Government of the British Indian Ocean Territory explained

The British Indian Ocean Territory (abbreviated as BIOT) is an overseas territory of the United Kingdom. It is administered by a Commissioner, located at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London. There is no Governor appointed to represent the King in the territory as there are no permanent inhabitants (as is also the case in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands and the British Antarctic Territory).

Constitution

The laws of the territory are based on the constitution, currently set out in the British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004.[1] [2] The Order allows for:

If the Commissioner has not made a law on a particular topic then, in most circumstances, the laws that apply in the territory are the same as those that apply in England and Wales under the terms of the Courts Ordinance 1983.[3] As almost all residents of the BIOT are members of the United States military, however, in practice crimes are more commonly charged under United States military law.[4]

Legislation is formally published in the BIOT Gazette, but this is not widely distributed.[5]

Executive

The territory was formally acquired by the United Kingdom under the Treaty of Paris in 1814 and subsequently formed part of the British colony of Mauritius until its detachment as a separate territory in 1965. The head of state is Charles III, King of the United Kingdom.

The Commissioner is currently Ben Merrick, who is also Director of Overseas Territories in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Commissioner of the British Antarctic Territory;[6] the Deputy Commissioner is Stephen Hilton and the Administrator is Kit Pyman. The Commissioner's Representative in the territory is the officer commanding the detachment of British forces.[7]

There is no legislature (or elections) in the territory as there are no permanent inhabitants.

Judiciary

BIOT has a full and independent administration of civil and criminal justice, with a Magistrates Court, Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. Further appeals can be heard by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, located in London.[8] The following persons have served as the territory's Chief Justice, overseeing a small legal system for the jurisdiction: Sir John Farley Spry (1981-1987);[9] Sir John Fieldsend (1987 - 1998);[10] Christopher Gardner (2007); Simon Bryan (since 2015); and James Lewis.[11]

On 5 May 2023, the Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory ruled that there is a right in certain circumstances to legal aid for both civil and criminal matters on BIOT, based on a local adaption of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.[12] [13]

Capital punishment is prohibited under the domestic law of the territory. While United States military law (which does provide for capital punishment) applies for most BIOT residents, the 1966 exchange of notes which initially established the governance of the territory states: "A death sentence shall not be carried out in the Territory by the military authorities of the United States."[14]

US military presence

Applicable treaties between the United Kingdom and the United States of America govern the use of the military base. The first exchange of notes, signed on 30 December 1966, constituted an agreement concerning the availability for defence purposes of the British Indian Ocean Territory.[15] This was followed by agreements on the construction of a communications facility (1972), naval support facility (1976), construction contracts (1987), and monitoring facility (1999).

External links


Notes and References

  1. Web site: British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 – a Freedom of Information request to Privy Council Office. 9 November 2012. whatdotheyknow.com .
  2. Prerogative legislation as the paradigm of bad law-making: the Chagos Islands. Ronan. Cormacain. September 1, 2013. Commonwealth Law Bulletin. 39. 3. 487–508. Taylor and Francis+NEJM. 10.1080/03050718.2013.822317. 131408841 .
  3. British Indian Ocean Territory Ordinance No 3 of the 1983 ("the Courts Ordinance"), Article 3.1.
  4. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jksonc/docs/bancoult-d16b1.html#ii U.S./U.K. BIOT agreements, 1966-1987
  5. Web site: Prerogative Legislation as the Paradigm of Bad Law-Making: The Chagos Islands . Cormacain . Ronan . Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London . 2012 . 25 September 2023.
  6. Web site: Ben Merrick, Director, Overseas Territories, and Commissioner, British Antarctic Territory . gov.uk . Foreign and Commonwealth Office . 16 June 2020.
  7. Web site: Governance . BIOT . British Indian Ocean Territory Administration . 16 June 2020.
  8. Web site: Role of the JCPC . www.jcpc.uk . Judicial Committee of the Privy Council . 16 June 2020.
  9. Web site: Spry, Sir John Farley (1910 - 1999) Knight. Middle East Centre, St Antony’s College. 21 June 2016.
  10. The International Who's Who 2004
  11. Web site: Simon Bryan QC appointed as Chief Justice of the Falkland Islands and Other Overseas Territories. Essex Court. 21 June 2016.
  12. Web site: Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory rules there is a right to legal aid . Matrix Chambers . 5 May 2023 . 26 September 2023.
  13. Web site: The King v The Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory . BIOT SC/No3/2023 & BIOT SC/No 4/2023 . Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory . 5 May 2023 . 26 September 2023.
  14. Annex 2, Paragraph 1(g) . UN Treaty Series . 1967 . 286 . 16 June 2020.
  15. Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the availability for defense purposes of the British Indian Ocean Territory . UN Treaty Series . 1967 . 603 . 273 . 16 June 2020.