Fatigue limit explained

The fatigue limit or endurance limit is the stress level below which an infinite number of loading cycles can be applied to a material without causing fatigue failure.^[1] Some metals such as ferrous alloys and titanium alloys have a distinct limit,^[2] whereas others such as aluminium and copper do not and will eventually fail even from small stress amplitudes. Where materials do not have a distinct limit the term fatigue strength or endurance strength is used and is defined as the maximum value of completely reversed bending stress that a material can withstand for a specified number of cycles without a fatigue failure.^{[3] [4]} For polymeric materials, the fatigue limit is also commonly known as the intrinsic strength.^{[5] [6]}

Definitions

The ASTM defines fatigue strength,

S _{N _{f}} , as "the value of stress at which failure occurs after N _{f} cycles", and fatigue limit, S _{f} , as "the limiting value of stress at which failure occurs as N _{f} becomes very large". ASTM does not define endurance limit, the stress value below which the material will withstand many load cycles,^[1] but implies that it is similar to fatigue limit.^[7]

Some authors use endurance limit,

S _{e} , for the stress below which failure never occurs, even for an indefinitely large number of loading cycles, as in the case of steel; and fatigue limit or fatigue strength, S _{f} , for the stress at which failure occurs after a specified number of loading cycles, such as 500 million, as in the case of aluminium.^{[1] [8] [9]} Other authors do not differentiate between the expressions even if they do differentiate between the two types of materials.^{[10] [11] [12]}

Typical values

Typical values of the limit (

S _{e} ) for steels are one half the ultimate tensile strength, to a maximum of 290MPa. For iron, aluminium, and copper alloys, S _{e} is typically 0.4 times the ultimate tensile strength. Maximum typical values for irons are 24abbr=onNaNabbr=on, aluminums 19abbr=onNaNabbr=on, and coppers 14abbr=onNaNabbr=on.^[2] Note that these values are for smooth "un-notched" test specimens. The endurance limit for notched specimens (and thus for many practical design situations) is significantly lower.

For polymeric materials, the fatigue limit has been shown to reflect the intrinsic strength of the covalent bonds in polymer chains that must be ruptured in order to extend a crack. So long as other thermo chemical processes do not break the polymer chain (i.e. ageing or ozone attack), a polymer may operate indefinitely without crack growth when loads are kept below the intrinsic strength.^{[13] [14]}

The concept of fatigue limit, and thus standards based on a fatigue limit such as ISO 281:2007 rolling bearing lifetime prediction, remains controversial, at least in the US.^{[15] [16]}

Modifying factors of fatigue limit

The fatigue limit of a machine component, Se, is influenced by a series of elements named modifying factors. Some of these factors are listed below.

Surface factor

The surface modifying factor,

k _{S} , is related to both the tensile strength, S _{ut} , of the material and the surface finish of the machine component.k _{S} = aS ^{b} _{ut}

Where factor a and exponent b present in the equation are related to the surface finish.

Gradient factor

Besides taking into account the surface finish, it is also important to consider the size gradient factor

k _{G} . When it comes to bending and torsional loading, the gradient factor is also taken into consideration.

Load factor

Load modifying factor can be identified as.

k _{L} =0 . 85 for axialk _{L} =1 for bendingk _{L} =0 . 59 for pure torsion

Temperature factor

The temperature factor is calculated as

k _{T} = (S _{o})/(S _{r}) S _{o} is tensile strength at operating temperatureS _{r} is tensile strength at room temperature

Reliability factor

We can calculate the reliability factor using the equation

k _{R} =1-0 . 08 Z _{a} z _{a} =0 for 50% reliabilityz _{a} =1 . 288 for 90% reliabilityz _{a} =1 . 645 for 95% reliabilityz _{a} =2 . 326 for 99% reliability

History

The concept of endurance limit was introduced in 1870 by August Wöhler.^[17] However, recent research suggests that endurance limits do not exist for metallic materials, that if enough stress cycles are performed, even the smallest stress will eventually produce fatigue failure.^{[9] [18]}

See also

• Fatigue (material)
• , a diagram by British mechanical engineer

Notes and References

1. Book: Beer , Ferdinand P. . Mechanics of Materials. registration. 2. E. Russell Johnston Jr.. 1992. McGraw-Hill, Inc.. 978-0-07-837340-4. 51. Ferdinand Beer.
2. Web site: Metal Fatigue and Endurance. 2008-04-18. https://web.archive.org/web/20120415084023/http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Fatigue/Fatigue.html. 2012-04-15. dead.
3. Book: Jastrzebski, D. . Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials . John Wiley & Sons, Inc . Wiley International . 1959.
4. Book: Suresh . S. . Subra Suresh . 2004 . Fatigue of Materials . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-57046-6.
5. Book: Robertson . C.G. . Stocek . R. . Mars . W.V. . The Fatigue Threshold of Rubber and Its Characterization Using the Cutting Method . 27 November 2020 . Springer . 978-3-030-68920-9 . 57-83 . 24 July 2024.
6. Bhowmick . A. K. . Threshold fracture of elastomers . Polymer Reviews . 1988 . 28 . 3-4 . 339-370 . 10.1080/15583728808085379.
7. Book: Stephens , Ralph I. . Metal Fatigue in Engineering. limited. 2nd. 2001. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. 978-0-471-51059-8. 69.
8. Book: Budynas , Richard G. . Advanced Strength and Applied Stress Analysis. limited. 2nd. 1999. McGraw-Hill, Inc.. 978-0-07-008985-3. 532–533.
9. Book: Askeland, Donald R.. The Science and Engineering of Materials. Pradeep P. Phule. Brooks/Cole. 2003. 978-0-534-95373-7. 4th. 248.
10. Book: Hibbeler , R. C. . Mechanics of Materials. 5th. 2003. Pearson Education, Inc.. 978-0-13-008181-0. 110.
11. Book: Dowling , Norman E. . Mechanical Behavior of Materials. 2nd. 1998. Printice-Hall, Inc.. 978-0-13-905720-5. 365.
12. Book: Barber , J. R. . Intermediate Mechanics of Materials. 2001. McGraw-Hill. 978-0-07-232519-5. 65.
13. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 9. 4. 1965. 1233–1251. The mechanical fatigue limit for rubber . Lake. G. J.. P. B. Lindley. 10.1002/app.1965.070090405.
14. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 300. 1460. 1967. 108–119. The strength of highly elastic materials. Lake. G. J.. A. G. Thomas. 10.1098/rspa.1967.0160. 1967RSPSA.300..108L. 138395281.
15. In search of a fatigue limit: A critique of ISO standard 281:2007 . Erwin V. Zaretsky . August 2010 . Tribology & Lubrication Technology . 30–40 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20150518100537/http://www.stle.org/assets/document/8-10_tlt_commentary_ISO_Standard_281_2007_Part_II.pdf . 2015-05-18 .
16. ISO 281:2007 bearing life standard – and the answer is? . July 2010 . Tribology & Lubrication Technology . 34–43 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20131024084224/http://www.stle.org/assets/document/tlt_July_cover_story_article.pdf . 2013-10-24.
17. W. Schutz (1996). A history of fatigue. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 54: 263-300. DOI
18. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures. 22. 7. 1999. 559–565. There is no infinite fatigue life in metallic materials . Bathias. C.. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00183.x.