End extension explained

In model theory and set theory, which are disciplines within mathematics, a model

ak{B}=\langleB,F\rangle

of some axiom system of set theory

T

in the language of set theory is an end extension of

ak{A}=\langleA,E\rangle

, in symbols

ak{A}\subseteqendak{B}

, if

ak{A}

is a substructure of

ak{B}

, (i.e.,

A\subseteqB

and

E=F|A

), and

b\inA

whenever

a\inA

and

bFa

hold, i.e., no new elements are added by

ak{B}

to the elements of

A

.[1]

The second condition can be equivalently written as

\{b\inA:bEa\}=\{b\inB:bFa\}

for all

a\inA

.

For example,

\langleB,\in\rangle

is an end extension of

\langleA,\in\rangle

if

A

and

B

are transitive sets, and

A\subseteqB

.

A related concept is that of a top extension (also known as rank extension), where a model

ak{B}=\langleB,F\rangle

is a top extension of a model

ak{A}=\langleA,E\rangle

if

ak{A}\subseteqendak{B}

and for all

a\inA

and

b\inB\setminusA

, we have

rank(b)>rank(a)

, where

rank()

denotes the rank of a set.

Existence

Keisler and Morley showed that every countable model of ZF has an end extension which is also an elementary extension. If the elementarity requirement is weakened to being elementary for formulae that are

\Sigman

on the Lévy hierarchy, every countable structure in which

\Sigman

-collection holds has a

\Sigman

-elementary end extension.

Notes and References

  1. H. J. Keisler, J. H. Silver, "End Extensions of Models of Set Theory", p.177. In Axiomatic Set Theory, Part 1 (1971), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Dana Scott, editor.