Erdős–Mordell inequality explained

In Euclidean geometry, the Erdős–Mordell inequality states that for any triangle ABC and point P inside ABC, the sum of the distances from P to the sides is less than or equal to half of the sum of the distances from P to the vertices. It is named after Paul Erdős and Louis Mordell. posed the problem of proving the inequality; a proof was provided two years later by . This solution was however not very elementary. Subsequent simpler proofs were then found by,, and .

Barrow's inequality is a strengthened version of the Erdős–Mordell inequality in which the distances from P to the sides are replaced by the distances from P to the points where the angle bisectors of ∠APB, ∠BPC, and ∠CPA cross the sides. Although the replaced distances are longer, their sum is still less than or equal to half the sum of the distances to the vertices.

Statement

Let

P

be an arbitrary point P inside a given triangle

ABC

, and let

PL

,

PM

, and

PN

be the perpendiculars from

P

to the sides of the triangles.(If the triangle is obtuse, one of these perpendiculars may cross through a different side of the triangle and end on the line supporting one of the sides.) Then the inequality states that

PA+PB+PC\geq2(PL+PM+PN)

Proof

Let the sides of ABC be a opposite A, b opposite B, and c opposite C; also let PA = p, PB = q, PC = r, dist(P;BC) = x, dist(P;CA) = y, dist(P;AB) = z. First, we prove that

cr\geqax+by.

This is equivalent to

c(r+z)
2\geq
ax+by+cz
2.

The right side is the area of triangle ABC, but on the left side, r + z is at least the height of the triangle; consequently, the left side cannot be smaller than the right side. Now reflect P on the angle bisector at C. We find that cray + bx for P's reflection. Similarly, bqaz + cx and apbz + cy. We solve these inequalities for r, q, and p:

r\geq(a/c)y+(b/c)x,

q\geq(a/b)z+(c/b)x,

p\geq(b/a)z+(c/a)y.

Adding the three up, we get

p+q+r \geq \left(

b
c

+

c
b

\right)x+ \left(

a
c

+

c
a

\right)y+ \left(

a
b

+

b
a

\right)z.

Since the sum of a positive number and its reciprocal is at least 2 by AM–GM inequality, we are finished. Equality holds only for the equilateral triangle, where P is its centroid.

Another strengthened version

Let ABC be a triangle inscribed into a circle (O) and P be a point inside of ABC. Let D, E, F be the orthogonal projections of P onto BC, CA, AB. M, N, Q be the orthogonal projections of P onto tangents to (O) at A, B, C respectively, then:

PM+PN+PQ\ge2(PD+PE+PF)

Equality hold if and only if triangle ABC is equilateral (;)

A generalization

Let

A1A2...An

be a convex polygon, and

P

be an interior point of

A1A2...An

. Let

Ri

be the distance from

P

to the vertex

Ai

,

ri

the distance from

P

to the side

AiAi+1

,

wi

the segment of the bisector of the angle

AiPAi+1

from

P

to its intersection with the side

AiAi+1

then :
n
\sum
i=1

Ri\ge\left(\sec{

\pi
n
}\right)\sum_^ w_i \ge \left(\sec\right)\sum_^ r_i

In absolute geometry

In absolute geometry the Erdős–Mordell inequality is equivalent, as proved in, to the statementthat the sum of the angles of a triangle is less than or equal to two right angles.

See also

References

External links