Egorov's theorem explained

In measure theory, an area of mathematics, Egorov's theorem establishes a condition for the uniform convergence of a pointwise convergent sequence of measurable functions. It is also named Severini–Egoroff theorem or Severini–Egorov theorem, after Carlo Severini, an Italian mathematician, and Dmitri Egorov, a Russian physicist and geometer, who published independent proofs respectively in 1910 and 1911.

Egorov's theorem can be used along with compactly supported continuous functions to prove Lusin's theorem for integrable functions.

Historical note

The first proof of the theorem was given by Carlo Severini in 1910:^{[1] [2]} he used the result as a tool in his research on series of orthogonal functions. His work remained apparently unnoticed outside Italy, probably due to the fact that it is written in Italian, appeared in a scientific journal with limited diffusion and was considered only as a means to obtain other theorems. A year later Dmitri Egorov published his independently proved results,^[3] and the theorem became widely known under his name: however, it is not uncommon to find references to this theorem as the Severini–Egoroff theorem. The first mathematicians to prove independently the theorem in the nowadays common abstract measure space setting were, and in :^[4] an earlier generalization is due to Nikolai Luzin, who succeeded in slightly relaxing the requirement of finiteness of measure of the domain of convergence of the pointwise converging functions in the ample paper .^[5] Further generalizations were given much later by Pavel Korovkin, in the paper, and by Gabriel Mokobodzki in the paper .

Formal statement and proof

Statement

Let (f_n) be a sequence of M-valued measurable functions, where M is a separable metric space, on some measure space (X,Σ,μ), and suppose there is a measurable subset A ⊆ X, with finite μ-measure, such that (f_n) converges μ-almost everywhere on A to a limit function f. The following result holds: for every ε > 0, there exists a measurable subset B of A such that μ(B) < ε, and (f_n) converges to f uniformly on A \ B.

Here, μ(B) denotes the μ-measure of B. In words, the theorem says that pointwise convergence almost everywhere on A implies the apparently much stronger uniform convergence everywhere except on some subset B of arbitrarily small measure. This type of convergence is also called almost uniform convergence.

Discussion of assumptions and a counterexample

• The hypothesis μ(A) < ∞ is necessary. To see this, it is simple to construct a counterexample when μ is the Lebesgue measure: consider the sequence of real-valued indicator functions $$f\_n(x)\; =\; 1\_(x),\; \backslash qquad\; n\backslash in\backslash N,\backslash \; x\backslash in\backslash R,$$ defined on the real line. This sequence converges pointwise to the zero function everywhere but does not converge uniformly on

\R\setminus B for any set B of finite measure: a counterexample in the general n -dimensional real vector space \R ^{n} can be constructed as shown by .

• The separability of the metric space is needed to make sure that for M-valued, measurable functions f and g, the distance d(f(x), g(x)) is again a measurable real-valued function of x.

Proof

Fix

\varepsilon > 0 .For natural numbers n and k, define the set E_n,k by the unionE _{n,k} = c up _{m\ge} \left\{ x\in A | |f _{m(x)} - f(x)| \ge (1 k)/(\right\}.)

These sets get smaller as n increases, meaning that E_n+1,k is always a subset of E_n,k, because the first union involves fewer sets. A point x, for which the sequence (f_m(x)) converges to f(x), cannot be in every E_n,k for a fixed k, because f_m(x) has to stay closer to f(x) than 1/k eventually. Hence by the assumption of μ-almost everywhere pointwise convergence on A,

\mu\left( c ap _{n\in\N} E _{n,k} \right) =0

for every k. Since A is of finite measure, we have continuity from above; hence there exists, for each k, some natural number n_k such that

\mu(E _{n _{k,k}} ) < (\varepsilon{ 2)/(^{k}.})

For x in this set we consider the speed of approach into the 1/k-neighbourhood of f(x) as too slow. Define

B = c up _{k\in\N} E _{n _{k,k}}

as the set of all those points x in A, for which the speed of approach into at least one of these 1/k-neighbourhoods of f(x) is too slow. On the set difference

A\setminus B we therefore have uniform convergence. Explicitly, for any \epsilon , let (1)/(k) < \epsilon , then for any n > n _{k} , we have |f _{n} - f| < \epsilon on all of A\setminus B .

Appealing to the sigma additivity of μ and using the geometric series, we get

\mu(B) \le \sum _{k\in\N} \mu(E _{n _{k,k}} ) < \sum _{k\in\N} (\varepsilon{ 2)/(^{k}=\varepsilon.})

Generalizations

Luzin's version

See main article: Lusin's theorem. Nikolai Luzin's generalization of the Severini–Egorov theorem is presented here according to .

Statement

Under the same hypothesis of the abstract Severini–Egorov theorem suppose that A is the union of a sequence of measurable sets of finite μ-measure, and (f_n) is a given sequence of M-valued measurable functions on some measure space (X,Σ,μ), such that (f_n) converges μ-almost everywhere on A to a limit function f, then A can be expressed as the union of a sequence of measurable sets H, A₁, A₂,... such that μ(H) = 0 and (f_n) converges to f uniformly on each set A_k.

Proof

It is sufficient to consider the case in which the set A is itself of finite μ-measure: using this hypothesis and the standard Severini–Egorov theorem, it is possible to define by mathematical induction a sequence of sets _k=1,2,... such that

\mu\left (A \setminus c up ^{N} _{k =1} A _{k} \right)\leq (1)/(N)

and such that (f_n) converges to f uniformly on each set A_k for each k. Choosing

H = A\setminus c up ^{inf ty} _{k =1} A _{k}

then obviously μ(H) = 0 and the theorem is proved.

Korovkin's version

\leq and \geq respectively in conditions 1 and 2.

Statement

ak{A} containing A and its measurable subsets such that their countable in unions and intersections belong to the same class. Suppose there exists a non-negative measure μ such that μ(A) exists and\mu(\cap A _{n)} = \lim \mu(A _{n)} if A _{1} \supset A _{2} \supset … with A _{n\inak{A}} for all n\mu(\cup A _{n)} = \lim \mu(A _{n)} if A _{1} \subset A _{2} \subset … with \cup A _{n\inak{A}} .If (f_n) is a sequence of M-valued measurable functions converging μ-almost everywhere on A\in ak{A} to a limit function f, then there exists a subset A′ of A such that 0 < μ(A) − μ(A′) < ε and where the convergence is also uniform.

Proof

Consider the indexed family of sets whose index set is the set of natural numbers

m\in\N, defined as follows:A _{0,m} = \left\{x\in A|d(f _{n(x),f(x))} \le 1 \forall n\geq m\right\}

Obviously

A _{0,1} \subseteq A _{0,2} \subseteq A _{0,3} \subseteq ...

and

A = c up _{m\in\N} A _{0,m}

therefore there is a natural number m₀ such that putting A_0,m0=A₀ the following relation holds true:

0 \leq\mu(A) - \mu(A _{0)\leq\varepsilon}

Using A₀ it is possible to define the following indexed family

A _{1,m} = \left\{x\in A _{0\left|} d(f _{m(x),f(x))} \le (12)/(\forall) n\geq m\right.\right\}

satisfying the following two relationships, analogous to the previously found ones, i.e.

A _{1,1} \subseteq A _{1,2} \subseteq A _{1,3} \subseteq ...

and

A _{0=cup} _{m\in\N} A _{1,m}

This fact enable us to define the set A_1,m1=A₁, where m₁ is a surely existing natural number such that

0 \leq\mu(A) - \mu(A _{1)\leq\varepsilon}

By iterating the shown construction, another indexed family of set is defined such that it has the following properties:

A _{0\supseteq} A _{1\supseteq} A _{2\supseteq …} 0 \leq\mu(A) - \mu(A _{m)\leq\varepsilon} for all m\in\N

• for each

m\in\N there exists k_m such that for all n \geq k _{m} then d(f _{n(x),f(x))} \le 2 ^{-m} for all x \in A _{m}

and finally putting

A' = c up _{n\in\N} A _{n}

the thesis is easily proved.

References

Historical references

• , available at Gallica.
• .
• .
• . Published by the Accademia Gioenia in Catania.
• .
• , available from the Biblioteca Digitale Italiana di Matematica. The obituary of Carlo Severini.
• . A short note in which Leonida Tonelli credits Severini for the first proof of Severini–Egorov theorem.

Scientific references

• • . A definitive monograph on integration and measure theory: the treatment of the limiting behavior of the integral of various kind of sequences of measure-related structures (measurable functions, measurable sets, measures and their combinations) is somewhat conclusive.
• . Contains a section named Egorov type theorems, where the basic Severini–Egorov theorem is given in a form which slightly generalizes that of .
  • • • , reviewed by and by .
• (available at the Polish Virtual Library of Science).

Notes and References

1. Published in .
2. According to, Severini, while acknowledging his own priority in the publication of the result, was unwilling to disclose it publicly: it was Leonida Tonelli who, in the note, credited him the priority for the first time.
3. In the note
4. According to and .
5. According to .