The Forbes Global 2000 is an annual ranking of the top 2000 public companies in the world, published by: sales, profit, assets and market value. The list has been published annually since 2003.
Forbes Global 2000 as of 2023:[1] [2]
In 2023, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[3]
1 | JPMorgan Chase[4] | New York | Banking, financial services | 179.93 | 41.8 | 3,700 | |
2 | Saudi Aramco | Dhahran | Oil and gas | 393.16 | 61.69 | 369.4 | |
3 | Citigroup | New York | Banking, financial services | 216.77 | 52.47 | 6,100 | |
4 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 203.08 | 48.25 | 5,000 | |
5 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 186.14 | 37.92 | 5,400 | |
6 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 133.84 | 28.62 | 3,200 | |
7 | Alphabet[5] | Mountain View, California | Conglomerate | 282.85 | 58.59 | 369.5 | |
8 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Conglomerate | 589.47 | 156.36 | 653.9 | |
9 | Microsoft | Redmond | Software | 207.59 | 69.02 | 380.1 | |
10 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Software | 385.1 | 94.32 | 332.2 |
In 2022, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[6]
1 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Conglomerate | 276.1 | 89.9 | 958.8 | 741.5 | |
2 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial Service | 208.1 | 54.0 | 5,518.5 | 214.4 | |
3 | Saudi Aramco | Dhahran | Oil and gas | 400.4 | 105.4 | 576.0 | 2,292.1 | |
4 | JPMorgan Chase | New York | Banking, financial services | 124.5 | 42.1 | 3,954.7 | 374.5 | |
5 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 202.1 | 46.9 | 4,747.0 | 181.3 | |
6 | Amazon.com, Inc. | Seattle | Conglomerate | 469.8 | 33.4 | 420.6 | 1,468.4 | |
7 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computer software | 678.7 | 100.6 | 381.2 | 2,640.3 | |
8 | Citigroup | New York | Banking, financial services | 181.4 | 37.4 | 4,561.1 | 133.4 | |
9 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 96.8 | 31.0 | 3,238.2 | 303.1 | |
10 | Toyota Motor | Toyota, Aichi | Automotive | 281.8 | 28.2 | 552.5 | 237.7 |
In 2021, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[7]
1 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial Service | 190.5 | 45.8 | 4914.7 | 249.5 | |
2 | JPMorgan Chase | New York City | Banking, financial services | 136.2 | 40.4 | 3689.3 | 464.8 | |
3 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Banking, financial services | 245.5 | 42.5 | 873.7 | 624.4 | |
4 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 173.5 | 39.3 | 4301.7 | 210.4 | |
5 | Saudi Aramco | Dhahran | Oil and gas | 229.7 | 49.3 | 510.3 | 1897.2 | |
6 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computer software | 294 | 63.9 | 354.1 | 2252.3 | |
6 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 98.8 | 17.9 | 2832.2 | 336.3 | |
6 | Ping An Insurance | Shenzhen | Financial services | 169.1 | 20.8 | 1453.8 | 211.2 | |
9 | Citigroup | New York | Banking, financial services | 153.9 | 31.3 | 4159.9 | 140.1 | |
10 | Amazon.com, Inc. | Seattle | Conglomerate | 386.1 | 21.3 | 321.2 | 1711.8 |
In 2020, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[8]
1 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 177.2 | 45.3 | 4322.5 | 242.3 | |
2 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 162.1 | 38.9 | 3822 | 203.8 | |
3 | JPMorgan Chase | New York City | Banking, financial services | 142.9 | 30 | 3139.4 | 291.7 | |
4 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Banking, financial services | 254.6 | 81.4 | 817.7 | 455.4 | |
5 | Citigroup | New York | Banking, financial services | 148.7 | 30.9 | 3697.5 | 147.2 | |
6 | Saudi Aramco | Dhahran | Oil and gas | 329.8 | 88.2 | 398.3 | 1284.8 | |
7 | Ping An Insurance | Shenzhen | Financial services | 155 | 18.8 | 1218.6 | 187.2 | |
8 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 112.1 | 24.1 | 2620 | 208.6 | |
9 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computer software | 267.7 | 57.2 | 320.4 | 1285.5 | |
10 | Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 135.4 | 27.2 | 3387 | 112.8 |
In 2019, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[9]
+ 2019 top ten | Rank | Company | Headquarters | Industry | Sales (billion $) | Profits (billion $) | Assets (billion $) | Market value (billion $) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 175.9 | 45.2 | 4034.5 | 305.1 | |
2 | JPMorgan Chase | New York City | Banking, financial services | 132.9 | 32.7 | 2737.2 | 368.5 | |
3 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 150.3 | 38.8 | 3382.4 | 225 | |
4 | Citigroup | New York City | Banking, financial services | 137.5 | 30.9 | 3293.1 | 197 | |
5 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 111.9 | 28.5 | 2377.2 | 287.3 | |
6 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Electronic and software | 261.7 | 59.4 | 373.7 | 961.3 | |
7 | Ping An Insurance | Shenzhen | Financial services | 151.8 | 16.3 | 1038.3 | 220.2 | |
8 | American Express | Buffalo | Banking, financial services | 126.7 | 27.5 | 3097.6 | 143 | |
9 | Royal Dutch Shell | The Hague | Oil and gas | 382.6 | 23.3 | 399.2 | 264.9 | |
10 | Wells Fargo | San Francisco | Banking, financial services | 101.5 | 23.1 | 1887.8 | 214.7 |
In 2018, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[10]
+ 2018 top ten | Rank | Company | Headquarters | Industry | Sales (billion $) | Profits (billion $) | Assets (billion $) | Market value (billion $) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 165.3 | 43.7 | 4210.9 | 311 | |
2 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 143.2 | 37.1 | 3631.6 | 261.2 | |
3 | JPMorgan Chase | New York City | Banking, financial services | 118.2 | 26.5 | 2609.8 | 387.7 | |
4 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Conglomerate | 235.2 | 39.7 | 702.7 | 491.9 | |
5 | Citigroup | New York City | Banking, financial services | 129.3 | 29.6 | 3439.3 | 184.1 | |
6 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 92.2 | 16.6 | 2196.8 | 231.9 | |
7 | Wells Fargo | San Francisco | Banking, financial services | 103.0 | 21.7 | 1915.4 | 265.3 | |
8 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computing | 247.5 | 53.3 | 367.5 | 926.9 | |
9 | Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 118.2 | 26.4 | 3204.2 | 158.6 | |
10 | American Express | Buffalo | Banking, financial services | 141.6 | 13.9 | 1066.4 | 181.4 |
As a group, the Forbes Global 2000 in year 2018 accounts for $39.1* trillion in sales, $3.2 trillion in profit, $189* trillion in assets and $56.8* trillion in market value.
The top-ranked companies in each industry sector are as follows.
+ 2018 top company by sector | Sector | Company | Headquarters | Overall rank | Sales (billion $) | Profits (billion $) | Assets (billion $) | Market value (billion $) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Advertising | London |
| 18.7 | 1.8 | 42.4 | 30.1 | ||
Chicago |
| 96.1 | 5.2 | 94.4 | 85.3 | |||
Sandy Springs, Georgia | Sandy Springs |
| 58.1 | 4.8 | 38.3 | 93.3 | ||
Airline | Atlanta |
| 40.5 | 4.7 | 53.3 | 34.4 | ||
Aluminum | New York City |
| 21.7 | style="text-align:center;" | -0.3 | 36.1 | 13.7 | |
Paris |
| 41.6 | 1.7 | 68.1 | 31.4 | |||
A Coruña |
| 23.1 | 3.2 | 18.8 | 103.2 | |||
Toyota Motor | Toyota, Aichi | Toyota |
| 235.8 | 19.3 | 406.7 | 177.0 | |
Hanover |
| 43.5 | 3.0 | 36.7 | 43.7 | |||
Leuven |
| 43.6 | 8.3 | 136.5 | 204.6 | |||
Foster City, California | Foster City |
| 32.2 | 18.1 | 51.8 | 138.1 | ||
Philadelphia |
| 74.5 | 8.2 | 166.6 | 148.2 | |||
Hangzhou |
| 15.0 | 11.0 | 56.2 | 200.7 | |||
Tokyo |
| 31.4 | 1.8 | 36.8 | 40.4 | |||
Casinos & Gaming | Paradise, Nevada | Paradise |
| 11.4 | 1.8 | 21.0 | 37.2 | |
San Jose, California | San Jose |
| 49.6 | 10.3 | 112.6 | 141.7 | ||
Richfield, Minnesota | Richfield |
| 39.5 | 0.9 | 13.5 | 10.7 | ||
Apple Inc. | Cupertino |
| 233.3 | 53.7 | 293.3 | 586.0 | ||
Mountain View, California | Mountain View |
| 77.2 | 17.0 | 149.7 | 500.1 | ||
Hopkinton, Massachusetts | Hopkinton |
| 24.6 | 2.0 | 45.7 | 51.9 | ||
Conglomerates | Munich |
| 85.5 | 6.5 | 133.9 | 91.8 | ||
Courbevoie |
| 43.9 | 1.4 | 48.7 | 25.6 | |||
Construction Services | Beijing |
| 135.0 | 4.1 | 165.6 | 25.6 | ||
Tokyo |
| 67.9 | 1.1 | 142.2 | 34.1 | |||
New York City |
| 34.6 | 5.0 | 159.0 | 63.2 | |||
Hawthorn, Victoria | Hawthorn |
| 9.3 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 13.6 | ||
New York City |
| 27.1 | 1.1 | 20.6 | 12.8 | |||
Bentonville, Arkansas | Bentonville |
| 482.1 | 14.7 | 199.6 | 215.7 | ||
Ludwigshafen |
| 78.1 | 4.4 | 80.1 | 73.2 | |||
Ping An Insurance | Shenzhen |
| 98.7 | 8.7 | 732.3 | 90.0 | ||
Beijing |
| 27.3 | 2.6 | 85.3 | 43.1 | |||
Veolia Environnement | Paris |
| 27.7 | 0.5 | 39.0 | 13.3 | ||
Woonsocket, Rhode Island | Woonsocket |
| 153.3 | 5.2 | 93.7 | 110.8 | ||
Seoul |
| 52.1 | 11.7 | 149.5 | 33.1 | |||
Rueil-Malmaison |
| 29.5 | 1.6 | 46.3 | 39.3 | |||
Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn) | New Taipei City |
| 141.2 | 4.6 | 70.3 | 39.2 | ||
Houston |
| 13.0 | 0.8 | 20.9 | 25.1 | |||
Vevey |
| 92.2 | 9.4 | 123.9 | 235.7 | |||
Cincinnati |
| 109.8 | 2.0 | 34.9 | 34.2 | |||
Santiago |
| 4.8 | 0.3 | 14.8 | 5.4 | |||
Stellenbosch |
| 13.3 | 1.4 | 25.1 | 22.8 | |||
St. Louis |
| 101.8 | 2.5 | 54.0 | 46.5 | |||
Peoria, Illinois | Peoria |
| 47.0 | 2.1 | 78.5 | 45.6 | ||
Atlanta |
| 88.5 | 7.0 | 42.5 | 169.8 | |||
Miami |
| 15.8 | 1.9 | 38.4 | 37.8 | |||
Foshan |
| 22.0 | 2.0 | 19.8 | 20.2 | |||
Cincinnati |
| 69.4 | 8.4 | 129.1 | 218.9 | |||
London |
| 11.7 | 1.4 | 27.2 | 27.9 | |||
Seattle |
| 107.0 | 0.6 | 67.7 | 292.6 | |||
Omaha |
| 210.8 | 24.1 | 561.1 | 360.1 | |||
Iron & Steel | Hong Kong |
| 53.8 | 5.4 | 877.8 | 45.4 | ||
Tokyo |
| 129.8 | 4.4 | 2,450.7 | 62.6 | |||
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing |
| 171.1 | 44.2 | 3,420.3 | 198.0 | ||
Minnetonka, Minnesota | Minnetonka |
| 165.9 | 6.0 | 117.9 | 127.5 | ||
New Brunswick, New Jersey | New Brunswick |
| 70.2 | 15.4 | 133.4 | 312.6 | ||
Gas Natural Fenosa | Barcelona |
| 28.8 | 1.7 | 52.3 | 20.6 | ||
ExxonMobil | Irving |
| 236.8 | 16.2 | 336.8 | 363.3 | ||
Houston |
| 31.7 | 1.6 | 69.1 | 111.1 | |||
Dublin |
| 20.9 | 2.0 | 31.0 | 28.9 | |||
Copenhagen |
| 40.3 | 0.7 | 64.1 | 30.7 | |||
Memphis, Tennessee | Memphis |
| 22.4 | 0.9 | 30.6 | 17.8 | ||
New York City |
| 48.9 | 7.7 | 167.5 | 205.7 | |||
Waltham, Massachusetts | Waltham |
| 17.0 | 2.0 | 40.9 | 57.8 | ||
Printing & Publishing | New York City |
| 12.2 | 1.3 | 29.1 | 30.9 | ||
New York City |
| 26.9 | 3.4 | 102.0 | 32.4 | |||
Railroads | Omaha |
| 21.0 | 4.6 | 55.8 | 75.4 | ||
Shenzhen |
| 31.1 | 2.9 | 94.1 | 27.7 | |||
Recreational Products | Santa Monica, California | Santa Monica |
| 4.6 | 0.9 | 15.3 | 25.5 | |
China Construction Bank | Beijing |
| 146.8 | 36.4 | 2,826.0 | 162.8 | ||
Tokyo |
| 6.7 | 0.5 | 42.3 | 4.2 | |||
Restaurants | Oak Brook, Illinois | Oak Brook |
| 25.4 | 4.8 | 37.9 | 110.1 | |
Security Systems | Tokyo |
| 7.1 | 0.6 | 13.2 | 18.1 | ||
Samsung Electronics | Seoul |
| 177.3 | 16.5 | 206.5 | 161.6 | ||
Redmond, Washington | Redmond |
| 86.6 | 10.2 | 181.9 | 407.0 | ||
Paris |
| 18.2 | 1.9 | 31.4 | 40.5 | |||
Bellevue, Switzerland | Bellevue |
| 12.4 | 1.7 | 21.2 | 37.6 | ||
Dallas |
| 146.8 | 13.2 | 402.7 | 234.2 | |||
Wiesbaden |
| 1.4 | 0.4 | 57.2 | 2.1 | |||
London |
| 20.0 | 6.6 | 46.5 | 111.0 | |||
Tokyo |
| 59.8 | 2.7 | 135.7 | 27.7 | |||
Trucking | Tokyo |
| 11.7 | 0.3 | 9.3 | 8.6 |
In 2017, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[11]
+ 2017 top ten | Rank | Company | Headquarters | Industry | Sales (billion $) | Profits (billion $) | Assets (billion $) | Market value (billion $) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 151.4 | 42.0 | 3473.2 | 229.8 | |
2 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 134.2 | 35.0 | 3016.6 | 200.5 | |
3 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Conglomerate | 222.9 | 24.1 | 620.9 | 409.9 | |
4 | JPMorgan Chase | New York City | Banking, financial services | 102.5 | 24.2 | 2513.0 | 306.6 | |
5 | Wells Fargo | San Francisco | Banking, financial services | 97.6 | 21.9 | 1943.4 | 274.4 | |
6 | Citigroup | New York City | Banking, financial services | 115.7 | 27.8 | 2816.0 | 149.2 | |
7 | Bank of America | Charlotte | Banking, financial services | 92.2 | 16.6 | 2196.8 | 231.9 | |
8 | Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 113.1 | 24.9 | 2611.5 | 141.3 | |
9 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computing | 217.5 | 45.2 | 331.1 | 752.0 | |
10 | Toyota Motor | Toyota | 249.9 | 17.1 | 412.5 | 171.9 |
In 2016, the ten largest companies as calculated by this method were:[12]
+ 2016 top ten | Rank | Company | Headquarters | Industry | Sales (billion $) | Profits (billion $) | Assets (billion $) | Market value (billion $) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 171.1 | 44.2 | 3,420.2 | 198 | |
2 | China Construction Bank | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 146.8 | 36.4 | 2,826 | 162.8 | |
3 | Citigroup | New York City | Banking, financial services | 131.9 | 28.8 | 2,739.8 | 152.7 | |
4 | Berkshire Hathaway | Omaha | Conglomerate | 210.8 | 24.1 | 561.1 | 360.1 | |
5 | JPMorgan Chase | New York City | Banking, financial services | 99.9 | 23.5 | 2,423.8 | 234.2 | |
6 | Bank of China | Beijing | Banking, financial services | 122 | 27.2 | 2,589.6 | 143 | |
7 | Wells Fargo | San Francisco | Banking, financial services | 91.4 | 22.7 | 1,849.2 | 256 | |
8 | Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computing | 233.3 | 53.7 | 293.3 | 586 | |
9 | Oil and gas | 236.8 | 16.2 | 336.8 | 363.3 | |||
10 | Toyota Motor | Toyota | Automotive | 235.8 | 19.3 | 406.7 | 177 |