Greenberg's conjectures explained
Greenberg's conjecture is either of two conjectures in algebraic number theory proposed by Ralph Greenberg. Both are still unsolved as of 2021.
Invariants conjecture
The first conjecture was proposed in 1976 and concerns Iwasawa invariants. This conjecture is related to Vandiver's conjecture, Leopoldt's conjecture, Birch–Tate conjecture, all of which are also unsolved.
The conjecture, also referred to as Greenberg's invariants conjecture, firstly appeared in Greenberg's Princeton University thesis of 1971 and originally stated that, assuming that
is a
totally real number field and that
is the cyclotomic
-extension,
λ(Finfty/F)=\mu(Finfty/F)=0
, i.e. the power of
dividing the class number of
is bounded as
. Note that if
Leopoldt's conjecture holds for
and
, the only
-extension of
is the cyclotomic one (since it is totally real).
In 1976, Greenberg expanded the conjecture by providing more examples for it and slightly reformulated it as follows: given that
is a finite extension of
and that
is a fixed prime, with consideration of subfields of cyclotomic extensions of
, one can define a tower of number fields
k=k0\subsetk1\subsetk2\subset … \subsetkn\subset …
such that
is a cyclic extension of
of degree
. If
is totally real, is the power of
dividing the class number of
bounded as
? Now, if
is an arbitrary number field, then there exist integers
,
and
such that the power of
dividing the class number of
is
, where
for all sufficiently large
. The integers
,
,
depend only on
and
. Then, we ask: is
for
totally real?
Simply speaking, the conjecture asks whether we have
for any totally real number field
and any prime number
, or the conjecture can also be reformulated as asking whether both invariants
λ and
μ associated to the cyclotomic
-extension of a totally real number field vanish.
In 2001, Greenberg generalized the conjecture (thus making it known as Greenberg's pseudo-null conjecture or, sometimes, as Greenberg's generalized conjecture):
Supposing that
is a totally real number field and that
is a prime, let
denote the compositum of all
-extensions of
. (Recall that if
Leopoldt's conjecture holds for
and
, then
.) Let
denote the pro-
Hilbert class field of
and let
\tilde{X}=\operatorname{Gal}(\tilde{L}/\tilde{F})
, regarded as a module over the ring
\tilde{Λ}={Zp}[[\operatorname{Gal}(\tilde{F}/F)]]
. Then
is a pseudo-null
-module.
A possible reformulation: Let
be the compositum of all the
-extensions of
and let
\operatorname{Gal}(\tilde{k}/k)\simeq
, then
is a pseudo-null
-module. Another related conjecture (also unsolved as of yet) exists:
We have
for any number field
and any prime number
.
This related conjecture was justified by Bruce Ferrero and Larry Washington, both of whom proved (see: Ferrero–Washington theorem) that
for any abelian extension
of the rational number field
and any prime number
.
p-rationality conjecture
Another conjecture, which can be referred to as Greenberg's conjecture, was proposed by Greenberg in 2016, and is known as Greenberg's
-rationality conjecture
. It states that for any odd prime
and for any
, there exists a
-rational field
such that \operatorname{Gal}(K/Q)\cong(Z/2Z)t
. This conjecture is related to the Inverse Galois problem.Further reading
- R. Greenberg, On some questions concerning the lwasawa invariants, Princeton University thesis (1971)
- R. Greenberg, "On the lwasawa invariants of totally real number fields", American Journal of Mathematics, issue 98 (1976), pp. 263–284
- R. Greenberg, "Iwasawa Theory — Past and Present", Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, issue 30 (2001), pp. 335–385
- R. Greenberg, "Galois representations with open image", Annales mathématiques du Québec, volume 40, number 1 (2016), pp. 83–119
- B. Ferrero and L. C. Washington, "The Iwasawa Invariant
Vanishes for Abelian Number Fields",
Annals of Mathematics (Second Series), volume 109, number 2 (May, 1979), pp. 377–395