Enhanced geothermal system explained

An enhanced geothermal system (EGS) generates geothermal electricity without natural convective hydrothermal resources. Traditionally, geothermal power systems operated only where naturally occurring heat, water, and rock permeability are sufficient to allow energy extraction. However, most geothermal energy within reach of conventional techniques is in dry and impermeable rock. EGS technologies expand the availability of geothermal resources through stimulation methods, such as 'hydraulic stimulation'.

Overview

In many rock formations natural cracks and pores do not allow water to flow at economic rates. Permeability can be enhanced by hydro-shearing, pumping high-pressure water down an injection well into naturally-fractured rock. The injection increases the fluid pressure in the rock, triggering shear events that expand pre-existing cracks and enhance the site's permeability. As long as the injection pressure is maintained, high permeability is not required, nor are hydraulic fracturing proppants required to maintain the fractures in an open state.[1]

Hydro-shearing is different from hydraulic tensile fracturing, used in the oil and gas industry, which can create new fractures in addition to expanding existing fractures.[2]

Water passes through the fractures, absorbing heat until forced to the surface as hot water. The water's heat is converted into electricity using either a steam turbine or a binary power plant system, which cools the water.[3] The water is cycled back into the ground to repeat the process.

EGS plants are baseload resources that produce power at a constant rate. Unlike hydrothermal, EGS is apparently feasible anywhere in the world, depending on the resource depth. Good locations are typically over deep granite covered by a 3- layer of insulating sediments that slow heat loss.[4]

Advanced drilling techniques penetrate hard crystalline rock at depths of up to or exceeding 15 km, which give access to higher-temperature rock (400 °C and above), as temperature increases with depth.[5]

EGS plants are expected to have an economic lifetime of 20–30 years.

EGS systems are under development in Australia, France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, and the United States. The world's largest EGS project is a 25-megawatt demonstration plant in Cooper Basin, Australia. Cooper Basin has the potential to generate 5,000–10,000 MW.

Research and development

EGS technologies use a variety of methods to create additional flow paths. EGS projects have combined hydraulic, chemical, thermal, and explosive stimulation methods. Some EGS projects operate at the edges of hydrothermal sites where drilled wells intersect hot, yet impermeable, reservoir rocks. Stimulation methods enhance that permeability. The table below shows EGS projects around the world.[6] [7]

NameCountryState/regionYear StartStimulation methodReferences
MosfellssveitIceland1970Thermal and hydraulic[8]
Fenton HillUSANew Mexico1973Hydraulic and chemical
Bad UrachGermany1977Hydraulic[9]
FalkenbergGermany1977Hydraulic[10]
UK1977Hydraulic and explosive[11]
Le Mayet France1978Hydraulic,[12] [13]
East MesaUSACalifornia1980Hydraulic[14]
KraflaIceland1980Thermal[15]
BacaUSANew Mexico1981Hydraulic
Geysers UnocalUSACalifornia1981Explosive
BeowaweUSANevada1983Hydraulic
BruchalGermany1983Hydraulic
FjällbackaSweden1984Hydraulic and chemical[16]
Germany1984[17]
Hijiori Japan1985Hydraulic[18]
Soultz France1986Hydraulic and chemical[19]
AltheimAustria1989Chemical[20]
HachimantaiJapan1989Hydraulic[21]
Ogachi Japan1989Hydraulic[22]
SumikawaJapan1989Thermal[23]
TyrnyauzRussia`1991Hydraulic,[24] [25]
BacmanPhilippines1993Chemical[26]
SeltjarnarnesIceland1994Hydraulic[27]
MindanaoPhilippines1995Chemical[28]
BouillanteFrance1996Thermal[29]
LeytePhilippines1996Chemical[30]
Hunter ValleyAustralia1999
Groß SchönebeckGermany2000Hydraulic and chemical[31]
TiwiPhilippines2000Chemical[32]
BerlinEl Salvador2001Chemical[33]
Cooper Basin: HabaneroAustralia2002Hydraulic[34]
Cooper Basin: Jolokia 1Australia2002Hydraulic
CosoUSACalifornia1993, 2005Hydraulic and chemical[35]
HellisheidiIceland1993Thermal[36]
Genesys: HorstbergGermany2003Hydraulic[37]
Germany2003Hydraulic[38]
UnterhachingGermany2004Chemical[39]
SalakIndonesia2004Chemical, thermal, hydraulic and cyclic pressure loading[40]
Olympic DamAustralia2005Hydraulic[41]
ParalanaAustralia2005Hydraulic and chemical[42]
Los AzufresMexico2005Chemical[43]
Switzerland2006Hydraulic[44]
LarderelloItaly1983, 2006Hydraulic and chemical[45]
InsheimGermany2007Hydraulic[46]
Desert Peak USANevada2008Hydraulic and chemical[47]
Brady Hot SpringsUSANevada2008Hydraulic[48]
Southeast GeysersUSACalifornia2008Hydraulic[49]
Genesys: HannoverGermany2009Hydraulic[50]
St. GallenSwitzerland2009Hydraulic and chemical[51]
New York CanyonUSANevada2009Hydraulic[52]
Northwest GeysersUSACalifornia2009Thermal[53]
NewberryUSAOregon2010Hydraulic[54]
MauerstettenGermany2011Hydraulic and chemical[55]
Soda LakeUSANevada2011Explosive[56]
Raft RiverUSAIdaho1979, 2012Hydraulic and thermal[57]
Blue MountainUSANevada2012Hydraulic[58]
Rittershoffen France2013Thermal, hydraulic and chemical[59]
KlaipėdaLithuania2015Jetting[60]
Otaniemi Finland2016Hydraulic[61]
South Hungary EGS DemoHungary2016Hydraulic[62]
PohangSouth Korea2016Hydraulic[63]
FORGE UtahUSAUtah2016Hydraulic[64]
ReykjanesIceland2006, 2017Thermal[65]
Roter Kamm (Schneeberg)Germany2018Hydraulic[66]
United Downs Deep Geothermal Power (Redruth)UK2018Hydraulic[67]
Eden (St Austell)UK2018Hydraulic[68]
QiabuqiaChina2018Thermal and hydraulic[69]
VendenheimFrance2019[70]
Project RedUSANevada2023Hydraulic[71] [72]
Cape StationUSAUtah2023Hydraulic[73]

Australia

See main article: Geothermal power in Australia.

The Australian government has provided research funding for the development of Hot Dry Rock technology. Projects include Hunter Valley (1999), Cooper Basin: Habanero (2002), Cooper Basin: Jolokia 1 (2002), and Olympic Dam (2005).[74]

European Union

The EU's EGS R&D project at Soultz-sous-Forêts, France, connects a 1.5 MW demonstration plant to the grid. The Soultz project explored the connection of multiple stimulated zones and the performance of triplet well configurations (1 injector/2 producers). Soultz is in the Alsace.

Induced seismicity in Basel led to the cancellation of the EGS project there.

The Portuguese government awarded, in December 2008, an exclusive license to Geovita Ltd to prospect and explore geothermal energy in one of the best areas in continental Portugal. Geovita is studying an area of about 500 square kilometers together with the Earth Sciences department of the University of Coimbra's Science and Technology faculty.

South Korea

The Pohang EGS project started in December 2010, with the goal of producing 1 MW.[75]

The 2017 Pohang earthquake may have been linked to the activity of the Pohang EGS project. All research activities were stopped in 2018.

United States

Early days — Fenton Hill

The first EGS effort — then termed Hot Dry Rock — took place at Fenton Hill, New Mexico with a project run by the federal Los Alamos Laboratory. It was the first attempt to make a deep, full-scale EGS reservoir.

The EGS reservoir at Fenton Hill was completed in 1977 at a depth of about 2.6 km, exploiting rock temperatures of 185°C. In 1979 the reservoir was enlarged with additional hydraulic stimulation and was operated for about 1 year. The results demonstrated that heat could be extracted at reasonable rates from a hydraulically stimulated region of low-permeability hot crystalline rock. In 1986, a second reservoir was prepared for initial hydraulic circulation and heat extraction testing. In a 30-day flow test with a constant reinjection temperature of 20°C, the production temperature steadily increased to about 190°C, corresponding to a thermal power level of about 10MW. Budget cuts ended the study.

2000-2010

In 2009, The US Department of Energy (USDOE) issued two Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) related to enhanced geothermal systems. Together, the two FOAs offered up to $84 million over six years.[76]

The DOE opened another FOA in 2009 using stimulus funding from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act for $350 million, including $80 million aimed specifically at EGS projects,[77]

Cornell University — Ithaca, NY

Developing EGS in conjunction with a district heating system is a part in Cornell University's Climate Action Plan for their Ithaca campus.[78] The project began in 2018 to determine feasibility, gain funding and monitor baseline seismicity.[79] The project received $7.2 million in USDOE funding.[80] A test well was to be drilled in spring of 2021, at a depth of 2.5 –5 km targeting rock with a temperature > 85 °C. The site is planned to supply 20% of the campus' annual heating load. Promising geological locations for reservoir were proposed in the Trenton-Black River formation (2.2 km) or in basement crystalline rock (3.5 km).[81] The 2 mile deep borehole was completed in 2022.[82]

EGS "earthshot"

In September 2022, the Geothermal Technologies Office within the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy announced an "Enhanced Geothermal Shot" as part of their Energy Earthshots campaign.[83] The goal of the Earthshot is to reduce the cost of EGS by 90%, to $45/megawatt hour by 2035.[84]

Other federal funding and support

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act authorized $84 million to support EGS development through four demonstration projects.[85] The Inflation Reduction Act extended the production tax credit (PTC) for renewable energy sources (including geothermal) until 2024 and included geothermal energy in the new Clean Electricity PTC to begin in 2024.[86]

Induced seismicity

See main article: Induced seismicity. Induced seismicity is earth tremors caused by human activity. Seismicity is common in EGS, because of the high pressures involved. Seismicity events at the Geysers geothermal field in California are correlated with injection activity.[87]

Induced seismicity in Basel led the city to suspend its project and later cancel the project.

According to the Australian government, risks associated with "hydrofracturing induced seismicity are low compared to that of natural earthquakes, and can be reduced by careful management and monitoring" and "should not be regarded as an impediment to further development".[88] Induced seismicity varies from site to site and should be assessed before large scale fluid injection.

EGS potential

United States

A 2006 report by MIT, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, conducted the most comprehensive analysis to date on EGS. The report offered several significant conclusions:

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Pierce. Brenda. Geothermal Energy Resources. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). 2010-02-16. PowerPoint. 2011-03-19. 2011-10-06. https://web.archive.org/web/20111006173034/http://www.narucmeetings.org/Presentations/NARUC%20Pierce%20Geothermal%20presentation.pdf. dead.
  2. Web site: Cichon. Meg. Is Fracking for Enhanced Geothermal Systems the Same as Fracking for Natural Gas?. RenewableEnergyWorld.com. 2013-07-16. 2014-05-07. 2014-05-08. https://web.archive.org/web/20140508025638/http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/07/is-fracking-for-enhanced-geothermal-systems-the-same-as-fracking-for-natural-gas. dead.
  3. Web site: How an Enhanced Geothermal System Works. US Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20130520223811/http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/egs_animation.html. 2013-05-20.
  4. Web site: 20 slide presentation inc geothermal maps of Australia.
  5. Superhot Rock Energy: A Vision for Firm, Global Zero-Carbon Energy . Clean Air Task Force . October 2022 .
  6. Web site: Pollack. Ahinoam. 2020. Gallery of 1D, 2D, and 3D maps from enhanced geothermal systems around the world.
  7. Pollack. Ahinoam. 2020. What Are the Challenges in Developing Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)? Observations from 64EGS Sites. https://web.archive.org/web/20200713175257/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7086/9eb5565e691d9226f0077db4746291e56f03.pdf. dead. 2020-07-13. World Geothermal Congress. 211051245.
  8. Thorsteinsson. T.. Tomasson. J.. 1979-01-01. Drillhole stimulation in Iceland. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., (Pap.); (United States). en. 78-PET-24. 6129079.
  9. Stober. Ingrid. 2011-05-01. Depth- and pressure-dependent permeability in the upper continental crust: data from the Urach 3 geothermal borehole, southwest Germany. Hydrogeology Journal. en. 19. 3. 685–699. 10.1007/s10040-011-0704-7. 2011HydJ...19..685S. 129285719. 1435-0157.
  10. Book: Rummel . F. . Kappelmeyer . O. . The Falkenberg Geothermal Frac-Project: Concepts and Experimental Results . Hydraulic fracturing and geothermal energy . Mechanics of elastic and inelastic solids . 1983 . 5 . 59–74 . 10.1007/978-94-009-6884-4_4 . https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-6884-4_4 . Springer Netherlands . 978-94-009-6886-8 . en.
  11. Batchelor. A. S.. 1987-05-01. Development of hot-dry-rock geothermal systems in the UK. IEE Proceedings A . en. 134. 5. 371–380. 10.1049/ip-a-1.1987.0058. 2053-7905.
  12. Cornet. FH. 1987-01-01. Results from Le Mayet de Montagne project. Geothermics. en. 16. 4. 355–374. 10.1016/0375-6505(87)90016-2. 1987Geoth..16..355C . 0375-6505.
  13. Cornet. F. H.. Morin. R. H.. 1997-04-01. Evaluation of hydromechanical coupling in a granite rock mass from a high-volume, high-pressure injection experiment: Le Mayet de Montagne, France. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. en. 34. 3. 207.e1–207.e14. 10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00185-8. 1997IJRMM..34E.207C . 1365-1609.
  14. Entingh. D. J.. 2000. Geothermal Well Stimulation Experiments in the United States. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress.
  15. Axelsson. G. 2009. Review of well stimulation operations in Iceland. Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council. 2020-07-13. 2020-07-13. https://web.archive.org/web/20200713203918/http://pubs.geothermal-library.org/lib/grc/1028561.pdf. dead.
  16. Wallroth. Thomas. Eliasson. Thomas. Sundquist. Ulf. 1999-08-01. Hot dry rock research experiments at Fjällbacka, Sweden. Geothermics. en. 28. 4. 617–625. 10.1016/S0375-6505(99)00032-2. 1999Geoth..28..617W . 0375-6505.
  17. Пашкевич . Р.И. . Павлов . К.А. . 2015 . Современное состояние использования циркуляционных геотермальных систем в целях тепло- и электроснабжения . Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень . 388–399 . 0236-1493.
  18. Matsunaga. I. 2005. Review of the HDR Development at Hijiori Site, Japan. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress.
  19. Genter. Albert. Evans. Keith. Cuenot. Nicolas. Fritsch. Daniel. Sanjuan. Bernard. 2010-07-01. Contribution of the exploration of deep crystalline fractured reservoir of Soultz to the knowledge of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Comptes Rendus Geoscience. Vers l'exploitation des ressources géothermiques profondes des systèmes hydrothermaux convectifs en milieux naturellement fracturés. en. 342. 7. 502–516. 10.1016/j.crte.2010.01.006. 2010CRGeo.342..502G. 1631-0713.
  20. Pernecker. G. 1999. Altheim geothermal plant for electricity production by ORC-turbogenerator. Bulletin d'Hydrogéologie.
  21. Niitsuma. H.. 1989-07-01. Fracture mechanics design and development of HDR reservoirs— Concept and results of the Γ-project, Tohoku University, Japan. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. en. 26. 3. 169–175. 10.1016/0148-9062(89)91966-9. 1989IJRMA..26..169N . 0148-9062.
  22. Ito. Hisatoshi. 2003. Inferred role of natural fractures, veins, and breccias in development of the artificial geothermal reservoir at the Ogachi Hot Dry Rock site, Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. en. 108. B9. 2426. 10.1029/2001JB001671. 2003JGRB..108.2426I. 2156-2202. free.
  23. Kitao. K. 1990. Geotherm. Resourc. Counc. Trans. Cold-water Well Stimulation Experiments in the Sumikawa Geotheral Field, Japan. 2020-07-13. 2020-07-13. https://web.archive.org/web/20200713224151/http://pubs.geothermal-library.org/lib/grc/1002028.pdf. dead.
  24. Дядькин. Ю. Д.. 2001. Извлечение и использование тепла земли. Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень (научно-технический журнал). 9. 228–241.
  25. Book: Алхасов, А.Б.. Возобновляемые источники энергии. М.. Издательский дом МЭИ. 108. 2016. 978-5-383-00960-4.
  26. Buoing . Balbino C. . Recent Experiences in Acid Stimulation Technology by PNOC-Energy Development Corporation, Philippines . World Geothermal Congress 1995 . 1995 .
  27. Tulinius. Helga. Axelsson. Gudni. Tomasson. Jens. Kristmannsdóttir. Hrefna. Guðmundsson. Ásgrímur. 1996-01-01. Stimulation of well SN12 in the Seltjarnarnes low-temperature field in SW-Iceland.
  28. Malate. Ramonchito Cedric M.. 2000. SK-2D: A CASE HISTORY ON GEOTHERMAL WELLBORE ENHANCEMENT, MINDANAO GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION FIELD, PHILIPPINES. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000.
  29. Sanjuan. Bernard. Jousset. Philippe. Pajot. Gwendoline. Debeglia. Nicole. Michele. Marcello de. Brach. Michel. Dupont. François. Braibant. Gilles. Lasne. Eric. Duré. Frédéric. 2010-04-25 . Monitoring of the Bouillante Geothermal Exploitation (Guadeloupe, French West Indies) and the Impact on Its Immediate Environment . World Geothermal Congress 2010 . en. 11 p.
  30. Malate. 2003. ACID STIMULATION OF INJECTION WELLS IN THE LEYTE GEOTHERMAL POWER PROJECT, PHILIPPINES. Twenty-Second Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University. 51736784.
  31. Zimmermann. Günter. Moeck. Inga. Blöcher. Guido. 2010-03-01. Cyclic waterfrac stimulation to develop an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS)—Conceptual design and experimental results. Geothermics. The European I-GET Project: Integrated Geophysical Exploration Technologies for Deep Geothermal Reservoirs. en. 39. 1. 59–69. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2009.10.003. 2010Geoth..39...59Z . 0375-6505.
  32. Xu . Tianfu . Scaling of hot brine injection wells: supplementing field studies with reactive transport modeling . TOUGH Symposium 2003 .
  33. Barrios . L. A. . Enhanced Permeability by Chemical Stimulation at the Berlín Geothermal field . Geothermal Resources Council Transactions . 2002 . 26 .
  34. Holl . Heinz-Gerd . What did we learn about EGS in the Cooper Basin? . 2015 . 10.13140/RG.2.2.33547.49443 .
  35. Evanoff . Jerry . STIMULATION AND DAMAGE REMOVAL OF CALCIUM CARBONATE SCALING IN GEOTHERMAL WELLS: A CASE STUDY . Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress . 2004 . 199385006 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200227064652/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e3da/b00454742fde4f087775c7e5c630e5e97579.pdf . dead . 2020-02-27 .
  36. Bjornsson . Grimur . RESERVOIR CONDITIONS AT 3-6 KM DEPTH IN THE HELLISHEIDIGEOTHERMAL FIELD, SW-ICELAND, ESTIMATED BY DEEP DRILLING, COLD WATER INJECTION AND SEISMIC MONITORING . Twenty-Ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2004 .
  37. Tischner . Torsten . New Concepts for Extracting Geothermal Energy from One Well: The GeneSys-Project . Proceedings World Geothermal Congress . 2010 .
  38. Schindler . Marion . Successful Hydraulic Stimulation Techniques for Electric Power Production in the Upper Rhine Graben, Central Europe . Proceedings World Geothermal Congress . 2010 .
  39. Sigfússon . B. . 2014 JRC geothermal energy status report : technology, market and economic aspects of geothermal energy in Europe. . Op.europa.eu . 1 March 2016 . 10.2790/959587 . 9789279540486 . en.
  40. Pasikki . Riza . COILED TUBING ACID STIMULATION: THE CASE OF AWI 8-7 PRODUCTION WELL IN SALAK GEOTHERMAL FIELD, INDONESIA . Thirty-First Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2006 .
  41. Bendall . Betina . Australian Experiences in EGS Permeability Enhancement –A Review of 3 Case Studies . Thirty-Ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering .
  42. Albaric . J. . Oye . V. . Langet . N. . Hasting . M. . Lecomte . I. . Iranpour . K. . Messeiller . M. . Reid . P. . Monitoring of induced seismicity during the first geothermal reservoir stimulation at Paralana, Australia . Geothermics . 1 October 2014 . 52 . 120–131 . 10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.10.013 . 2014Geoth..52..120A . en . 0375-6505.
  43. Armenta . Magaly Flores . Productivity Analysis and Acid Treatment of Well AZ-9ADat the Los Azufres Geothermal Field, Mexico . GRC Transactions . 2006 . 30 .
  44. Häring . Markus O. . Schanz . Ulrich . Ladner . Florentin . Dyer . Ben C. . Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system . Geothermics . 1 October 2008 . 37 . 5 . 469–495 . 10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.06.002 . 2008Geoth..37..469H . en . 0375-6505.
  45. Carella . R. . Verdiani . G. . Palmerini . C. G. . Stefani . G. C. . Geothermal activity in Italy: Present status and future prospects . Geothermics . 1 January 1985 . 14 . 2 . 247–254 . 10.1016/0375-6505(85)90065-3 . 1985Geoth..14..247C . en . 0375-6505.
  46. Küperkoch . L. . Olbert . K. . Meier . T. . Long-Term Monitoring of Induced Seismicity at the Insheim Geothermal Site, GermanyLong-Term Monitoring of Induced Seismicity at the Insheim Geothermal Site, Germany . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America . 1 December 2018 . 108 . 6 . 3668–3683 . 10.1785/0120170365 . 134085568 . en . 0037-1106.
  47. Chabora . Ethan . HYDRAULIC STIMULATION OF WELL 27-15, DESERT PEAK GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NEVADA, USA . Thirty-Seventh Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2012 .
  48. Drakos . Peter . Feasibility of EGS Development at Brady Hot Springs, Nevada . US DOE Geothermal Office . 2017 .
  49. Alta Rock Energy . Engineered Geothermal SystemDemonstration ProjectNorthern California Power Agency, The Geysers, CA . 2013 . 10.2172/1134470 . 1134470 .
  50. Tischner . T. . MASSIVE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN LOW PERMEABLESEDIMENTARY ROCK IN THE GENESYS PROJECT . Thirty-EighthWorkshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2013 .
  51. Moeck . I. . Bloch . T. . Graf . R. . Heuberger . S. . Kuhn . P. . Naef . H. . Sonderegger . Michael . Uhlig . S. . Wolfgramm . M. . The St. Gallen Project: Development of Fault Controlled Geothermal Systems in Urban Areas . 2015 . 55741874 . Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015.
  52. Moeck . Inga . The St. Gallen Project: Development of Fault Controlled Geothermal Systems in Urban Areas . Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 . 2015 .
  53. Garcia . Julio . Hartline . Craig . Walters . Mark . Wright . Melinda . Rutqvist . Jonny . Dobson . Patrick F. . Jeanne . Pierre . The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Part 1: Characterization and reservoir response to injection . Geothermics . 1 September 2016 . 63 . 97–119 . 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.08.003 . 2016Geoth..63...97G . 140540505 . en . 0375-6505. free .
  54. Cladouhos. Trenton T.. Petty. Susan. Swyer. Michael W.. Uddenberg. Matthew E.. Grasso. Kyla. Nordin. Yini. 2016-09-01. Results from Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration, 2010–2014. Geothermics. Enhanced Geothermal Systems: State of the Art. en. 63. 44–61. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.08.009. 2016Geoth..63...44C . 0375-6505.
  55. Mraz . Elena . Moeck . Inga . Bissmann . Silke . Hild . Stephan . Multiphase fossil normal faults as geothermal exploration targets in the Western Bavarian Molasse Basin: Case study Mauerstetten . Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften . 31 October 2018 . 169 . 3 . 389–411 . 10.1127/zdgg/2018/0166 . 135225984 . en.
  56. Ohren . Mary . Permeability Recovery and Enhancements in the Soda Lake Geothermal Field, Fallon, Nevada . GRC Transactions . 2011 . 35 .
  57. Bradford . Jacob . Hydraulic and Thermal Stimulation Program at Raft River Idaho, A DOE EGS . GRC Transactions . 2015 .
  58. Petty . Susan . Current Status of Geothermal Stimulation Technology . 2016 GRC Annual Meeting Presentations . 2016 . 2020-09-08 . 2020-07-18 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200718225036/https://geothermal.org/Annual_Meeting/PDFs/Reservoir-Stimulation_2016/12Petty.pdf . dead .
  59. Baujard . C . Hydrothermal characterization of wells GRT-1 and GRT-2 in Rittershoffen, France: Implications on the understanding of natural flow systems in the rhine graben . Geothermics . 1 January 2017 . 65 . 255–268 . 10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.11.001 . 2017Geoth..65..255B . en . 0375-6505. free .
  60. Nair . R. . A case study of radial jetting technology for enhancing geothermal energy systems at Klaipėda geothermal demonstration plant . 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2017 .
  61. Ader . Thomas . Chendorain . Michael . Free . Matthew . Saarno . Tero . Heikkinen . Pekka . Malin . Peter Eric . Leary . Peter . Kwiatek . Grzegorz . Dresen . Georg . Bluemle . Felix . Vuorinen . Tommi . Design and implementation of a traffic light system for deep geothermal well stimulation in Finland . Journal of Seismology . 29 August 2019 . 24 . 5 . 991–1014 . 10.1007/s10950-019-09853-y . 201661087 . en . 1573-157X.
  62. Garrison . Geoffrey . The South Hungary Enhanced Geothermal System (SHEGS) Demonstration Project . GRC Transactions . 2016 .
  63. Kim . Kwang-Hee . Ree . Jin-Han . Kim . YoungHee . Kim . Sungshil . Kang . Su Young . Seo . Wooseok . Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event . Science . 1 June 2018 . 360 . 6392 . 1007–1009 . 10.1126/science.aat6081 . 29700224 . 2018Sci...360.1007K . 13876371 . en . 0036-8075. free .
  64. Moore . Joseph . The Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE): An International Laboratory for Enhanced Geothermal System Technology Development . 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2019 .
  65. Friðleifsson . Guðmundur Ómar . TheReykjanes DEEPEGS Demonstration Well –IDDP-2 . European Geothermal Congress 2019 . 2019 .
  66. Wagner . Steffen . PetrothermalEnergyGenerationin Crystalline Rocks (Germany) . Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 . 2015 .
  67. Ledingham . Peter . The United Downs Deep Geothermal Power Project . 44th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering . 2019 .
  68. Web site: Understanding geothermal power . Eden Project . en . 15 February 2014.
  69. Lei . Zhihong . Zhang . Yanjun . Yu . Ziwang . Hu . Zhongjun . Li . Liangzhen . Zhang . Senqi . Fu . Lei . Zhou . Ling . Xie . Yangyang . Exploratory research into the enhanced geothermal system power generation project: The Qiabuqia geothermal field, Northwest China . Renewable Energy . 1 August 2019 . 139 . 52–70 . 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.088 . 116422325 . en . 0960-1481.
  70. Bogason . Sigurdur G. . [DEEPEGS project management -Lessons learned --> DEEPEGS project management -Lessons learned ]. European Geothermal Congress 2019 . 2019 .
  71. Web site: Clifford . Catherine . 2023-07-18 . Fervo Energy hits milestone in using oil drilling technology to tap geothermal energy . 2024-03-21 . CNBC . en.
  72. Web site: Norbeck . Jack Hunter . Latimer . Timothy . 2023-07-18 . Commercial-Scale Demonstration of a First-of-a-Kind Enhanced Geothermal System . 2024-04-08 . eartharxiv.org . en-US . preprint submitted to EarthArXiv.
  73. Web site: Fracking for heat: Utah could become home to world’s largest enhanced geothermal plant . 2024-06-27 . The Salt Lake Tribune . en-US.
  74. Web site: Geothermal Drilling Program . 2010-06-03 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100606181052/http://www.ret.gov.au/energy/energy%20programs/cei/acre/gdp/Pages/default.aspx . 2010-06-06 . dead .
  75. Web site: DESTRESS - Pohang . DESTRESS . DESTRESS H2020 . January 3, 2019.
  76. Web site: EERE News: DOE to Invest up to $84 Million in Enhanced Geothermal Systems. 2009-07-04. 2009-03-04. 2009-06-09. https://web.archive.org/web/20090609171632/http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=12279. dead.
  77. Web site: Department of Energy – President Obama Announces Over $467 Million in Recovery Act Funding for Geothermal and Solar Energy Projects. 2009-07-04. 2009-05-27. https://web.archive.org/web/20090624215012/http://www.energy.gov/news2009/7427.htm. 2009-06-24. dead.
  78. Web site: Climate Action Plan & roadmap 2014-2015 . Whang . Jyu . et al. . Cornell University . 2013. 2020-12-07.
  79. Web site: Cornell's Commitment to a Sustainable Campus – Earth Source Heat. 2020-12-08. earthsourceheat.cornell.edu. 2020-06-18. https://web.archive.org/web/20200618074850/https://earthsourceheat.cornell.edu/cornells-commitment-to-sustainability/. dead.
  80. Web site: $7.2M grant funds exploratory research into Earth Source Heat. 2020-12-08. Cornell Chronicle. en.
  81. Web site: District Geothermal Heating Using EGS Technology to Meet Carbon Neutrality Goals: A Case Study of Earth Source Heat for the Cornell University Campus . Tester. Jeffery . et al. . Proceedings World Geothermal Congress April 26-May 2, 2020 . April 26, 2020. 2020-12-07.
  82. Web site: University . Office of Web Communications, Cornell . Earth Source Heat Cornell University . 2023-08-08 . Earth Source Heat Cornell University . en.
  83. Web site: DOE Launches New Energy Earthshot to Slash the Cost of Geothermal Power . Department of Energy . 18 January 2023.
  84. Web site: Enhanced Geothermal Shot . Department of Energy . 18 January 2023.
  85. Web site: Ben Lefebvre . Kelsey Tamborrino . Meet the renewable energy source poised for growth with the help of the oil industry . Politico . 18 January 2023.
  86. Inflation Reduction Act Summary . Bipartisan Policy Center . August 4, 2022 .
  87. The Impact of Injection on Seismicity at The Geyses, California Geothermal Field. Ernest L.. Majer. John E.. Peterson. May 21, 2008. escholarship.org.
  88. Web site: Induced Seismicity and Geothermal Power Development in Australia . Geoscience Australia . Australian Government . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20111011143551/http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA11478.pdf . 2011-10-11 .
  89. Book: Tester, Jefferson W. ([[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]) . The Future of Geothermal Energy – Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century . 2006 . Idaho National Laboratory . Idaho Falls . 0-615-13438-6 . 14MB PDF . 2007-02-07 . etal . https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20110310030646/http://geothermal.inel.gov/publications/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf . 2011-03-10 . dead .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Enhanced geothermal system".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.