Echinocandin Explained

Echinocandins are a class of antifungal drugs[1] that inhibit the synthesis of β-glucan in the fungal cell wall via noncompetitive inhibition of the enzyme 1,3-β glucan synthase.[2] [3] The class has been termed the "penicillin of antifungals," along with the related papulacandins, as their mechanism of action resembles that of penicillin in bacteria. β-glucans are carbohydrate polymers that are cross-linked with other fungal cell wall components, the fungal equivalent to bacterial peptidoglycan. Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin are semisynthetic echinocandin derivatives with limited clinical use due to their solubility, antifungal spectrum, and pharmacokinetic properties.[4]

Medical uses

Drugs and drug candidates in this class are fungicidal against some yeasts (most species of Candida, but not Cryptococcus, Trichosporon, and Rhodotorula). Echinocandins also have displayed activity against Candida biofilms, especially in synergistic activity with amphotericin B and additive activity with fluconazole. Echinocandins are fungistatic against some molds (Aspergillus, but not Fusarium and Rhizopus), and modestly or minimally active against dimorphic fungi (Blastomyces and Histoplasma). They have some activity against the spores of the fungus Pneumocystis jirovecii, formerly known as Pneumocystis carinii. Caspofungin is used in the treatment of febrile neutropenia and as "salvage" therapy for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis.[5] Micafungin is used as prophylaxis against Candida infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.[5]

Side effects

All three agents are well-tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being fever, rash, nausea, and phlebitis at the infusion site. They can also cause a histamine-like reaction (flushing) when infused too rapidly.[6] Toxicity is uncommon. Its use has been associated with elevated aminotransferases and alkaline phosphatase levels.[7]

Chemistry

The present-day clinically used echinocandins are semisynthetic pneumocandins, which are chemically lipopeptide in nature, consisting of large cyclic hexapeptoids. Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin are similar cyclic hexapeptide antibiotics linked to long modified N-linked acyl fatty acid chains. The chains serve as anchors on the fungal cell membrane to facilitate antifungal activity.[8] Due to their limited oral bioavailability, echinocandins are administered through intravenous infusion.[9]

Mechanism of action

Echinocandins noncompetitively inhibit beta-1,3-D-glucan synthase enzyme complex in susceptible fungi to disturb fungal cell glucan synthesis.[10] Beta-glucan destruction prevents resistance against osmotic forces, which leads to cell lysis.[11] They have fungistatic activity against Aspergillus species and fungicidal activity against most Candida spp., including strains that are resistant to fluconazole.[5] In vitro and mouse models show echinocandins may also enhance host immune responses by exposing highly antigenic beta-glucan epitopes that can accelerate host cellular recognition and inflammatory responses.[12]

Resistance

Echinocandin resistance is rare among Candida spp. However, case studies have shown some resistance in C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. lusitaniae, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis. Resistance patterns include alterations in the glucan synthase (Fks1-Fks2 complex), overexpression of efflux pumps, strengthening of cell wall by increased chitin production, upregulation of stress-response pathways,[13] and dysregulation of mismatch repair pathways. In addition a few species and strains of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. show a "paradoxic effect", i.e., they are susceptible to low concentrations but resistant to high concentrations in broth microdilution studies.[14]

Several non-candidal yeasts, e.g., Cryptococcus, Trichosporon, Rhodotorula and Blastoschizomyces and filamentous fungi like Fusarium, zygomycetes and Scedosporium are often resistant to echinocandins.[15] Echinocandins have weak in vitro activity (a high minimum inhibitory concentration) and very little clinical efficacy against Histoplasma, Blastomyces, and Coccidioides, especially their yeast forms.[16]

Pharmacokinetics

Due to the large molecular weight of echinocandins, they have poor oral bioavailability and are administered by intravenous infusion. In addition, their large structures limit penetration into cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and eyes. In plasma, echinocandins have a high affinity to serum proteins. Echinocandins do not have primary interactions with CYP450 or P-glycoprotein pumps. Caspofungin has triphasic nonlinear pharmacokinetics, while micafungin (hepatically metabolized by arylsulfatase, catechol O-methyltransferase, and hydroxylation) and anidulafungin (degraded spontaneously in the system and excreted mostly as a metabolite in the urine) have linear elimination.[7] [17] [18] Younger patients exhibit a faster rate of elimination of micafungin and caspofungin.[19]

Interference

Caspofungin has some interference with ciclosporin metabolism, and micafungin has some interference with sirolimus (rapamycin), but anidulafungin needs no dose adjustments when given with ciclosporin, tacrolimus, or voriconazole.[20]

Advantages

Advantages of echinocandins:

Disadvantages

Disadvantages of echinocandins:

Examples

List of echinocandins:[23]

History

Discovery of echinocandins stemmed from studies on papulacandins isolated from a strain of Papularia sphaerosperma (Pers.), which were liposaccharide - i.e., fatty acid derivatives of a disaccharide that also blocked the same target, 1,3-β glucan synthase - and had action only on Candida spp. (narrow spectrum). Screening of natural products of fungal fermentation in the 1970s led to the discovery of echinocandins, a new group of antifungals with broad-range activity against Candida spp. One of the first echinocandins of the pneumocandin type, discovered in 1974, echinocandin B, could not be used clinically due to risk of high degree of hemolysis. Screening semisynthetic analogs of the echinocandins gave rise to cilofungin, the first echinofungin analog to enter clinical trials, in 1980, which, it is presumed, was later withdrawn for a toxicity due to the solvent system needed for systemic administration. The semisynthetic pneumocandin analogs of echinocandins were later found to have the same kind of antifungal activity, but low toxicity. The first of these newer echinocandins to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was caspofungin, and later micafungin and anidulafungin were also approved. All these preparations have very low oral bioavailability, so they must be given intravenously to be useful. Echinocandins have become one of the first-line treatments for Candida before the species are identified, and even as antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Denning. DW. Echinocandins: a new class of antifungal.. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. June 2002. 49. 6. 889–91. 10.1093/jac/dkf045. 12039879. free.
  2. Morris MI, Villmann M . Echinocandins in the management of invasive fungal infections, part 1 . American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy . 63 . 18 . 1693–703 . September 2006 . 16960253 . 10.2146/ajhp050464.p1 .
  3. Morris MI, Villmann M . Echinocandins in the management of invasive fungal infections, Part 2 . American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy . 63 . 19 . 1813–20 . October 2006 . 16990627 . 10.2146/ajhp050464.p2 .
  4. Debono M, Gordee RS . Antibiotics that inhibit fungal cell wall development . Annual Review of Microbiology . 48 . 471–97 . 1994 . 7826015 . 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.002351 .
  5. Sucher AJ, Chahine EB, Balcer HE . Echinocandins: the newest class of antifungals . Annals of Pharmacotherapy . 43 . 10 . 1647–57 . October 2009 . 19724014 . 10.1345/aph.1M237 . 207263606 .
  6. Book: Lippincott pharmacology.
  7. Cancidas. Prescribing information-(caspofungin acetate) for injection. Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ 2008.
  8. Denning DW . Echinocandin antifungal drugs . Lancet . 362 . 9390 . 1142–51 . October 2003 . 14550704 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14472-8 . 35067894 .
  9. Chang CC, Slavin MA, Chen SC . New developments and directions in the clinical application of the echinocandins . Archives of Toxicology . 91 . 4 . 1613–1621 . April 2017 . 28180946 . 10.1007/s00204-016-1916-3 . 31029386 .
  10. Douglas CM . Fungal beta(1,3)-D-glucan synthesis . Medical Mycology . 39 . 55–66 . 2001 . Suppl 1 . 11800269 . 10.1080/mmy.39.1.55.66 . free .
  11. Beauvais A, Latgé JP . Membrane and cell wall targets in Aspergillus fumigatus . Drug Resistance Updates . 4 . 1 . 38–49 . February 2001 . 11512152 . 10.1054/drup.2001.0185 .
  12. Wheeler RT, Fink GR . A drug-sensitive genetic network masks fungi from the immune system . PLOS Pathogens . 2 . 4 . e35 . April 2006 . 16652171 . 1447670 . 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020035 . free .
  13. Perlin . DS . Echinocandin Resistance in Candida. . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 1 December 2015 . 61 . Suppl 6 . S612-7 . 10.1093/cid/civ791 . 26567278. 4643482 .
  14. Wagener . Johannes . Loiko . Veronika . Recent Insights into the Paradoxical Effect of Echinocandins . Journal of Fungi . 28 December 2017 . 4 . 1 . 5 . 10.3390/jof4010005 . 29371498 . 5872308 . free .
  15. Chandrasekar . P H . Increased dose of echinocandins for invasive fungal infections: bonanza for the patient or the pharmaceutical industry? . Bone Marrow Transplantation . 24 January 2007 . 39 . 3 . 129–131 . 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705563. 17245422 . free .
  16. Eschenauer . Gregory . DePestel . Daryl D . Carver . Peggy L . Comparison of echinocandin antifungals . Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management . February 2007 . 3 . 1 . 71–97 . 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.71 . 18360617 . 1936290 . free .
  17. Dodds Ashley . ES . Lewis . R . Lewis . JS . etal . 2006 . Pharmacology of Systemic Antifungal Agents . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 43 . Suppl 1. S28 . 10.1086/504492. free .
  18. Boucher HW, Groll AH, Chiou CC, Walsh TJ . Newer systemic antifungal agents : pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy . Drugs . 64 . 18 . 1997–2020 . 2004 . 15341494 . 10.2165/00003495-200464180-00001 . 46957874 .
  19. Lehrnbecher T, Groll AH . Micafungin: a brief review of pharmacology, safety, and antifungal efficacy in pediatric patients . Pediatric Blood & Cancer . 55 . 2 . 229–32 . August 2010 . 20583216 . 10.1002/pbc.22449 . 31575233 .
  20. Book: Hospenthal DR, Rinaldi MG. Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Infections. 2015-05-12. Springer. 978-3-319-13090-3. 95.
  21. Web site: Pharmacotherapy Update - New Antifungal Agents: Additions to the Existing Armamentarium (Part 1) .
  22. Gauthier GM, Nork TM, Prince R, Andes D . Subtherapeutic ocular penetration of caspofungin and associated treatment failure in Candida albicans endophthalmitis . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 41 . 3 . e27–8 . August 2005 . 16007519 . 10.1086/431761 .
  23. Eschenauer G, Depestel DD, Carver PL . Comparison of echinocandin antifungals . Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management . 3 . 1 . 71–97 . March 2007 . 18360617 . 1936290 . 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.71 . free .
  24. Rezafungin versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis- The STRIVE Trial |https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1380/5909460#.X2j03oyvxDQ.twitter