In mathematics, the Gromov boundary of a δ-hyperbolic space (especially a hyperbolic group) is an abstract concept generalizing the boundary sphere of hyperbolic space. Conceptually, the Gromov boundary is the set of all points at infinity. For instance, the Gromov boundary of the real line is two points, corresponding to positive and negative infinity.
There are several equivalent definitions of the Gromov boundary of a geodesic and proper δ-hyperbolic space. One of the most common uses equivalence classes of geodesic rays.
Pick some point
O
X
\gamma:[0,infty) → X
\gamma([0,t])
O
\gamma(t)
Two geodesics
\gamma1,\gamma2
K
d(\gamma1(t),\gamma2(t))\leqK
t
\gamma
[\gamma]
The Gromov boundary of a geodesic and proper hyperbolic metric space
X
\partialX=\{[\gamma]|\gamma
X\}
It is useful to use the Gromov product of three points. The Gromov product of three points
x,y,z
(x,y)z=1/2(d(x,z)+d(y,z)-d(x,y))
z
x
y
z
x
y
Given a point
p
V(p,r)=\{q\in\partialX|
\gamma1,\gamma2
[\gamma1]=p,[\gamma2]=q
\liminfs,t → (\gamma1(s),\gamma2(t))O\geqr\}
These open sets are just the set of geodesic rays which follow one fixed geodesic ray up to a distance
r
This topology makes the Gromov boundary into a compact metrizable space.
The number of ends of a hyperbolic group is the number of components of the Gromov boundary.
The Gromov boundary is a quasi-isometry invariant; that is, if two Gromov-hyperbolic metric spaces are quasi-isometric, then the quasi-isometry between them induces a homeomorphism between their boundaries. This is important because homeomorphisms of compact spaces are much easier to understand than quasi-isometries of spaces.
This invariance allows to define the Gromov boundary of a Gromov-hyperbolic group: if
G
G
For a complete CAT(0) space X, the visual boundary of X, like the Gromov boundary of δ-hyperbolic space, consists of equivalence class of asymptotic geodesic rays. However, the Gromov product cannot be used to define a topology on it. For example, in the case of a flat plane, any two geodesic rays issuing from a point not heading in opposite directions will have infinite Gromov product with respect to that point. The visual boundary is instead endowed with the cone topology. Fix a point o in X. Any boundary point can be represented by a unique geodesic ray issuing from o. Given a ray
\gamma
[\gamma]
U(\gamma,t,r)=\{[\gamma1]\in\partialX|\gamma1(0)=o,d(\gamma1(t),\gamma(t))<r\}.
If X is proper, then the visual boundary with the cone topology is compact. When X is both CAT(0) and proper geodesic δ-hyperbolic space, the cone topology coincides with the topology of Gromov boundary.
See main article: Cannon's conjecture. Cannon's conjecture concerns the classification of groups with a 2-sphere at infinity:
Cannon's conjecture: Every Gromov hyperbolic group with a 2-sphere at infinity acts geometrically on hyperbolic 3-space.
The analog to this conjecture is known to be true for 1-spheres and false for spheres of all dimension greater than 2.