Evofosfamide (INN,[1] USAN;[2] formerly known as TH-302) is a compound being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of multiple tumor types as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents and other targeted cancer drugs.
This compound has been evaluated in the treatment of solid tumors, as a hypoxia-activated prodrug (HAPs), such chemical agents in low oxygen conditions undergo bio-reduction to yield cancer fighting cytotoxic breakdown products.
Many such agents have been developed, though this compound has been extensively studied, in preclinical and clinical studies.[3] [4]
Evofosfamide was developed by Threshold Pharmaceuticals Inc. In 2012, Threshold signed a global license and co-development agreement for evofosfamide with Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (EMD Serono Inc. in the US and Canada), which includes an option for Threshold to co-commercialize evofosfamide in the United States. Threshold is responsible for the development of evofosfamide in the soft tissue sarcoma indication in the United States. In all other cancer indications, Threshold and Merck KGaA are developing evofosfamide together.[5] From 2012 to 2013, Merck KGaA paid 110 million US$ for upfront payment and milestone payments to Threshold. Additionally, Merck KGaA covers 70% of all evofosfamide development expenses.[6]
Evofosfamide is a 2-nitroimidazole prodrug of the cytotoxin bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM). Evofosfamide is activated by a process that involves a 1-electron (1 e−) reduction mediated by ubiquitous cellular reductases, such as the NADPH cytochrome P450, to generate a radical anion prodrug:
Evofosfamide is essentially inactive under normal oxygen levels. In areas of hypoxia, evofosfamide becomes activated and converts to an alkylating cytotoxic agent resulting in DNA cross-linking. This renders cells unable to replicable their DNA and divide, leading to apoptosis. This investigational therapeutic approach of targeting the cytotoxin to hypoxic zones in tumors may cause less broad systemic toxicity that is seen with untargeted cytotoxic chemotherapies.[8]
The activation of evofosfamide to the active drug Br-IPM and the mechanism of action (MOA) via cross-linking of DNA is shown schematically below:
Phosphorodiamidate-based, DNA-crosslinking, bis-alkylator mustards have long been used successfully in cancer chemotherapy and include e.g. the prodrugs ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide. To demonstrate that known drugs of proven efficacy could serve as the basis of efficacious hypoxia-activated prodrugs, the 2-nitroimidizole HAP of the active phosphoramidate bis-alkylator derived from ifosfamide was synthesized. The resulting compound, TH-281, had a high HCR (hypoxia cytotoxicity ratio), a quantitative assessment of its hypoxia selectivity. Subsequent structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies showed that replacement of the chlorines in the alkylator portion of the prodrug with bromines improved potency about 10-fold. The resulting, final compound is evofosfamide (TH-302).[9]
Evofosfamide can be synthesized in 7 steps.[10] [11]
The evofosfamide drug product formulation used until 2011 was a lyophilized powder. The current drug product formulation is a sterile liquid containing ethanol, dimethylacetamide and polysorbate 80. For intravenous infusion, the evofosfamide drug product is diluted in 5% dextrose in WFI.[12]
Diluted evofosfamide formulation (100 mg/mL evofosfamide, 70% ethanol, 25% dimethylacetamide and 5% polysorbate 80; diluted to 4% v/v in 5% dextrose or 0.9% NaCl) can cause leaching of DEHP from infusion bags containing PVC plastic.[13]
Evofosfamide (TH-302) is currently being evaluated in clinical studies as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy agents and other targeted cancer drugs. The indications are a broad spectrum of solid tumor types and blood cancers.
Evofosfamide clinical trials (as of 21 November 2014)[14] sorted by (Estimated) Primary Completion Date:[15]
Evofosfamide (TH-302) clinical trials in following indications:Solid Tumors, Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Pancreatic Cancer/Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma/Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Prostate Cancer, Kidney Cancer/Renal Cell Carcinoma, Liver Cancer/Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Myelogenous Leukemia/Lymphocytic Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Myelofibrosis, Multiple Myeloma, Glioma/Glioblastoma, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT Number / Title | Other IDs | Start Date | (Estimated) Primary Completion Date | Recruitment | Conditions | Interventions | Phases | Enrollment (Patients) | Sponsor / Collaborators | |
NCT00495144 A Phase I Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Anti-Tumor Activity of TH-302 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors | TH-CR-401 | June 2007 | December 2011 | Tumors, Hypoxia | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 1 | 129 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01149915 Study of Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug TH-302 to Treat Advanced Leukemias | TH-CR-407 | June 2010 | August 2013 | Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Advanced Myelofibrosis | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 1 | 40 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01144455 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of TH-302 in Combination With Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Previously Untreated Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | TH-CR-404 | June 2010 | August 2013 | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Drug: Gemzar (Gemcitabine), Drug: TH-302, Drug: TH-302 | Phase 2 | 165 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals, PRA Health Sciences | ||
18 November 2014[18]
| ||||||||||
NCT00742963 Dose-Escalation Study of TH-302 in Combination With Doxorubicin to Treat Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma | TH-CR-403 | August 2008 | September 2013 | Soft Tissue Sarcoma | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 1, Phase 2 | 102 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
15 November 2012, Results for overall study population (N=91)[19] [20]
10 October 2014, Results for overall study population (N=91)[21]
| ||||||||||
NCT00743379 Dose-Escalation Study of TH-302 in Combination With A) Gemcitabine or B) Docetaxel or C) Pemetrexed to Treat Advanced Solid Tumors | TH-CR-402 | August 2008 | September 2013 | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 1, Phase 2 | 71 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
12 October 2010[22]
| ||||||||||
NCT01497444 Sorafenib Tosylate and Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug TH-302 in Treating Patients With Advanced Kidney Cancer or Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery | TH-IST-4004, N1153, NCCTG-N1153, CDR0000720022, NCI-2012-00095, U10CA031946 | May 2012 | January 2014 | Kidney Cancer, Liver Cancer | Drug: hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302, Drug: sorafenib tosylate, Genetic: protein analysis, Other: laboratory biomarker analysis | Phase 1, Phase 2 | 48 | North Central Cancer Treatment Group, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, American College of Surgeons, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01440088 A Trial of TH-302 in Combination With Doxorubicin Versus Doxorubicin Alone to Treat Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma | TH-CR-406 / SARC021 | September 2011 | June 2014 | Soft Tissue Sarcoma | Drug: TH-302 in Combination with Doxorubicin, Drug: Doxorubicin | Phase 3 | 620 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC) | ||
18 September 2014[27]
22 September 2014[28]
3 November 2014[29]
| ||||||||||
NCT01381822 Dose-Escalation Study of TH-302 in Combination With Sunitinib to Treat Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors | TH-CR-410 | June 2011 | June 2014 | Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 1 | 58 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01833546 A Japanese Phase 1 Trial of TH-302 in Subjects With Solid Tumors and Pancreatic Cancer | EMR200592-002 | April 2013 | January 2015 | Solid Tumor, Pancreatic Cancer | Drug: TH-302 monotherapy, Drug: TH-302, Drug: Gemcitabine | Phase 1 | 20 | Merck KGaA, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT02020226 A Cardiac Safety Study of TH-302 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors | TH-CR-414 | November 2013 | January 2015 | Solid Tumors | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 1 | 40 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT02076230 A Phase 1 TH-302 Mass Balance Trial | EMR200592-007, 2013-003950-25 | February 2014 | March 2015 | Solid Tumors | Drug: [14C] TH-302 (Label 1), Drug: [14C] TH-302 (Label 2), Drug: Unlabeled TH-302 | Phase 1 | 10 | Merck KGaA, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01522872 Open-label Study of TH-302 and Dexamethasone With or Without Bortezomib in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma | TH-CR-408 | February 2012 | June 2015 | Multiple Myeloma | Drug: TH-302, Drug: TH-302, Drug: TH-302 and bortezomib | Phase 1, Phase 2 | 60 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01864538 A Phase 2 Biomarker - Enriched Study of TH-302 in Subjects With Advanced Melanoma | TH-CR-413 | May 2013 | June 2015 | Metastatic Melanoma | Drug: TH-302 | Phase 2 | 40 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01403610 Safety and Efficacy Study of TH-302 CNS Penetration in Recurrent High Grade Astrocytoma Following Bevacizumab | TH-IST-4003, CTRC 11-24 | June 2011 | July 2015 | High Grade Glioma | Drug: TH-302, Drug: Placebo | Phase 2 | 34 | The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | ||
17 November 2014[32]
| ||||||||||
NCT01721941 TH-302 Plus Doxorubicin Delivered by Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma | TH302 | December 2014 | December 2015 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Drug: Phase I Dose level -1, Drug: Phase I dose level 1, Drug: Phase I Dose level 2, Drug: Phase I Dose level 3 | Phase 1 | 20 | Scripps Clinic Cancer Center, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01746979 Clinical Trial Testing TH-302 in Combination With Gemcitabine in Previously Untreated Subjects With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | , EMR 200592-001, 2012-002957-42 | December 2012 | February 2016 | Metastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Drug: TH-302, Drug: Gemcitabine, Drug: Placebo (5 percent dextrose - D5W) | Phase 3 | 660 | EMD Serono, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
3 November 2014[33]
18 November 2014[34]
| ||||||||||
NCT02047500 Phase I TH-302 Plus Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel in Pancreatic Cancer | EMR200592-006 | January 2014 | June 2016 | Pancreatic Cancer | Drug: TH-302, Drug: Nab-paclitaxel, Drug: Gemcitabine | Phase 1 | 48 | EMD Serono, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT02093962 Study of TH-302 or Placebo in Combination With Pemetrexed in Patients With Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | TH-CR-415 | March 2014 | July 2016 | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Drug: TH-302 combination with pemetrexed, Drug: Matched placebo in combination with pemetrexed | Phase 2 | 440 | Threshold Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono | ||
18 November 2014[35]
| ||||||||||
NCT02255110 A Japanese Trial of TH-302 in Subjects With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma | EMR200592-008 | October 2014 | October 2016 | Soft Tissue Sarcoma | Drug: TH-302, Drug: Doxorubicin | Phase 2 | 46 | Merck KGaA, Threshold Pharmaceuticals | ||
NCT01485042 Dose Escalation Study of Pazopanib Plus TH-302 | , TH-IST-4001, Pro00031123 | December 2011 | December 2016 | Solid Tumors | Drug: Pazopanib and TH-302 | Phase 1 | 50 | Herbert Hurwitz, MD, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, GlaxoSmithKline, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Duke University | ||
EudraCT: 2014-004072-30 A phase II trial to assess the activity and safety of TH-302 in combination with sunitinib in patients with well- and moderately-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) previously untreated | GETNE-1408, EMR 200592-012 | January 2015 | Metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) | Drug: TH-302 in combination with sunitinib | Phase 2 | 43 | Grupo Español de Tumores Neuroendocrinos, MFAR, S.L., Spain | |||
NCT02342379 TH-302 in Combination With Bevacizumab for Glioblastoma | TH-IST-4008, CTRC 12-0105 | February 2015 | February 2017 | Glioblastoma | Drug: Bevacizumab and TH-302 | Phase 2 | 33 | The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | ||
Note: Results based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) assessments are not shown. |
Both, evofosfamide and ifosfamide have been investigated in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The study TH-CR-403 is a single arm trial investigating evofosfamide in combination with doxorubicin.[36] The study EORTC 62012 compares doxorubicin with doxorubicin plus ifosfamide.[37] Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are generic products sold by many manufacturers.
The indirect comparison of both studies shows comparable hematologic toxicity and efficacy profiles of evofosfamide and ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin. However, a longer overall survival of patients treated with evofosfamide/doxorubicin (TH-CR-403) trial was observed. The reason for this increase is probably the increased number of patients with certain sarcoma subtypes in the evofosfamide/doxorubicin TH-CR-403 trial, see table below.
However, in the Phase 3 TH-CR-406/SARC021 study (conducted in collaboration with the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC)), patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with evofosfamide in combination with doxorubicin did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS compared with doxorubicin alone (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.88 - 1.29).
Comparison of ifosfamide/doxorubicin with evofosfamide/doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline Characteristics | Study ID | NCT00061984 Phase 3 trial EORTC 62012[38] | NCT01440088 Phase 2 trial TH-CR-403[39] | |
Drug 1 | Doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 Day 1 or as a 72-hour continuous i.v. infusion | Doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 Days 1-3 | Doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 Day 1 | |
Drug 2 | Ifosfamide 2.5 g/m2 Days 1-4 | Evofosfamide 300 mg/m2 Days 1, 8 | ||
Drug 3 | Pegfilgrastim 6 mg s.c. Day 5 | Growth Factor Day 8 or Day 9 | ||
Patients | N=228 | N=227 | N=91 | |
Median number of cycles | 5 cycles | 6 cycles | 7 cycles (N = 91) + 10 maintenance cycles (n = 48) | |
Number of patients with sarcoma subtype Leiomyosarcoma or Liposarcoma | 35% | 40% | 52% | |
Efficacy | 4.6 months | 7.4 months | 6.5 months | |
Median Overall survival (OS) | 12.8 months | 14.3 months | 21.5 months | |
Median OS, Leiomyosarcoma patients | 31.9 months | |||
Median OS, Liposarcoma patients | 32.9 months | |||
Hematologic Toxicity | Grade 3/4 Neutropenia | 37% | 42% | 31% |
Grade 3/4 Febrile Neutropenia | 13% | 46% | 8% | |
Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia | < 1% | 34% | 32% | |
Grade 3/4 Anemia | 4% | 35% | 36% | |
Grade 3/4 Leucopenia | 18% | 43% | N/A |
Both, evofosfamide and protein-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) have been investigated in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The study TH-CR-404 compares gemcitabine with gemcitabine plus evofosfamide.[40] The study CA046 compares gemcitabine with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.[41] Gemcitabine is a generic product sold by many manufacturers.
The indirect comparison of both studies shows comparable efficacy profiles of evofosfamide and nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine. However, the hematologic toxicity is increased in patients treated with evofosfamide/gemcitabine (TH-CR-404 trial), see table below.
In the Phase 3 MAESTRO study, patients with previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with evofosfamide in combination with gemcitabine did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with gemcitabine plus placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71 - 1.01; p=0.0589).
Comparison of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine/evofosfamide in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline Characteristics | Study ID | NCT00844649 Phase 3 trial CA046[42] | NCT01144455 Phase 2 trial TH-CR-404[43] | ||||
Drug 1 | Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 Schedule A | Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 Schedule B | Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 Schedule B | Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 Schedule B | Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 Schedule B | ||
Drug 2 | --- | nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 Schedule B | --- | Evofosfamide 240 mg/m2 Schedule B | Evofosfamide 340 mg/m2 Schedule B | ||
Drug 3 | 15% of patients received growth factors | 26% of patients received growth factors | Optional: Growth factors | Optional: Growth factors | Optional: Growth factors | ||
Patients [N] | 430 | 431 | 69 | 71 | 74 | ||
Efficacy | Median Progression-free survival [months] | 3.7 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
Median Overall survival [months] | 6.7 | 8.5 | 6.9 (1) | 8.7 (1) | 9.2 (1) | ||
Hematologic Toxicity | Grade 3/4 Neutropenia [%] | 27 | 38 | 17 | 34 | 43 | |
Grade 3/4 Febrile Neutropenia [%] | 1 | 3 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia [%] | 9 | 13 | 12 | 30 | 55 | ||
Grade 3/4 Anemia [%] | 12 | 13 | 29 | 34 | 43 | ||
Grade 3/4 Leucopenia [%] | 16 | 31 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
Schedule A: Weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (cycle 1) and then on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle 2 and subsequent cycles) Schedule B: On days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (1) statistically not significant |
Oxygen deficient conditions are linked to tumor progression throughout the body and poses an issue in cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation.[44] Hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) function in hypoxic conditions and inhibit the growth of tumor cells.[45] Evofosfamide is a HAP that targets tumor progression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tissues by inhibitng the overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α).[46]
In this study, the efficacy of Evofosfamide along with cisplastin (DDP) in blocking cell progression was measured. "The combination of evofosfamide with DDP had a synergistic effect on cytotoxicity in the NPC cell lines by combination index values assessment. Cell cycle G2 phase was arrested after treated with 0.05 μmol/L evofosfamide under hypoxia. Histone H2AX phosphorylation (γH2AX) (a marker of DNA damage) expression increased while HIF-1α expression suppressed after evofosfamide treatment under hypoxic conditions".[47] These findings allow for evidence for Evofosfamide to be pushed towards clinical trials to further investigate the potential to be developed as an FDA approved anticancer drug.
Risks published in the quarterly/annual reports of Threshold and Merck KGaA that could affect the further development of evofosfamide (TH-302):
The evofosfamide formulation that Threshold and Merck KGaA are using in the clinical trials was changed in 2011[48] to address issues with storage and handling requirements that were not suitable for a commercial product. Additional testing is ongoing to verify if the new formulation is suitable for a commercial product. If this new formulation is also not suitable for a commercial product another formulation has to be developed and some or all respective clinical phase 3 trials may be required to be repeated which could delay the regulatory approvals.[49]
Even if Threshold/Merck KGaA succeed in obtaining regulatory approvals and bringing evofosfamide to the market, the amount reimbursed for evofosfamide may be insufficient and could adversely affect the profitability of both companies. Obtaining reimbursement for evofosfamide from third-party and governmental payors depend upon a number of factors, e.g. effectiveness of the drug, suitable storage and handling requirements of the drug and advantages over alternative treatments.
There could be the case that the data generated in the clinical trials are sufficient to obtain regulatory approvals for evofosfamide but the use of evofosfamide has a limited benefit for the third-party and governmental payors. In this case Threshold/Merck KGaA could be forced to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost effectiveness data for the use of evofosfamide to each payor. Threshold/Merck KGaA may not be able to provide data sufficient to obtain reimbursement.[50]
Each cancer indication has a number of established medical therapies with which evofosfamide will compete, for example:
Threshold relies on third-party contract manufacturers for the manufacture of evofosfamide to meet its and Merck KGaA's clinical supply needs. Any inability of the third-party contract manufacturers to produce adequate quantities could adversely affect the clinical development and commercialization of evofosfamide. Furthermore, Threshold has no long-term supply agreements with any of these contract manufacturers and additional agreements for more supplies of evofosfamide will be needed to complete the clinical development and/or commercialize it. In this regard, Merck KGaA has to enter into agreements for additional supplies or develop such capability itself. The clinical programs and the potential commercialization of evofosfamide could be delayed if Merck KGaA is unable to secure the supply.[52]
Date | Event | |
---|---|---|
Jun 2005 | Threshold files evofosfamide (TH-302) patent applications in the U.S.[53] | |
Jun 2006 | Threshold files an evofosfamide (TH-302) patent application in the EU and in Japan[54] | |
Sep 2011 | Threshold starts a Phase 3 trial (TH-CR-406) of evofosfamide in combination with doxorubicin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma | |
Feb 2012 | Threshold signs an agreement with Merck KGaA to co-develop evofosfamide | |
Apr 2012 | A Phase 2b trial (TH-CR-404) of evofosfamide in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer meets primary endpoint | |
Jan 2013 | Merck KGaA starts a global Phase 3 trial (MAESTRO) of evofosfamide in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer | |
Dec 2015 | two Phase 3 trials fail, Merck will not apply for a license |