Graphene lens explained
A graphene lens is an optical refraction device. Graphene's unique 2-D honeycomb contributes to its unique optical properties.
Graphene
The honeycomb structure allows electrons to behave as massless quasiparticles known as Dirac fermions.[1] Graphene's optical conductivity properties are thus unobstructed by any material parameters (represented by Equation 1), where is the electron charge, is Planck's constant and represents the universal conductance.[2]
(Equation 1)
This behavior is the result of an undoped graphene material at zero temperature (Figure 1a).[3] In contrast to traditional semiconductors or metals (Figure 1b); graphene's band gap is nearly nonexistent because the conducting and valence bands make contact (Figure 1a). However, the band gap is tunable via doping and electrical gating, changing optical properties.[4] As a result of its tunable conductivity, graphene is suitable for various optical applications.
Applications
Photodetectors
Electrical gating and doping allows for adjustment of graphene's optical absorptivity.[5] [6] The application of electric fields transverse to staggered graphene bilayers generates a shift in Fermi energy and an artificial, non-zero band gap (Equation 2, Figure 1).
(Equation 2)where
Dt = top electrical displacement field
Db = bottom electrical displacement field
Varying δD above or below zero (δD=0 denotes non-gated, neutral bilayers) allows electrons to pass through the bilayer without altering the gating-induced band gap.[7] Varying the average displacement field, ▁D, alters the bilayer's absorption spectra (as shown in Figure 2). The optical tunability resulting from gating and electrostatic doping (also known as charge plasma doping[8]) lends to the application of graphene as an ultra-broadband photodetector in lenses.[9]
Chang-Hua et al. implemented graphene in an infrared photodetector by sandwiching an insulating barrier of between two graphene sheets.[10] The graphene layers became electrically isolated and exhibited an average Fermi difference of 0.12eV when a current was passed through the bottom layer (Figure 3). When the photodetector is exposed to light, excited hot electrons transitioned from the top graphene layer to the bottom, a process promoted by the structural asymmetry of the insulating barrier.[11] As a consequence of the hot electron transition, the top layer accumulates positive charges and induces a photogating [12] effect on the lower graphene layer, which is measured as a change in current correlating with photon detection. Utilizing graphene both as a channel for charge transport and light absorption, the photodetectors ably detects the visible to mid-infrared spectrum. Nanometers thin and functional at room temperature, graphene photodetectors show promise in lens applications.
Fresnel zone plates
Fresnel zone plates are devices that focus light on a fixed point in space. These devices concentrate light reflected off a lens onto a singular point (Figure 4). Composed of a series of discs centered about an origin, Fresnel zone plates are manufactured using laser pulses, which embed voids into a reflective lens.
Despite its weak reflectance (R = 0.25π2 α 2 at T = 1.3 × 10−4 K), graphene has utility as a lens for Fresnel zone plates.[13] Graphene lenses effectively concentrate light of ʎ = 850 nm onto a single point 120 μm away from the Fresnel zone plate (Figure 5). Further investigation illustrates that the reflected intensity increases linearly with the number of graphene layers within the lens (Figure 6).
Transparent conductors
Optoelectronic components such as light-emitting diode (LED) displays, solar cells, and touchscreens require highly transparent materials with low sheet resistance, Rs. For a thin film, the sheet resistance is given by Equation 3:
(Equation 3)where is the film thickness and is the
DC conductivity.
A material with tunable thickness t and conductivity σ is suitable for optoelectronic applications if Rs is reasonably small. Graphene is such a material; the number of graphene layers that comprise the film can tune t and the inherent tunability of graphene's optical properties via doping or grating can tune sigma. Figure 7 shows graphene's potential relative to other known transparent conductors.[14] [15] [16]
The need for alternative transparent conductors is well documented.[17] [18] [19] Semiconductor based transparent conductors such as doped indium oxides, zinc oxides, or tin oxides suffer from practical downfalls including rigorous processing requirements, prohibitive cost, sensitivity toward Ph, and brittle consistency. However, graphene does not suffer from these shortfalls.
Notes and References
- Geim. A. K.. Novoselov. K. S.. 14647602. The rise of graphene. Nature Materials. March 2007. 6. 3. 183–91. 10.1038/nmat1849. 17330084. 2007NatMa...6..183G . cond-mat/0702595.
- Grigorenko. A. N.. Polini. M.. Novoselov. K. S.. 119285513. Graphene plasmonics. Nature Photonics. 5 November 2012. 6. 11. 749–58. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.262. 1301.4241 . 2012NaPho...6..749G .
- Li. Z. Q.. Henriksen. E. A.. Jiang. Z.. Hao. Z.. Martin. M. C.. Kim. P.. Stormer. H. L.. Basov. D. N.. 5867656. Dirac charge dynamics in graphene by infrared spectroscopy. Nature Physics. 8 June 2008. 4. 7. 532–35. 10.1038/nphys989. 0807.3780.
- Zhang. Yuanbo. Tang. Tsung-Ta. Girit. Caglar. Hao. Zhao. Martin. Michael C.. Zettl. Alex. Crommie. Michael F.. Shen. Y. Ron. Wang. Feng. 205217165. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature. 11 June 2009. 459. 7248. 820–23. 10.1038/nature08105. 19516337. 2009Natur.459..820Z . 974550.
- Koppens. F. H. L.. Mueller. T.. Avouris. Ph.. Ferrari. A. C.. Vitiello. M. S.. Polini. M.. Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nature Nanotechnology. 6 October 2014. 9. 10. 780–93. 10.1038/nnano.2014.215. 25286273. 2014NatNa...9..780K .
- Wang. F.. Zhang. Y.. Tian. C.. Girit. C.. Zettl. A.. Alex Zettl. Crommie. M.. Shen. Y. R.. 9321526. Gate-Variable Optical Transitions in Graphene. Science. 11 April 2008. 320. 5873. 206–09. 10.1126/science.1152793. 18339901. 2008Sci...320..206W .
- Wang. F.. Zhang. Y.. Tian. C.. Girit. C.. Zettl. A.. Crommie. M.. Shen. Y. R.. 9321526. Gate-Variable Optical Transitions in Graphene. Science. 11 April 2008. 320. 5873. 206–209. 10.1126/science.1152793. 18339901. 2008Sci...320..206W .
- Hueting. R. J. E.. Rajasekharan. B.. Salm. C.. Schmitz. J.. 16320021. The charge plasma p-n diode. IEEE Electron Device Letters. 2008. 29. 12. 1367–1369. 10.1109/LED.2008.2006864. 2008IEDL...29.1367H .
- Liu. Chang-Hua. Chang. You-Chia. Norris. Theodore B.. Zhong. Zhaohui. Graphene photodetectors with ultra-broadband and high responsivity at room temperature. Nature Nanotechnology. 16 March 2014. 9. 4. 273–78. 10.1038/nnano.2014.31. 24633521. 2014NatNa...9..273L .
- Liu. Chang-Hua. Chang. You-Chia. Norris. Theodore B.. Zhong. Zhaohui. Graphene photodetectors with ultra-broadband and high responsivity at room temperature. Nature Nanotechnology. 16 March 2014. 9. 4. 273–278. 10.1038/nnano.2014.31. 24633521. 2014NatNa...9..273L .
- Lee. C.-C.. Suzuki. S.. Xie. W.. Schibli. T. R.. Broadband graphene electro-optic modulators with sub-wavelength thickness. Optics Express. 17 February 2012. 20. 5. 5264–69. 10.1364/OE.20.005264. 22418332. 2012OExpr..20.5264L. free.
- Li. Hongbo B. T.. Schropp. Ruud E. I.. Rubinelli. Francisco A.. Photogating effect as a defect probe in hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon solar cells. Journal of Applied Physics. 2010. 108. 1. 014509–. 10.1063/1.3437393. 2010JAP...108a4509L . 11336/13706. 54936938 . free.
- Kong. Xiang-Tian. Khan. Ammar A.. Kidambi. Piran R.. Deng. Sunan. Yetisen. Ali K.. Dlubak. Bruno. Hiralal. Pritesh. Montelongo. Yunuen. Bowen. James. Xavier. Stéphane. Jiang. Kyle. Amaratunga. Gehan A. J.. Hofmann. Stephan. Wilkinson. Timothy D.. Dai. Qing. Butt. Haider. Graphene-Based Ultrathin Flat Lenses. ACS Photonics. 18 February 2015. 2. 2. 200–07. 10.1021/ph500197j.
- Bae. Sukang. Kim. Hyeongkeun. Lee. Youngbin. Xu. Xiangfan. Park. Jae-Sung. Zheng. Yi. Balakrishnan. Jayakumar. Lei. Tian. Ri Kim. Hye. Song. Young Il. Kim. Young-Jin. Kim. Kwang S.. Özyilmaz. Barbaros. Ahn. Jong-Hyun. Hong. Byung Hee. Iijima. Sumio. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nature Nanotechnology. 20 June 2010. 5. 8. 574–78. 10.1038/nnano.2010.132. 20562870. 2010NatNa...5..574B . 10.1.1.176.439. 7359174 .
- Geng. Hong-Zhang. Kim. Ki Kang. So. Kang Pyo. Lee. Young Sil. Chang. Youngkyu. Lee. Young Hee. Effect of Acid Treatment on Carbon Nanotube-Based Flexible Transparent Conducting Films. Journal of the American Chemical Society. June 2007. 129. 25. 7758–59. 10.1021/ja0722224. 17536805.
- Lee. Jung-Yong. Connor. Stephen T.. Cui. Yi. Peumans. Peter. Solution-Processed Metal Nanowire Mesh Transparent Electrodes. Nano Letters. February 2008. 8. 2. 689–92. 10.1021/nl073296g. 18189445. 2008NanoL...8..689L . 17022574 . 10.1.1.463.7007.
- Minami. Tadatsugu. Transparent conducting oxide semiconductors for transparent electrodes. Semiconductor Science and Technology. 1 April 2005. 20. 4. S35–S44. 10.1088/0268-1242/20/4/004. 2005SeScT..20S..35M . 93242002 .
- Holland. L.. Siddall. G.. the properties of some reactively sputtered metal oxide films. Vacuum. October 1953. 3. 4. 375–91. 10.1016/0042-207X(53)90411-4. 1953Vacuu...3..375H.
- Hamberg. I.. Granqvist. C. G.. Evaporated Sn-doped In2O3 films: Basic optical properties and applications to energy-efficient windows. Journal of Applied Physics. 1986. 60. 11. R123. 10.1063/1.337534. 1986JAP....60R.123H .