Ferdinand Brunetière Explained

Ferdinand Brunetière
Birth Name:Ferdinand Vincent-de-Paul Marie Brunetière
Birth Date:19 July 1849
Birth Place:Toulon, France
Death Place:Paris, France
Occupation:Literary critic
Language:French
Nationality:French

Ferdinand Vincent-de-Paul Marie Brunetière (19 July 1849 – 9 December 1906) was a French writer and critic.

Personal and public life

Early years

Brunetière was born in Toulon, Var, Provence. After school at Marseille, he studied in Paris at the Lycée Louis-le-Grand.[1] Desiring a teaching career, he entered for examination at the École Normale Supérieure, but failed, and the outbreak of war in 1870 prevented him trying again. He turned to private tuition and literary criticism. After the publication of successful articles in the Revue Bleue, he became connected with the Revue des Deux Mondes, first as contributor, then as secretary and sub-editor, and finally, in 1893, as principal editor.

Career

In 1886 Brunetière was appointed professor of French language and literature at the École Normale,[1] a singular honour for one who had not passed through the academic mill; and later he presided with distinction over various conferences at the Sorbonne and elsewhere. He was decorated with the Legion of Honour in 1887, and became a member of the Académie française in 1893.

The published works of Brunetière consist largely of reprinted papers and lectures. They include six series of Etudes critiques (1880 - 1898) on French history and literature; Le Roman naturaliste (1883); Histoire et Littérature, three series (1884 - 1886); Questions de critique (1888; second series, 1890). The first volume of L'Evolution de genres dans l'histoire de la littérature, lectures in which a formal classification, founded on Darwinism, is applied to the phenomena of literature, appeared in 1890; and his later works include a series of studies (2 vols, 1894) on the evolution of French lyrical poetry during the 10th century, a history of French classic literature begun in 1904, a monograph on Honoré de Balzac (1906), and various pamphlets of a polemical nature dealing with questions of education, science and religion. Among these may be mentioned Discours académiques (1901), Discours de combat (1900, 1903), L'Action sociale du Christianisme (1904), Sur les chemins de la croyance (1905).

Political activity

Brunetière was a leading member of the anti-Dreyfusards.[2]

Personal views

Before 1895 Brunetière was widely known as a rationalist, freethinking scholar. That year, however, he published an article, fr | "Après une visite au Vatican" (After a Visit to the Vatican), in which he argued that science was incapable of providing a convincing social morality and that faith alone could achieve that result.[3] This work introduced the metaphor of the "bankruptcy of science".[4]

Shortly afterwards, Brunetière converted to Roman Catholicism. As a Catholic, he was orthodox and his political sympathies were conservative. He authored the article on "Literary and Theological Appreciation of Bousset" for the Catholic Encyclopedia.[1]

Works

Translated into English

Bibliography

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. https://books.google.com/books?id=oZQuAAAAYAAJ&q=W.H.+Grattan+Flood&pg=PA10 "Brunetiere, Ferdinand", The Catholic Encyclopedia and Its Makers, New York, the Encyclopedia Press, 1917, p. 21
  2. Blake Smith, The Religion of Liberal Democracy, Tablet Magazine, November 15, 2019 https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/the-religion-of-liberal-democracy
  3. [Jennifer Michael Hecht]
  4. Book: Feuer . Lewis Samuel . Lewis Samuel Feuer . 29 September 2017 . 1982 . Generational Movements and 'Scientific Revolutions' . Einstein and the Generations of Science . 2 . Abingdon . Routledge . 313 . 9781351312073 . 8 October 2023 . The metaphor of the 'bankruptcy of science' was originated by the conservative literary critic Brunetière [...]. It was introduced by his article in January 1895, "After a Visit to the Vatican" [...]. Brunetière himself affirmed only the partial failure of science, not its bankruptcy..