| Litigants: | Freedman v. Maryland |
| Arguedate: | November 19 |
| Argueyear: | 1964 |
| Decidedate: | March 1 |
| Decideyear: | 1965 |
| Fullname: | Freedman v. Maryland |
| Usvol: | 380 |
| Uspage: | 51 |
| Parallelcitations: | 85 S. Ct. 734; 13 L. Ed. 2d 649; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1732; 1 Media L. Rep. 1126 |
| Holding: | The Maryland law is unconstitutional, since it provides the danger of unduly suppressing protected expression. |
| Majority: | Brennan |
| Joinmajority: | unanimous |
| Concurrence: | Douglas |
| Joinconcurrence: | Black |
Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case that ended government-operated rating boards with a decision that a rating board could only approve a film and had no power to ban a film. The ruling also concluded that a rating board must either approve a film within a reasonable time, or go to court to stop a film from being shown in theatres. Other court cases determined that television stations are federally licensed, so local rating boards have no jurisdiction over films shown on television. When the movie industry set up its own rating system—the Motion Picture Association of America—most state and local boards ceased operating.[1]
Ronald Freedman challenged the law of Maryland that films must be submitted to the Maryland State Board of Censors before being shown in theaters, claiming it unconstitutional; violating freedom of expression granted by the First Amendment.
In a unanimous opinion by Justice Brennan, the Court held that a rating board could only approve a film and had no power to ban a film.