Enmeshment Explained

Enmeshment is a concept in psychology and psychotherapy introduced by Salvador Minuchin (1921–2017) to describe families where personal boundaries are diffused, sub-systems undifferentiated, and over-concern for others leads to a loss of autonomous development.[1] According to this hypothesis, by being enmeshed in parental needs, trapped in a discrepant role function,[2] a child may lose their capacity for self-direction;[3] their own distinctiveness, under the weight of "psychic incest";[4] and, if family pressures increase, may end up becoming the identified patient or family scapegoat.[5]

Enmeshment was also used by John Bradshaw to describe a state of cross-generational bonding within a family, whereby a child (normally of the opposite sex) becomes a surrogate spouse for their mother or father.[6]

The term is sometimes applied to engulfing codependent relationships,[7] where an unhealthy symbiosis is in existence.[8]

Others suggest that for the toxically enmeshed child, the adult's carried feelings may be the only ones they know, outweighing and eclipsing their own.[9]

Critiques

There are important cultural differences in how "enmeshment" would be experienced or conceptualized, however. One study found that "enmeshed" adults in the United Kingdom experienced more depression than those in Italy, because of cultural expectations in more individualistic versus more collectivist cultures.[10]

Further, feminist family therapy critics have argued[11] [12] that the very concept of enmeshment may "reflect prototypically male standards of self and relationships, which contribute to the common practice of labeling women's preferred interactional styles as pathological or dysfunctional".[13] Empirical research in this critical feminist tradition has found that young women with the strongest sense of family cohesion have the highest social self-esteem, despite exhibiting what could be pathologized as "enmeshment".[14]

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. H. & L. Goldenberg, Family Therapy: An Overview (2008) pp. 244, 467.
  2. [Virginia Satir]
  3. R. C. Schwartz, Internal Family Systems Therapy (1997) p. 162
  4. Robert Bly, Iron John (1991) pp. 170, 185–7.
  5. Goldenberg, p. 239
  6. John Bradshaw, Reclaiming Virtue (2009) p. 390
  7. Bradshaw, p. 272
  8. R. Abell, Own Your Own Life (1977) pp. 119–22
  9. Terence Real, I Don't Want to Talk About It (1997) pp. 206, 360.
  10. Manzi C, Vignoles VL, Regalia C, Scabini E. Cohesion and enmeshment revisited: differentiation, identity, and well-being in two european cultures. J Marriage and Family. 2006;68(3):673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00282.x
  11. Allen, S. F., & Stoltenberg, C. D. (1995). Psychological separation of older adolescents and young adults from their parents: An investigation of gender differences. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 542–546.
  12. Boss, P., & Thorne, B. (1989). Family sociology and family therapy: A feminist linkage. In M. McGoldrick & C. M. Anderson (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 78–96). New York:Norton.
  13. Bograd M. Enmeshment, fusion or relatedness?: a conceptual analysis. Journal of Psychotherapy & The Family. 1988;3(4):65–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000118
  14. Gorbett, K., & Kruczek, T. (2008). Family factors predicting social self-esteem in young adults. The Family Journal, 16(1), 58–65