Fréchet derivative explained

Fréchet derivative should not be confused with Differentiation in Fréchet spaces.

In mathematics, the Fréchet derivative is a derivative defined on normed spaces. Named after Maurice Fréchet, it is commonly used to generalize the derivative of a real-valued function of a single real variable to the case of a vector-valued function of multiple real variables, and to define the functional derivative used widely in the calculus of variations.

Generally, it extends the idea of the derivative from real-valued functions of one real variable to functions on normed spaces. The Fréchet derivative should be contrasted to the more general Gateaux derivative which is a generalization of the classical directional derivative.

The Fréchet derivative has applications to nonlinear problems throughout mathematical analysis and physical sciences, particularly to the calculus of variations and much of nonlinear analysis and nonlinear functional analysis.

Definition

Let

V and W be normed vector spaces, and U\subseteq V be an open subset of V. A function f : U \to W is called Fréchet differentiable at x \in U if there exists a bounded linear operator A:V\to W such that$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac\; =\; 0.$$

The limit here is meant in the usual sense of a limit of a function defined on a metric space (see Functions on metric spaces), using

V and W as the two metric spaces, and the above expression as the function of argument h in V. As a consequence, it must exist for all sequences \langle h _{n\rangle} ^{inf ty} ^{n =1} of non-zero elements of V that converge to the zero vector h _{n} \to 0 . Equivalently, the first-order expansion holds, in Landau notation$$f(x\; +\; h)\; =\; f(x)\; +\; Ah\; +o(h).$$

If there exists such an operator

A, it is unique, so we write Df(x) = A and call it the Fréchet derivative of f at x. A function f that is Fréchet differentiable for any point of U is said to be C¹ if the function$$Df\; :\; U\; \backslash to\; B(V,W)\; ;\; x\; \backslash mapsto\; Df(x)$$is continuous (B(V,W) denotes the space of all bounded linear operators from V to W ). Note that this is not the same as requiring that the map Df(x) : V \to W be continuous for each value of x (which is assumed; bounded and continuous are equivalent).

This notion of derivative is a generalization of the ordinary derivative of a function on the real numbers

f : \R \to \R since the linear maps from \R to \R are just multiplication by a real number. In this case, D f(x) is the function t \mapsto f'(x)t.

Properties

A function differentiable at a point is continuous at that point.

Differentiation is a linear operation in the following sense: if

f and g are two maps V \to W which are differentiable at x, and c is a scalar (a real or complex number), then the Fréchet derivative obeys the following properties: $$D(cf)(x)\; =\; cDf(x)$$$$D(f+g)(x)\; =\; Df(x)\; +\; Dg(x).$$

The chain rule is also valid in this context: if

f : U \to Y is differentiable at x \in U, and g : Y \to W is differentiable at y = f(x), then the composition g \circ f is differentiable in x and the derivative is the composition of the derivatives:$$D(g\; \backslash circ\; f)(x)\; =\; Dg(f(x))\; \backslash circ\; Df(x).$$

Finite dimensions

The Fréchet derivative in finite-dimensional spaces is the usual derivative. In particular, it is represented in coordinates by the Jacobian matrix.

Suppose that

f is a map, f : U \subseteq \R ^{n} \to \R ^{m} with U an open set. If f is Fréchet differentiable at a point a \in U, then its derivative is$$\backslash begin\; Df(a)\; :\; \backslash R^n\; \backslash to\; \backslash R^m\; \backslash \backslash \; Df(a)(v)\; =\; J\_f(a)\; v\; \backslash end$$where J _{f(a)} denotes the Jacobian matrix of f at a.

Furthermore, the partial derivatives of

f are given by$$\backslash frac(a)\; =\; Df(a)(e\_i)\; =\; J\_f(a)\; e\_i,$$where \left\{ e _{i} \right\} is the canonical basis of \R ^{n.} Since the derivative is a linear function, we have for all vectors h \in \R ^{n} that the directional derivative of f along h is given by$$Df(a)(h)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^n\; h\_i\; \backslash frac(a).$$

If all partial derivatives of

f exist and are continuous, then f is Fréchet differentiable (and, in fact, C¹). The converse is not true; the functionis Fréchet differentiable and yet fails to have continuous partial derivatives at ( 0 , 0 ).

Example in infinite dimensions

One of the simplest (nontrivial) examples in infinite dimensions, is the one where the domain is a Hilbert space (

H ) and the function of interest is the norm. So consider \| ⋅ \| : H \to \R.

First assume that

x ≠ 0 . Then we claim that the Fréchet derivative of \| ⋅ \| at x is the linear functional D, defined by $$Dv\; :=\; \backslash left\backslash langle\; v,\backslash frac\backslash right\backslash rangle.$$

Indeed, $$\backslash begin\backslash frac$$

x+h\

-\

x\

-Dh

&=\frac

x\

\

x+h\

-\langle x,x\rangle-\langle x,h\rangle

\\[8pt]&=\frac

x\

\

x+h\

-\langle x,x+h\rangle

\\[8pt]&=\frac \\[8pt]&=\frac \\&\end

Using continuity of the norm and inner product we obtain:$$\backslash begin\backslash lim\_\backslash frac$$

x+h\

-\

x\

-Dh

&= \lim_ \frac \\[8pt]&= \frac\lim_\frac \\[8pt]&= \frac\lim_\left(\langle x,x\rangle\|h\|-\langle x,h\rangle \left\langle x,\frac\right\rangle\right) \\[8pt]&= \frac\left(\lim_\langle x,x\rangle\|h\|-\lim_\langle x,h\rangle \left\langle x,\frac\right\rangle \right) \\[8pt]&= \frac\left(0-\lim_\langle x,h\rangle \left\langle x,\frac\right\rangle \right) \\[8pt]&= -\frac\left(\lim_\langle x,h\rangle \left\langle x,\frac\right\rangle \right) \\[8pt]\end

As

\|h\|\to 0 , \langle x,h\rangle \to 0 and because of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality$$\backslash left\backslash langle\; x,\backslash frac\backslash right\backslash rangle$$ is bounded by \|x\| thus the whole limit vanishes.

Now we show that at

x =0 the norm is not differentiable, that is, there does not exist bounded linear functional D such that the limit in question to be 0 . Let D be any linear functional. Riesz Representation Theorem tells us that D could be defined by Dv = \langle a, v\rangle for some a \in H. Consider $$A(h)\; =\; \backslash frac$$

0+h\

- \

0\

-Dh

= \left|1-\left\langle a, \frac\right\rangle\right|.

In order for the norm to be differentiable at

0 we must have $$\backslash lim\_\; A(h)\; =\; 0.$$

We will show that this is not true for any

a. If a = 0 obviously A(h) = 1 independently of h, hence this is not the derivative. Assume a ≠ 0 . If we take h tending to zero in the direction of - a (that is, h = t ⋅ ( - a), where t \to 0 ^{+} ) then A(h) = | 1+ \|a\|| > 1 > 0 , hence $$\backslash lim\_\; A(h)\; \backslash neq\; 0$$

(If we take

h tending to zero in the direction of a we would even see this limit does not exist since in this case we will obtain | 1- \|a\|| ).

The result just obtained agrees with the results in finite dimensions.

Relation to the Gateaux derivative

A function

f : U \subseteq V \to W is called Gateaux differentiable at x \in U if f has a directional derivative along all directions at x. This means that there exists a function g : V \to W such that$$g(v)\; =\; \backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac$$for any chosen vector v \in V, and where t is from the scalar field associated with V (usually, t is real).^[1]

If

f is Fréchet differentiable at x, it is also Gateaux differentiable there, and g is just the linear operator A = D f(x).

However, not every Gateaux differentiable function is Fréchet differentiable. This is analogous to the fact that the existence of all directional derivatives at a point does not guarantee total differentiability (or even continuity) at that point.For example, the real-valued function

f of two real variables defined byis continuous and Gateaux differentiable at the origin ( 0 , 0 ) , with its derivative at the origin being

The function

g is not a linear operator, so this function is not Fréchet differentiable.

More generally, any function of the form

f(x, y) = g(r) h(\phi), where r and \phi are the polar coordinates of (x, y), is continuous and Gateaux differentiable at ( 0 , 0 ) if g is differentiable at 0 and h(\phi + \pi) = - h(\phi), but the Gateaux derivative is only linear and the Fréchet derivative only exists if h is sinusoidal.

In another situation, the function

f given byis Gateaux differentiable at ( 0 , 0 ), with its derivative there being g(a, b) = 0 for all (a, b), which a linear operator. However, f is not continuous at ( 0 , 0 ) (one can see by approaching the origin along the curve \left(t, t ^{3\right)} ) and therefore f cannot be Fréchet differentiable at the origin.

A more subtle example iswhich is a continuous function that is Gateaux differentiable at

( 0 , 0 ), with its derivative at this point being g(a, b) = 0 there, which is again linear. However, f is not Fréchet differentiable. If it were, its Fréchet derivative would coincide with its Gateaux derivative, and hence would be the zero operator A = 0 ; hence the limit$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac$$ = \lim_ \left|\frac\right|would have to be zero, whereas approaching the origin along the curve \left(t, t ^{2\right)} shows that this limit does not exist.

These cases can occur because the definition of the Gateaux derivative only requires that the difference quotients converge along each direction individually, without making requirements about the rates of convergence for different directions. Thus, for a given ε, although for each direction the difference quotient is within ε of its limit in some neighborhood of the given point, these neighborhoods may be different for different directions, and there may be a sequence of directions for which these neighborhoods become arbitrarily small. If a sequence of points is chosen along these directions, the quotient in the definition of the Fréchet derivative, which considers all directions at once, may not converge. Thus, in order for a linear Gateaux derivative to imply the existence of the Fréchet derivative, the difference quotients have to converge uniformly for all directions.

The following example only works in infinite dimensions. Let

X be a Banach space, and \varphi a linear functional on X that is discontinuous at x = 0 (a discontinuous linear functional). Let$$f(x)\; =\; \backslash |x\backslash |\; \backslash varphi(x).$$

Then

f(x) is Gateaux differentiable at x = 0 with derivative 0 . However, f(x) is not Fréchet differentiable since the limit$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash varphi(x)$$does not exist.

Higher derivatives

If

f : U \to W is a differentiable function at all points in an open subset U of V, it follows that its derivative$$D\; f\; :\; U\; \backslash to\; L(V,\; W)$$is a function from U to the space L(V, W) of all bounded linear operators from V to W. This function may also have a derivative, the second order derivative of f, which, by the definition of derivative, will be a map$$D^2\; f\; :\; U\; \backslash to\; L(V,\; L(V,\; W)).$$

To make it easier to work with second-order derivatives, the space on the right-hand side is identified with the Banach space

L ^{2(V} x V, W) of all continuous bilinear maps from V to W. An element \varphi in L(V, L(V, W)) is thus identified with \psi in L ^{2(V} x V, W) such that for all x, y \in V, $$\backslash varphi(x)(y)\; =\; \backslash psi(x,\; y).$$

(Intuitively: a function

\varphi linear in x with \varphi(x) linear in y is the same as a bilinear function \psi in x and y ).

One may differentiate$$D^2\; f\; :\; U\; \backslash to\; L^2(V\backslash times\; V,\; W)$$again, to obtain the third order derivative, which at each point will be a trilinear map, and so on. The

n -th derivative will be a function$$D^n\; f\; :\; U\; \backslash to\; L^n(V\; \backslash times\; V\; \backslash times\; \backslash cdots\; \backslash times\; V,\; W),$$taking values in the Banach space of continuous multilinear maps in n arguments from V to W. Recursively, a function f is n +1 times differentiable on U if it is n times differentiable on U and for each x \in U there exists a continuous multilinear map A of n +1 arguments such that the limit$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac\; =\; 0$$exists uniformly for h _{1,} h _{2,} \ldots, h _{n} in bounded sets in V. In that case, A is the (n +1 ) st derivative of f at x.

Moreover, we may obviously identify a member of the space

L ^{n\left(V} x V x … x V, W\right) with a linear map L\left( o times ^{n} _{j =1} V _{j,} W\right) through the identification f\left(x _{1,} x _{2,} \ldots, x _{n\right)} = f\left(x _{1} ⊗ x _{2} ⊗ … ⊗ x _{n\right),} thus viewing the derivative as a linear map.

Partial Fréchet derivatives

In this section, we extend the usual notion of partial derivatives which is defined for functions of the form

f: \R ^{n} \to \R, to functions whose domains and target spaces are arbitrary (real or complex) Banach spaces. To do this, let V _{1,} \ldots, V _{n} and W be Banach spaces (over the same field of scalars), and let $f\; :\; \backslash prod\_^n\; V\_i\; \backslash to\; W$ be a given function, and fix a point $a\; =\; \backslash left(a\_1,\; \backslash ldots,\; a\_n\backslash right)\; \backslash in\; \backslash prod\_^n\; V\_i.$ We say that f has an i-th partial differential at the point a if the function \varphi _{i} : V _{i} \to W defined by

$$\backslash varphi\_i(x)\; =\; f(a\_1,\; \backslash ldots,\; a\_,\; x,\; a\_,\; \backslash ldots\; a\_n)$$is Fréchet differentiable at the point

a _{i} (in the sense described above). In this case, we define \partial _{if(a)} : = D\varphi _{i(a} _{i),} and we call \partial _{if(a)} the i-th partial derivative of f at the point a. It is important to note that \partial _{if(a)} is a linear transformation from V _{i} into W. Heuristically, if f has an i-th partial differential at a, then \partial _{if(a)} linearly approximates the change in the function f when we fix all of its entries to be a _{j} for j ≠ i, and we only vary the i-th entry. We can express this in the Landau notation as$$f(a\_1,\; \backslash ldots,\; a\_i+h,\; \backslash ldots\; a\_n)\; -\; f(a\_1,\; \backslash ldots,\; a\_n)\; =\; \backslash partial\_if(a)(h)\; +\; o(h).$$

Generalization to topological vector spaces

The notion of the Fréchet derivative can be generalized to arbitrary topological vector spaces (TVS)

X and Y. Letting U be an open subset of X that contains the origin and given a function f: U \to Y such that f( 0 ) = 0 , we first define what it means for this function to have 0 as its derivative. We say that this function f is tangent to 0 if for every open neighborhood of 0, W \subseteq Y there exists an open neighborhood of 0, V\subseteq X and a function o: \R \to \R such that$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac\; =\; 0,$$and for all t in some neighborhood of the origin, f(tV) \subseteq o(t) W.

We can now remove the constraint that

f( 0 ) = 0 by defining f to be Fréchet differentiable at a point x _{0} \in U if there exists a continuous linear operator λ : X \to Y such that f(x _{0} + h) - f(x _{0)} - λ h, considered as a function of h, is tangent to 0. (Lang p. 6)

If the Fréchet derivative exists then it is unique. Furthermore, the Gateaux derivative must also exist and be equal the Fréchet derivative in that for all

v \in X, $$\backslash lim\_\backslash frac\; =\; f\text{'}(x\_0)\; v,$$where f'(x _{0)} is the Fréchet derivative. A function that is Fréchet differentiable at a point is necessarily continuous there and sums and scalar multiples of Fréchet differentiable functions are differentiable so that the space of functions that are Fréchet differentiable at a point form a subspace of the functions that are continuous at that point. The chain rule also holds as does the Leibniz rule whenever Y is an algebra and a TVS in which multiplication is continuous.

References

• .
• .
• .
• .
• .
• .

External links

• B. A. Frigyik, S. Srivastava and M. R. Gupta, Introduction to Functional Derivatives, UWEE Tech Report 2008-0001.
• http://www.probability.net. This webpage is mostly about basic probability and measure theory, but there is nice chapter about Frechet derivative in Banach spaces (chapter about Jacobian formula). All the results are given with proof.

Notes and References

1. It is common to include in the definition that the resulting map g must be a continuous linear operator. We avoid adopting this convention here to allow examination of the widest possible class of pathologies.