| Litigants: | Hills and Co. v. Hoover |
| Arguedatea: | March 15 |
| Arguedateb: | 16 |
| Argueyear: | 1911 |
| Decidedate: | April 3 |
| Decideyear: | 1911 |
| Fullname: | Hills and Company, Limited v. Hoover |
| Usvol: | 220 |
| Uspage: | 329 |
| Parallelcitations: | 31 S. Ct. 402; 55 L. Ed. 485 |
| Holding: | The owner of a copyright is restricted to a single action against another to find, seize, and seek penalties for allegedly infringing copies of a work. |
| Majority: | Day |
| Joinmajority: | unanimous |
Hills and Co. v. Hoover, 220 U.S. 329 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the owner of a copyright is restricted to a single action against another to find, seize, and seek penalties for allegedly infringing copies of a work.[1]