Edo machi-bugyō explained

were magistrates or municipal administrators with responsibility for governing and maintaining order in the shogunal city of Edo.[1] Machi-bugyō were samurai officials of the Tokugawa shogunate in Edo period Japan. Appointments to this prominent office were usually hatamoto,[2] this was amongst the senior administrative posts open to those who were not daimyōs.[3] Conventional interpretations have construed these Japanese titles as "commissioner", "overseer" or "governor."

During the Edo period, there were generally two hatamoto serving simultaneously as Edo machi-bugyō.[4] There were two Edo machi-bugyō-sho within the jurisdictional limits of metropolitan Edo; and during the years from 1702 though 1719, there was also a third appointed machi-bugyō.[5]

The Edo machi-bugyō were the central public authorities in this significant urban center. These men were bakufu-appointed officials fulfilling a unique role. They were an amalgam of chief of police, judge, and mayor. The machi-bugyō were expected to manage a full range of administrative and judicial responsibilities.[6]

Each machi-bugyō was involved in tax collection, policing, and firefighting; and at the same time, each played a number of judicial roles—hearing and deciding both ordinary civil cases and criminal cases.

In this period, the machi-bugyō were considered equal in status to the minor daimyōs. At any one time, there were as many as 16 machi-bugyō located throughout Japan, and there were always two in Edo.

Shogunal city

During this period, Edo ranked with the largest urban centers, some of which were designated as a "shogunal city". The number of such cities rose from three to eleven under Tokugawa administration.[7]

In Edo, a special system was devised to mitigate the possibility of municipal corruption. Initially, there were three machi-bugyō and then the number was reduced to one. The number of machi-bugyō was increased to two under Shōgun Iemitsu. Except for one brief period in the early 18th century, this bifurcated administration remained the consistent pattern until the shogunate was abolished in 1868.[8] There were two chief officials with equal powers and responsibilities; and each would alternately take control for one month before relinquishing the office to their counterpart. These two officials were each based in a separate location at some distance from each other. A reorganization of city government which focused greater attention on the two separate locations for these officials dates from 1719.[9] Kodenmachō(小伝馬町)

Kita-machi-bugyō

Edo's north magistrate was called the, so-called because his official residence was physically to the north of the official location of his counterpart, the minami-machi-bugyō.[10]

Minami-machi-bugyō

Edo's south magistrate was called the, so called because his official residence was physically to the south of the official location of his counterpart, the kita-machi-bugyō.[10] In 1707, the Tokugawa shogunate established the Minami-machi Bugyō-sho, the office of one of the magistrates of Edo, in this area of modern Yūrakuchō.

Honjo-machi-bugyō

Edo's third magistrate was called the, who was responsible for the neighborhoods of Honjo and Fukagawa on the east bank of the Sumida River.[10] A third machi-bugyō was deemed necessary in the years between 1702 through 1719.[2]

List of Edo machi-bugyō

See also

References

Notes and References

  1. Hall, John Wesley. (1955) Tanuma Okitsugu: Forerunner of Modern Japan, p. 201
  2. Cunningham, p. 39.
  3. Beasley, William G. (1955). Select Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy, 1853–1868, p. 325.
  4. Nussbaum, Louis-Frédéric. (2005). "Edo-machi bugyō" in ; n.b., Louis-Frédéric is pseudonym of Louis-Frédéric Nussbaum, see Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Authority File.
  5. Cunningham, Don. (2004). Taiho-Jutsu: Law and Order in the Age of the Samurai, p. 39.
  6. Cunningham, Don. (2004). Taiho-Jutsu: Law and Order in the Age of the Samurai, p. 42.
  7. Cullen, William. (2003). A History of Japan, 1582–1941: Internal and External Worlds, p. 159.
  8. Brinkley, p. 634.
  9. Murdoch, p. 46.
  10. Yoshino, Jun. "Law Enforcement in the Edo Period", Japan Echo. Vol. 31, No. 3. June 2004.
  11. Naito, Akira et al. (2003). Edo: the City that Became Tokyo, p. 26.
  12. [Takeuchi Rizō|Takeuchi, Rizō]
  13. Screech, Timon. (2006). Secret Memoirs of the Shoguns: Isaac Titsingh and Japan, 1779-1822, p. 243 n113.