an "appearance" or "manifestation".[133] [134]

The concept of the avatar is most developed in Vaishnavism tradition, and associated with Vishnu, particularly with Rama and Krishna.[135] [136] Vishnu takes numerous avatars in Hindu mythology. He becomes female, during the Samudra Manthana, in the form of Mohini, to resolve a conflict between the devas and the asuras. His male avatars include Matsya, Kurma, Varaha, Narasimha, Vamana, Parashurama, Rama, Krishna, Buddha, and Kalki.[136] In some lists, Balarama replaces the Buddha.[137] Various texts, particularly the Bhagavad Gita, discuss the idea of an avatar of Vishnu appearing to restore the cosmic balance whenever the power of evil becomes excessive and causes persistent oppression in the world.[132]

In Shaktism traditions, the concept appears in its legends as the various manifestations of Devi, the divine-mother principle in Hinduism.[138] The avatars of Devi or Parvati include Durga and Kali, who are particularly revered in the eastern states of India, as well as Tantra traditions.[139] [140] [141] Twenty-one avatars of Shiva are also described in Shaivism texts, but unlike Vaishnava traditions, Shaiva traditions focus directly on Shiva rather than the avatar concept.[131]

Major regional and pan-Indian Hindu deities

- ! Name Other NamesAvatārs or Associated DeitiesGeography ! class="unsortable"Image ! class="unsortable"Early illustrative art - Nārāyana,
Venkateshwara, Jagannatha Dattatreya, Hari, Other names of Rama and Krishna
Matsya, Kurma, Varaha, Narasimha, Vamana, Parashurama, Rama, Krishna, Kalki, Vithoba, Perumal, Balarama, Mohini,Buddha, HayagrivaIndia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Indonesia
2nd century BCE
- Mahādeva, Pashupati,
Tripurantaka, Vishvanatha,
Dakshinamurti, Kālāntaka,
Bhairava, Rudra,
Nataraja, Sadashiva, Dattatreya
Batara Guru (Indonesia)[142] [143]
Achalanatha (Japan)[144] [145]
India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, China
1st century BCE[146]
- Adi Prajāpati, Virinci, Vaidyanatha, Vacpati, Varishtadeva, Kamalaja, Srashta, Karta, DhataBonten (Japan),[147]
Phra Phrom (Thailand)
India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia
6th century CE
- Ganapati, Vināyaka, Lambodara, GajānanaKangiten (Japan)India, Nepal, Sri Lanka
7th century CE
- Skanda, Murugan, Mangala, Kumara, Subrahmanya, ShanmukhaIndia, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Nepal
2nd century BCE
- Uma, Devi, Gauri,
Durga, Kāli, Annapurna
Umahi (烏摩妃, Japan)
[148]
India, Nepal, Sri Lanka
5th century CE
- Sridevi, Bhargavi, Kamalāsanā, Padmavati, ChanchalaSita, Radha, Rukmini,
Kisshōten (Japan)
Dewi Sri (Indonesia)
Nang Kwak (Thailand)[149]
India, Nepal, Sri Lanka
1st century BCE
- Vāgishvari, Vīnāpāni, SharadaBenzaiten (Japan),
Biàncáitiān (China),
Thurathadi (Myanmar),
Suratsawadi (Thailand)[150]
India, Nepal, Java, Bali, Sri Lanka
10th century CE
- Pārvati, Kāli, Mahishāsuramardini
Betari Durga (Indonesia)[151] India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh
8th century CE
- India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh
12th century CE
- Durga, ParvatiIndia (mostly in South India),
Southeast Asia, Sri Lanka

10th century CE
- Harihara (Half Vishnu - Half Shiva) Shankaranarayana India, Sri Lanka, Nepal
6th century CE
- Ardhanārīshvara (Half Shiva - Half Parvati) India, Nepal, Sri Lanka
1st century CE
- Anjaneya, Maruti, Bajarangabali, Sankatamochana, Pavanasuta India, Nepal, Sri Lanka
11th century CE

See also

References

Sources

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. [Julius J. Lipner]
  2. Lester Kurtz (ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict,, Academic Press, 2008
  3. M. K. Gandhi, The Essence of Hindu, Editor: V. B. Kher, Navajivan Publishing, see p. 3; According to Gandhi, "a man may not believe in God and still call himself a Hindu."
  4. Radhakrishnan and Moore (1967, Reprinted 1989), A Source Book in Indian Philosophy, Princeton University Press,, pp. 37-39, 401-403, 498-503
  5. Nicholas Gier (2000), Spiritual Titanism: Indian, Chinese, and Western Perspectives, State University of New York Press,, pp. 59-76
  6. Jeaneane D. Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita, Sussex Academic Press,, pp. 253-262
  7. Mike Burley (2012), Classical Samkhya and Yoga - An Indian Metaphysics of Experience, Routledge,, pp. 39-41;
    Lloyd Pflueger, Person Purity and Power in Yogasutra, in Theory and Practice of Yoga (Editor: Knut Jacobsen), Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 38-39;
    Kovoor T. Behanan (2002), Yoga: Its Scientific Basis, Dover,, pp. 56-58
  8. Book: Scarborough, Jack . The Origins of Cultural Differences and Their Impact on Management . 2000 . Greenwood Publishing Group . 978-1-56720-439-1 . 131 . en.
  9. Sanjukta Gupta (2013), Lakṣmī Tantra: A Pāñcarātra Text, Motilal Banarsidass,, p. 166
  10. [:no:Knut A. Jacobsen|Knut Jacobsen]
  11. David Leeming (2001), A Dictionary of Asian Mythology, Oxford University Press,, p. 67
  12. Ellen Goldberg (2002), The Lord who is half woman: Ardhanārīśvara in Indian and feminist perspective, State University of New York Press,, pp. 1–4
  13. TA Gopinatha Rao (1993), Elements of Hindu Iconography, Vol. 2, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 334-335
  14. Fred Kleiner (2012), Gardner's Art through the Ages: A Global History, Cengage,, pp. 443-444
  15. Cynthia Packert Atherton (1997), The Sculpture of Early Medieval Rajasthan, Brill,, pp. 42-46
  16. Lance Nelson (2007), An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies (Editors: Orlando O. Espín, James B. Nickoloff), Liturgical Press,, pp. 562-563
  17. Julius J. Lipner (2009), Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, 2nd Edition, Routledge,, pp. 371-375
  18. Book: Frazier. Jessica. The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies . limited. 2011. Continuum. London. 978-0-8264-9966-0. 1–15.
  19. Michael Myers (2000), Brahman: A Comparative Theology, Routledge,, pp. 124-127
  20. [Klaus Klostermaier]
  21. Encyclopedia: pratima (Hinduism). Encyclopædia Britannica . 21 August 2011.
  22. PK Acharya, An Encyclopedia of Hindu Architecture, Oxford University Press, p. 426
  23. V. V. Raman (2012), Hinduism and Science: Some Reflections, Zygon - Journal of Religion and Science, 47(3): 549–574, Quote (p. 557): "Aside from nontheistic schools like the Samkhya, there have also been explicitly atheistic schools in the Hindu tradition. One virulently anti-supernatural system is/was the so-called Charvaka school."
  24. John Clayton (2010), Religions, Reasons and Gods: Essays in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge University Press,, p. 150
  25. A Goel (1984), Indian philosophy: Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika and modern science, Sterling,, pages 149-151;
    R. Collins (2000), The Sociology of Philosophies, Harvard University Press,, p. 836
  26. Book: Naidoo, Thillayvel. The Arya Samaj Movement in South Africa. Motilal Banarsidass. 158. 1982. 81-208-0769-3.
  27. Glyn Richards (1990), The World's Religions: The Religions of Asia (Editor: Friedhelm Hardy), Routledge,, pp. 173-176
  28. John E. Cort (1998), Open Boundaries: Jain Communities and Cultures in Indian History, State University of New York Press,, pp. 218-220
  29. Ellen London (2008), Thailand Condensed: 2,000 Years of History & Culture, Marshall Cavendish,, p. 74
  30. Trudy Ring et al. (1996), International Dictionary of Historic Places: Asia and Oceania, Routledge,, p. 692
  31. Jean Holm and John Bowker (1998), Sacred Place, Bloomsbury Academic,, pp. 76-78
  32. Michael Coogan (2003), The Illustrated Guide to World Religions, Oxford University Press,, p. 149
  33. [Alain Daniélou]
  34. [Patrick Olivelle]
  35. For dualism school of Hinduism, see: Francis X. Clooney (2010), Hindu God, Christian God: How Reason Helps Break Down the Boundaries between Religions, Oxford University Press,, pp. 51-58, 111-115;
    For monist school of Hinduism, see: B. Martinez-Bedard (2006), Types of Causes in Aristotle and Sankara, Thesis - Department of Religious Studies (Advisors: Kathryn McClymond and Sandra Dwyer), Georgia State University, pp. 18-35
  36. Book: Brodd, Jeffrey . World Religions . Saint Mary's Press . 2003 . Winona, MN . 978-0-88489-725-5 .
  37. R Prasad (2009), A Historical-developmental Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals, Concept Publishing,, pp. 345-347
  38. Monier Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary" Etymologically and Philologically Arranged to cognate Indo-European Languages, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 496
  39. John Stratton Hawley and Donna Marie Wulff (1998), Devi: Goddesses of India, Motilal Banarsidass,, p. 2
  40. William K Mahony (1997), The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination, State University of New York Press,, p. 18
  41. Monier Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary" Etymologically and Philologically Arranged to cognate Indo-European Languages, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 492
  42. Wash Edward Hale (1999), Ásura in Early Vedic Religion, Motilal Barnarsidass,, pp. 5-11, 22, 99-102
  43. Monier Monier-Williams, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary" Etymologically and Philologically Arranged to cognate Indo-European Languages, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 121
  44. https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40167/asura/40167rellinks/Related-Links Encyclopædia Britannica
  45. Don Handelman (2013), One God, Two Goddesses, Three Studies of South Indian Cosmology, Brill Academic,, pp. 23-29
  46. Wendy Doniger (1988), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, Manchester University Press,, p. 67
  47. George Williams (2008), A Handbook of Hindu Mythology, Oxford University Press,, pp. 24-33
  48. Bina Gupta (2011), An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Routledge,, pp. 21-25
  49. Hajime Nakamura (1998), A Comparative History of Ideas, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 26-33
  50. David Kinsley (2005), Hindu Goddesses: Vision of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Traditions, University of California Press,, pp. 6-17, 55-64
  51. David Kinsley (2005), Hindu Goddesses: Vision of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Traditions, University of California Press,, pp. 18, 19
  52. Christopher John Fuller (2004), The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India, Princeton University Press,, p. 41
  53. Wash Edward Hale (1999), Ásura in Early Vedic Religion, Motilal Barnarsidass,, p. 20
  54. Ananda Coomaraswamy (1935), "Angel and Titan: An Essay in Vedic Ontology", Journal of the American Oriental Society, volume 55, pp. 373–418
  55. Nicholas Gier (1995), Hindu Titanism, Philosophy East and West, Volume 45, Number 1, p. 76, see also 73-96
  56. Christopher K Chapple (2010), The Bhagavad Gita: Twenty-fifth–Anniversary Edition, State University of New York Press,, pp. 610-629
  57. Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge,, pp. 437-439
  58. Gregory Bailey (2003), The Study of Hinduism (Editor: Arvind Sharma), The University of South Carolina Press,, p. 139
  59. Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag,, pp. 1-5, 12-21
  60. [Alain Daniélou]
  61. Jonathan Edelmann (2013), Hindu Theology as Churning the Latent, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp. 439-441
  62. William K Mahony (1997), The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination, State University of New York Press,, pp. 17, 27, 32
  63. Nicholas Gier (1995), Hindu Titanism, Philosophy East and West, Volume 45, Number 1, pp. 76-80
  64. Stella Kramrisch and Raymond Burnier (1986), The Hindu Temple, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 75-78
  65. William K Mahony (1997), The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination, State University of New York Press,, pp. 50, 72-73
  66. Jonathan Edelmann (2013), Hindu Theology as Churning the Latent, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp. 440-442
  67. Siroj Sorajjakool, Mark Carr and Julius Nam (2009), World Religions, Routledge,, p. 38
  68. Monier Williams, Sanskrit-English dictionary, Izvara, Sanskrit Digital Lexicon, University of Cologne, Germany
  69. James Lochtefeld, "Ishvara", The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing., p. 306
  70. Dale Riepe (1961, Reprinted 1996), Naturalistic Tradition in Indian Thought, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 177-184, 208-215
  71. Mircea Eliade (2009), Yoga: Immortality and Freedom, Princeton University Press,, pp. 73-76
  72. Ian Whicher, The Integrity of the Yoga Darsana, State University of New York Press,, pp. 82-86
  73. G Oberhammer (1965), Zum problem des Gottesbeweises in der indischen Philosophie, Numen, 12: 1-34
  74. Francis X. Clooney (2010), Hindu God, Christian God: How Reason Helps Break Down the Boundaries, Oxford University Press,, pp. 18-19, 35-39
  75. Klaus Klostermaier (2007), A Survey of Hinduism, Third Edition, State University of New York,, p. 337
  76. FX Clooney (1997), What's a god? The quest for the right understanding of devatā in Brāhmaṅical ritual theory (Mīmāṃsā), International Journal of Hindu Studies, August 1997, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp. 337-385
  77. P. Bilimoria (2001), Hindu doubts about God: Towards Mimamsa Deconstruction, in Philosophy of Religion: Indian Philosophy (Editor: Roy Perrett), Volume 4, Routledge,, pp. 87-106
  78. A Malinar (2014), Current Approaches: Articles on Key Themes, in The Bloomsbury Companion to Hindu Studies (Editor: Jessica Frazier), Bloomsbury Academic,, p. 79
  79. Mike Burley (2012), Classical Samkhya and Yoga - An Indian Metaphysics of Experience, Routledge,, p. 39
  80. Richard Garbe (2013), Die Samkhya-Philosophie, Indische Philosophie Volume 11,, pp. 25-27 (in German)
  81. Knut Jacobsen (2008), Theory and Practice of Yoga: 'Essays in Honour of Gerald James Larson, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 15-16
  82. Orlando Espín and James Nickoloff (2007), An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies, Liturgical Press,, p. 651
  83. Lloyd Pflueger, Person Purity and Power in Yogasutra, in Theory, and Practice of Yoga (Editor: Knut Jacobsen), Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 38-39
  84. Ian Whicher (1999), The Integrity of the Yoga Darsana: A Reconsideration of Classical Yoga, State University of New York Press,, p. 86
  85. JN Mohanty (2001), Explorations in Philosophy, Vol 1 (Editor: Bina Gupta), Oxford University Press, pp. 107-108
  86. Paul Hacker (1978), Eigentumlichkeiten dr Lehre und Terminologie Sankara: Avidya, Namarupa, Maya, Isvara, in Kleine Schriften (Editor: L. Schmithausen), Franz Steiner Verlag, Weisbaden, pp. 101-109 (in German), also pp. 69-99
  87. William Indich (2000), Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta, Motilal Banarsidass,, p. 5
  88. William James (1985), The Varieties of Religious Experience, Harvard University Press,, p. 404 with footnote 28
  89. John Koller (2012), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Editors: Chad Meister, Paul Copan), Routledge,, pp. 99-107
  90. Lance Nelson (1996), Living liberation in Shankara and classical Advaita, in Living Liberation in Hindu Thought (Editors: Andrew O. Fort, Patricia Y. Mumme), State University of New York Press,, pp. 38-39, 59 (footnote 105)
  91. Thomas Padiyath (2014), The Metaphysics of Becoming, De Gruyter,, pp. 155-157
  92. Alain Daniélou (1991), The Myths and Gods of India, Princeton/Bollingen Paperbacks,, pp. 350-354
  93. Serenity Young (2001), Hinduism, Marshall Cavendish,, p. 73
  94. David R Kinsley (1995), Tantric Visions of the Divine Feminine: The Ten Mahāvidyās, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 136-140, 122-128
  95. RT Vyas and Umakant Shah, Studies in Jaina Art and Iconography and Allied Subjects, Abhinav,, pp. 23-26
  96. WJ Wilkins (2003), Hindu Gods and Goddesses, Dover,, pp. 9-10
  97. George Williams (2008), A Handbook of Hindu Mythology, Oxford University Press,, pp. 90, 112
  98. Book: Lynn Foulston, Stuart Abbott. Hindu goddesses: beliefs and practices. 1–3, 40–41. Sussex Academic Press. 9781902210438. 2009.
  99. Jeffrey Brodd (2003), World Religions: A Voyage of Discovery, Saint Mary's Press,, p. 43
  100. Christopher John Fuller (2004), The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India, Princeton University Press,, pp. 30-31, Quote: "Crucial in Hindu polytheism is the relationship between the deities and humanity. Unlike Jewish, Christian and Islamic monotheism, predicated on the otherness of God and either his total separation from man and his singular incarnation, Hinduism postulates no absolute distinction between deities and human beings. The idea that all deities are truly one is, moreover, easily extended to proclaim that all human beings are in reality also forms of one supreme deity - Brahman, the Absolute of philosophical Hinduism. In practice, this abstract monist doctrine rarely belongs to an ordinary Hindu's statements, but examples of permeability between the divine and human can be easily found in popular Hinduism in many unremarkable contexts".
  101. Jeaneane D Fowler (1996), Hinduism: Beliefs and Practices, Sussex Academic Press,, pp. 41-45
  102. Gopinath Rao, Elements of Hindu Iconography Madras, Cornell University Archives, pp. 17-39
  103. Stella Kramrisch (1994), The Presence of Siva, Princeton University Press,, pp. 179-187
  104. Michael Willis (2009), The Archaeology of Hindu Ritual, Cambridge University Press,, pp. 96-112, 123-143, 168-172
  105. Heather Elgood (2000), Hinduism and the Religious Arts, Bloomsbury Academic,, pp. 14-15, 32-36
  106. Harold Coward and David Goa (2008), Mantra: 'Hearing the Divine In India and America, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 25-30
  107. James Lochtefeld (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M, The Rosen Publishing Group,, p. 726
  108. Book: Flood, Gavin D.. The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism. Wiley-Blackwell. 2002. 978-0-631-21535-6. 6–7.
  109. Paul Courtright (1985), in Gods of Flesh/Gods of Stone (Joanne Punzo Waghorne, Norman Cutler, and Vasudha Narayanan, eds),, Columbia University Press, see Chapter 2
  110. Book: Gale Encyclopedia of Religion. 7493–7495. Lindsay Jones. Thomson Gale. 2005. 11. 0-02-865980-5.
  111. Book: Willis, Michael D. . The Archaeology of Hindu Ritual . Cambridge University Press. 2009 . 2: 6.
  112. Michael D. . Willis . The Formation of Temple Ritual in the Gupta Period: pūjā and pañcamahāyajña . Prajñādhara: Gouriswar Bhattacharya Felicitation Volume, Edited by Gerd Mevissen . Gerd Mevissen . 2008 .
  113. https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/483030/puja Puja
  114. Hiro G. Badlani (2008), Hinduism: A path of ancient wisdom,, pp. 315-318
  115. Paul Thieme (1984), "Indische Wörter und Sitten", in Kleine Schriften, Vol. 2, pp. 343–370
  116. James Lochtefeld (2002), Puja in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Volume 2, Rosen Publishing,, pp. 529–530
  117. [Diana L. Eck]
  118. [Diana L. Eck]
  119. Jonathan Lee and Kathleen Nadeau (2010), Encyclopedia of Asian American Folklore and Folklife, Volume 1, ABC,, pp. 480-481
  120. Jean Holm and John Bowker (1998), Worship, Bloomsbury Academic,, p. 83, Quote: "Temples are the permanent residence of a deity and daily worship is performed by the priest, but the majority of Hindus visit temples only on special occasions. Worship in temples is wholly optional for them".
  121. [Julius J. Lipner]
  122. Book: Lipner, Julius . Hindu images and their worship with special reference to Vaisnavism: a philosophical-theological inquiry . 2017 . Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group . 978-1-138-29113-3 . Routledge Hindu studies series . London ; New York . 152-153.
  123. David Lawrence (2012), The Routledge Companion to Theism (Editors: Charles Taliaferro, Victoria S. Harrison and Stewart Goetz), Routledge,, pp. 78-79
  124. Guy Beck (2005), Alternative Krishnas: Regional and Vernacular Variations on a Hindu Deity, SUNY Press,, pp. 1-2
  125. Book: What is Hinduism? . Himalayan Academy . 2007 . 9781934145272 . 16 October 2011.
  126. Andrew J Nicholson (2013), Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History, Columbia University Press,, pp. 167-168
  127. Jan Gonda (1969), The Hindu Trinity, Anthropos, 63/64, 1/2, pp. 212-226
  128. GM Bailey (1979), Trifunctional Elements in the Mythology of the Hindu Trimūrti, Numen, Vol. 26, Fasc. 2, pp. 152-163
  129. James G. Lochtefeld, Guna, in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M, Vol. 1, Rosen Publishing,, p. 265
  130. Rudolf V D'Souza (1996), The Bhagavadgītā and St. John of the Cross, Gregorian University,, pp. 340-342
  131. James Lochtefeld (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-M, The Rosen Publishing Group,, pp. 72-73
  132. 10.1353/pew.2002.0005. Sheth. Noel. Jan 2002. Hindu Avatāra and Christian Incarnation: A Comparison. Philosophy East and West. University of Hawai'i Press . 52. 1 (Jan. 2002). 98–125. 1400135. 170278631.
  133. Book: Matchett, Freda. Krishna, Lord or Avatara?: the relationship between Krishna and Vishnu. 9780700712816. 2001. 4 . 978-0-7007-1281-6.
  134. [Christopher Hugh Partridge]
  135. Book: Kinsley, David. Gale's Encyclopedia of Religion. Lindsay Jones. Thomson Gale. 2005. Second. 2. 707–708. 0-02-865735-7.
  136. Book: Bryant, Edwin Francis. Krishna: A Sourcebook. Oxford University Press . 2007. 18 . 978-0-19-514891-6.
  137. Book: Laser, Tammy . Gods & Goddesses of Ancient India . 2014-07-15 . The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc . 978-1-62275-390-1 . 18 . en.
  138. Book: Hawley, John Stratton. Vasudha Narayanan. The life of Hinduism. University of California Press. 2006. 174. 978-0-520-24914-1.
  139. David Kinsley (1988), Hindu Goddesses: Vision of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Traditions, University of California Press,, pp. 45-48, 96-97
  140. Sally Kempton (2013), Awakening Shakti: The Transformative Power of the Goddesses of Yoga,, pp. 165-167
  141. Eva Rudy Jansen, The Book of Hindu Imagery: Gods, Manifestations and Their Meaning, Holland: Binkey Kok,, pp. 133-134, 41
  142. Hariani Santiko (1997), The Goddess Durgā in the East-Javanese Period, Asian Folklore Studies, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 209-226
  143. R. Ghose (1966), Saivism in Indonesia during the Hindu-Javanese period, The University of Hong Kong Press, pages 15-17
  144. Jiro Takei and Marc P Keane (2001), SAKUTEIKI, Tuttle,, p. 101
  145. Miyeko Murase (1975), Japanese Art: Selections from the Mary and Jackson Burke Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York),, p. 31
  146. M Chakravarti (1995), The concept of Rudra-Śiva through the ages, Motilal Banarsidass,, pp. 148-149
  147. Robert Paine and Alexander Soper (1992), The Art and Architecture of Japan, Yale University Press,, p. 60
  148. Joe Cribb (1999), Magic Coins of Java, Bali and the Malay Peninsula, British Museum Press,, p. 77
  149. Jonathan Lee, Fumitaka Matsuoka et al. (2015), Asian American Religious Cultures, ABC,, p. 892
  150. Kinsley, David (1988), Hindu Goddesses: Vision of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Traditions, University of California Press,, pp. 94-97
  151. Francine Brinkgreve (1997), Offerings to Durga and Pretiwi in Bali, Asian Folklore Studies Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 227-251