Hierarchy of the sciences explained

Hierarchy of the sciences should not be confused with Hard and soft science.

The hierarchy of the sciences is a theory formulated by Auguste Comte in the 19th century. This theory states that science develops over time beginning with the simplest and most general scientific discipline, astronomy, which is the first to reach the "positive stage" (one of three in Comte's law of three stages). As one moves up the "hierarchy", this theory further states that sciences become more complex and less general, and that they will reach the positive stage later. Disciplines further up the hierarchy are said to depend more on the developments of their predecessors; the highest discipline on the hierarchy are the social sciences.[1] [2] According to this theory, there are higher levels of consensus and faster rates of advancement in physics and other natural sciences than there are in the social sciences.[3] __TOC__

Evidence

Research has shown that, after controlling for the number of hypotheses being tested, positive results are 2.3 times more likely in the social sciences than in the physical sciences.[4] It has also been found that the degree of scientific consensus is highest in the physical sciences, lowest in the social sciences, and intermediate in the biological sciences.[5] Dean Simonton argues that a composite measure of the scientific status of disciplines ranks psychology much closer to biology than to sociology.[6]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Comte - The Work - Hierarchy of the Sciences . media.pfeiffer.edu . 2018-05-06 . 2018-03-03 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180303212524/http://media.pfeiffer.edu/lridener/DSS/Comte/COMTEW4.HTML . dead .
  2. Encyclopedia: Bourdeau . Michel . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . 2018-05-08 . 2019-06-21 . live . Auguste Comte . 4.2 The classification of the sciences and philosophy of science . https://web.archive.org/web/20190621002903/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/comte/ .
  3. Cole . Stephen . July 1983 . The Hierarchy of the Sciences? . American Journal of Sociology . en . 89 . 1 . 111–139 . 10.1086/227835 . 144920176 . 0002-9602.
  4. Fanelli . Daniele . 2010-04-07 . "Positive" Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences . PLOS ONE . en . 5 . 4 . e10068 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0010068 . 2850928 . 20383332. 2010PLoSO...510068F . free .
  5. Fanelli . Daniele . Glänzel . Wolfgang . 2013-06-26 . Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences . PLOS ONE . en . 8 . 6 . e66938 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0066938 . 3694152 . 23840557. 2013PLoSO...866938F . free .
  6. Simonton . Dean Keith . 2004 . Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement Within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences. . Review of General Psychology . en . 8 . 1 . 59–67 . 10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59. 145134072 .