Edgeworth price cycle explained

An Edgeworth price cycle is cyclical pattern in prices characterized by an initial jump, which is then followed by a slower decline back towards the initial level. The term was introduced by Maskin and Tirole (1988)[1] in a theoretical setting featuring two firms bidding sequentially and where the winner captures the full market.

Phases of a price cycle

A price cycle has the following phases:

Discussion

It can be debated whether Edgeworth Cycles should be thought of as tacit collusion because it is a Markov Perfect equilibrium, but Maskin and Tirole write: "Thus our model can be viewed as a theory of tacit collusion." (p. 592).

Edgeworth cycles have been reported in gasoline markets in many countries.[2] Because the cycles tend to occur frequently, weekly average prices found in government reports will generally mask the cycling. Wang (2012)[3] emphasizes the role of price commitment in facilitating price cycles: without price commitment, the dynamic game becomes one of simultaneous move and here, the cycles are no longer a Markov Perfect equilibrium but rely on, e.g., supergame arguments.

Edgeworth cycles are distinguished from both sticky pricing and cost-based pricing. Sticky prices are typically found in markets with less aggressive price competition, so there are fewer or no cycles. Purely cost-based pricing occurs when retailers mark up from wholesale costs, so costs follow wholesale variations closely.

Alternative models of price cycles

There is a separate literature, which has explored conditions under which price cycles like the ones observed gasoline markets and found that consumer search models can rationalize cycling under various conditions.[4] [5] [6] Here, the intuition is that there is a small subset of consumers that are not informed about prices and therefore will buy from a firm regardless of the price charged. Once prices get low enough, a firm may find it optimal to charge a high price and exploit this small loyal segment rather than trying to win the whole market.

See also

References

  1. Maskin. Eric. Tirole. Jean. 1988. A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, II: Price Competition, Kinked Demand Curves, and Edgeworth Cycles. 1911701. Econometrica. 56. 3. 571–599. 10.2307/1911701.
  2. Web site: Edgeworth price cycles : The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. www.dictionaryofeconomics.com. 2018-01-02.
  3. Wang. Zhongmin. 2009-12-01. (Mixed) Strategy in Oligopoly Pricing: Evidence from Gasoline Price Cycles Before and Under a Timing Regulation. Journal of Political Economy. 117. 6. 987–1030. 10.1086/649801. 0022-3808. 10.1.1.320.9839. 16651870 .
  4. Fershtman. Chaim. Fishman. Arthur. 1992. Price Cycles and Booms: Dynamic Search Equilibrium. 2117475. The American Economic Review. 82. 5. 1221–1233.
  5. Tappata. Mariano. 2009-12-01. Rockets and feathers: Understanding asymmetric pricing. The RAND Journal of Economics. en. 40. 4. 673–687. 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00084.x. 62833662 . 1756-2171.
  6. Lewis. Matthew S.. 2011-06-01. Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. en. 20. 2. 409–449. 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00293.x. 1530-9134. 10.1.1.199.1790. 154718287 .

External links