Fractionally subadditive valuation explained

A set function is called fractionally subadditive, or XOS (not to be confused with OXS), if it is the maximum of several additive set functions.This valuation class was defined, and termed XOS, by Noam Nisan, in the context of combinatorial auctions.[1] The term fractionally subadditive was given by Uriel Feige.[2]

Definition

There is a finite base set of items,

M:=\{1,\ldots,m\}

.

There is a function

v

which assigns a number to each subset of

M

.

The function

v

is called fractionally subadditive (or XOS) if there exists a collection of set functions,

\{a1,\ldots,al\}

, such that:[3]

aj

is additive, i.e., it assigns to each subset

X\subseteqM

, the sum of the values of the items in

X

.

v

is the pointwise maximum of the functions

aj

. I.e, for every subset

X\subseteqM

:

v(X)=

l
max
j=1

aj(X)

Equivalent Definition

The name fractionally subadditive comes from the following equivalent definition: a set function

v

is fractionally subadditive if, for any

S\subseteqM

and any collection

\{\alphai,Ti\}

k
i=1
with

\alphai>0

and

Ti\subseteqM

such that
\sum
Ti\nij

\alphai\ge1

for all

j\inS

, we have

v(S)\le

k
\sum
i=1

\alphaiv(Ti)

.

Relation to other utility functions

Every submodular set function is XOS, and every XOS function is a subadditive set function.[1]

See also: Utility functions on indivisible goods.

Notes and References

  1. 10.1145/352871.352872. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce - EC '00. 1. 2000. Nisan. Noam. 1581132727.
  2. 10.1137/070680977. On Maximizing Welfare when Utility Functions Are Subadditive. SIAM Journal on Computing. 39. 122–142. 2009. Feige. Uriel. 10.1.1.86.9904.
  3. 10.1145/2835172. Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions. Journal of the ACM. 63. 2. 1. 2016. Christodoulou. George. Kovács. Annamária. Schapira. Michael. 10.1.1.721.5346.