Goodhart's law explained

Goodhart's law should not be confused with Godwin's law.

Goodhart's law is an adage often stated as, "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure". It is named after British economist Charles Goodhart, who is credited with expressing the core idea of the adage in a 1975 article on monetary policy in the United Kingdom:[1]

It was used to criticize the British Thatcher government for trying to conduct monetary policy on the basis of targets for broad and narrow money,[2] but the law reflects a much more general phenomenon.[3]

Priority and background

Numerous concepts are related to this idea, at least one of which predates Goodhart's statement.[4] Notably, Campbell's law likely has precedence, as Jeff Rodamar has argued, since various formulations date to 1969.[5] Other academics had similar insights at the time. Jerome Ravetz's 1971 book Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems[6] also predates Goodhart, though it does not formulate the same law. He discusses how systems in general can be gamed, focuses on cases where the goals of a task are complex, sophisticated, or subtle. In such cases, the persons possessing the skills to execute the tasks properly seek their own goals to the detriment of the assigned tasks. When the goals are instantiated as metrics, this could be seen as equivalent to Goodhart and Campbell's claim.

Shortly after Goodhart's publication, others suggested closely related ideas, including the Lucas critique (1976). As applied in economics, the law is also implicit in the idea of rational expectations, a theory in economics that states that those who are aware of a system of rewards and punishments will optimize their actions within that system to achieve their desired results. For example, if an employee is rewarded by the number of cars sold each month, they will try to sell more cars, even at a loss.

While it originated in the context of market responses, the law has profound implications for the selection of high-level targets in organizations. Jon Danielsson states the law as

And suggested a corollary for use in financial risk modelling:

Mario Biagioli related the concept to consequences of using citation impact measures to estimate the importance of scientific publications:[7] [8]

The law is illustrated in the 2018 book The Tyranny of Metrics by Jerry Z. Muller.[9]

Generalization

Later writers generalized Goodhart's point about monetary policy into a more general adage about measures and targets in accounting and evaluation systems. In a book chapter published in 1996, Keith Hoskin wrote:

In a 1997 paper responding to the work of Hoskin and others on financial accounting and grades in education, anthropologist Marilyn Strathern expressed Goodhart's Law as "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure," and linked the sentiment to the history of accounting stretching back into Britain in the 1800s:

Examples

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Encyclopedia: Problems of Monetary Management: The U.K. Experience . Papers in Monetary Economics . Reserve Bank of Australia . Sydney . Goodhart . Charles . Papers in monetary economics 1975; 1; 1. - [Sydney]. - 1975, p. 1-20 . 1975 . Charles Goodhart . 1.
  2. Book: Smith . David . The Rise And Fall of Monetarism . 1987 . . 9780140227543 . London.
  3. 1803.04585. cs.AI. David. Manheim. Scott. Garrabrant. Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law. 2018.
  4. Web site: Manheim . David . 29 September 2016 . Overpowered Metrics Eat Underspecified Goals . 26 January 2017 . ribbonfarm . en-US.
  5. Rodamar . Jeffery . 28 November 2018 . There ought to be a law! Campbell versus Goodhart . Significance . 15 . 6 . 9 . 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01205.x . free.
  6. Book: Ravetz, Jerome R. . Scientific knowledge and its social problems . Transaction Publishers . 1971 . 1-56000-851-2 . New Brunswick, New Jersey . 295–296 . 32779931 .
  7. Biagioli . Mario . 12 July 2016 . Watch out for cheats in citation game . Nature . 535 . 7611 . 201 . 2016Natur.535..201B . 10.1038/535201a . 27411599. free .
  8. Varela . Diego . Benedetto . Giacomo . Sanchez-Santos . Jose Manuel . Editorial statement: Lessons from Goodhart's law for the management of the journal . European Journal of Government and Economics . 30 December 2014 . 3 . 2 . 100–103 . 10.17979/ejge.2014.3.2.4299. 152551763 . 8 February 2022. free . 2183/23376 . free .
  9. Book: Muller, Jerry Z. . The Tyranny of Metrics . 2018 . Princeton University Press . 978-0-691-19126-3.
  10. Koltun . V . Hafner . D . The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. . PLOS One . 2021 . 16 . 6 . e0253397 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 . 34181681 . 8238192 . 2102.03234 . 2021PLoSO..1653397K . Our results suggest that the use of the h-index in ranking scientists should be reconsidered, and that fractional allocation measures such as h-frac provide more robust alternatives. . free . Companion webpage
  11. Web site: Mooers . Arne . 2022-05-23 . When is a species really extinct? . 2023-06-23 . The Conversation . en.
  12. Martin . T. E. . Bennett . G. C. . Fairbairn . A. . Mooers . A. O. . March 2023 . 'Lost' taxa and their conservation implications . Animal Conservation . en . 26 . 1 . 14–24 . 10.1111/acv.12788 . 2023AnCon..26...14M . 248846699 . 1367-9430.
  13. Book: How to Read Numbers. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. 2021. Chivers. Tom. Chivers. David. 9781474619974. 22: Goodhart's Law.
  14. Web site: Roshan . Revanka . Juking the Stats . medium.com. January 20, 2016 . August 14, 2024.