In particle physics, the electroweak interaction or electroweak force is the unified description of two of the four known fundamental interactions of nature: electromagnetism (electromagnetic interaction) and the weak interaction. Although these two forces appear very different at everyday low energies, the theory models them as two different aspects of the same force. Above the unification energy, on the order of 246 GeV,[1] they would merge into a single force. Thus, if the temperature is high enough – approximately 1015 K – then the electromagnetic force and weak force merge into a combined electroweak force. During the quark epoch (shortly after the Big Bang), the electroweak force split into the electromagnetic and weak force. It is thought that the required temperature of 1015 K has not been seen widely throughout the universe since before the quark epoch, and currently the highest human-made temperature in thermal equilibrium is around (from the Large Hadron Collider).
Sheldon Glashow,[2] Abdus Salam,[3] and Steven Weinberg[4] were awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics for their contributions to the unification of the weak and electromagnetic interaction between elementary particles, known as the Weinberg–Salam theory.[5] [6] The existence of the electroweak interactions was experimentally established in two stages, the first being the discovery of neutral currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collaboration in 1973, and the second in 1983 by the UA1 and the UA2 collaborations that involved the discovery of the W and Z gauge bosons in proton–antiproton collisions at the converted Super Proton Synchrotron. In 1999, Gerardus 't Hooft and Martinus Veltman were awarded the Nobel prize for showing that the electroweak theory is renormalizable.
After the Wu experiment in 1956 discovered parity violation in the weak interaction, a search began for a way to relate the weak and electromagnetic interactions. Extending his doctoral advisor Julian Schwinger's work, Sheldon Glashow first experimented with introducing two different symmetries, one chiral and one achiral, and combined them such that their overall symmetry was unbroken. This did not yield a renormalizable theory, and its gauge symmetry had to be broken by hand as no spontaneous mechanism was known, but it predicted a new particle, the Z boson. This received little notice, as it matched no experimental finding.
In 1964, Salam and John Clive Ward[7] had the same idea, but predicted a massless photon and three massive gauge bosons with a manually broken symmetry. Later around 1967, while investigating spontaneous symmetry breaking, Weinberg found a set of symmetries predicting a massless, neutral gauge boson. Initially rejecting such a particle as useless, he later realized his symmetries produced the electroweak force, and he proceeded to predict rough masses for the W and Z bosons. Significantly, he suggested this new theory was renormalizable.[4] In 1971, Gerard 't Hooft proved that spontaneously broken gauge symmetries are renormalizable even with massive gauge bosons.
See main article: Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model.
Mathematically, electromagnetism is unified with the weak interactions as a Yang–Mills field with an gauge group, which describes the formal operations that can be applied to the electroweak gauge fields without changing the dynamics of the system. These fields are the weak isospin fields,, and, and the weak hypercharge field .This invariance is known as electroweak symmetry.
The generators of SU(2) and U(1) are given the name weak isospin (labeled) and weak hypercharge (labeled) respectively. These then give rise to the gauge bosons that mediate the electroweak interactions – the three bosons of weak isospin (and), and the boson of weak hypercharge, respectively, all of which are "initially" massless. These are not physical fields yet, before spontaneous symmetry breaking and the associated Higgs mechanism.
In the Standard Model, the observed physical particles, the and bosons, and the photon, are produced through the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the electroweak symmetry SU(2) × U(1) to U(1), effected by the Higgs mechanism (see also Higgs boson), an elaborate quantum-field-theoretic phenomenon that "spontaneously" alters the realization of the symmetry and rearranges degrees of freedom.[8] [9] [10] [11]
The electric charge arises as the particular linear combination (nontrivial) of (weak hypercharge) and the component of weak isospin (
Q=T3+\tfrac{1}{2}YW
(the symmetry group of electromagnetism only) is defined to be the group generated by this special linear combination, and the symmetry described by the group is unbroken, since it does not directly interact with the Higgs.
The above spontaneous symmetry breaking makes the and bosons coalesce into two different physical bosons with different masses – the boson, and the photon,
\begin{pmatrix} \gamma\\ Z0\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} \cos\thetaW&\sin\thetaW\\ -\sin\thetaW&\cos\thetaW\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} B\\ W3\end{pmatrix},
mZ=
mW | |
\cos\thetaW |
~.
The and bosons, in turn, combine to produce the charged massive bosons :
W\pm=
1 | |
\sqrt{2 |
The Lagrangian for the electroweak interactions is divided into four parts before electroweak symmetry breaking becomes manifest,
l{L}EW=l{L}g+l{L}f+l{L}h+l{L}y~.
The
l{L}g
l{L}g=-\tfrac{1}{4}
\mu\nu | |
W | |
a |
a | |
W | |
\mu\nu |
-\tfrac{1}{4}B\mu\nuB\mu\nu,
\mu\nu | |
W | |
a |
a=1,2,3
B\mu\nu
l{L}f
l{L}f=\overline{Q}jiD/ Qj+\overline{u}jiD/ uj+\overline{d}jiD/ dj+\overline{L}jiD/ Lj+\overline{e}jiD/ ej,
D/
D/\equiv
\mu D | |
\gamma | |
\mu, |
D\mu\equiv\partial\mu-i
g' | |
2 |
Y B\mu-i
g | |
2 |
Tj W
j. | |
\mu |
Y
Tj
The
l{L}h
h
l{L}h=|D\muh|2-λ\left(|h|2-
v2 | |
2 |
\right)2 ,
v
The
l{L}y
l{L}y=-yu ij\epsilonab
\dagger \overline{Q} | |
h | |
ia |
c | |
u | |
j |
-yd ij h \overline{Q}i
c | |
d | |
j |
-yeij h \overline{L}i
c | |
e | |
j |
+h.c.~,
ij | |
y | |
k |
,
k\in\{u,d,e\} ,
The Lagrangian reorganizes itself as the Higgs field acquires a non-vanishing vacuum expectation value dictated by the potential of the previous section. As a result of this rewriting, the symmetry breaking becomes manifest. In the history of the universe, this is believed to have happened shortly after the hot big bang, when the universe was at a temperature [12] (assuming the Standard Model of particle physics).
Due to its complexity, this Lagrangian is best described by breaking it up into several parts as follows.
l{L}EW=l{L}K+l{L}N+l{L}C+l{L}H+l{L}HV+l{L}WWV+l{L}WWVV+l{L}Y~.
The kinetic term
l{L}K
\begin{align} l{L}K=\sumf\overline{f}(i\partial/ -mf) f-
1 | |
4 |
A\mu\nu A\mu\nu-
1 | |
2 |
+ | |
W | |
\mu\nu |
W-\mu\nu+
2 W | |
m | |
W |
-\mu | |
\mu W |
\\ -
1 | |
4 |
Z\mu\nuZ\mu\nu+
1 | |
2 |
\mu | |
m | |
\mu Z |
+
1 | |
2 |
\mu H)(\partial | |
(\partial | |
\mu H) |
-
1 | |
2 |
2 H | |
m | |
H |
2~, \end{align}
A\mu\nu ,
Z\mu\nu ,
- | |
W | |
\mu\nu |
,
+ | |
W | |
\mu\nu |
\equiv
- | |
(W | |
\mu\nu |
)\dagger
a | |
X | |
\mu\nu |
=\partial\mu
a | |
X | |
\nu |
-\partial\nu
a | |
X | |
\mu |
+gfabc
b | |
X | |
\mu |
c | |
X | |
\nu |
~,
X
A,
Z,
W\pm
The neutral current
l{L}N
l{L}C
l{L}N=
em A | |
e J | |
\mu |
\mu+
g | |
\cos\thetaW |
3 | |
( J | |
\mu |
-
2\theta | |
\sin | |
W J |
em ) Z | |
\mu |
\mu~,
~e=g \sin\thetaW=g' \cos\thetaW~.
em | |
J | |
\mu |
em | |
J | |
\mu |
=\sumf qf \overline{f} \gamma\mu f~,
qf
3 | |
J | |
\mu |
3 | |
J | |
\mu |
=
3 | |
\sum | |
f \overline{f} \gamma |
|
f~,
3 | |
T | |
f |
The charged current part of the Lagrangian is given by
l{L}C=-
g | |
\sqrt{2 |
| ||||
} \left[ \overline{u} | ||||
i \gamma |
CKM | |
M | |
ij |
dj+
| ||||
\overline{\nu} | ||||
i \gamma |
ei \right] W
+ | |
\mu |
+h.c.~,
\nu
CKM | |
M | |
ij |
l{L}H
l{L}H=-
| |||||||
4 mW |
H3-
| |||||||
|
H4~.
l{L}HV
l{L}HV=\left( g mHV+
g2 | |
4 |
H2 \right)\left( W
-\mu | |
\mu W |
+
1 | ||||||
|
\mu \right) | |
Z | |
\mu Z |
~.
l{L}WWV
l{L}WWV=-i g \left[
+ | |
\left( W | |
\mu\nu |
W-\mu-W+\mu
- | |
W | |
\mu\nu |
\right)\left( A\nu \sin\thetaW-
\nu \cos\theta | |
Z | |
W \right) |
+
\mu\nu | |
W | |
\mu \left( A |
\sin\thetaW-Z\mu\nu \cos\thetaW \right) \right]~.
l{L}WWVV
\begin{align} l{L}WWVV=-
g2 | |
4 |
-\mu | |
l\{ &l[ 2 W | |
\mu W |
+( A\mu \sin\thetaW-Z\mu \cos\thetaW )2 r]2 \\ &-
+ | |
l[ W | |
\mu |
- | |
W | |
\nu |
+
- | |
W | |
\mu |
+\left( A\mu \sin\thetaW-Z\mu \cos\thetaW \right)\left( A\nu \sin\thetaW-Z\nu \cos
2r\} | |
\theta | |
W \right) r] |
~. \end{align}
l{L}Y
l{L}Y=
-\sum | ||||
|
\overline{f} f H~.
v=(GF\sqrt{2})-1/2
GF