Hominidae Explained

The Hominidae, whose members are known as the great apes or hominids, are a taxonomic family of primates that includes eight extant species in four genera: Pongo (the Bornean, Sumatran and Tapanuli orangutan); Gorilla (the eastern and western gorilla); Pan (the chimpanzee and the bonobo); and Homo, of which only modern humans (Homo sapiens) remain.

Numerous revisions in classifying the great apes have caused the use of the term hominid to change over time. The original meaning of "hominid" referred only to humans (Homo) and their closest extinct relatives. However, by the 1990s humans, apes, and their ancestors were considered to be "hominids".

The earlier restrictive meaning has now been largely assumed by the term hominin, which comprises all members of the human clade after the split from the chimpanzees (Pan). The current meaning of "hominid" includes all the great apes including humans. Usage still varies, however, and some scientists and laypersons still use "hominid" in the original restrictive sense; the scholarly literature generally shows the traditional usage until the turn of the 21st century.[1]

Within the taxon Hominidae, a number of extant and extinct genera are grouped with the humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas in the subfamily Homininae; others with orangutans in the subfamily Ponginae (see classification graphic below). The most recent common ancestor of all Hominidae lived roughly 14 million years ago,[2] when the ancestors of the orangutans speciated from the ancestral line of the other three genera.[3] Those ancestors of the family Hominidae had already speciated from the family Hylobatidae (the gibbons), perhaps 15 to 20 million years ago.[4]

Due to the close genetic relationship between humans and the other great apes, certain animal rights organizations, such as the Great Ape Project, argue that nonhuman great apes are persons and should be given basic human rights. Twenty-nine countries have instituted research bans to protect great apes from any kind of scientific testing.[5]

Evolution

In the early Miocene, about 22 million years ago, there were many species of tree-adapted primitive catarrhines from East Africa; the variety suggests a long history of prior diversification. Fossils from 20 million years ago include fragments attributed to Victoriapithecus, the earliest Old World monkey. Among the genera thought to be in the ape lineage leading up to 13 million years ago are Proconsul, Rangwapithecus, Dendropithecus, Limnopithecus, Nacholapithecus, Equatorius, Nyanzapithecus, Afropithecus, Heliopithecus, and Kenyapithecus, all from East Africa.

At sites far distant from East Africa, the presence of other generalized non-cercopithecids, that is, non-monkey primates, of middle Miocene age—Otavipithecus from cave deposits in Namibia, and Pierolapithecus and Dryopithecus from France, Spain and Austria—is further evidence of a wide diversity of ancestral ape forms across Africa and the Mediterranean basin during the relatively warm and equable climatic regimes of the early and middle Miocene. The most recent of these far-flung Miocene apes (hominoids) is Oreopithecus, from the fossil-rich coal beds in northern Italy and dated to 9 million years ago.

Molecular evidence indicates that the lineage of gibbons (family Hylobatidae), the "lesser apes", diverged from that of the great apes some 18–12 million years ago, and that of orangutans (subfamily Ponginae) diverged from the other great apes at about 12 million years. There are no fossils that clearly document the ancestry of gibbons, which may have originated in a still-unknown South East Asian hominoid population; but fossil proto-orangutans, dated to around 10 million years ago, may be represented by Sivapithecus from India and Griphopithecus from Turkey.[6] Species close to the last common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees and humans may be represented by Nakalipithecus fossils found in Kenya and Ouranopithecus fossils found in Greece. Molecular evidence suggests that between 8 and 4 million years ago, first the gorillas (genus Gorilla), and then the chimpanzees (genus Pan) split off from the line leading to humans. Human DNA is approximately 98.4% identical to that of chimpanzees when comparing single nucleotide polymorphisms (see human evolutionary genetics).[7] The fossil record, however, of gorillas and chimpanzees is limited; both poor preservation—rain forest soils tend to be acidic and dissolve bone—and sampling bias probably contribute most to this problem.

Other hominins probably adapted to the drier environments outside the African equatorial belt; and there they encountered antelope, hyenas, elephants and other forms becoming adapted to surviving in the East African savannas, particularly the regions of the Sahel and the Serengeti. The wet equatorial belt contracted after about 8 million years ago, and there is very little fossil evidence for the divergence of the hominin lineage from that of gorillas and chimpanzees—which split was thought to have occurred around that time. The earliest fossils argued by some to belong to the human lineage are Sahelanthropus tchadensis (7 Ma) and Orrorin tugenensis (6 Ma), followed by Ardipithecus (5.5–4.4 Ma), with species Ar. kadabba and Ar. ramidus.

Taxonomy

See also: Human taxonomy.

Terminology

The classification of the great apes has been revised several times in the last few decades; these revisions have led to a varied use of the word "hominid" over time. The original meaning of the term referred to only humans and their closest relatives—what is now the modern meaning of the term "hominin". The meaning of the taxon Hominidae changed gradually, leading to a modern usage of "hominid" that includes all the great apes including humans.

A number of very similar words apply to related classifications:

A cladogram indicating common names (cf. more detailed cladogram below):

Extant and fossil relatives of humans

Hominidae was originally the name given to the family of humans and their (extinct) close relatives, with the other great apes (that is, the orangutans, gorillas and chimpanzees) all being placed in a separate family, the Pongidae. However, that definition eventually made Pongidae paraphyletic because at least one great ape species (the chimpanzees) proved to be more closely related to humans than to other great apes. Most taxonomists today encourage monophyletic groups—this would require, in this case, the use of Pongidae to be restricted to just one closely related grouping. Thus, many biologists now assign Pongo (as the subfamily Ponginae) to the family Hominidae. The taxonomy shown here follows the monophyletic groupings according to the modern understanding of human and great ape relationships.

Humans and close relatives including the tribes Hominini and Gorillini form the subfamily Homininae (see classification graphic below). (A few researchers go so far as to refer the chimpanzees and the gorillas to the genus Homo along with humans.)[11] [12] [13] But, those fossil relatives more closely related to humans than the chimpanzees represent the especially close members of the human family, and without necessarily assigning subfamily or tribal categories.[14]

Many extinct hominids have been studied to help understand the relationship between modern humans and the other extant hominids. Some of the extinct members of this family include Gigantopithecus, Orrorin, Ardipithecus, Kenyanthropus, and the australopithecines Australopithecus and Paranthropus.[15]

The exact criteria for membership in the tribe Hominini under the current understanding of human origins are not clear, but the taxon generally includes those species that share more than 97% of their DNA with the modern human genome, and exhibit a capacity for language or for simple cultures beyond their 'local family' or band. The theory of mind concept—including such faculties as empathy, attribution of mental state, and even empathetic deception—is a controversial criterion; it distinguishes the adult human alone among the hominids. Humans acquire this capacity after about four years of age, whereas it has not been proven (nor has it been disproven) that gorillas or chimpanzees ever develop a theory of mind.[16] This is also the case for some New World monkeys outside the family of great apes, as, for example, the capuchin monkeys.

However, even without the ability to test whether early members of the Hominini (such as Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, or even the australopithecines) had a theory of mind, it is difficult to ignore similarities seen in their living cousins. Orangutans have shown the development of culture comparable to that of chimpanzees,[17] and some say the orangutan may also satisfy those criteria for the theory of mind concept. These scientific debates take on political significance for advocates of great ape personhood.

Description

The great apes are tailless primates, with the smallest living species being the bonobo at NaNkg (-2,147,483,648lb) in weight, and the largest being the eastern gorillas, with males weighing NaNkg (-2,147,483,648lb). In all great apes, the males are, on average, larger and stronger than the females, although the degree of sexual dimorphism varies greatly among species. Hominid teeth are similar to those of the Old World monkeys and gibbons, although they are especially large in gorillas. The dental formula is . Human teeth and jaws are markedly smaller for their size than those of other apes, which may be an adaptation to not only having supplanted with extensive tool use the role of jaws in hunting and fighting, but also eating cooked food since the end of the Pleistocene.[18] [19]

Behavior

Although most living species are predominantly quadrupedal, they are all able to use their hands for gathering food or nesting materials, and, in some cases, for tool use.[20] They build complex sleeping platforms, also called nests, in trees to sleep in at night, but chimpanzees and gorillas also build terrestrial nests, and gorillas can also sleep on the bare ground.[21]

All species are omnivorous,[22] although chimpanzees and orangutans primarily eat fruit. When gorillas run short of fruit at certain times of the year or in certain regions, they resort to eating shoots and leaves, often of bamboo, a type of grass. Gorillas have extreme adaptations for chewing and digesting such low-quality forage, but they still prefer fruit when it is available, often going miles out of their way to find especially preferred fruits. Humans, since the Neolithic Revolution, have consumed mostly cereals and other starchy foods, including increasingly highly processed foods, as well as many other domesticated plants (including fruits) and meat.

Gestation in great apes lasts 8–9 months, and results in the birth of a single offspring, or, rarely, twins. The young are born helpless, and require care for long periods of time. Compared with most other mammals, great apes have a remarkably long adolescence, not being weaned for several years,[23] and not becoming fully mature for eight to thirteen years in most species (longer in orangutans and humans). As a result, females typically give birth only once every few years. There is no distinct breeding season.

Gorillas and chimpanzees live in family groups of around five to ten individuals, although much larger groups are sometimes noted. Chimpanzees live in larger groups that break up into smaller groups when fruit becomes less available. When small groups of female chimpanzees go off in separate directions to forage for fruit, the dominant males can no longer control them and the females often mate with other subordinate males. In contrast, groups of gorillas stay together regardless of the availability of fruit. When fruit is hard to find, they resort to eating leaves and shoots.

This fact is related to gorillas' greater sexual dimorphism relative to that of chimpanzees; that is, the difference in size between male and female gorillas is much greater than that between male and female chimpanzees. This enables gorilla males to physically dominate female gorillas more easily. In both chimpanzees and gorillas, the groups include at least one dominant male, and young males leave the group at maturity.

Legal status

See main article: Great ape personhood, Great Ape Project and Countries banning non-human ape experimentation. Due to the close genetic relationship between humans and the other great apes, certain animal rights organizations, such as the Great Ape Project, argue that nonhuman great apes are persons and, per the Declaration on Great Apes, should be given basic human rights. In 1999, New Zealand was the first country to ban any great ape experimentation, and now 29 countries have currently instituted a research ban to protect great apes from any kind of scientific testing.

On 25 June 2008, the Spanish parliament supported a new law that would make "keeping apes for circuses, television commercials or filming" illegal.[24] On 8 September 2010, the European Union banned the testing of great apes.[25]

Conservation

The following table lists the estimated number of great ape individuals living outside zoos.

SpeciesEstimated
number
Conservation
status
Refs
Bornean orangutan61,234Critically endangered[26]
Sumatran orangutan6,667Critically endangered[27]
Tapanuli orangutan800Critically endangered[28]
Western gorilla200,000Critically endangered[29]
Eastern gorilla6,000Critically endangered
Chimpanzee200,000Endangered[30] [31]
Bonobo10,000Endangered
Human8,040,640,000N/A[32]

Phylogeny

Below is a cladogram with extinct species.[33] [34] [35] It is indicated approximately how many million years ago (Mya) the clades diverged into newer clades.[36]

Extant

See also: List of hominoids. There are eight living species of great ape which are classified in four genera. The following classification is commonly accepted:

Fossil

In addition to the extant species and subspecies, archaeologists, paleontologists, and anthropologists have discovered and classified numerous extinct great ape species as below, based on the taxonomy shown.[38] Family Hominidae

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Morton. Mary. Hominid vs. hominin. Earth Magazine. 17 July 2017.
  2. 1988 . Andrew Hill . Steven Ward . Origin of the Hominidae: The Record of African Large Hominoid Evolution Between 14 My and 4 My. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology . 31 . 59 . 49–83 . 10.1002/ajpa.1330310505. free.
  3. Dawkins R (2004) The Ancestor's Tale.
  4. Web site: Query: Hominidae/Hylobatidae. . TimeTree. 2015 . 28 December 2017.
  5. Web site: International Bans Laws Release & Restitution for Chimpanzees. releasechimps.org. 2020-12-19.
  6. Book: Srivastava. Morphology of the Primates And Human Evolution. 6 November 2011. 2009. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.. 978-81-203-3656-8. 87.
  7. Chen. Feng-Chi. Li. Wen-Hsiung. 2001-01-15. Genomic Divergences between Humans and Other Hominoids and the Effective Population Size of the Common Ancestor of Humans and Chimpanzees. American Journal of Human Genetics. 68. 2. 444–456. 0002-9297. 1235277. 11170892. 10.1086/318206.
  8. B. Wood . 2010 . Reconstructing human evolution: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 107 . Suppl 2 . 8902–8909 . 10.1073/pnas.1001649107 . 2010PNAS..107.8902W . 20445105 . 3024019. free.
  9. Wood . 2000 . Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology . Journal of Anatomy . 197 . 19–60 . 10999270 . Richmond . B. G. . 1468107 . 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710019.x . Pt 1. . In this suggestion, the new subtribe of Hominina was to be designated as including the genus Homo exclusively, so that Hominini would have two subtribes, Australopithecina and Hominina, with the only known genus in Hominina being Homo. Orrorin (2001) has been proposed as a possible ancestor of Hominina but not Australopithecina.Book: African Genesis: Perspectives on Hominin Evolution . 9781107019959 . Reynolds . Sally C. . Gallagher. Andrew . 2012-03-29. Cambridge University Press. . Designations alternative to Hominina have been proposed: Australopithecinae (Gregory & Hellman 1939) and Preanthropinae (Cela-Conde & Altaba 2002); Brunet . M. . etal . 2002 . A new hominid from the upper Miocene of Chad, central Africa . Nature . 418 . 6894. 145–151 . 10.1038/nature00879 . 12110880 . 2002Natur.418..145B. 1316969. Cela-Conde . C.J. . Ayala . F.J. . 2003 . Genera of the human lineage . PNAS . 100 . 13. 7684–7689 . 10.1073/pnas.0832372100 . 12794185 . 164648 . 2003PNAS..100.7684C. free. Wood . B. . Lonergan . N. . 2008 . The hominin fossil record: taxa, grades and clades . J. Anat. . 212 . 4. 354–376 . 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00871.x . 18380861 . 2409102.
  10. Web site: GEOL 204 The Fossil Record: The Scatterlings of Africa: The Origins of Humanity. www.geol.umd.edu. 2019-11-07.
  11. Web site: Pickrell, John . Chimps Belong on Human Branch of Family Tree, Study Says . https://web.archive.org/web/20030601115459/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0520_030520_chimpanzees.html . dead . 1 June 2003 . 20 May 2003 . 4 August 2007 . National Geographic Society.
  12. http://www.berggorilla.de/english/gjournal/texte/32mensch-gorilla-groves.html Relationship Humans-Gorillas
  13. Book: Watson, E. E. . etal . 2001 . Homo genus: a review of the classification of humans and the great apes . 311–323 . Humanity from African Naissance to Coming Millennia . Tobias, P. V. . etal . Florence . Firenze Univ. Press.
  14. Schwartz, J.H. (1986) Primate systematics and a classification of the order. Comparative primate biology volume 1: Systematics, evolution, and anatomy (ed. by D.R. Swindler, and J. Erwin), pp. 1–41, Alan R. Liss, New York.
  15. Schwartz, J.H. (2004b) Issues in hominid systematics. Zona Arqueología 4, 360–371.
  16. Heyes, C. M. . 1998 . Theory of Mind in Nonhuman Primates . Behavioral and Brain Sciences . 1 . bbs00000546 . 21 . 10.1017/S0140525X98000703 . 10097012 . 101–14. 6469633 .
  17. Van Schaik C.P. . 2003 . Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture . Science . 299 . 5603. 102–105 . 10.1126/science.1078004 . 12511649 . Ancrenaz . M . Borgen . G . Galdikas . B . Knott . CD . Singleton . I . Suzuki . A . Utami . SS . Merrill . M . 2003Sci...299..102V. 25139547.
  18. 1971. Brace . C. Loring . C. Loring Brace . Mahler . Paul Emil . Post-Pleistocene changes in the human dentition. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 34. 2 . 191–203. 10.1002/ajpa.1330340205 . 5572603 . 2027.42/37509 . free.
  19. Book: Wrangham, Richard . 2007 . Chapter 12: The Cooking Enigma . Charles Pasternak . What Makes Us Human? . Oxford . Oneworld Press . 978-1-85168-519-6.
  20. Book: Macdonald. D.. Harcourt. A.H.. MacKinnon. J.. Wrangham . R.W.. 1984. The Encyclopedia of Mammals. Facts on File. New York. 422–439. 978-0-87196-871-5. registration.
  21. 10.1007/s10764-020-00186-z . Deciding Where to Sleep: Spatial Levels of Nesting Selection in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Living in Savanna at Issa, Tanzania . 2020 . Hernandez-Aguilar . R. Adriana . Reitan . Trond . International Journal of Primatology . 41 . 6 . 870–900 . free .
  22. Web site: Alina . Bradford . 29 May 2015 . Facts About Apes . 2021-01-25 . livescience.com . en.
  23. Web site: Hamilton . Jon . Orangutan Moms Are The Primate Champs Of Breast-Feeding . NPR . 2017-05-17 . 2024-05-20.
  24. News: Spanish parliament to extend rights to apes . 11 July 2008 . 25 June 2008 . Reuters.
  25. Web site: New EU rules on animal testing ban use of apes . . 12 September 2010.
  26. Web site: Orangutan Action Plan 2007–2017. 2007 . . 5 . id . 1 May 2010. \
  27. An estimate of the number of wild orangutans in 2004: Web site: Orangutan Action Plan 2007–2017 . 2007 . Government of Indonesia.
  28. News: New species of orangutan discovered in Sumatra – and is already endangered . Davis . Nicola . 2017-11-02 . The Guardian . 2017-11-03 . en-GB . 0261-3077.
  29. Web site: Gorillas on Thin Ice . 15 January 2009 . . 19 May 2010. dead . http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160518164244/http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=556&ArticleID=6033&l=en&t=long . 18 May 2016.
  30. Linda . Vigilant . 2004 . Chimpanzees . . 14 . 10 . R369–R371 . 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.006 . 15186757. free. 2004CBio...14.R369V.
  31. Web site: Chimpanzees.
  32. Web site: U.S. and World Population Clock. United States Census Bureau. 22 November 2022.
  33. Grabowski. Mark. Jungers. William L.. 2017. Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes. Nature Communications. en. 8. 1. 880. 10.1038/s41467-017-00997-4. 2041-1723. 5638852. 29026075. 2017NatCo...8..880G.
  34. Nengo. Isaiah. Tafforeau. Paul. Gilbert. Christopher C.. Fleagle. John G.. Miller. Ellen R.. Feibel. Craig. Fox. David L.. Feinberg. Josh. Pugh. Kelsey D.. New infant cranium from the African Miocene sheds light on ape evolution. Nature. 548. 7666. 169–174. 10.1038/nature23456. 28796200. 2017. 2017Natur.548..169N. 4397839.
  35. Web site: Hominidae primate family. Encyclopedia Britannica. en. 2019-07-19.
  36. Malukiewicz. Joanna. Hepp. Crystal M.. Guschanski. Katerina. Stone. Anne C.. 2017-01-01. Phylogeny of the jacchus group of Callithrix marmosets based on complete mitochondrial genomes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. en. 162. 1. 157–169. 10.1002/ajpa.23105. 27762445. 1096-8644. Fig 2: "Divergence time estimates for the jacchus marmoset group based on the BEAST4 (Di Fiore et al., 2015) calibration scheme for alignment A.[...] Numbers at each node indicate the median divergence time estimate."
  37. 3 . Nater . Alexander. Mattle-Greminger . Maja P. . Nurcahyo . Anton . Nowak . Matthew G. . de Manuel. Marc . Desai. Tariq . Groves. Colin . Pybus. Marc . Sonay. Tugce Bilgin . Roos. Christian . Lameira. Adriano R. . Wich. Serge A. . Askew. James . Davila-Ross. Marina . Fredriksson. Gabriella . de Valles. Guillem . Casals. Ferran . Prado-Martinez. Javier . Goossens. Benoit . Verschoor. Ernst J. . Warren. Kristin S. . Singleton. Ian . Marques. David A. . Pamungkas. Joko . Perwitasari-Farajallah. Dyah . Rianti. Puji . Tuuga. Augustine . Gut. Ivo G. . Gut. Marta . Orozco-terWengel. Pablo . van Schaik. Carel P. . Bertranpetit. Jaume . Anisimova. Maria . Scally. Aylwyn . Marques-Bonet. Tomas . Meijaard . Erik . Krützen . Michael . 2017-11-02 . Morphometric, Behavioral, and Genomic Evidence for a New Orangutan Species . . 27. 22. 3487–3498.e10. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.047 . 29103940. free. 2017CBio...27E3487N . 10230/34400 . free.
  38. Web site: Hominoidea . Mikko's Phylogeny Archive . 14 January 2005 . Mikko . Haaramo.
  39. Web site: Pongidae . Mikko's Phylogeny Archive . 4 February 2004 . Mikko . Haaramo.
  40. Web site: Hominoidea . Mikko's Phylogeny Archive . 14 January 2005 . Mikko . Haaramo.
  41. Web site: Hominidae . Mikko's Phylogeny Archive . 10 November 2007 . Mikko . Haaramo.
  42. Fuss . J . Spassov . N . Begun . DR . Böhme . M . 2017 . Potential hominin affinities of Graecopithecus from the Late Miocene of Europe . PLOS ONE . 12 . 5 . 5 . 2017PLoSO..1277127F . 10.1371/journal.pone.0177127 . 5439669 . 28531170 . free.