Ella Freeman Sharpe Explained

Ella Freeman Sharpe
Birth Date:22 February 1875
Birth Place:Haverhill, Suffolk, England
Death Date:1 June 1947
Death Place:London

Ella Freeman Sharpe (1875–1947) was a leading figure in the early development of psychoanalysis in Britain,[1] and was among the most influential of the first British training analysts.[2]

Life

Sharpe taught at the Hucknall Pupil Teachers Training College 1904-16,[2] before moving to London to undertake analysis with Edward Glover's brother James. In 1923 she became a member of the British Psycho-Analytical Society, and had a second analysis, postwar, with Hanns Sachs.[2]

In the twenties Sharpe, like most of the London analysts, supported the more experienced work of Melanie Klein against the newcomer Anna Freud,[3] and she continued to show Kleinian influence into the early thirties.[4] By the time of the controversial discussions, however, Sharpe had taken a more nuanced attitude to Kleinianism, which saw her increasingly aligned with the Middle Group of British psychoanalysts, seeing Kleinianism as marred by a tendency to concrete embodiment.[5]

The symbolic in sublimation

Sharpe argued in her papers on sublimation for a continuous thread between compulsive symptoms indicating penance, and creative sublimations of childhood sadism.[6] Investigating female patients who used artistic performance as a form of identification with the phallus, she also pointed out the problematic aspects of that incorporation in phantasy.[7]

Her attention to the role of symbolism in life and psychoanalysis has made her appear as a precursor of Jacques Lacan,[8] who would himself pay tribute in Ecrits to "Ella Sharpe and her very relevant remarks...She is far from ordinary in the extent to which she requires the analyst to be familiar with all branches of human knowledge".[9] Nevertheless, her sense of the concrete, the body and the material behind sublimation and the symbolic differentiates her from the more linguistic elements of the Lacanian turn.[10]

Sharpe [11] drew attention to the similarities between poetic devices, like synecdoche, and Freud's [12] views on the relations of parts, in the manifest content of dreams, and the whole, in the latent content of dreams.

Selected writings

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Gwendolyn Steevens/Sheldon Gardner, The Women of Psychology (1982) p. 129-30
  2. Mary Jacobus, The Poetics of Psychoanalysis: In the Wake of Klein (London 2005) p. 4n
  3. Brenda Maddox, Freud's Wizard (London 2006) p. 188
  4. Jacobus, p. 30
  5. Mary Jacobus, The Poetics of Psychoanalysis: In the Wake of Klein (London 2005) p. 31
  6. Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (London 1946) p. 289
  7. Mary Jacobus, The Poetics of Psychoanalysis: In the Wake of Klein (London 2005) p. 28-9
  8. Veronique Voruz/Bogdan Wolf, The Later Lacan (2007) p. 244
  9. Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection (London 1997) p. 251
  10. Mary Jacobus, The Poetics of Psychoanalysis: In the Wake of Klein (London 2005) p. 4-5
  11. Sharpe, E. (1937). ' 'Dream Analysis.' ' New York: Norton.
  12. Freud, S. (1916-1917) ' 'Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis.' ' Standard Edition, vol. 16
  13. Mary Jacobus, The Poetics of Psychoanalysis: In the Wake of Klein (London 2005) p. 16-7
  14. E. Raynor, The Independent Mind in British Psychoanalysis (1991) p. 253
  15. Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (London 1946) p. 653