Remora Explained

The remora, sometimes called suckerfish or sharksucker, is any of a family (Echeneidae) of ray-finned fish in the order Carangiformes.[1] Depending on species, they grow to long. Their distinctive first dorsal fins take the form of a modified oval, sucker-like organ with slat-like structures that open and close to create suction and take a firm hold against the skin of larger marine animals.[2] The disk is made up of stout, flexible membranes that can be raised and lowered to generate suction.[3] By sliding backward, the remora can increase the suction, or it can release itself by swimming forward. Remoras sometimes attach to small boats, and have been observed attaching to divers as well. They swim well on their own, with a sinuous, or curved, motion.

Characteristics

Remora front dorsal fins have evolved to enable them to adhere by suction to smooth surfaces, and they spend most of their lives clinging to a host animal such as a whale, turtle, shark or ray. It is probably a mutualistic arrangement as the remora can move around on the host, removing ectoparasites and loose flakes of skin, while benefiting from the protection provided by the host and the constant flow of water across its gills.[4] Although it was initially believed that remoras fed off particulate matter from the host's meals, this has been shown to be false; in reality, their diets are composed primarily of host feces.[5]

Habitat

Remoras are tropical open-ocean dwellers, but are occasionally found in temperate or coastal waters if they have attached to large fish that have wandered into these areas. In the mid-Atlantic Ocean, spawning usually takes place in June and July; in the Mediterranean Sea, it occurs in August and September. The sucking disc begins to show when the young fish are about 1cm (00inches) long. When the remora reaches about 3cm (01inches), the disc is fully formed and the remora can then attach to other animals. The remora's lower jaw projects beyond the upper, and the animal lacks a swim bladder.

Some remoras associate with specific host species. They are commonly found attached to sharks, manta rays, whales, turtles, and dugongs, hence the common names "sharksucker" and "whalesucker". Smaller remoras also fasten onto fish such as tuna and swordfish, and some of the smallest remoras travel in the mouths or gills of large manta rays, ocean sunfish, swordfish and sailfish.

The relationship between a remora and its host is most often taken to be one of commensalism, specifically phoresy.

While some of the relationships are mutualistic, it is believed that dolphins with remoras attached do not benefit from the relationship. The attachment of the remora adds resistance to the Dolphin making the energy needed for swimming greater. The remora is also thought to irritate the skin of the dolphin.[6]

Physiology

Research into the physiology of the remora has been of significant benefit to the understanding of ventilation costs in fish.

Remoras, like many other fishes, have two different modes of ventilation. Ram ventilation[7] is the process in which at higher speeds, the remora uses the force of the water moving past it to create movement of fluid in the gills. At lower speeds, the remora will use a form of active ventilation, in which the fish actively moves fluid through its gills. In order to use active ventilation, a fish must actively use energy to move the fluid; however, determining this energy cost is normally complicated due to the fish's movement when using either method. As a result, the remora has proved invaluable in finding this cost difference (since they will stick to a shark or tube, and hence remain stationary despite the movement, or lack thereof, of water). Experimental data from studies on remora found that the associated cost for active ventilation created a 3.7–5.1% increased energy consumption in order to maintain the same quantity of fluid flow the fish obtained by using ram ventilation.[8]

Other research into the remora's physiology came about as a result of studies across multiple taxa, or using the remora as an out-group for certain evolutionary studies. Concerning the latter case, remoras were used as an outgroup when investigating tetrodotoxin resistance in remoras, pufferfish, and related species, finding remoras (specifically Echeneis naucrates) had a resistance of 6.1–5.5 M.[9]

Use for fishing

Some cultures use remoras to catch turtles. A cord or rope is fastened to the remora's tail, and when a turtle is sighted, the fish is released from the boat; it usually heads directly for the turtle and fastens itself to the turtle's shell, and then both remora and turtle are hauled in. Smaller turtles can be pulled completely into the boat by this method, while larger ones are hauled within harpooning range. This practice has been reported throughout the Indian Ocean, especially from eastern Africa near Zanzibar and Mozambique,[10] and from northern Australia near Cape York and Torres Strait.[11] [12]

Similar reports come from Japan and from the Americas. Some of the first records of the "fishing fish" in the Western literature come from the accounts of the second voyage of Christopher Columbus. However, Leo Wiener considers the Columbus accounts to be apocryphal: what was taken for accounts of the Americas may have been, in fact, notes Columbus derived from accounts of the East Indies, his desired destination.[13]

Mythology

See also: Echeneis. In ancient times, the remora was believed to stop a ship from sailing. In Latin, remora means "delay", while the genus name Echeneis comes from Greek ἔχειν, echein ("to hold") and ναῦς, naus ("a ship"). In a notable account by Pliny the Elder, the remora is blamed for the defeat of Mark Antony at the Battle of Actium and, indirectly, for the death of Caligula.[14] A modern version of the story is given by Jorge Luis Borges in Book of Imaginary Beings (1957).

Timeline

ImageSize = width:1000px height:auto barincrement:15pxPlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px

Period = from:-65.5 till:10TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:-65.5ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:-65.5TimeAxis = orientation:horAlignBars = justify

Colors = #legends id:CAR value:claret id:ANK value:rgb(0.4,0.3,0.196) id:HER value:teal id:HAD value:green id:OMN value:blue id:black value:black id:white value:white id:cenozoic value:rgb(0.54,0.54,0.258) id:paleogene value:rgb(0.99,0.6,0.32) id:paleocene value:rgb(0.99,0.65,0.37) id:eocene value:rgb(0.99,0.71,0.42) id:oligocene value:rgb(0.99,0.75,0.48) id:neogene value:rgb(0.999999,0.9,0.1) id:miocene value:rgb(0.999999,0.999999,0) id:pliocene value:rgb(0.97,0.98,0.68) id:quaternary value:rgb(0.98,0.98,0.5) id:pleistocene value:rgb(0.999999,0.95,0.68) id:holocene value:rgb(0.999,0.95,0.88) BarData= bar:eratop bar:space bar:periodtop bar:space bar:NAM1

bar:space bar:period bar:space bar:era

PlotData= align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(7,-4) bar:periodtop from: -65.5 till: -55.8 color:paleocene text:Paleocene from: -55.8 till: -33.9 color:eocene text:Eocene from: -33.9 till: -23.03 color:oligocene text:Oligocene from: -23.03 till: -5.332 color:miocene text:Miocene from: -5.332 till: -2.588 color:pliocene text:Plio. from: -2.588 till: -0.0117 color:pleistocene text:Pleist. from: -0.0117 till: 0 color:holocene text:H.

bar:eratop from: -65.5 till: -23.03 color:paleogene text:Paleogene from: -23.03 till: -2.588 color:neogene text:Neogene from: -2.588 till: 0 color:quaternary text:Q.

PlotData= align:left fontsize:M mark:(line,white) width:5 anchor:till align:left

color:oligocene bar:NAM1 from: -33.9 till: 0 text: Echeneis

PlotData= align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25

bar:period from: -65.5 till: -55.8 color:paleocene text:Paleocene from: -55.8 till: -33.9 color:eocene text:Eocene from: -33.9 till: -23.03 color:oligocene text:Oligocene from: -23.03 till: -5.332 color:miocene text:Miocene from: -5.332 till: -2.588 color:pliocene text:Plio. from: -2.588 till: -0.0117 color:pleistocene text:Pleist. from: -0.0117 till: 0 color:holocene text:H.

bar:era from: -65.5 till: -23.03 color:paleogene text:Paleogene from: -23.03 till: -2.588 color:neogene text:Neogene from: -2.588 till: 0 color:quaternary text:Q.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Fishes of the World . 5th . J. S. Nelson . T. C. Grande . M. V. H. Wilson . 2016 . 384 . Wiley . 978-1-118-34233-6 . 2019-11-16 . 2019-04-08 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190408194051/https://sites.google.com/site/fotw5th/ . dead .
  2. Web site: Sharksucker fish's strange disc explained . Natural History Museum . 28 January 2013 . 5 February 2013. dead. 1 February 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20130201194123/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/news/2013/january/sharksucker-fishs-strange-disc-explained118235.html.
  3. Book: Beer, Amy-Jane. Derek Hall.. The Illustrated World Encyclopedia of Marine Fish & Sea Creatures. Lorenz Books . 2012. 978-0-7548-2290-5. Leicestershire. 235.
  4. News: How does the Remora develop its sucker? . Jackson, John . National History Museum . 30 November 2012 . 2 January 2016.
  5. 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00236.x. Echeneid-sirenian associations, with information on sharksucker diet. Journal of Fish Biology. 63. 5. 1176. 2003. Williams. E. H.. Mignucci-Giannoni. A. A.. Bunkley-Williams. L.. Bonde. R. K.. Self-Sullivan. C.. Preen. A.. Cockcroft. V. G.. 2003JFBio..63.1176W . 10.1.1.619.4020.
  6. Weihs . Daniel . Fish . Frank E. . Nicastro . Anthony J. . Mechanics of Remora Removal by Dolphin Spinning . Marine Mammal Science . 11 June 2007 . 23 . 3 . 707–714 . 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00131.x. 2007MMamS..23..707W .
  7. Book: Environmental Physiology of Animals. Willmer. Pat. Stone. Graham. Johnston. Ian. 2009-03-12. John Wiley & Sons. 978-1-4443-0922-5. en.
  8. Steffensen. J. F.. Lomholt. J. P.. 1983-03-01. Energetic cost of active branchial ventilation in the sharksucker, Echeneis naucrates. Journal of Experimental Biology. en. 103. 1. 185–192. 10.1242/jeb.103.1.185 . 0022-0949. 6854201.
  9. 10.1007/BF00696163. Tetrodotoxin sensitivity of muscle action potentials in pufferfishes and related fishes. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 89. 59–72. 1974. Kidokoro. Yoshiaki. Grinnell. Alan D.. Eaton. Douglas C.. 33178106 .
  10. Gudger, E. W. . 1919 . On the Use of the Sucking-Fish for Catching Fish and Turtles: Studies in Echeneis or Remora, II., Part 1. . The American Naturalist . 53 . 627 . 289–311 . 10.1086/279716 . 2455925 . free .
  11. Gudger, E. W. . 1919 . On the Use of the Sucking-Fish for Catching Fish and Turtles: Studies in Echeneis or Remora, II., Part 2 . The American Naturalist . 53 . 628 . 446–467 . 10.1086/279724 . 2456185 . free .
  12. Book: MacGillivray, John . Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Rattlesnake, Commanded By the Late Captain Owen Stanley, R.N., F.R.S. etc. During the Years 1846–1850 . 2 . 1852 . Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty . London. (Dr. Gudger's accounts are more authoritative, but this source is noted as an early account that Gudger appears to have missed.)
  13. Wiener, Leo . Leo Wiener . 1921 . Once more the sucking-fish . The American Naturalist . 55 . 637 . 165–174 . 10.1086/279802 . 2456418 . 85369826 .
  14. Book: Pliny the Elder . Natural History . Book 32, Chapter 1. Pliny the Elder . (cited in Gudger, E. W. . 1930 . Some old time figures of the shipholder, Echeneis or Remora, holding the ship . Isis . 13 . 2 . 340–352 . 10.1086/346461 . 224651. 143773548 .)