In physics, the Heisenberg picture or Heisenberg representation[1] is a formulation (largely due to Werner Heisenberg in 1925) of quantum mechanics in which the operators (observables and others) incorporate a dependency on time, but the state vectors are time-independent, an arbitrary fixed basis rigidly underlying the theory.
It stands in contrast to the Schrödinger picture in which the operators are constant and the states evolve in time. The two pictures only differ by a basis change with respect to time-dependency, which corresponds to the difference between active and passive transformations. The Heisenberg picture is the formulation of matrix mechanics in an arbitrary basis, in which the Hamiltonian is not necessarily diagonal.
It further serves to define a third, hybrid, picture, the interaction picture.
In the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics the state vectors |ψ⟩ do not change with time, while observables satisfywhere "H" and "S" label observables in Heisenberg and Schrödinger picture respectively, is the Hamiltonian and denotes the commutator of two operators (in this case and). Taking expectation values automatically yields the Ehrenfest theorem, featured in the correspondence principle.
By the Stone–von Neumann theorem, the Heisenberg picture and the Schrödinger picture are unitarily equivalent, just a basis change in Hilbert space. In some sense, the Heisenberg picture is more natural and convenient than the equivalent Schrödinger picture, especially for relativistic theories. Lorentz invariance is manifest in the Heisenberg picture, since the state vectors do not single out the time or space.
This approach also has a more direct similarity to classical physics: by simply replacing the commutator above by the Poisson bracket, the Heisenberg equation reduces to an equation in Hamiltonian mechanics.
For the sake of pedagogy, the Heisenberg picture is introduced here from the subsequent, but more familiar, Schrödinger picture.
According to Schrödinger's equation, the quantum state at time
t
|\psi(t)\rangle=U(t)|\psi(0)\rangle
U(t)=T
| |||||||||||
e |
(s)}
H\rm(t)
|\psi(0)\rangle
T
A\rm(t)
|\psi(t)\rangle
In the Heisenberg picture, the quantum state is assumed to remain constant at its initial value
|\psi(0)\rangle
\langleA\ranglet=\langle\psi(0)|A\rm(t)|\psi(0)\rangle
H\rm(t)
H\rm(t)
H\rm
H\rm\equivH\rm\equivH
U(t)
H
Furthermore, if
A{\rm
d | |
dt |
A\rm(t)=
i | |
\hbar |
[H,A\rm(t)],
where
A{\rm
A similar relation also holds for classical mechanics, the classical limit of the above, given by the correspondence between Poisson brackets and commutators:In classical mechanics, for an A with no explicit time dependence, so again the expression for A(t) is the Taylor expansion around t = 0.
In effect, the initial state of the quantum system has receded from view, and is only considered at the final step of taking specific expectation values or matrix elements of observables that evolved in time according to the Heisenberg equation of motion. A similar analysis applies if the initial state is mixed.
The time evolved state
|\psi(t)\rangle
|\psi\rm(t)\rangle
|\psi\rm(t)\rangle
Commutator relations may look different than in the Schrödinger picture, because of the time dependence of operators. For example, consider the operators and . The time evolution of those operators depends on the Hamiltonian of the system. Considering the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator,the evolution of the position and momentum operators is given by:
Note that the Hamiltonian is time independent and hence
x(t),p(t)
Direct computation yields the more general commutator relations,
For
t1=t2
For a time-independent Hamiltonian HS, where H0,S is the free Hamiltonian,