In mathematics, in particular commutative algebra, the concept of fractional ideal is introduced in the context of integral domains and is particularly fruitful in the study of Dedekind domains. In some sense, fractional ideals of an integral domain are like ideals where denominators are allowed. In contexts where fractional ideals and ordinary ring ideals are both under discussion, the latter are sometimes termed integral ideals for clarity.
Let
R
K=\operatorname{Frac}R
A fractional ideal of
R
R
I
K
r\inR
rI\subseteqR
r
I
The principal fractional ideals are those
R
K
K
I
R
R
A fractional ideal
I
J
IJ=R
IJ=\{a1b1+a2b2+ … +anbn:ai\inI,bj\inJ,n\inZ>0\}
In this case, the fractional ideal
(R:KI)=\{x\inK:xI\subseteqR\}.
(1)=R
R
R
Spec(R)
Every finitely generated R-submodule of K is a fractional ideal and if
R
R
In Dedekind domains, the situation is much simpler. In particular, every non-zero fractional ideal is invertible. In fact, this property characterizes Dedekind domains:
An integral domain is a Dedekind domain if and only if every non-zero fractional ideal is invertible.
The set of fractional ideals over a Dedekind domain
R
Div(R)
Its quotient group of fractional ideals by the subgroup of principal fractional ideals is an important invariant of a Dedekind domain called the ideal class group.
K
Q(\zetan)
l{O}K
K
l{O}Q(\sqrt{d)}=Z[\sqrt{d}]
d
2,3(mod4)
l{O}K
For the ring of integers[1] pg 2
l{O}K
l{I}K
l{P}K
l{C}K:=l{I}K/l{P}K
hK
hK=|l{C}K|
l{O}K
hK=1
l{O}K
There is an exact sequence
0\to
* | |
l{O} | |
K |
\toK*\tol{I}K\tol{C}K\to0
One of the important structure theorems for fractional ideals of a number field states that every fractional ideal
I
I=(ak{p}1\ldotsak{p}n)(ak{q}1\ldotsak{q}
-1 | |
m) |
ak{p}i,ak{q}j\inSpec(l{O}K)
in the spectrum of
l{O}K
2 | |
5 |
l{O}Q(i)
(1+i)(1-i)((1+2i)(1-2i))-1
Also, because fractional ideals over a number field are all finitely generated we can clear denominators by multiplying by some
\alpha
J
I=
1 | |
\alpha |
J
l{O}K
5 | |
4 |
Z
Z
K=Q(i)
(5)
l{O}Q(i)=Z[i]
(2-i)(2+i)
K=Q | |
\zeta3 |
(3)=(2\zeta3+1)2
\begin{align} (2\zeta3+1)2&=
2 | |
4\zeta | |
3 |
+4\zeta3+1\\ &=
2 | |
4(\zeta | |
3 |
+\zeta3)+1 \end{align}
Since
\zeta3
2 | |
\zeta | |
3 |
+\zeta3=-1
K=Q(\sqrt{-23})
I=(2,
12\sqrt{-23} | |
- |
12) | |
J=(4, | 12\sqrt{-23} |
+ |
32) | |
to get the ideal
IJ=( |
| |||
Let
\tildeI
I
Equivalently,
\tildeI=(R:(R:I)),
(R:I)=\{x\inK:xI\subseteqR\}.
\tildeI=I
If I is divisorial and J is a nonzero fractional ideal, then (I : J) is divisorial.
Let R be a local Krull domain (e.g., a Noetherian integrally closed local domain). Then R is a discrete valuation ring if and only if the maximal ideal of R is divisorial.
An integral domain that satisfies the ascending chain conditions on divisorial ideals is called a Mori domain.