Grigorchuk group explained

In the mathematical area of group theory, the Grigorchuk group or the first Grigorchuk group is a finitely generated group constructed by Rostislav Grigorchuk that provided the first example of a finitely generated group of intermediate (that is, faster than polynomial but slower than exponential) growth. The group was originally constructed by Grigorchuk in a 1980 paper and he then proved in a 1984 paper that this group has intermediate growth, thus providing an answer to an important open problem posed by John Milnor in 1968. The Grigorchuk group remains a key object of study in geometric group theory, particularly in the study of the so-called branch groups and automata groups, and it has important connections with the theory of iterated monodromy groups.^[1]

History and significance

The growth of a finitely generated group measures the asymptotics, as

n \to inf ty of the size of an n-ball in the Cayley graph of the group (that is, the number of elements of G that can be expressed as words of length at most n in the generating set of G). The study of growth rates of finitely generated groups goes back to the 1950s and is motivated in part by the notion of volume entropy (that is, the growth rate of the volume of balls) in the universal covering space of a compact Riemannian manifold in differential geometry. It is obvious that the growth rate of a finitely generated group is at most exponential and it was also understood early on that finitely generated nilpotent groups have polynomial growth. In 1968 John Milnor posed a question^[2] about the existence of a finitely generated group of intermediate growth, that is, faster than any polynomial function and slower than any exponential function. An important result in the subject is Gromov's theorem on groups of polynomial growth, obtained by Gromov in 1981, which shows that a finitely generated group has polynomial growth if and only if this group has a nilpotent subgroup of finite index. Prior to Grigorchuk's work, there were many results establishing growth dichotomy (that is, that the growth is always either polynomial or exponential) for various classes of finitely generated groups, such as linear groups, solvable groups,^{[3] [4]} etc.

Grigorchuk's group G was constructed in a 1980 paper of Rostislav Grigorchuk,^[5] where he proved that this group is infinite, periodic and residually finite. In a subsequent 1984 paper^[6] Grigorchuk proved that this group has intermediate growth (this result was announced by Grigorchuk in 1983).^[7] More precisely, he proved that G has growth b(n) that is faster than

\exp(\sqrt n) but slower than \exp(n ^{s)} where s =log _{32} 31 ≈ 0 . 991 . The upper bound was later improved by Laurent Bartholdi^[8] tos = (log2)/(log2-logη) ≈ 0 . 7674 , η ^{3+η} ^{2+η=2.}

A lower bound of

\exp(n ^{0.504} ) was proved by Yurii Leonov.^[9] The precise asymptotics of the growth of G is still unknown. It is conjectured that the limit\lim _{n\to} log _{n} log b(n),

exists but even this remained a major open problem. This problem was resolved in 2020 by Anna Erschler and Tianyi Zheng.^[10] They show that the limit equals

s .

Grigorchuk's group was also the first example of a group that is amenable but not elementary amenable, thus answering a problem posed by Mahlon Marsh Day in 1957.^[11]

Originally, Grigorchuk's group G was constructed as a group of Lebesgue-measure-preserving transformations on the unit interval, but subsequently simpler descriptions of G were found and it is now usually presented as a group of automorphisms of the infinite regular binary rooted tree. The study of Grigorchuk's group informed in large part the development of the theory of branch groups, automata groups and self-similar groups in the 1990s - 2000s and Grigorchuk's group remains a central object in this theory. Recently important connections between this theory and complex dynamics, particularly the notion of iterated monodromy groups, have been uncovered in the work of Volodymyr Nekrashevych,^[12] and others.

After Grigorchuk's 1984 paper, there were many subsequent extensions and generalizations.^{[13] [14] [15] [16]}

Definition

Although initially the Grigorchuk group was defined as a group of Lebesgue measure-preserving transformations of the unit interval, at present this group is usually given by its realization as a group of automorphisms of the infinite regular binary rooted tree . The tree is the set of all finite strings in the alphabet , including the empty string , which roots . For a vertex  of the string is the left child of and the string is the right child of in . The group of all automorphisms  can thus be thought of as the group of all length-preserving permutations  of that also respect the initial segment relation: whenever a string  is an initial segment of a string  then is an initial segment of .

The Grigorchuk group  is the subgroup of generated by four specific elements of defined as follows (note that is fixed by any tree-automorphism): $$G\; =\; \backslash langle\; a,\; b,\; c,\; d\; \backslash rangle\; \backslash leq\; \backslash text(T\_2)\backslash text$$ where $$a(0)\; =\; 1\backslash text\; \backslash qquad\; a(1)\; =\; 0\backslash text\; \backslash qquad\; \backslash forall\; x\; \backslash in\; \backslash Sigma^*\backslash quad\; \backslash begin\; a(0x)\; =\; 1x\; \backslash \backslash \; a(1x)\; =0x\; \backslash end$$ and

Only the element is defined explicitly; it swaps the child trees of . The elements,, and are defined through a mutual recursion.

To understand the effect of the latter operations, consider the rightmost branch  of, which begins . As a branch, is order-isomorphic to

N . The original tree can be obtained by rooting a tree isomorphic to at each element of ; conversely, one can decompose into isomorphic subtrees indexed by elements of B \cong N .

The operations,, and all respect this decomposition: they fix each element of and act as automorphisms on each indexed subtree. When acts, it fixes every subtree with index, but acts as on the rest. Likewise, when acts, it fixes only the subtrees of index ; and fixes those of index .

A compact notation for these operations is as follows: let the left (resp. right) branch of be (resp.), so that $$a(T\_L)\; \backslash subseteq\; T\_R,\; \backslash quad\; a(T\_R)\; \backslash subseteq\; T\_L\backslash text$$ We write to mean that acts as on and as on . Thus Similarly $$aba\; =\; (c,\; a),\; \backslash quad\; aca\; =\; (d,\; a),\; \backslash quad\; ada\; =\; (b,\; \backslash text)\backslash text$$ where is the identity function.

Properties

The following are basic algebraic properties of the Grigorchuk group (see^[17] for proofs):

• The group G is infinite.^[6]
• The group G is residually finite.^[6] Let

\rho _{n} : G \to Aut (T[n]) be the restriction homomorphism that sends every element of G to its restriction to the first levels of . The groups Aut(T[''n'']) are finite and for every nontrivial g in G there exists n such that \rho _{n} (g) ≠ 1 .

• The group G is generated by a and any two of the three elements b,c,d. For example, we can write

G = \langle a, b, c\rangle.

• The elements a, b, c, d are involutions.
• The elements b, c, d pairwise commute and bc = cb = d, bd = db = c, dc = cd = b, so that

\langle b, c, d \rangle \leqslant G is an abelian group of order 4 isomorphic to the direct product of two cyclic groups of order 2.

• Combining the previous two properties we see that every element of G can be written as a (positive) word in a, b, c, d such that this word does not contain any subwords of the form aa, bb, cc, dd, cd, dc, bc, cb, bd, db. Such words are called reduced.
• The group G is a 2-group, that is, every element in G has finite order that is a power of 2.^[5]
• The group G is periodic (as a 2-group) and not locally finite (as it is finitely generated). As such, it is a counterexample to the Burnside problem.
• The group G has intermediate growth.^[6]
• The group G is amenable but not elementary amenable.^[6]
• The group G is just infinite, that is G is infinite but every proper quotient group of G is finite.
• The group G has the congruence subgroup property: a subgroup H has finite index in G if and only if there is a positive integer n such that

\ker(\rho _{n)} \leqslant H.

• The group G has solvable subgroup membership problem, that is, there is an algorithm that, given arbitrary words w, u₁, ..., u_n decides whether or not w represents an element of the subgroup generated by u₁, ..., u_n.
• The group G is subgroup separable, that is, every finitely generated subgroup is closed in the pro-finite topology on G.^[18]
• Every maximal subgroup of G has finite index in G.^[19]
• The group G is finitely generated but not finitely presentable.^{[6] [20]}
• The stabilizer of the level one vertices in

T _{2} in G (the subgroup of elements that act as identity on the strings 0 and 1), is generated by the following elements:G _{\{0,} } = \langle b, c, d, aba, aca, ada \rangle.G _{\{0,} } is a normal subgroup of index 2 in G and G = G _{\{0,} } \sqcup a G_.

• A reduced word represents an element of

G _{\{0,} }if and only if this word involves an even number of occurrences of a.

• If w is a reduced word in G with a positive even number of occurrences of a, then there exist words u, v (not necessarily reduced) such that:

w = (u,v) and \begin{cases} |u|, |v| \leqslant \tfrac{ 1 }{ 2 } |w| & |w| odd \ |u|, |v| \leqslant \tfrac{ 1 }{ 2 } (|w| +1 ) & |w| even \end{cases}

This is sometimes called the contraction property. It plays a key role in many proofs regarding G since it allows to use inductive arguments on the length of a word.

• The group G has solvable word problem and solvable conjugacy problem (consequence of the contraction property).

See also

• Geometric group theory
• Growth of finitely generated groups
• Amenable groups
• Iterated monodromy group
• Non-commutative cryptography

External links

• Rostislav Grigorchuk and Igor Pak, Groups of Intermediate Growth: an Introduction for Beginners, preprint, 2006, arXiv

Notes and References

1. Volodymyr Nekrashevych. Self-similar groups. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 117. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005. .
2. John Milnor, Problem No. 5603, American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 75 (1968), pp. 685 - 686.
3. [John Milnor]
4. Joseph Rosenblatt. Invariant Measures and Growth Conditions, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 193 (1974), pp. 33 - 53.
5. R. I. Grigorchuk. On Burnside's problem on periodic groups. (Russian) Funktsionalyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya, vol. 14 (1980), no. 1, pp. 53 - 54.
6. R. I. Grigorchuk, Degrees of growth of finitely generated groups and the theory of invariant means. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya. vol. 48 (1984), no. 5, pp. 939 - 985.
7. Grigorchuk . R. I. . 1983 . ru:К проблеме Милнора о групповом росте . On the Milnor problem of group growth . Russian . . 271 . 1 . 30–33.
8. Laurent Bartholdi. Lower bounds on the growth of a group acting on the binary rooted tree. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, vol. 11 (2001), no. 1, pp. 73 - 88.
9. Yu. G. Leonov, On a lower bound for the growth of a 3-generator 2-group. Matematicheskii Sbornik, vol. 192 (2001), no. 11, pp. 77 - 92; translation in: Sbornik Mathematics. vol. 192 (2001), no. 11 - 12, pp. 1661 - 1676.
10. [Anna Erschler]
11. Mahlon M. Day. Amenable semigroups. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, vol. 1 (1957), pp. 509 - 544.
12. Volodymyr Nekrashevych, Self-similar groups. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 117. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005. .
13. Roman Muchnik, and Igor Pak. On growth of Grigorchuk groups. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, vol. 11 (2001), no. 1, pp. 1 - 17.
14. Laurent Bartholdi. The growth of Grigorchuk's torsion group. International Mathematics Research Notices, 1998, no. 20, pp. 1049 - 1054.
15. [Anna Erschler]
16. Jeremie Brieussel, Growth of certain groups, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Paris, 2008.
17. Pierre de la Harpe. Topics in geometric group theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ; Ch. VIII, The first Grigorchuk group, pp. 211 - 264.
18. R. I.Grigorchuk, and J. S. Wilson. A structural property concerning abstract commensurability of subgroups. Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2), vol. 68 (2003), no. 3, pp. 671 - 682.
19. E. L. Pervova, Everywhere dense subgroups of a group of tree automorphisms. (in Russian). Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Imeni V. A. Steklova. vol. 231 (2000), Din. Sist., Avtom. i Beskon. Gruppy, pp. 356 - 367; translation in: Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, vol 231 (2000), no. 4, pp. 339 - 350.
20. I. G. Lysënok, A set of defining relations for the Grigorchuk group. Matematicheskie Zametki, vol. 38 (1985), no. 4, pp. 503 - 516.