Enshakushanna Explained

Enshakushanna
Reign:c. 2350 BC[1] [2]
Successor:Lugal-kinishe-dudu
Dynasty:Second Dynasty of Uruk

Enshakushanna (Sumerian: {{cuneiform|,),[3] or Enshagsagana,[4] En-shag-kush-ana, Enukduanna, En-Shakansha-Ana, En-šakušuana was a king of Uruk around the mid-3rd millennium BC who is named on the Sumerian King List, which states his reign to have been 60 years. He conquered Hamazi, Akkad, Kish, and Nippur, claiming hegemony over all of Sumer.

Titulature

He adopted the Sumerian title en ki-en-gi lugal kalam .,[5] [6] [7] which may be translated as "lord of Sumer and king of all the land" (which possibly implies "en of the region of Uruk and lugal of the region of Ur"[8]), and could correspond to the later title lugal ki-en-gi ki-uri "King of Sumer and Akkad" that eventually came to signify kingship over Mesopotamia as a whole.

Reign

Enshakushanna's reign is largely characterized by his military campaigns, the most prominent of which was against Kish and Akshak. His attack on these two cities is attested from a stone bowl at Nippur and reads as follows:

For Enlil, king of all lands,

Enshakushanna, lord of the land of Sumer and king of the nation

when the gods commanded him,

he sacked Kish

(and) captured Enbi-Ishtar, the king of Kish.

The leader of Kish and the leader of Akshak, (when) both their cities were destroyed ...

(Lacuna)

in (?) [..] he returned to them,

but [he] dedicated their statues, their precious metals and lapis lazuli, their timber and treasure, to the god Enlil at [N]ippur.[9]

Many scholars have attributed the EDIIIb destruction layers at the Palace A and Plano-Convex Building in Kish to Enshakushanna.[10] Federico Zaina notes the archaeological evidence at Kish attests to a "pervasive violent destruction of the city of Kish at the end of the ED IIIb". Apart from his attacks to the North, Enshakushanna is also known to have attacked Akkad. A year name of En-šakušuana, king of Uruk was "Year in which En-šakušuana defeated Akkad". This would have been shortly before the rise of the Akkadian Empire.[11]

Succession

He was succeeded in Uruk by Lugal-kinishe-dudu, but the hegemony seems to have passed to Eannatum of Lagash for a time. Lugal-kinishe-dudu was later allied with Entemena, a successor of Eannatum, against Lagash's principal rival, Umma.[12] [13]

Inscriptions

Several inscriptions of Enshakushanna are known.[3] A dedication tablet in his name is known, now in the State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation:[14]

The inscription states his father was "Elilina", possibly King Elulu of Ur.[15]

Notes and References

  1. Book: Frayne . Douglas . Pre-Sargonic Period: Early Periods, Volume 1 (2700-2350 BC) . 2008 . University of Toronto Press . 429–432.
  2. Tohru . Maeda . "KING OF KISH" IN PRE-SAROGONIC SUMER . Orient . 1981 . 17 . 5 .
  3. Web site: CDLI-Found Texts . cdli.ucla.edu.
  4. Book: Clay . Albert Tobias . Hilprecht . H. V. (Hermann Vollrat) . The Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania. Series A: Cuneiform texts . 1892 . Philadelphia : Dept. of Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania . 50 .
  5. Web site: CDLI-Archival View . cdli.ucla.edu.
  6. Web site: The Emar Lexical Texts : Part 2 - Composite edition . Openaccess.leideuniv.nl . 2015-08-15.
  7. Web site: List of Found Texts . 2008-08-13 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110617021425/http://cdli.ucla.edu/search/result.pt?id_text=P222870&start=0&result_format=single&-op_id_text=eq&size=100 . 2011-06-17 .
  8. See e.g. Glassner, Jean-Jacques, 2000: Les petits etats Mésopotamiens à la fin du 4e et au cours du 3e millénaire. In: Hansen, Mogens Herman (ed.) A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures. The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen., P.48
  9. Web site: CDLI-Found Texts. 2021-01-27. cdli.ucla.edu.
  10. Book: Zaina, Federico. THE URBAN ARCHAEOLOGY OF EARLY KISH: 3RD MILLENNIUM BCE LEVELS AT TELL INGHARRA. Ante Quem S.r.l.. 2020. 147. 2021-01-27. 2021-10-19. https://web.archive.org/web/20211019062429/https://www.orientlab.net/pubs/pdf/OLSM_5_KISH_2020.pdf. dead.
  11. POMPONIO, Francesco. “FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON KIŠKI IN THE EBLA TEXTS.” Revue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie Orientale, vol. 107, pp. 71–83, 2013
  12. Book: Hayes . William . Chronology . 1950 . Cambridge Ancient History . 51 . en.
  13. https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2010/cdlj2010_001.html
  14. Web site: CDLI-Archival View . cdli.ucla.edu.
  15. Book: Gadd . C. J. . Edwards . I. E. S. . Hammond . N. G. L. . The Cambridge Ancient History . 1970 . Cambridge University Press . 978-0-521-07051-5 . 223, 237 . en.