Edgar-class cruiser explained

The Edgar class were nine first-class protected cruisers built for the Royal Navy under the Naval Defence Act of 1889. The class gave long service and all of the ships participated in the First World War. One,, was lost during the war, with the other eight being scrapped in the 1920s.

Design

Nine new first-class cruisers were required by the Naval Defence Act. Although the Blake-class cruisers were impressive ships and powerful, they were too large and expensive to simply repeat en masse.

The new ships were envisioned as reduced version of Blake and Blenheim, retaining the same main armament of two 9.2-inch BL guns and ten 6-inch QF guns. The 9.2-inch pieces were mounted singly on the centreline at either end of the upper deck, on turntable mountings provided with heavily-armoured open-backed gunshields which resembled turrets. The 6-inch battery was divided between two decks on each beam, with six upper deck guns (three on each beam) and four on the main deck, two to a beam. The main deck guns were in casemates, while the six upper deck guns were protected only by shields. For close-range defence against torpedo boats there were 12 QF 6-pounder Hotchkiss guns and four QF 3-pounder Hotchkiss guns. Armament was completed with four 18-inch torpedo tubes.

Displacement was reduced by 1,800 tons from Blake, length between perpendiculars by 15 feet. Propulsion came from steam expansion engines,[1] driving two shafts. With funnels as tall as the Blake class, the Edgars appeared stockier than the preceding ships. Despite this, slimming their beam by 5 feet, slightly reducing draught and providing highly reliable 12,000 ihp machinery (compared with the previous troublesome 13,000 ihp installation) meant the new ships would practically match their two larger predecessors' steaming performance.

The Edgar class' main armour protection was an internal protective deck, consisting of 5inches thick steel armour on the outboard slopes, which connected with the hull plating just below waterline level and rose up the further it extended into the ship, with 3inches on the flat of the deck over the magazines and machinery spaces. The gun casemates were 6inches thick, with 3inches shields for the 9.2-inch guns. The conning tower had 10inches armour. Four of the Edgar class were fitted with anti-torpedo bulge during refit in 1914.

Crescent and Royal Arthur were intended to operate as flagships for cruiser squadrons on foreign stations. They were built to a slightly modified design and are sometimes considered a separate class. In order to accommodate the additional flag officers and staff in the forward part of the ship, they had a forecastle one deck higher than their other sisters'. This additional weight forwards was balanced by the deletion of the forward 9.2-inch gun and its very heavy armoured gunshield, with sufficient weight allowance remaining afterwards for two additional 6-inch guns to be placed, sided, atop the forecastle in light open-backed shields.

Building programme

The following table gives the build details and purchase cost of the members of the Edgar class. Standard British practice at that time was for these costs to exclude armament and stores.

width=120 rowspan=2 Shipalign = center rowspan=2 Builderalign = center rowspan=2 Maker
of
Engines
ConstructionCost according to Brassey's Naval Annual
align = center width = 74 Laid downalign = center width = 74 Launchedalign = center width = 74 Completedalign = center BNA 1895[2] align = center BNA 1905[3] align = center BNA 1906[4]
align= center Devonport Dockyardalign= center Elderalign=right 3 Jun 1889align=right 24 Nov 1890align=right 2 Mar 1893£401,083£428,081£410,980
Chatham Dockyardalign= center Elderalign=right 16 Jun 1889align=right 11 Mar 1891align=right 16 May 1893£365,491£413,101£400,702
C & W Earle, Hullalign= center Earlealign=right 22 Nov 1889align=right 22 July 1891align=right 26 May 1894£350,459£397,973£375,250

ex-Centaur
Portsmouth Dockyardalign= center Maudslayalign=right 20 Jan 1890align=right 26 Feb 1891align=right 2 Mar 1893£402,414£427,620£412,033
Robert Napier & Sons, Govanalign= center Napieralign=right 2 Dec 1889align=right 27 Apr 1892align=right 1 Nov 1894£347,634£377,741£373,236
Thames Ironworks Leamouthalign= center Humphrysalign=right 1 Jan 1890align=right 30 Jan 1892align=right 18 Oct 1894£351,851£381,958£372,890
C & W Earle, Hullalign= center Maudslayalign=right 23 Apr 1890align=right 23 Jun 1892align=right 25 Oct 1894£377,204£407,540£388,755
Thames Ironworks Leamouthalign= center Maudslayalign=right 16 Jul 1890align=right 8 Sep 1892align=right 14 Jan 1894£347,577£377,913£370,359
Portsmouth Dockyardalign= center Pennalign=right 13 Oct 1890align=right 30 Mar 1892align=right 22 Feb 1894£383,068£411,108£392,453

References

External links

Notes and References

  1. H.M.S. Hawke. The Engineer. 18 March 1892 . 229 .
  2. Brassey's The Naval Annual 1895, p201-217
  3. Brassey's The Naval Annual 1905, p242-249
  4. Brassey's The Naval Annual 1906, p216-223