Ghana–Togo Mountain languages explained

Ghana–Togo Mountain languages
Also Known As:Togo Remnant, Central Togo
Region:Ivory Coast, Ghana, and Togo
Familycolor:Niger-Congo
Fam2:Atlantic–Congo
Fam3:Kwa
Child1:Na-Togo
Child2:AniiAdere
Child3:Ka-Togo
Child4:KebuAnimere
Glotto:kato1245
Glottoname:Ka-Togo
Glotto2:nato1234
Glottoname2:Na-Togo

The Ghana–Togo Mountain languages, formerly called Togorestsprachen (Togo Remnant languages) and Central Togo languages, form a grouping of about fourteen languages spoken in the mountains of the GhanaTogo borderland. They are part of the Kwa branch of the Niger–Congo family.

History of classification

Bernhard Struck, in 1912, was the first to group together these languages under the label Semibantu von Mitteltogo. Westermann, in his classification of the then Sudanic languages, adopted the grouping but called it Togorestsprachen.[1] This was mainly a loose geographical-typological grouping based on the elaborate noun class systems of the languages; lack of comparative data prevented a more definitive phylogenetic classification. Bernd Heine (1968) carried out comparative research among the group, establishing a basic division between Ka-Togo and Na-Togo based on the word for 'flesh' in the languages. Dakubu and Ford (1988) renamed this cluster the Central Togo languages, a term still used by some (e.g. Blench 2001); since the mid-90s, the term Ghana–Togo Mountain languages has become more common.

No comparative study of the languages has appeared in print since Heine (1968); Blench (unpublished) presented a tentative reclassification of the group in 2001, noting the internal diversity of the grouping. It is still unclear whether the grouping forms a branch on its own within Kwa.[2]

Features

A characteristic of these languages is their Niger–Congo noun class system, since in many surrounding languages only remnants of such a system are found. All Ghana–Togo Mountain languages are tonal and most have a nine or ten vowel system employing ATR vowel harmony. Both Ewe and Twi, the dominant regional languages, have exerted considerable influence on many GTM languages.

Languages

English namesAutonyms
People Language
NaAdele Bidire Gidire
Anii, Basila
Giseme, Akpe
Logba Akpanawò Ikpana
Lelemi, Buem Lε-lεmi
Lefana, Buem Lε-fana
Siwu-Lolobi, Akpafu sg. Ɔwu,
pl. Mawu
Siwu
Likpe sg. Ɔkpεlá,
pl. Bakpεlá
Sεkpεlé
Santrokofí sg. Ɔlɛɛ,
pl. Balɛɛ
Sεlεε
KaAvatime Ke-dane-ma Sì-yà
NyangboBatrugbu Tùtrùgbù
Tafi Bàgbɔ̀ Tɛ̀gbɔ̀
IkposoAkpɔsɔ Ikpɔsɔ
Bowiri, ToraBawuliTuwuli
Ahlon Igo
Akebu Ǝkpǝǝβǝ Kɨkpǝǝkǝ
Animere Animere

Classification of GTM languages

Heine (1968) placed the GTM languages into two branches of Kwa, Na-Togo and Ka-Togo:

However, this classification was distorted by influence from Ewe on the one hand and Twi on the other. Blench (2006) makes the following tentative classification, which he expects to change as more data becomes available. One branch each of the Na and Ka languages are split off. As with Heine's classification, these may be independent branches of Kwa:

Ethnologue also lists Agotime, which they note is similar to Ahlo.

Westernmann (1922)[3] also includes Boro, but this is uncertain due to the little data that is available.

See also

Bibliography

Sources

Seidel treats Avatime (203-218), Logba (218-227), Nyangbo-Tafi (227-229), Nkunya (230-234), Bórada (235-238), Boviri (239-242), Akpafu (242-246), 'Santrokofi' (246-250), Likpe (250-254), Axolo (254-257), Akposo (257-264), Kebu (264-267), Atakpame (267-272), the Fetischsprachen Agu (273-274), Gbelle/Muatse (275-286), and the extinct Boro (286).

External links

Notes and References

  1. E.g. Westermann 1935:146
  2. Blench (2001) says that 'Although much of the literature and in particular Heine (1968) treats the Central Togo languages as a unit, since Stewart (1989) it has generally been accepted that these form distinct branches showing no particular relationship.'
  3. Westermann, Diedrich Hermann (1922) 'Vier Sprachen aus Mitteltogo. Likpe, Bowili, Akpafu und Adele, nebst einigen Resten der Borosprache. Nach Aufnahmen von Emil Funke und Adam Mischlich bearbeitet'. Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen, 25, 1-59.