EHD protein family explained

The EHD protein family is a relatively small group of proteins which have been shown to play a role in several physiological functions, the most notable being the regulation of endocytotic vesicles. This family is recognized by its highly conserved EH (Eps15 homology)[1] domain, a structural motif that has been shown to facilitate specificity and interaction between protein and ligand. The four mammalian EHD proteins that have been classified are: EHD1, EHD2, EHD3, and EHD4.

History

During the late 20th century, several advances were made regarding the identification of proteins involved in endocytotic recycling and other mechanisms of intracellular trafficking. This period of research led to the discovery of over 60 proteins which collectively make up the Rab family. Rab proteins have been found to play a major role in endocytotic recycling via SNARE-based vesicle fusion and transport. When bound to GTP, Rab proteins have a large affinity for their respective effectors which then work to carry out a specific function.

Some years later after the identification of the Rab family, the EHD family was discovered and was found to be associated with the same effectors that interact with the Rab proteins. This mutual interaction insinuates that the EHD proteins must somehow be cooperatively involved in the endocytotic recycling pathway. Some novel research even suggests that the EHD family has the ability to function in the place of Rab proteins when Rab concentrations drop.[2]

Protein structure

While only the complete structure of EHD2 is known, all four of the EHD proteins have similar arrangements. Every EHD protein consists of approximately 534-543 amino acids. These amino acids assemble to form a unique secondary structure containing two helical regions, an ATP binding domain, a small linker region, and a C-terminus EH domain (see Figure 1).

EH domain

The EH domain is responsible for promoting specificity of interaction between the EHD protein and its associated effector. Current research suggests that the EH domain interacts with the NPF motif, a basic region classified by its arginine (N), proline (P), and phenylalanine (F) constituents. There have been several questions regarding the interaction between these two domains as they are both basic in nature and should, logically speaking, repel one another. The domains, however, are able to interact due to the flanking acidic amino acids (glutamate or aspartate) that surround either side of the NPF motif.[3] These acidic amino acids create salt bridges with the lysine residues that lie within the EH domain and ultimately promote EHD functionality.

Rabenosyn-5, Rab11-FIP2 and Syndapin II are examples of interaction partners that all contain multiple NPF motifs within their individual architectures.

ATP-binding domain

The ATP binding domain shows impressive structural and functional similarity to the Dynamin GTP binding domain which is known to facilitate clathrin-coated vesicle budding. Given this resemblance, several researchers tend to consider the EHD protein family a sub-group that falls within the Dynamin protein superfamily. When ATP binds to this domain, EHD dimerization occurs, activating a cascade of reactions that results in the oligomerization of EHD and budding of the cell membrane to form a vesicle.[4]

Helical regions

The two helical domains act as lipid binding interfaces so that the EHD protein can interact with the cell membrane.[5] These regions are rotated 50° in relation to the ATP binding domain. This angulation is what facilitates the interaction of EHD with the lipid bilayer during endocytotic tubulation and vesiculation.[6]

Transportation pathways

EHD proteins can recycle antigens, receptors, and other cellular materials through two mechanisms of recycling – slow and fast. Fast recycling is a direct pathway from early endosome to the cell membrane without an intermediate organelle present. Contrastingly, slow recycling requires cellular components to travel from early endosome to an endocytotic recycling compartment (ERC) before heading back towards the cell membrane. Other mechanisms of vesicular transport include retrograde transport, the movement of vesicles to the golgi apparatus, or lysosomal transport which results in the degradation of cellular material. The currently accepted model for the mechanism of EHD vesiculation and recycling is as follows (see Figure 2):

  1. Cytoplasmic EHD binds ATP at the ATP binding domain which leads to dimerization of the protein
  2. Membrane binding sites are formed and EHD associates with available tubular membranes
  3. ATP is hydrolyzed which leads to the destabilization of the membrane
  4. Vesicles are excised with cellular material trapped inside its walls

Family members

EHD1

See main article: EHD1. The EHD1 protein is thought to carry out vesicular transportation from the early endosome to the ERC, which has been linked to dynein motor proteins, as well as transportation from the ERC to the cell membrane. It has also been implicated in specialized modes of transport dependent upon the cellular material involved. Current research suggests that EHD1 plays a role in carrying the transferrin receptor, the LDL receptor, and other receptors that are associated with clathrin-independent internalization.

EHD2

See main article: EHD2. No consensus has been reached regarding the role of EHD2 but it seems to play a role in the structure of caveolae.[7] Further it may be required to tether caveolae to cell surfaces [8]

EHD3

See main article: EHD3. Studies regarding the physiological functions of EHD3 are still being debated today. Currently, EHD3 is thought to interact with EHD1 to carry out transportation from the early endosome to the ERC. Evidence for this is implied as present-day research has only observed the consequences of the depletion of EHD3 concentration levels which renders transport from early endosome to ERC defective. Other research suggests that the EHD3 protein is involved in the retrograde pathway. A common receptor that is recycled via EHD3 is the dopamine receptor.

EHD4

See main article: EHD4. EHD4 is implicated in vesicular transport from early endosome to ERC as well as in the lysosomal degradation pathway. Recent studies have shown that the EHD4 protein may only function within specific tissues. Nerve growth receptors such as TrkA/TrkB are commonly transported via EDH4.

Other EHD receptors

References

__FORCETOC__

Notes and References

  1. Okada AK, Teranishi K, Ambroso MR, Isas JM, Vazquez-Sarandeses E, Lee JY, Melo AA, Pandey P, Merken D, Berndt L, Lammers M, Daumke O, Chang K, Haworth IS, Langen R . 6 . Lysine acetylation regulates the interaction between proteins and membranes . Nature Communications . 12 . 1 . 6466 . November 2021 . 10.1038/s41467-021-26657-2 . 34753925 . 8578602 . 2021NatCo..12.6466O .
  2. Grant BD, Caplan S . Mechanisms of EHD/RME-1 protein function in endocytic transport . Traffic . 9 . 12 . 2043–2052 . December 2008 . 18801062 . 2766864 . 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x .
  3. Naslavsky N, Caplan S . EHD proteins: key conductors of endocytic transport . Trends in Cell Biology . 21 . 2 . 122–131 . February 2011 . 21067929 . 3052690 . 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.003 .
  4. Iseka FM, Goetz BT, Mushtaq I, An W, Cypher LR, Bielecki TA, Tom EC, Arya P, Bhattacharyya S, Storck MD, Semerad CL, Talmadge JE, Mosley RL, Band V, Band H . 6 . Role of the EHD Family of Endocytic Recycling Regulators for TCR Recycling and T Cell Function . Journal of Immunology . 200 . 2 . 483–499 . January 2018 . 29212907 . 10.4049/jimmunol.1601793 . 5760286 .
  5. Daumke O, Lundmark R, Vallis Y, Martens S, Butler PJ, McMahon HT . Architectural and mechanistic insights into an EHD ATPase involved in membrane remodelling . Nature . 449 . 7164 . 923–927 . October 2007 . 10.1038/nature06173 . 17914359 . 2007Natur.449..923D . 4388638 .
  6. Melo AA, Hegde BG, Shah C, Larsson E, Isas JM, Kunz S, Lundmark R, Langen R, Daumke O . 6 . Structural insights into the activation mechanism of dynamin-like EHD ATPases . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 114 . 22 . 5629–5634 . May 2017 . 28228524 . 5465921 . 10.1073/pnas.1614075114 . 2017PNAS..114.5629M . free .
  7. Matthaeus C, Sochacki KA, Dickey AM, Puchkov D, Haucke V, Lehmann M, Taraska JW . 6 . The molecular organization of differentially curved caveolae indicates bendable structural units at the plasma membrane . Nature Communications . 13 . 7234 . November 2022 . 10.1038/s41467-022-34958-3 . free . 9700719 .
  8. Hoernke M, Mohan J, Larsson E, Blomberg J, Kahra D, Westenhoff S, Schwieger C, Lundmark R . 6 . EHD2 restrains dynamics of caveolae by an ATP-dependent, membrane-bound, open conformation . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 114 . 22 . May 2017 . E4360–E4369 . 28223496 . 5465919. 10.1073/pnas.1614066114 . free .
  9. Gudmundsson H, Hund TJ, Wright PJ, Kline CF, Snyder JS, Qian L, Koval OM, Cunha SR, George M, Rainey MA, Kashef FE, Dun W, Boyden PA, Anderson ME, Band H, Mohler PJ . 6 . EH domain proteins regulate cardiac membrane protein targeting . Circulation Research . 107 . 1 . 84–95 . July 2010 . 20489164 . 2901408 . 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.216713 .
  10. Naslavsky N, Caplan S . C-terminal EH-domain-containing proteins: consensus for a role in endocytic trafficking, EH? . Journal of Cell Science . 118 . Pt 18 . 4093–4101 . September 2005 . 16155252 . 10.1242/jcs.02595 . 9585336 .
  11. Guilherme A, Soriano NA, Furcinitti PS, Czech MP . Role of EHD1 and EHBP1 in perinuclear sorting and insulin-regulated GLUT4 recycling in 3T3-L1 adipocytes . The Journal of Biological Chemistry . 279 . 38 . 40062–40075 . September 2004 . 10.1074/jbc.M401918200 . 15247266 . free .
  12. Larsen JE, Massol RH, Nieland TJ, Kirchhausen T . HIV Nef-mediated major histocompatibility complex class I down-modulation is independent of Arf6 activity . Molecular Biology of the Cell . 15 . 1 . 323–331 . January 2004 . 14617802 . 307550 . 10.1091/mbc.E03-08-0578 .
  13. Park M, Penick EC, Edwards JG, Kauer JA, Ehlers MD . Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP . Science . 305 . 5692 . 1972–1975 . September 2004 . 10.1126/science.1102026 . 15448273 . 2004Sci...305.1972P . 34651431 .