Heisenberg's microscope is a thought experiment proposed by Werner Heisenberg that has served as the nucleus of some commonly held ideas about quantum mechanics. In particular, it provides an argument for the uncertainty principle on the basis of the principles of classical optics.
The concept was criticized by Heisenberg's mentor Niels Bohr, and theoretical and experimental developments have suggested that Heisenberg's intuitive explanation of his mathematical result might be misleading.[1] [2] While the act of measurement does lead to uncertainty, the loss of precision is less than that predicted by Heisenberg's argument when measured at the level of an individual state. The formal mathematical result remains valid, however, and the original intuitive argument has also been vindicated mathematically when the notion of disturbance is expanded to be independent of any specific state.[3] [4]
Heisenberg supposes that an electron is like a classical particle, moving in the
x
\varepsilon
λ
\Deltax=
| λ | |
| \sin\varepsilon |
.
An observer perceives an image of the particle because the light rays strike the particle and bounce back through the microscope to the observer's eye. We know from experimental evidence that when a photon strikes an electron, the latter has a Compton recoil with momentum proportional to
h/λ
h
x
\Deltapx ≈
| h | |
| λ |
\sin\varepsilon.
Combining the relations for
\Deltax
\Deltapx
\Deltax\Deltapx ≈ \left(
| λ | |
| \sin\varepsilon |
\right)\left(
| h | |
| λ |
\sin\varepsilon\right)=h
which is an approximate expression of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
Although the thought experiment was formulated as an introduction to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, one of the pillars of modern physics, it attacks the very premises under which it was constructed, thereby contributing to the development of an area of physics—namely, quantum mechanics—that redefined the terms under which the original thought experiment was conceived.
Some interpretations of quantum mechanics question whether an electron actually has a determinate position before it is disturbed by the measurement used to establish said determinate position. Under the Copenhagen interpretation, an electron has some probability of showing up at any point in the universe, though the probability that it will be far from where one expects becomes very low at great distances from the neighborhood in which it is originally found. In other words, the "position" of an electron can only be stated in terms of a probability distribution, as can predictions of where it may move.