Hazen–Williams equation explained

The Hazen–Williams equation is an empirical relationship which relates the flow of water in a pipe with the physical properties of the pipe and the pressure drop caused by friction. It is used in the design of water pipe systems[1] such as fire sprinkler systems,[2] water supply networks, and irrigation systems. It is named after Allen Hazen and Gardner Stewart Williams.

The Hazen–Williams equation has the advantage that the coefficient C is not a function of the Reynolds number, but it has the disadvantage that it is only valid for water. Also, it does not account for the temperature or viscosity of the water,[3] and therefore is only valid at room temperature and conventional velocities.[4]

General form

Henri Pitot discovered that the velocity of a fluid was proportional to the square root of its head in the early 18th century. It takes energy to push a fluid through a pipe, and Antoine de Chézy discovered that the hydraulic head loss was proportional to the velocity squared.[5] Consequently, the Chézy formula relates hydraulic slope S (head loss per unit length) to the fluid velocity V and hydraulic radius R:

V=C\sqrt{RS}=CR0.5S0.5

The variable C expresses the proportionality, but the value of C is not a constant. In 1838 and 1839, Gotthilf Hagen and Jean Léonard Marie Poiseuille independently determined a head loss equation for laminar flow, the Hagen–Poiseuille equation. Around 1845, Julius Weisbach and Henry Darcy developed the Darcy–Weisbach equation.

The Darcy-Weisbach equation was difficult to use because the friction factor was difficult to estimate. In 1906, Hazen and Williams provided an empirical formula that was easy to use. The general form of the equation relates the mean velocity of water in a pipe with the geometric properties of the pipe and slope of the energy line.

V=kCR0.63S0.54

where:

The equation is similar to the Chézy formula but the exponents have been adjusted to better fit data from typical engineering situations. A result of adjusting the exponents is that the value of C appears more like a constant over a wide range of the other parameters.[6]

The conversion factor k was chosen so that the values for C were the same as in the Chézy formula for the typical hydraulic slope of S=0.001. The value of k is 0.001−0.04.

Typical C factors used in design, which take into account some increase in roughness as pipe ages are as follows:

Material C Factor low C Factor high Reference
140 140 -
Cast iron new 130 130
Cast iron 10 years 107 113
Cast iron 20 years 89 100
140 140
100 140
130 140
90 110
120 120
140 140
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 150 150
Fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) 150 150

Pipe equation

The general form can be specialized for full pipe flows. Taking the general form

V=kCR0.63S0.54

and exponentiating each side by gives (rounding exponents to 3–4 decimals)

V1.852=k1.852C1.852R1.167S

Rearranging gives

S={V1.852\overk1.852C1.852R1.167

} The flow rate, so

S={V1.852A1.852\overk1.852C1.852R1.167A1.852

} = The hydraulic radius (which is different from the geometric radius) for a full pipe of geometric diameter is ; the pipe's cross sectional area is, so

S={41.16741.852Q1.852\over\pi1.852k1.852C1.852d1.167d3.7034

}= = =

U.S. customary units (Imperial)

When used to calculate the pressure drop using the US customary units system, the equation is:[7]

Spsi per foot=

Pd
L

=

4.52 Q1.852
C1.852d4.8704

where:

Note: Caution with U S Customary Units is advised. The equation for head loss in pipes, also referred to as slope, S, expressed in "feet per foot of length" vs. in 'psi per foot of length' as described above, with the inside pipe diameter, d, being entered in feet vs. inches, and the flow rate, Q, being entered in cubic feet per second, cfs, vs. gallons per minute, gpm, appears very similar. However, the constant is 4.73 vs. the 4.52 constant as shown above in the formula as arranged by NFPA for sprinkler system design. The exponents and the Hazen-Williams "C" values are unchanged.

SI units

When used to calculate the head loss with the International System of Units, the equation will then become

[8]

S=

hf
L

=

10.67 Q1.852
C1.852d4.8704

where:

Note: pressure drop can be computed from head loss as hf × the unit weight of water (e.g., 9810 N/m3 at 4 deg C)

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Hazen–Williams Formula . 2008-12-06 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20080822051759/http://docs.bentley.com/en/HMFlowMaster/FlowMasterHelp-06-05.html . 22 August 2008 .
  2. Web site: Hazen–Williams equation in fire protection systems. 27 January 2009. Canute LLP. 2009-01-27 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130406095047/http://www.canutesoft.com/index.php/Basic-Hydraulics-for-fire-protection-engineers/Hazen-Williams-formula-for-use-in-fire-sprinkler-systems.html . 2013-04-06.
  3. Book: Brater . Ernest F. . King . Horace W. . Lindell . James E. . Wei . C. Y. . Handbook of Hydraulics . McGraw Hill . New York . 1996 . Seventh . 6.29 . 6 . 0-07-007247-7.
  4. Book: Pumping station design. 2006. Butterworth-Heinemann. Jones, Garr M.. 978-0-08-094106-6. 3rd. Burlington, MA. 3.4. 144609617.
  5. , p. 112.
  6. , stating "Exponents can be selected, however, representing approximate average conditions, so that the value of c for a given condition of surface will vary so little as to be practically constant."
  7. 2007 version of NFPA 13: Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, page 13-213, eqn 22.4.2.1
  8. Web site: Comparison of Pipe Flow Equations and Head Losses in Fittings . 2008-12-06 . 21 January 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220121124350/http://rpitt.eng.ua.edu/Class/Water%20Resources%20Engineering/M3e%20Comparison%20of%20methods.pdf . dead .