Foster children in Canada are known as permanent wards (crown wards in Ontario).[1] A ward is someone, in this case a child, placed under protection of a legal guardian and are the legal responsibility of the government. Census data from 2011 counted children in foster care for the first time, counting 47,885 children in care. The majority of foster children – 29,590, or about 62% – were aged 14 and under.[2] The wards remain under the care of the government until they "age out of care." This age is different depending on the province.
Different provinces have different regulations for the wards in their care. Many of the provinces also have third party groups set up to support both youth and alumni in and from care. These networks are not connected to the provincial governments
Province | Rate per 1000* [3] | Percentage | Age of protection** [4] ! Youth network | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | 10.1 | 1.01% | 19 | Federation of BC Youth in Care Networks | |
Alberta | 10.6 | 1.06% | 18 | Alberta Youth in Care and Custody Network | |
Saskatchewan | 21.7 | 2.17% | 16 | Saskatchewan Youth in Care and Custody Network | |
Manitoba | 24.4 | 2.44% | 18 | Voices: Manitoba's Youth in Care Network | |
Ontario | 6.4 | 0.64% | 18[5] | Ontario Youth Communication and Advocacy Network | |
Quebec | 7.8 | 0.78% | 18 | – | |
New Brunswick | 9.0 | 0.90% | 16 | Partners for Youth | |
Nova Scotia | 8.8 | 0.88% | 16 | Youth Voices of Nova Scotia Society | |
Prince Edward Island | 5.3 | 0.53% | 16 | Prince Edward Island Youth in Care Network; | |
Newfoundland | 7.5 | 0.75% | 16 | – | |
Yukon | 24.7 | 2.47% | 19 | – | |
Northwest Territories | 30.8 | 3.08% | 16 | – | |
Nunavut | 15.3 | 1.53% | 16 | – |
Cases are filed though individual provinces Social Services departments. In 92% of cases, the child remains at home and is not in put in an Out-of-Home Placement.
The three most common categories for maltreatment are ‘neglect’ and ‘Exposure to intimate partner violence’ (witness of physical or emotional abuse) both tied at 34%, followed by physical abuse at 20%. Sexual abuse sits at 3%.[6] Police statistics for youth under 18 show that youth, accounting for 21% of the Canadian population account for 21% of all physical assaults and 61% of all sexual assaults in Canada. In 71% of all police-reported assaults, the victims were between the ages of 12–17.[7]
86% of the time, cases are filed against the biological mother.[7]
A former youth from care is also considered to be the risk factor in 8% of cases.[7]
There are several different types of out-of-home placements or care arrangements:
Informal kinship 4%;Foster care (kinship & non-kinship) 4%;Group home/secure treatment 0% (rate of .25/1000 children)
There is a severe over representation of Aboriginal youth in Canada's foster care system. Of all children in care, the percentage of Aboriginal children reaches 62% to 85% in some provinces. First Nation children make up 82% of the Aboriginal children in foster care, while Metis children make up 13%, and Inuit children make up 4%.[8]
Province | % of children in foster care who are aboriginal | % of the total population that is aboriginal | |
---|---|---|---|
British Columbia | 56% | 5.9% | |
Alberta | 73.6% | 6.5% | |
Saskatchewan | 87% | 16.3% | |
Manitoba | 84.6% | 18% | |
Ontario | 25.5% | 2.8% | |
Quebec | 15.4% | 2.3% | |
Newfoundland and Labrador | 28% | 8.9% | |
New Brunswick | 28.8% | 4% | |
Nova Scotia | 23.9% | 5.7% | |
Prince Edward Island | 0% | 2% | |
Yukon | 100% | 23.3% | |
Northwest Territories | 93.8% | 50.7% | |
Nunavut | 100% | 85.9% | |
Canada | 48% | 4.9% |
Many legal actions have been taken attempting at correcting the overrepresentation. For example, In 1995, the Aboriginal Custom Adoption Recognition Act came into effect recognizing Aboriginal customary law with regards to custom adoptions in the Northwest Territories, a form of adoption that has been practised by many Indigenous communities for generations.[10] Lastly, In 2017, Bill 99 was introduced as an amendment to the Youth Protection Act of Quebec, bringing the preservation of culture as an important factor in the decision making process for foster children, and stated that whenever possible, Indigenous children will be placed with a member of his extended family or community.[11]
There are many indigenous organizations, services and activist groups who work in collaboration with the federal government of Canada and within each province or territory to manage services for First Nations, Inuit and Métis families. These groups work to find ways to reduce the number of indigenous children taken into the foster care system for racially biased and/or preventable reasons. They also attempt to act as third part mediators who are literate in the social welfare system, providing avenues for social workers and Indigenous families to be in healthy communication and trusting relationships. This is vital considering the history of the Sixties Scoop.[12]
Indigenous-based agencies deliver mandated child and family services and programs in a way which maintains and strengthens the individual, the family, and the community within the context of Indigenous values and customs. Without indigenous networks of care, certain alternative care models might be disregarded or withheld from communities who practice these traditions. Additionally, Customary care preserves a child's cultural identity, respects the child's heritage, facilitates cross-generational connections, and recognizes the role of the community in raising its children.[13]
While 54% of cases have no child functioning concerns, a wide range of categories for physical, emotional, cognitive and behavioural issues may be exhibited by youth:[7]
11%
11%
4%
2%
Many children enter care with bad health; over 90% have medical needs ranging from minor skin conditions to severe neurological disease. Children in care experience twice as many chronic difficulties, such as poor eyesight and hearing, when compared to children outside of the system. Often, children in care have poor or undocumented history of immunizations. Children in kinship care exhibit fewer health problems then those in regular foster care. Advice on smoking, drug and alcohol use as well as safe sex practices are most often given only after the child was engaged in such activities.[14]
In a number of studies, youth who have aged out of the child welfare system have spoken of their experiences and highlighted areas where they could have been better prepared for their transition from care. They speak of the frustration of being "cut off" from the system once they reach their 18th (or 19th) birthday to fend for themselves, with limited life skills, financial support and support networks. The transition from care is alluded to as a process that may take many years, not an event triggered by a youth’s 18th (or 19th) birthday. In most cases, the youth were not emotionally ready to live independently. Youth living with their families don’t typically achieve independence until their mid- to late-twenties, whereas youth in care are "expelled" from the system at age 18, whether they are ready or not.
–Anne Tweddle in Youth Leaving Care Report
For youth aged 24 years from the general public, 15% did not complete high school, 13.8% are unemployed, 6.4% are pregnant or are an unwed parent, and 5.5% are on public assistance. For youth from the foster care system of the same age, 50% did not complete high school, 50% are unemployed, 60% are pregnant or are an unwed parent (among females), and 30% are on public assistance.