R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Explained

Ginna nuclear power plant
Country:United States
Location:Ontario, New York
Coordinates:43.2778°N -77.31°W
Owner:Constellation Energy
Operator:Constellation Energy
Construction Began:April 25, 1966
Commissioned:June 1, 1970
Ps Cooling Source:Lake Ontario
Np Reactor Supplier:Westinghouse
Np Reactor Type:PWR
Ps Electrical Capacity:580 MW
Ps Annual Generation:4732 GWh (2021)
Status:O
Ps Units Operational:1 × 580 MW
Cost:$346.15 million (2007 USD)[1]
Website:Ginna Nuclear Power Plant

The Robert Emmett Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, commonly known as Ginna, is a nuclear power plant located on the southern shore of Lake Ontario, in the town of Ontario, Wayne County, New York, United States, approximately east of Rochester, New York.[2] It is a single unit Westinghouse 2-Loop pressurized water reactor, similar to those at Point Beach, Kewaunee, and Prairie Island. Having gone into commercial operation in 1970, Ginna became the second oldest nuclear power reactor, after Nine Mile unit 1, still in operation in the United States when the Oyster Creek power plant was permanently shut down on September 17, 2018.

History

The plant was named after Robert Emmett Ginna, a former chief executive of Rochester Gas & Electric, who was one of the nation's earliest advocates of using nuclear energy to generate electricity.[3]

Ginna is owned and operated by Constellation Energy following separation from Exelon in 2022. Constellation, prior to merger with Exelon purchased it from Rochester Gas and Electric in 2004.[4] [5]

The Ginna plant was the site of a nuclear accident when, on January 25, 1982, a small amount of radioactive steam leaked into the air after a steam-generator tube ruptured.[6] [7] The leak which lasted 93 minutes led to the declaration of a site emergency. The rupture was caused by a small pie-pan-shaped object left in the steam generator during an outage. This was not the first time a tube rupture had occurred at an American reactor but following on so closely behind the Three Mile Island accident caused considerable attention to be focused on the incident at the Ginna plant. In total, 485.3 curies of noble gas and 1.15 millicuries of iodine-131 were released to the environment https://web.archive.org/web/20160311053932/http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/chrono4.htm and of contaminated water was lost from the reactor.[8]

In 1996 the original Westinghouse supplied steam generators (including the one that was damaged in 1982 and repaired) were replaced by two brand new Babcock & Wilcox steam generators. This project enabled an uprating of Ginna's output several years later and was a major factor in the approval of the plant's operating license extension for 20 years beyond the original license (originally valid until 2009).

Electricity Production

Generation (MWh) of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant[9] !Year!Jan!Feb!Mar!Apr!May!Jun!Jul!Aug!Sep!Oct!Nov!Dec!Annual (Total)
2001363,157333,798352,214357,305369,403351,793359,110357,953348,927366,030356,796369,2424,285,728
2002369,437309,639167,286110,696368,745354,854358,597357,515336,869366,674357,224369,3123,826,848
2003369,157333,040358,284357,078370,018355,741361,548317,417149,717165,598357,350369,0713,864,019
2004368,981345,506369,581357,110368,969359,679363,554360,422351,488338,115358,159370,3794,311,943
2005371,538308,251231,144221,167370,006352,150344,889356,950339,371371,222360,373371,1523,998,213
2006370,750335,216371,075359,071371,293354,770359,643358,382354,16285,503366,516433,2934,119,674
2007391,257387,834401,525418,284423,302409,952409,867419,625408,689411,515417,479431,1994,930,528
2008431,274403,434430,630274,251261,037413,782419,771418,979410,902428,998417,387432,3814,742,826
2009432,130390,108431,376413,772336,937415,529422,912417,308174,390375,579413,995406,8674,630,903
2010340,553388,412431,703418,154430,836411,637417,520421,282409,225429,647417,397431,9974,948,363
2011429,794389,941431,777317,7530275,078417,081418,559411,333368,958385,844432,4144,278,532
2012432,520404,390431,961418,365430,825411,946418,054414,834406,077285,706116,230430,8114,601,719
2013432,767390,729432,514419,309432,300414,881363,935418,663407,739428,096419,261433,1024,993,296
2014424,520390,493432,045371,081105,955417,293423,190407,687411,411427,554418,641432,6254,662,495
2015432,353390,466431,859418,743431,027416,419423,337426,923418,624245,231328,898437,5114,801,391
2016438,041409,814437,839417,497430,574412,175426,117417,886404,918427,365417,058431,0395,070,323
2017431,281389,833430,885298,362210,016412,085420,460419,606408,610427,257417,573431,7074,697,675
2018431,746389,920388,055418,273431,906415,493412,470417,553408,858257,347290,620427,1994,689,440
2019431,412390,119430,988417,825431,766361,140418,815420,587411,409429,922417,947431,7634,993,693
2020432,047404,201429,19762,64472,039413,348416,834415,553408,485428,428418,270431,8424,332,888
2021432,048390,196431,443418,048430,618413,188451,712417,592406,82391,809418,304430,9464,732,727
2022432,313390,539431,723418,326431,515412,419418,928415,491409,057428,9034,189,214
2023

Surrounding population

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[10]

The 2010 U.S. population within of Ginna was 66,847, an increase of 12.7 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within was 1,269,589, an increase of 2.1 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Rochester (17 miles to city center). Canadian population is not included in these figures.[11]

Seismic risk

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Ginna was 1 in 76,923, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[12] [13]

See also

References

http://www.whec.com/whecimages/ginna_nuclear.jpg

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: EIA - State Nuclear Profiles. www.eia.gov. 3 October 2017. en.
  2. Web site: Constellation Energy Ginna Site Description . Constellation Energy . July 9, 2007 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20070929040926/http://www.constellation.com/portal/site/constellation/menuitem.385c7a188817d1908d84ff10025166a0/ . September 29, 2007 .
  3. News: Salpukas . Agis . 1996-05-19 . Robert Ginna, 94, a Champion of Nuclear Power . en-US . The New York Times . 2022-09-09 . 0362-4331.
  4. http://ir.constellation.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112182&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=580660&highlight= "Constellation Energy Press Release, June 10, 2004"
  5. Web site: CENG'S Five Reactors Officially Join Exelon's Nuclear Fleet - Exelon.
  6. Web site: TRANSMITTAL OF NUREG-0916 RELATIVE TO THE RESTART OF R. E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (Generic Letter No. 82-11) . UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION . June 9, 1982 . 2009-01-09 .
  7. Web site: Nuclear Plant Mishap Is Explained by Utility . The New York Times . March 25, 1982 . January 9, 2009.
  8. Book: Schlager. When Technology Fails. 1994. Gale Research . 0-8103-8908-8.
  9. Web site: Electricity Data Browser . 2023-01-08 . www.eia.gov.
  10. Web site: NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants . 2012-02-08 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20061002131207/http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power-bg.html . 2006-10-02 .
  11. Web site: Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors . 2022-09-09 . NBC News . 14 April 2011 . en.
  12. Web site: What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk . 2022-09-09 . NBC News . 16 March 2011 . en.
  13. Web site: Archived copy . 2011-04-19 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170525170632/http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf . 2017-05-25 . dead .