Iron Duke engine explained

Iron Duke
Aka:Tech IV (1982-1990)
Manufacturer:General Motors
Production:1977–1993
Predecessor:GM 2300 engine
Successor:GM 122 engine
Bore:41NaN1
Stroke:31NaN1
Configuration:Straight-four
Displacement:150.81NaN1
Weight:375lb[1]
Block:Cast iron
Head:Cast iron
Valvetrain:OHV 2 valves x cyl.
Fuelsystem:Carburetor
Throttle-body fuel injection
Fueltype:Gasoline
Oilsystem:Wet sump
Coolingsystem:Water-cooled
Power:NaN0NaN0
Specpower:NaN1NaN1-NaN1NaN1 per liter
Torque:NaN0NaN0
Compression:8.25:1 (1977–1983) 9.0:1 (1984–1993)
Redline:5000 rpm

The Iron Duke engine (also called 151, 2500, Pontiac 2.5, and Tech IV) is a 1511NaN1 straight-4 piston engine built by the Pontiac Motor Division of General Motors from 1977 until 1993. Originally developed as Pontiac's new economy car engine, it was used in a wide variety of vehicles across GM's lineup in the 1980s as well as supplied to American Motors Corporation (AMC). The engine was engineered for fuel efficiency, smooth operation, and long life, not for performance.[2] Total Duke engine production is estimated to be between 3.8 and 4.2 million units.[3]

Development

At the time of the 1973 oil crisis the only engines Pontiac built were 3501NaN1, 4001NaN1, and 4551NaN1 versions of their V8 engine. Recognizing that future products would need to be smaller and more fuel-efficient, Pontiac engineers were tasked with developing a new engine that would be suitable for these future products.[4] The engineers considered developing smaller displacement versions of the existing V8, a V6 derived from the V8, a V4 derived from the V8, and an inline-four derived from one of the cylinder banks of the V8 (in the same fashion as the 1961 Pontiac Tempest's "Trophy 4" engine), but ultimately decided to create an entirely new four-cylinder engine.

The development team's design goals were to minimize noise and vibration while maximizing durability, drivability, fuel economy, and "usable" power at lower engine speeds. They began by analyzing other four-cylinder engines in production at General Motors at the time, and they found that GM do Brasil's 1511NaN1 version of the Chevrolet 153 cu in four-cylinder—with a shorter 3inches stroke and longer 6inches connecting rods—had significantly reduced secondary vibration as compared to the original Chevrolet design and the newer 2.3 L four-cylinder from the Chevrolet Vega. This obviated the need for counter-rotating balance shafts, which would have increased the weight, complexity, and cost of the engine. Despite sharing the same bore, stroke, and cylinder spacing as the Brazilian engine, the majority of parts are not interchangeable.

Focusing on making power at lower engine speeds was a deliberate consideration in order to meet the rest of the design goals. Careful consideration was made to the design of the intake manifold and exhaust gas recirculation system to ensure power output from each cylinder was equalized. Power consumption of the water and oil pumps were reduced, and the piston rings, cylinder bores, and crankshaft journals were designed to minimize friction.

To maximize durability the engine block was made of cast iron with five main bearings, rather than the relatively fragile cast aluminum block used by the 2.3 L Vega engine. (Even with the cast iron block the Iron Duke only weighed about 20 pounds more.) The 2.3 L engine's belt-driven overhead camshaft was eschewed in favor of an overhead valve design with timing gears. Specially-designed bolts that stretch slightly farther than a conventional bolt were used to secure the intake and exhaust manifolds to the cylinder head, to allow slight movement while maintaining the seal of the gaskets in order to prevent cracking the manifolds as they expand with heat.

A two-stage, two-barrel carburetor with electric choke was used to improve performance in cold starts, while heat shields incorporated underneath the carburetor and between the intake and exhaust manifolds were used to prevent heat soaking the gasoline in the carburetor thereby improving performance in hot weather. Recognizing that cars with four-cylinder engines equipped with air conditioning tended to experience drivability issues in hot weather, other improvements were made including a cut-off switch that shut the compressor off at wide open throttle and a delay incorporated into the air conditioning's circuitry to prevent the compressor from engaging until twelve seconds after the engine was started.

Early applications

The Iron Duke's first applications were in the 1977 Astre and Sunbird subcompact cars, replacing the 2.3 L Vega engine, and in the compact Phoenix. As these cars were originally designed for Chevrolet engines, the Iron Duke also used the Chevrolet bell housing bolt pattern, instead of the Buick-Oldsmobile-Pontiac V8 pattern. The following year use of the engine expanded to the Sunbird's Chevrolet and Oldsmobile twins, the Monza and Starfire.

For the 1979 model year, the engine was extensively redesigned. The original reverse-flow cylinder head was replaced by a crossflow design, a new two-barrel carburetor called "Vara-Jet" was introduced, the distributor was relocated, and the size of the oil pan was reduced. The only parts carried over from the 1978 engines were the connecting rods.[5] Peak power increased to 90 hp.

For 1980 the Iron Duke engine was redesigned to be mounted transversely, to suit the new front-drive General Motors "X-body" cars. The bellhousing bolt pattern was revised to match that of the new 60° V6 engine.

GM also began selling the engine to American Motors Corporation (AMC) starting with the 1980 model year. It was the base engine in Spirit, Concord, and Eagle automobiles, as well as in base-model Jeep CJs.[6] The engines purchased by AMC continued to use the Chevrolet V8 bellhousing pattern. The four-cylinder engine was discontinued from AMC's rear-wheel drive models after 1982. During 1983, the all-wheel drive Eagle base engine switched from the Iron Duke to a new, AMC-developed 1501NaN1 four-cylinder. The 1980 through 1983 Jeep CJs were also available with the Iron Duke as the base engine.[7]

YearPowerTorque
1978850NaN0 @ 4400 rpm[8] 1230NaN0 @ 2800 rpm
1979900NaN01280NaN0
1980900NaN0 @ 4000 rpm[9] 1340NaN0 @ 2400 rpm
1981840NaN0 @ 4000 rpm[10] 1250NaN0 @ 2400 rpm

Tech IV

Iron Dukes were fitted with fuel injection (TBI, via a single injector in the throttle body) in 1982. This version was christened the Tech IV, though Car and Driver later ridiculed it as the low-Tech IV. Power output increased to 900NaN0.[11]

This was replaced by a swirl-port head with 9.0:1 (instead of 8.25:1) compression ratio in 1984 for a 2hp gain. Other additions for 1985 included roller lifters, improved bearings, and a new crankshaft. Several significant changes were made in 1987, which included: an improved cylinder head, intake manifold, and throttle-body fuel injection module; a more-modern serpentine belt with an automatic spring-loaded tensioner for the accessories; and a Distributorless Ignition System (DIS). This revision to the engine increased power to 980NaN0. In 1988, a balance shaft was added to smooth engine vibrations. Up to this point, the engine incorporated a 'dogbone' upper front engine mount secured to the cowling of the vehicle's hood latch, aiding in controlling the vibration. Further improvements in later years included new pistons, rods, crankshaft, and an in-pan oiling system. The most powerful variant of the Tech IV raised the rev limit to 5500 rpm, and achieved 1100NaN0. The Tech IV uses the same bellhousing pattern as the 2.8 L 60-Degree V6. Over the years, the Tech IV engine has proved to be a reliable workhorse for owners when not pushed to its limits. All 1978-1990 Iron Duke engines used a micarta camshaft gear that meshed directly with a steel gear on the crankshaft. 1991-92 VIN R and U engines used a timing chain instead.

The Grumman LLV (Long Life Vehicle) built from 1987 until 1994 for the United States Postal Service for use in mail delivery were initially powered by the Iron Duke engine. The Postal Service specifications called for a 24-year service life and those with 2.5 L engine have surpassed expectations.[12]

Super Duty

Super Duty Engine Displacements
DisplacementStroke
NaN1NaN1
31NaN1
NaN1NaN1
NaN1NaN1
NaN1NaN1

The Iron Duke block formed the basis of Pontiac's Super Duty four-cylinder racing engines of the 1980s, the last in a line of high-performance Pontiac Super Duty engines. The engines were featured in NASCAR's Charlotte/Daytona Dash Series, the IMSA GT Championship (in GTP and GTU class cars), and even in American Power Boat Association racing boats. Super Duty engines continued to be used in ARCA racing until well into the 2000s.

In addition to parts matching the Iron Duke's stock 2.5 L displacement other crankshafts and their corresponding connecting rods were offered by Pontiac Motorsports, resulting in displacements ranging from 2.1 L to 3.2 L. A 2.7 L, 2320NaN0 Super Duty engine powered the 1984 Fiero Indy Pace Car to over 138mph during the race, but Super Duty engines were never available in factory-built GM vehicles. However, GM sold the Super-Duty-specific parts at authorized dealers and all of the parts required to convert a stock Iron Duke engine to a Super Duty version were available.

Kansas Racing Products continued to make the engines in the early 21st century after buying rights to make them from GM.

Cosworth also produced a 16-valve, double-overhead cam head for the 3.0 L version of the racing engine (Cosworth Project DBA, 1987).[13]

References

External links

Notes and References

  1. Sawruk . John M. . Pontiac's New 2.5 Litre 4 Cylinder Engine . Society of Automotive Engineers: Passenger Car Meeting . 26–30 September 1977 . Detroit . 17 August 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180205132841/https://gafiero.akroncdnr.com/docs/IronDuke.pdf . 5 February 2018.
  2. Web site: Hunting . Benjamin . GM's Unkillable Iron Duke 4-Cylinder Engine Powered Dozens Of Trucks, Cars, and SUVs For Decades . May 26, 2021 . DrivingLine . January 20, 2023.
  3. Web site: Appel . Tom . What Was The Iron Duke? . The Daily Drive by Consumer Guide . January 20, 2023 . September 12, 2018.
  4. Web site: Strohl . Daniel . For the last time, the Iron Duke was not the same engine as the Chevy II four-cylinder . Hemmings . September 20, 2019 . January 20, 2023.
  5. Weissler . Paul . November 1978 . Servicing the '79 GM Cars . 162–164 . Popular Mechanics . 17 August 2019.
  6. Web site: Martin . Murilee . 1982: Luxurious AMC Concord gets Ziebart no-rust, GM Iron Duke power . Autoweek . 11 October 2017 . January 20, 2023.
  7. Web site: Jeep Engine: GM 151 . jeeptech.com . December 1, 2010 . January 20, 2023.
  8. Small-engine sport sedans—good handling, tame performance . August 1978 . Jim Dunne (automotive spy photographer) . Jim . Dunne . Jacobs . Ed . Popular Science . 18 August 2019.
  9. GM's X-cars challenge traditional compacts . July 1979 . Jim . Dunne . Jacobs . Ed . Popular Science . 18 August 2019.
  10. Jim . Dunne . Jacobs . Ed . March 1981 . U.S. compacts: Is Chrysler's K-car the new champ? . 46 . Popular Science . 27 August 2019.
  11. Are carburetors kaput? Coming: throttle-body injection . February 1982 . Dunne . Jim . Popular Science . 52 . 27 August 2019.
  12. Web site: Weinstein . Joshua . GM 2.5L Iron Duke I4 Engine Guide . Junkyard Mob . June 8, 2022 . January 20, 2023.
  13. Web site: Cosworth Type Reference . Race-cars.com . 2012-06-04 . 2011-02-22 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110222090951/http://www.race-cars.com/utility/coswrthr.htm . dead .