Ecotype Explained

In evolutionary ecology, an ecotype,[1] sometimes called ecospecies, describes a genetically distinct geographic variety, population, or race within a species, which is genotypically adapted to specific environmental conditions.

Typically, though ecotypes exhibit phenotypic differences (such as in morphology or physiology) stemming from environmental heterogeneity, they are capable of interbreeding with other geographically adjacent ecotypes without loss of fertility or vigor.[2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Definition

An ecotype is a variant in which the phenotypic differences are too few or too subtle to warrant being classified as a subspecies. These different variants can occur in the same geographic region where distinct habitats such as meadow, forest, swamp, and sand dunes provide ecological niches. Where similar ecological conditions occur in widely separated places, it is possible for a similar ecotype to occur in the separated locations. An ecotype is different from a subspecies, which may exist across a number of different habitats. In animals, ecotypes owe their differing characteristics to the effects of a very local environment.[7] Therefore, ecotypes have no taxonomic rank.

Terminology

Ecotypes are closely related to morphs. In the context of evolutionary biology, genetic polymorphism is the occurrence in the equilibrium of two or more distinctly different phenotypes within a population of a species, in other words, the occurrence of more than one form or morph. The frequency of these discontinuous forms (even that of the rarest) is too high to be explained by mutation. In order to be classified as such, morphs must occupy the same habitat at the same time and belong to a panmictic population (whose members can all potentially interbreed). Polymorphism is actively and steadily maintained in populations of species by natural selection (most famously sexual dimorphism in humans) in contrast to transient polymorphisms where conditions in a habitat change in such a way that a "form" is being replaced completely by another.

In fact, Begon, Townsend, and Harper assert that

The notions "form" and "ecotype" may appear to correspond to a static phenomenon, however; this is not always the case. Evolution occurs continuously both in time and space, so that two ecotypes or forms may qualify as distinct species in only a few generations. Begon, Townsend, and Harper use an illuminating analogy on this:

Thus ecotypes and morphs can be thought of as precursory steps of potential speciation.[8]

Range and distribution

Experiments indicate that sometimes ecotypes manifest only when separated by great spatial distances (of the order of 1,000 km). This is due to hybridization whereby different but adjacent varieties of the same species (or generally of the same taxonomic rank) interbreed, thus overcoming local selection. However other studies reveal that the opposite may happen, i.e., ecotypes revealing at very small scales (of the order of 10 m), within populations, and despite hybridization.

In ecotypes, it is common for continuous, gradual geographic variation to impose analogous phenotypic and genetic variation. This situation is called cline. A well-known example of a cline is the skin color gradation in indigenous human populations worldwide, which is related to latitude and amounts of sunlight.[9] But often the distribution of ecotypes is bimodal or multimodal. This means that ecotypes may display two or more distinct and discontinuous phenotypes even within the same population. Such phenomenon may lead to speciation and can occur if conditions in a local environment change dramatically through space or time.

Examples

See also

Explanatory notes

  1. Greek: οίκος = home and τύπος = type, coined by Göte Turesson in 1922
  2. Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems by Begon, Townsend, Harper, Blackwell Publishing 4th ed. (2006), p.5,6,7,8
  3. Turesson . Göte . The Genotypical Response of the Plant Species to the Habitat . Hereditas . 9 July 2010 . 3 . 3 . 211–350 . 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1922.tb02734.x . 2027/uc1.b2636816 . free .
  4. Book: Molles, Manuel C. Jr. . Ecology: Concepts and Applications . The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. . 3rd . 2005 . New York . 201 . 978-0-07-243969-4 .
  5. Environmental Encyclopedia by Bortman, Brimblecombe, Mary Ann Cunningham, William P. Cunningham, Freedman - 3rd ed., p.435, "Ecotype"
  6. Web site: ecotype - Dictionary of botany. botanydictionary.org.
  7. Book: Ernst Mayr. Systematics and the Origin of Species, from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Harvard University Press. 1999. VIII-Nongeographic speciation. 194–195. https://books.google.com/books?id=mAIjnLp6r_MC&pg=PA194. 9780674862500.
  8. Lowry . David B. . Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species . Biological Journal of the Linnean Society . June 2012 . 106 . 2 . 241–257 . 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01867.x . free .
  9. "Race". (2009). Encyclopædia Britannica. Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica.
  10. "reindeer (Rangifer tarandus)" Encyclopædia Britannica. Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2009
  11. COSEWIC 2011:3.
  12. Banfield, who worked with both the Canadian Wildlife Service and the National Museum of Canada, in his often-cited 1961 classification, identified five subspecies of Rangifer tarandus: 1) the largely migratory barren-ground caribou subspecies Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus, which are found mainly in the Canadian territories of Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, along with western Greenland; 2) the subspecies Rangifer tarandus caribou which is divided into ecotypes: boreal woodland caribou, (also known as forest-dwelling, woodland caribou (boreal), mountain woodland caribou and migratory woodland caribou) —the migratory George River Caribou Herd, for example in the Ungava region of Quebec; 3) Rangifer tarandus pearyi (Peary caribou), the smallest of the species, known as Tuktu in Inuktitut, found in the northern islands of Nunavut and the Northwest Territories; 4) Rangifer tarandus granti subspecies Grant’s caribou, which are mainly migratory and live in Alaska and the northern Yukon and 5) the R. t. dawsoni subspecies; † Queen Charlotte Islands caribou from the Queen Charlotte Islands (extinct since 1910)
  13. Bergerud . A.T. . Evolving perspectives on caribou population dynamics, have we got it right yet? . Rangifer . 1 January 1996 . 16 . 4 . 95 . 10.7557/2.16.4.1225 . free .
  14. Festa-Bianchet . M. . Ray . J.C. . Boutin . S. . Côté . S.D. . Gunn . A. . Conservation of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in Canada: an uncertain future . Canadian Journal of Zoology . May 2011 . 89 . 5 . 419–434 . 10.1139/z11-025 . free .
  15. Mager . Karen H. . Population Structure And Hybridization Of Alaskan Caribou And Reindeer: Integrating Genetics And Local Knowledge . 2012 . 11122/9130 . free . 10.1.1.692.2993 .
  16. Cunha . H.A. . da Silva . V.M.F. . Lailson-Brito . J . Santos . M.C.O. . Flores . P.A.C. . Martin . A.R. . Azevedo . A.F. . Fragoso . A.B.L. . Zanelatto . R.C. . Solé-Cava . A.M. . Riverine and marine ecotypes of Sotalia dolphins are different species . Marine Biology . December 2005 . 148 . 2 . 449–457 . 10.1007/s00227-005-0078-2 . 49359327 .
  17. Costa. A.P.B.. Mcfee. W.. Wilcox. L.A.. Archer. F.I.. Rosel. P.E.. The common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) ecotypes of the western North Atlantic revisited: an integrative taxonomic investigation supports the presence of distinct species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 196. 4. 2022. 1608-1636. 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac025. free.
  18. Book: Hau . Michaela . Wikelski . Martin . Darwin's Finches . Encyclopedia of Life Sciences . 19 April 2001 . 10.1038/npg.els.0001791 . 978-0-470-01617-6 .
  19. Introduction to Ecology (1983), J.C. Emberlin, chapter 8