| The Lord Upjohn | |
| Honorific Prefix: | The Right Honourable |
| Honorific Suffix: | CBE, PC, DL |
| Office: | Lord of Appeal in Ordinary |
| Termstart: | 26 November 1963 |
| Termend: | 27 January 1971 |
| Office2: | Justice of the High Court |
| Office1: | Lord Justice of Appeal |
| Birth Date: | 25 February 1903 |
| Birth Place: | Wimbledon, Surrey, England |
| Birth Name: | Gerald Ritchie Upjohn |
| Death Place: | London, England |
| Termstart1: | 1960 |
| Termstart2: | 1951 |
| Termend1: | 1963 |
| Termend2: | 1960 |
Gerald Ritchie Upjohn, Baron Upjohn, CBE, PC, DL (25 February 1903 - 27 January 1971) was a British soldier and judge.
The younger son of William Henry Upjohn KC, he served in the Welsh Guards during the Second World War, reaching the rank of brigadier. In 1948, he sat with Sir George Lynskey and Sir Godfrey Vick on the Lynskey tribunal. Appointed to the Privy Council in 1960, he was Lord Justice of Appeal from 1960 to 1963. On 26 November 1963 he became a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary and was made additionally a life peer by the style title Baron Upjohn, of Little Tey in the County of Essex.[1]
While a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary he contributed to a number of significant cases. Three cases of particular importance are Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (giving a powerful dissent), Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291 (where he gave a majority speech) and In re Gulbenkian's Settlements [1970] AC 508.
An interesting problem arose on Lord Upjohn's death. The Judicial Committee of the House of Lords would ideally sit with an odd number of judges, to ensure a clear decision. Lord Upjohn's death raised the problem of an equally divided Appellate Committee. Kennedy v Spratt [1972] AC 83 remained on the docket and Lord Upjohn had already prepared a speech, intending to vote with Lord Reid and Lord Diplock, dismissing the appeal. Lord Reid read Lord Upjohn's speech as a part of his own and in accordance with the presumption in favour of the status quo (semper pracsumitur pro negante), the appeal was dismissed. It has been pointed out that, 'had Lord Upjohn been in favour of allowing the appeal, the application of the principlewould have produced a disgruntled appellant whose victory had been snatched from under his nose: it may well be that such manifest injustice would have led to the case being reargued before a reconstituted court.'[2]
| Escutcheon: | Sable a Fess between in chief two Lion's Heads erased and in base as many Leeks in saltire Or |
| Crest: | A Stork proper holding in the beak a Balance Or |
| Motto: | Quid quid agis age toto [3] |