Gravitational redshift explained

In physics and general relativity, gravitational redshift (known as Einstein shift in older literature)^{[1] [2]} is the phenomenon that electromagnetic waves or photons travelling out of a gravitational well lose energy. This loss of energy corresponds to a decrease in the wave frequency and increase in the wavelength, known more generally as a redshift. The opposite effect, in which photons gain energy when travelling into a gravitational well, is known as a gravitational blueshift (a type of blueshift). The effect was first described by Einstein in 1907,^{[3] [4]} eight years before his publication of the full theory of relativity.

Gravitational redshift can be interpreted as a consequence of the equivalence principle (that gravity and acceleration are equivalent and the redshift is caused by the Doppler effect)^[5] or as a consequence of the mass–energy equivalence and conservation of energy ('falling' photons gain energy),^{[6] [7]} though there are numerous subtleties that complicate a rigorous derivation.^[8] A gravitational redshift can also equivalently be interpreted as gravitational time dilation at the source of the radiation: if two oscillators (attached to transmitters producing electromagnetic radiation) are operating at different gravitational potentials, the oscillator at the higher gravitational potential (farther from the attracting body) will tick faster; that is, when observed from the same location, it will have a higher measured frequency than the oscillator at the lower gravitational potential (closer to the attracting body).

To first approximation, gravitational redshift is proportional to the difference in gravitational potential divided by the speed of light squared,

z = \Delta U / c ^{2} , thus resulting in a very small effect. Light escaping from the surface of the Sun was predicted by Einstein in 1911 to be redshifted by roughly 2 ppm or 2 × 10⁻⁶.^[9] Navigational signals from GPS satellites orbiting at 20,000 km altitude are perceived blueshifted by approximately 0.5 ppb or 5 × 10⁻¹⁰,^[10] corresponding to a (negligible) increase of less than 1 Hz in the frequency of a 1.5 GHz GPS radio signal (however, the accompanying gravitational time dilation affecting the atomic clock in the satellite is crucially important for accurate navigation^[11]). On the surface of the Earth the gravitational potential is proportional to height, \Delta U = g \Delta h , and the corresponding redshift is roughly 10⁻¹⁶ (0.1 parts per quadrillion) per meter of change in elevation and/or altitude.

In astronomy, the magnitude of a gravitational redshift is often expressed as the velocity that would create an equivalent shift through the relativistic Doppler effect. In such units, the 2 ppm sunlight redshift corresponds to a 633 m/s receding velocity, roughly of the same magnitude as convective motions in the Sun, thus complicating the measurement. The GPS satellite gravitational blueshift velocity equivalent is less than 0.2 m/s, which is negligible compared to the actual Doppler shift resulting from its orbital velocity. In astronomical objects with strong gravitational fields the redshift can be much greater; for example, light from the surface of a white dwarf is gravitationally redshifted on average by around 50 km/s/c (around 170 ppm).^[12]

Observing the gravitational redshift in the Solar System is one of the classical tests of general relativity.^[13] Measuring the gravitational redshift to high precision with atomic clocks can serve as a test of Lorentz symmetry and guide searches for dark matter.

Prediction by the equivalence principle and general relativity

Uniform gravitational field or acceleration

Einstein's theory of general relativity incorporates the equivalence principle, which can be stated in various different ways. One such statement is that gravitational effects are locally undetectable for a free-falling observer. Therefore, in a laboratory experiment at the surface of the Earth, all gravitational effects should be equivalent to the effects that would have been observed if the laboratory had been accelerating through outer space at g. One consequence is a gravitational Doppler effect. If a light pulse is emitted at the floor of the laboratory, then a free-falling observer says that by the time it reaches the ceiling, the ceiling has accelerated away from it, and therefore when observed by a detector fixed to the ceiling, it will be observed to have been Doppler shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. This shift, which the free-falling observer considers to be a kinematical Doppler shift, is thought of by the laboratory observer as a gravitational redshift. Such an effect was verified in the 1959 Pound–Rebka experiment. In a case such as this, where the gravitational field is uniform, the change in wavelength is given by

z = (\Delta λ)/(λ) ≈ (g\Delta y)/(c ^{2}) ,

where

\Delta y</Math> is the change in height. Since this prediction arises directly from the equivalence principle, it does not require any of the mathematical apparatus of general relativity, and its verification does not specifically support general relativity over any other theory that incorporates the equivalence principle. On Earth's surface (or in a spaceship accelerating at 1 &nbsp;g), the gravitational redshift is approximately 1 . 1 × 10 ^{− 16}, the equivalent of a 3 . 3 × 10 ^{− 8} m/s Doppler shift, for every meter of height differential. === Spherically symmetric gravitational field === When the field is not uniform, the simplest and most useful case to consider is that of a spherically symmetric field. By [[Birkhoff's theorem (relativity)|Birkhoff's theorem]], such a field is described in general relativity by the [[Schwarzschild metric]], <math>d\tau ^{2} = \left( 1 - r ^{2} _{S /R\right)dt} + \ldots , where d\tau is the clock time of an observer at distance R from the center, dt is the time measured by an observer at infinity, r _{S} is the Schwarzschild radius 2 GM/c ^{2} , "..." represents terms that vanish if the observer is at rest, G is Newton's gravitational constant, M the mass of the gravitating body, and c the speed of light. The result is that frequencies and wavelengths are shifted according to the ratio1 + z = (λ _{infty})/(λ _{e}) = \left( 1 - (r _{S})/(R _{e}) \right) ^{- (1)/(2)}

where

λ _{infty} is the wavelength of the light as measured by the observer at infinity,λ _{e} is the wavelength measured at the source of emission, andR _{e} is the radius at which the photon is emitted.

This can be related to the redshift parameter conventionally defined as

z = λ _{infty/λ} _{e} - 1 .

In the case where neither the emitter nor the observer is at infinity, the transitivity of Doppler shifts allows us to generalize the result to

λ _{1/λ} _{2} = \left[\left( 1 - r _{S/R} _{1\right)/\left(1} - r _{S/R} ^{1 / 2} ^{2 \right)\right]} . The redshift formula for the frequency \nu = c/ λ is \nu _{o/\nu} _{e} = λ _{e/λ} _{o} . When R _{1} - R _{2} is small, these results are consistent with the equation given above based on the equivalence principle.

The redshift ratio may also be expressed in terms of a (Newtonian) escape velocity

v _{e} at R _{e} = 2 GM/v ^{2} _{e} , resulting in the corresponding Lorentz factor:1 + z = \gamma _{e} = (1)/(\sqrt{ 1 - (v ^{2} _{e /c)}) }.

For an object compact enough to have an event horizon, the redshift is not defined for photons emitted inside the Schwarzschild radius, both because signals cannot escape from inside the horizon and because an object such as the emitter cannot be stationary inside the horizon, as was assumed above. Therefore, this formula only applies when

R _{e} is larger than r _{S} . When the photon is emitted at a distance equal to the Schwarzschild radius, the redshift will be infinitely large, and it will not escape to any finite distance from the Schwarzschild sphere. When the photon is emitted at an infinitely large distance, there is no redshift.

Newtonian limit

In the Newtonian limit, i.e. when

R _{e} is sufficiently large compared to the Schwarzschild radius r _{S} , the redshift can be approximated asz = (\Delta λ)/(λ) ≈ (1)/(2) (r _{S})/(R _{e}) = (GM)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) = (g R _{e})/(c ^{2})

where

g is the gravitational acceleration at R _{e} . For Earth's surface with respect to infinity, z is approximately 7 × 10⁻¹⁰ (the equivalent of a 0.2 m/s radial Doppler shift); for the Moon it is approximately 3 × 10⁻¹¹ (about 1 cm/s). The value for the surface of the Sun is about 2 × 10⁻⁶, corresponding to 0.64 km/s. (For non-relativistic velocities, the radial Doppler equivalent velocity can be approximated by multiplying z with the speed of light.)

The z-value can be expressed succinctly in terms of the escape velocity at

R _{e} , since the gravitational potential is equal to half the square of the escape velocity, thus:z ≈ (1)/(2) \left( (v _{e})/(c) \right) ^{2}

where

v _{e} is the escape velocity at R _{e} .

It can also be related to the circular orbit velocity

v _{o} at R _{e} , which equals v _{e/\sqrt{2}} , thusz ≈ \left( (v _{o})/(c) \right) ^{2} .

For example, the gravitational blueshift of distant starlight due to the Sun's gravity, which the Earth is orbiting at about 30 km/s, would be approximately 1 × 10⁻⁸ or the equivalent of a 3 m/s radial Doppler shift.

For an object in a (circular) orbit, the gravitational redshift is of comparable magnitude as the transverse Doppler effect,

z ≈ \tfrac{ 1 }{ 2 } \beta ^{2} where β=v/c, while both are much smaller than the radial Doppler effect, for which z ≈ \beta .

Prediction of the Newtonian limit using the properties of photons

The formula for the gravitational red shift in the Newtonian limit can also be derived using the properties of a photon:^[14]

In a gravitational field

\vec{g} a particle of mass m and velocity \vec{v} changes it's energy E according to:(dE)/(dt) = m \vec{g} ⋅ \vec{v} = \vec{g} ⋅ \vec{p} .

For a massless photon described by its energy

E = h \nu = \hbar \omega and momentum \vec{p} = \hbar\vec{k} this equation becomes after dividing by Planck's constant \hbar :(d \omega)/(dt) = \vec{g} ⋅ \vec{k}

Inserting the gravitational field of a spherical body of mass

M within the distance \vec{r} \vec{g} = - G M (\vec{r)/() }

and the wave vector of a photon leaving the gravitational field in radial direction

\vec{k} = (\omega)/(c) (\vec{r)/() }the energy equation becomes(d \omega)/(dt) =- (G M)/(c) (\omega)/(r ^{2}) . Using dr = c dt an ordinary differential equation which is only dependent on the radial distance r is obtained:(d \omega)/(dr) =- (G M)/(c ^{2}) (\omega)/(r ^{2})

For a photon starting at the surface of a spherical body with a Radius

R _{e} with a frequency \omega _{0} = 2 \pi \nu _{0} the analytical solution is:(d \omega)/(dr) =- (G M)/(c ^{2}) (\omega)/(r ^{2}) ⇒ \omega(r) = \omega _{0} \exp \left ( - (G M)/(c ^{2}) \left( (1)/(R _{e}) - (1)/(r) \right) \right)

In a large distance from the body

r → inf ty an observer measures the frequency :\omega _{obs} = \omega _{0} \exp \left ( - (G M)/(c ^{2}) \left( (1)/(R _{e}) \right) \right) \simeq \omega _{0} \left( 1 - (G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) + (1)/(2) (G ^{2} M ^{2})/(R ^{2} _{e} c ^{4}) - \ldots \right).

Therefore the red shift is:

z = (\omega _{0} - \omega _{obs})/(\omega _{obs}) = (1 - \exp \left( - (G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) \right))/(\exp \left( - (G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) \right)) = (1 - \exp \left( - (r _{S})/(2 R _{e}) \right))/(\exp \left( - (r _{S})/(2 R _{e}) \right))

In the linear approximation

z = ((G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) - (1)/(2) (G ^{2} M ^{2})/(R ^{2} _{e} c ^{4}) + ...)/(1 - (G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) + (1)/(2) (G ^{2} M ^{2})/(R ^{2} _{e} c ^{4}) - \ldots) \simeq ((G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}))/(1 - (G M)/(R _{e} c ^{2}) + (1)/(2) (G ^{2} M ^{2})/(R ^{2} _{e} c ^{4}) - ...) \simeq (G M)/(c ^{2} R _{e})

the Newtonian limit for the graviational red shift of General Relativity is obtained.

Experimental verification

See also: Tests of general relativity.

Astronomical observations

A number of experimenters initially claimed to have identified the effect using astronomical measurements, and the effect was considered to have been finally identified in the spectral lines of the star Sirius B by W.S. Adams in 1925.^[15] However, measurements by Adams have been criticized as being too low^{[15] [16]} and these observations are now considered to be measurements of spectra that are unusable because of scattered light from the primary, Sirius A. The first accurate measurement of the gravitational redshift of a white dwarf was done by Popper in 1954, measuring a 21 km/s gravitational redshift of 40 Eridani B. The redshift of Sirius B was finally measured by Greenstein et al. in 1971, obtaining the value for the gravitational redshift of 89±16 km/s, with more accurate measurements by the Hubble Space Telescope, showing 80.4±4.8 km/s.^[17]

James W. Brault, a graduate student of Robert Dicke at Princeton University, measured the gravitational redshift of the sun using optical methods in 1962.^[18] In 2020, a team of scientists published the most accurate measurement of the solar gravitational redshift so far, made by analyzing Fe spectral lines in sunlight reflected by the Moon; their measurement of a mean global 638 ± 6 m/s lineshift is in agreement with the theoretical value of 633.1 m/s.^{[19] [20]} Measuring the solar redshift is complicated by the Doppler shift caused by the motion of the Sun's surface, which is of similar magnitude as the gravitational effect.

In 2011, the group of Radek Wojtak of the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen collected data from 8000 galaxy clusters and found that the light coming from the cluster centers tended to be red-shifted compared to the cluster edges, confirming the energy loss due to gravity.^[21]

In 2018, the star S2 made its closest approach to Sgr A*, the 4-million solar mass supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, reaching 7650 km/s or about 2.5% of the speed of light while passing the black hole at a distance of just 120 AU, or 1400 Schwarzschild radii. Independent analyses by the GRAVITY collaboration^{[22] [23] [24] [25]} (led by Reinhard Genzel) and the KECK/UCLA Galactic Center Group^{[26] [27]} (led by Andrea Ghez) revealed a combined transverse Doppler and gravitational redshift up to 200 km/s/c, in agreement with general relativity predictions.

In 2021, Mediavilla (IAC, Spain) & Jiménez-Vicente (UGR, Spain) were able to use measurements of the gravitational redshift in quasars up to cosmological redshift of z~3 to confirm the predictions of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the lack of cosmological evolution within 13%.^[28]

In 2024, Padilla et al. have estimated the gravitational redshifts of supermassive black holes (SMBH) in eight thousand quasars and one hundred Seyfert type 1 galaxies from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of their emission lines, finding log z ≈ -4, compatible with SMBHs of ~ 1 billion solar masses and broadline regions of ~ 1 parsec radius. This same gravitational redshift was directly measured by these authors in the SAMI sample of LINER galaxies, using the redshift differences between lines emitted in central and outer regions.^[29]

Terrestrial tests

The effect is now considered to have been definitively verified by the experiments of Pound, Rebka and Snider between 1959 and 1965. The Pound–Rebka experiment of 1959 measured the gravitational redshift in spectral lines using a terrestrial ⁵⁷Fe gamma source over a vertical height of 22.5 metres.^[30] This paper was the first determination of the gravitational redshift which used measurements of the change in wavelength of gamma-ray photons generated with the Mössbauer effect, which generates radiation with a very narrow line width. The accuracy of the gamma-ray measurements was typically 1%.

An improved experiment was done by Pound and Snider in 1965, with an accuracy better than the 1% level.^[31]

A very accurate gravitational redshift experiment was performed in 1976,^[32] where a hydrogen maser clock on a rocket was launched to a height of 10,000 km, and its rate compared with an identical clock on the ground. It tested the gravitational redshift to 0.007%.

Later tests can be done with the Global Positioning System (GPS), which must account for the gravitational redshift in its timing system, and physicists have analyzed timing data from the GPS to confirm other tests. When the first satellite was launched, it showed the predicted shift of 38 microseconds per day. This rate of the discrepancy is sufficient to substantially impair the function of GPS within hours if not accounted for. An excellent account of the role played by general relativity in the design of GPS can be found in Ashby 2003.^[33]

In 2010, an experiment placed two aluminum-ion quantum clocks close to each other, but with the second elevated 33 cm compared to the first, making the gravitational red shift effect visible in everyday lab scales.^{[34] [35]}

In 2020, a group at the University of Tokyo measured the gravitational redshift of two strontium-87 optical lattice clocks.^[36] The measurement took place at Tokyo Skytree where the clocks were separated by approximately 450 m and connected by telecom fibers. The gravitational redshift can be expressed as

z = (\Delta\nu)/(\nu _{1}) = ( 1+ \alpha) (\Delta U)/(c ^{2}) ,

where

\Delta\nu = \nu _{2} - \nu _{1} is the gravitational redshift, \nu _{1} is the optical clock transition frequency, \Delta U = U _{2} - U _{1} is the difference in gravitational potential, and \alpha denotes the violation from general relativity. By Ramsey spectroscopy of the strontium-87 optical clock transition (429 THz, 698 nm) the group determined the gravitational redshift between the two optical clocks to be 21.18 Hz, corresponding to a z-value of approximately 5 × 10⁻¹⁴. Their measured value of \alpha , ( 1 . 4 \pm 9 . 1 ) x 10 ^{-5} , is an agreement with recent measurements made with hydrogen masers in elliptical orbits.^{[37] [38]}

In October 2021, a group at JILA led by physicist Jun Ye reported a measurement of gravitational redshift in the submillimeter scale. The measurement is done on the ⁸⁷Sr clock transition between the top and the bottom of a millimeter-tall ultracold cloud of 100,000 strontium atoms in an optical lattice.^{[39] [40]}

Early historical development of the theory

The gravitational weakening of light from high-gravity stars was predicted by John Michell in 1783 and Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1796, using Isaac Newton's concept of light corpuscles (see: emission theory) and who predicted that some stars would have a gravity so strong that light would not be able to escape. The effect of gravity on light was then explored by Johann Georg von Soldner (1801), who calculated the amount of deflection of a light ray by the Sun, arriving at the Newtonian answer which is half the value predicted by general relativity. All of this early work assumed that light could slow down and fall, which is inconsistent with the modern understanding of light waves.

Once it became accepted that light was an electromagnetic wave, it was clear that the frequency of light should not change from place to place, since waves from a source with a fixed frequency keep the same frequency everywhere. One way around this conclusion would be if time itself were altered if clocks at different points had different rates. This was precisely Einstein's conclusion in 1911.^[41] He considered an accelerating box, and noted that according to the special theory of relativity, the clock rate at the "bottom" of the box (the side away from the direction of acceleration) was slower than the clock rate at the "top" (the side toward the direction of acceleration). Indeed, in a frame moving (in

x direction) with velocity v relative to the rest frame, the clocks at a nearby position dx are ahead by (dx/c)(v/c) (to the first order); so an acceleration g (that changes speed by g/dt per time dt ) makes clocks at the position dx to be ahead by (dx/c)(g/c)dt , that is, tick at a rate R =1+ (g/c ^{2)dx}

The equivalence principle implies that this change in clock rate is the same whether the acceleration

g is that of an accelerated frame without gravitational effects, or caused by a gravitational field in a stationary frame. Since acceleration due to gravitational potential V is - dV/dx , we get{dR \over dx} = g/c ^{2} = - {dV/c ^{2} \over dx} so – in weak fields – the change \Delta R in the clock rate is equal to - \Delta V/c ^{2} .

Since the light would be slowed down by gravitational time dilation (as seen by outside observer), the regions with lower gravitational potential would act like a medium with higher refractive index causing light to deflect. This reasoning allowed Einstein in 1911 to reproduce the incorrect Newtonian value for the deflection of light.^[41] At the time he only considered the time-dilating manifestation of gravity, which is the dominating contribution at non-relativistic speeds; however relativistic objects travel through space a comparable amount as they do though time, so purely spatial curvature becomes just as important. After constructing the full theory of general relativity, Einstein solved in 1915^[42] the full post-Newtonian approximation for the Sun's gravity and calculated the correct amount of light deflection – double the Newtonian value. Einstein's prediction was confirmed by many experiments, starting with Arthur Eddington's 1919 solar eclipse expedition.

The changing rates of clocks allowed Einstein to conclude that light waves change frequency as they move, and the frequency/energy relationship for photons allowed him to see that this was best interpreted as the effect of the gravitational field on the mass–energy of the photon. To calculate the changes in frequency in a nearly static gravitational field, only the time component of the metric tensor is important, and the lowest order approximation is accurate enough for ordinary stars and planets, which are much bigger than their Schwarzschild radius.

See also

• Tests of general relativity
• Equivalence principle
• Gravitational time dilation
• Redshift
• Gravitational wave#Redshifting (redshifting of Gravitational waves due to speed or cosmic expansion)

References

Primary sources

• Michell, John. 1784. On the means of discovering the distance, magnitude etc. of the fixed stars. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 35–57. 10.1098/rstl.1784.0008. 74. free. 1784RSPT...74...35M.
• Book: Laplace, Pierre-Simon . 1796. The system of the world. 2. 1809 English translation. 366–368. London. Richard Phillips.
• von Soldner, Johann Georg. 1804. On the deflection of a light ray from its rectilinear motion, by the attraction of a celestial body at which it nearly passes by. Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch. 161–172. s:On the Deflection of a Light Ray from its Rectilinear Motion.
• Albert Einstein, "Relativity: the Special and General Theory". (@Project Gutenberg).
• Pound . R.V. . Rebka . G.A. Jr. . 1959 . Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance . Phys. Rev. Lett. . 3 . 9. 439–441 . 10.1103/physrevlett.3.439. 1959PhRvL...3..439P . free .
• Pound . R.V. . Snider . J.L. . 1965 . Effect of gravity on gamma radiation . 10.1103/physrev.140.b788 . Phys. Rev. B . 140 . 3B. 788–803 . 1965PhRv..140..788P .
• Pound . R.V. . 2000. Weighing Photons" (2000) . Classical and Quantum Gravity . 17 . 12. 2303–2311 . 10.1088/0264-9381/17/12/301. 2000CQGra..17.2303P . 250886562 .

Other sources

• Book: Misner . Charles W. . Thorne . Kip S. . Wheeler . John Archibald . Gravitation . . San Francisco . 1973-09-15 . 978-0-7167-0344-0 .

Notes and References

1. Web site: Einstein shift definition and meaning Collins English Dictionary. 2021-01-21. www.collinsdictionary.com. en.
2. Eddington. A. S.. 1926. Einstein Shift and Doppler Shift. Nature. en. 117. 2933. 86. 10.1038/117086a0. 1926Natur.117...86E. 4092843. 1476-4687. free.
3. Einstein . Albert . 1907 . Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen . On the Relativity Principle and the Conclusions Drawn from It . Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität . 4 . 411–462.
4. Valente. Mário Bacelar. 2018-12-06. Einstein's redshift derivations: its history from 1907 to 1921. Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science. en. 22. 1–16. 10.23925/1980-7651.2018v22;1-16. 239568887 . 1980-7651. free.
5. Web site: Florides. Petros S.. Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Gravitational Red Shift. School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Ireland.
6. Chang . Donald C. . 2018 . A quantum mechanical interpretation of gravitational redshift of electromagnetic wave . Optik . en . 174 . 636–641 . 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.127. 126341445 .
7. Evans. R. F.. Dunning-Davies. J.. 2004. The Gravitational Red-Shift. gr-qc/0403082.
8. Scott. Robert B. 2015. Teaching the gravitational redshift: lessons from the history and philosophy of physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series . Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERE 2014). en. 600. 1. 012055. 10.1088/1742-6596/600/1/012055. 2015JPhCS.600a2055S. free.
9. News: Gräfe. Franziska. 23 October 2020. New study verifies prediction from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity — English. en. Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam. 2021-01-14.
10. Web site: Ashby. Neil. July 20–21, 2006. Relativity in the Global Positioning System. 2021-01-14. American Association of Physics Teachers.
11. Ashby . Neil . 2003 . Relativity in the Global Positioning System . Living Reviews in Relativity . 6 . 1 . 1 . 10.12942/lrr-2003-1 . free . 1433-8351 . 5253894 . 28163638. 2003LRR.....6....1A .
12. Web site: Trimble. Virginia. Barstow. Martin. November 2020. Gravitational redshift and White Dwarf stars. 2021-01-16. Einstein Online. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. en.
13. Web site: Alley. Carrol Overton. GPS Setup Showed General Relativistic Effects on Light Operate at Emission and Reception, Not In-Flight as Required by Big Bang's Friedman-Lemaitre Spacetime Expansion Paradigm. The Orion Foundation.
14. A. Malcherek: Elektromagnetismus und Gravitation, Vereinheitlichung und Erweiterung der klassischen Physik. 2. Edition, Springer-Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 2023, ISBN 978-3-658-42701-6.
15. Hetherington, N. S., "Sirius B and the gravitational redshift - an historical review", Quarterly Journal Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 21, Sept. 1980, pp. 246–252. Accessed 6 April 2017.
16. Holberg, J. B., "Sirius B and the Measurement of the Gravitational Redshift", Journal for the History of Astronomy, vol. 41, 1, 2010, pp. 41–64. Accessed 6 April 2017.
17. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971ApJ...169..563G/abstract Effective Temperature, Radius, and Gravitational Redshift of Sirius B
18. PhD . Brault . James W. . 1962 . The Gravitational Redshift in the Solar Spectrum . ProQuest . .
19. Hernández. J. I. González. Rebolo. R.. Pasquini. L.. Curto. G. Lo. Molaro. P.. Caffau. E.. Ludwig. H.-G.. Steffen. M.. Esposito. M.. Mascareño. A. Suárez. Toledo-Padrón. B.. 2020-11-01. The solar gravitational redshift from HARPS-LFC Moon spectra - A test of the general theory of relativity. Astronomy & Astrophysics. en. 643. A146. 10.1051/0004-6361/202038937. 2009.10558. 2020A&A...643A.146G . 221836649. 0004-6361.
20. Smith. Keith T.. 2020-12-18. Editors' Choice. Gravitational redshift of the Sun. Science. en. 370. 6523. 1429–1430. 10.1126/science.2020.370.6523.twil. 2020Sci...370Q1429S. 0036-8075. free.
21. Web site: Bhattacharjee. Yudhijit. 2011. Galaxy Clusters Validate Einstein's Theory. 2013-07-23. News.sciencemag.org.
22. Abuter. R.. Amorim. A.. Anugu. N.. Bauböck. M.. Benisty. M.. Berger. J. P.. Blind. N.. Bonnet. H.. Brandner. W.. Buron. A.. Collin. C.. 2018-07-01. Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole. Astronomy & Astrophysics. en. 615. L15. 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718. 1807.09409. 2018A&A...615L..15G. 118891445. 0004-6361.
23. Witze. Alexandra. 2018-07-26. Milky Way's black hole provides long-sought test of Einstein's general relativity. Nature. en. 560. 7716. 17. 10.1038/d41586-018-05825-3. 30065325. 2018Natur.560...17W. 51888156. free.
24. Web site: Tests of General Relativity. 2021-01-17. www.mpe.mpg.de. en.
25. Web site: First Successful Test of Einstein's General Relativity Near Supermassive Black Hole - Culmination of 26 years of ESO observations of the heart of the Milky Way. 2021-01-17. www.eso.org. en.
26. Do. Tuan. Hees. Aurelien. Ghez. Andrea. Martinez. Gregory D.. Chu. Devin S.. Jia. Siyao. Sakai. Shoko. Lu. Jessica R.. Gautam. Abhimat K.. O’Neil. Kelly Kosmo. Becklin. Eric E.. 2019-08-16. Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic center supermassive black hole. Science. 365. 6454. 664–668. en. 10.1126/science.aav8137. 0036-8075. 31346138. 1907.10731. 2019Sci...365..664D. 198901506.
27. Web site: Siegel. Ethan. 2019-08-01. General Relativity Rules: Einstein Victorious In Unprecedented Gravitational Redshift Test. 2021-01-17. Medium. en.
28. Mediavilla. E.. Jiménez-Vicente. J.. 2021. Testing Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its Cosmological Evolution from Quasar Gravitational Redshifts. The Astrophysical Journal. 914. 2. 112. 2106.11699. 10.3847/1538-4357/abfb70. 2021ApJ...914..112M . 235593322 . free .
29. N. D. Padilla . S. Carneiro. J. Chaves-Montero. C. J. Donzelli. C. Pigozzo. P. Colazo. J. S. Alcaniz. 2024. Active galactic nuclei and gravitational redshifts. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 683 . 120-126. 10.1051/0004-6361/202348146 . 2024A&A...683A.120P. 2304.13036.
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.337 . Apparent Weight of Photons . 1960 . Pound . R. . Rebka . G. . Physical Review Letters . 4 . 7 . 337–341 . 1960PhRvL...4..337P. free .
31. Pound. R. V.. Snider J. L. . November 2, 1964. Effect of Gravity on Nuclear Resonance. Physical Review Letters. 13 . 18 . 539–540 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.539 . 1964PhRvL..13..539P. free.
32. 8 . Vessot . R. F. C.. December 29, 1980. Test of Relativistic Gravitation with a Space-Borne Hydrogen Maser . Physical Review Letters . 45 . 26 . 2081–2084 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.2081 . M. W. Levine . E. M. Mattison . E. L. Blomberg. T. E. Hoffman . G. U. Nystrom. B. F. Farrel . R. Decher. P. B. Eby . C. R. Baugher. J. W. Watts . D. L. Teuber . F. D. Wills . amp . 1980PhRvL..45.2081V.
33. Relativity in the Global Positioning System. Living Reviews in Relativity. 6. 1. 1. 10.12942/lrr-2003-1. 28163638. 5253894. 2003. Ashby. Neil. free . 2003LRR.....6....1A.
34. Chou. C.W.. Hume. D.B.. Rosenband. T.. Wineland. D.J.. Optical Clocks and Relativity. Science. 2010. 329. 5999. 1630–1633. 10.1126/science.1192720. 20929843 . 2010Sci...329.1630C . 125987464 .
35. Einstein's time dilation apparent when obeying the speed limit. . 24 September 2010. 2015-04-10.
36. Takamoto, M. . Ushijima, I. . Ohmae, N. . etal . 6 April 2020. Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks. 10.1038/s41566-020-0619-8. Nat. Photonics. 14. 7 . 411–415. 2020NaPho..14..411T . 216309660 .
37. Sven Herrmann . Felix Finke . Martin Lülf . Olga Kichakova . Dirk Puetzfeld . Daniela Knickmann . Meike List . Benny Rievers . Gabriele Giorgi . Christoph Günther . Hansjörg Dittus . Roberto Prieto-Cerdeira . Florian Dilssner . Francisco Gonzalez . Erik Schönemann . Javier Ventura-Traveset . Claus Lämmerzahl. Test of the Gravitational Redshift with Galileo Satellites in an Eccentric Orbit . Physical Review Letters . 121 . 23 . December 2018 . 231102 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.231102. 30576165 . 1812.09161 . 2018PhRvL.121w1102H . 58537350 .
38. P. Delva . N. Puchades . E. Schönemann . F. Dilssner . C. Courde . S. Bertone . F. Gonzalez . A. Hees . Ch. Le Poncin-Lafitte . F. Meynadier . R. Prieto-Cerdeira . B. Sohet . J. Ventura-Traveset . P. Wolf. Gravitational Redshift Test Using Eccentric Galileo Satellites . Physical Review Letters . 121 . 23 . December 2018 . 231101 . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.231101. 30576203 . 1812.03711 . 2018PhRvL.121w1101D . 58666075 .
39. Bothwell . Tobias . Kennedy . Colin J. . Aeppli . Alexander . Kedar . Dhruv . Robinson . John M. . Oelker . Eric . Staron . Alexander . Ye . Jun . 2022 . Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample . Nature . 602 . 7897 . 420–424 . 2109.12238 . 2022Natur.602..420B . 10.1038/s41586-021-04349-7 . 35173346 . 237940816.
40. Web site: McCormick. Katie. 2021-10-25. An Ultra-Precise Clock Shows How to Link the Quantum World With Gravity. 2021-10-29. Quanta Magazine. en.
41. Einstein, A. . On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light . Annalen der Physik . 1911 . 35 . 10 . 898–908 . 10.1002/andp.19113401005 . 1911AnP...340..898E .
42. Web site: Explanation of the Perihelion Motion of Mercury from the General Theory of Relativity.