Harpegnathos Explained

Harpegnathos is a small ponerine genus of ants found in South and Southeast Asia. They are notable for their jumping ability, complex colony structure, and large to very large workers easily identifiable by their long mandibles and large eyes.

Taxonomy

The genus was established by Thomas C. Jerdon in 1851 to house the single species Harpegnathos saltator, found in India. Believing that the name was unavailable due to homonymy, Smith (1858) incorrectly erected the unnecessary replacement name Drepanognathus (now a synonym of Harpegnathos). For some time, both names were used in publications by other authors until the original name was restored. The most recent species was described in 1963, making the total number of Harpegnathos species seven, with an additional four described subspecies. The genus is closely related to the other genera in its tribe, Ponerini, and is probably a sister to all Ponerini.

Multifunctional mandibles

The ant's mandible exhibits spatially-dependent morphology and bi-axial kinematics, which collectively allows it to perform various daily labors from hunting and attacking to carefully caring for ant eggs.[1] Regarding the spatially-dependent morphology, at the distal-to-middle part, the mandible has double-rowed, non-parallel teeth responsible for powerful clamping. At the proximal part, the mandible has a smooth concavity that is solely used for gently gripping ant eggs.[2] On the other hand, the mandible rotates about two orthogonal axes, changing the mandibular distance and configuration simultaneously.[3] The spatially-dependent morphology and bi-axial kinematics endow the ant mandible multifunctionality.

Hunting behavior

Harpegnathos is an extremely distinctive genus appearance-wise, being very reminiscent of the Myrmecia found in Australia. Like Myrmecia, Harpegnathos has very large eyes, since both hunt mostly by vision and do not lay down pheromone trails like most other ants.[4] Also like Myrmecia, they have large jaws since, owing to their lack of pheromone signals, workers are solitary hunters and must carry food back to the nest in their jaws since they also lack a social stomach.[5]

Colony structure

Harpegnathos has a complex and different colony structure compared to other genera. In the beginning, young winged queens fly out from their natal colony, mate with foreign males and start new colonies independently. What differs from other ants is that, once the short-lived founding queen dies, several daughter workers replace her as reproductives in the colony. Characteristic of several ponerine species, workers can mate (almost always with foreign males) and store sperm in the spermatheca.

In H. saltator, many young workers inbreed with males from the same colony (their brothers). They fight to establish a dominance hierarchy, and a few high-ranking workers become reproductives and lay eggs, so-called gamergates. Every year, new winged queens are reared, and they disperse and start the process again. The combination of queen and gamergate reproduction results in an increased lifespan of colonies, in theory making them immortal.

Species

External links

Notes and References

  1. Wei . Zhang . Multifunctional mandibles of ants: Variation in gripping behavior facilitated by specific microstructures and kinematics . Journal of Insect Physiology . 2020 . 120 . 103993 . 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2019.103993 . 31836493 . 209358666 .
  2. Wei . Zhang . et . al. . A mathematical modeling method elucidating the integrated gripping performance of ant mandibles and bio-inspired grippers . Journal of Bionic Engineering . 2020 . 17 . 4 . 732–746 . 10.1007/s42235-020-0065-9 . 220503041 .
  3. Wei . Zhang . et . al. . Double-rowed teeth: design specialization of the H. venator ants for enhanced tribological stability . Bioinspiration & Biomimetics . 2021 . 16 . 5 . 055003 . 10.1088/1748-3190/ac124a . 34233306 . 235768522 .
  4. Functional characterization of odorant receptors in the ponerine ant, Harpegnathos saltator . Jesse D. . Slone . Gregory M. . Pask . Stephen T. . Ferguson . Jocelyn G. . Millar . Shelley L. . Berger . Danny . Reinberg . Jürgen . Liebig . Anandasankar . Ray . Laurence J. . Zwiebel . PNAS . 114 . 32 . 8586–859 . 2017 . 10.1073/pnas.1704647114 . free . 28696298 . en. 5559025 . 2017PNAS..114.8586S .
  5. Smaller Brains and Optic Lobes in Reproductive Workers of the Ant Harpegnathos . Gronenberg . W. . Liebig . J. . Naturwissenschaften . 86 . 343–345 . 1999 . 7 . 10.1007/s001140050631 . 1999NW.....86..343G . 41170361 . en.
  6. General . D.E.M. . 2016 . A review of the ant genus Harpegnathos Jerdon, 1851 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Philippines, with the description of two new species . Halteres . 7 . 99–105.